1887
Volume 28, Issue 1
  • ISSN 1387-6740
  • E-ISSN: 1569-9935
USD
Buy:$35.00 + Taxes

Abstract

Abstract

To explore individual identity narratives of accommodation and resistance in relationship to dominant American social, political and cultural constructs, this paper uses the Listening Guide Method of Qualitative Inquiry (Gilligan et al., 2006) to investigate the intersectionality of race, ethnicity, gender and American identity during and post college among four second-generation, college educated, Korean American women. The analysis, drawing from the emergence of themes across interviews, found that participant women accommodated and/or resisted dominant American social, political, and cultural constructs in service of their individual Korean American identities narratives during and post college.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1075/ni.17018.gra
2018-09-27
2019-10-20
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. Adams St. Pierre, E.
    (2014) A brief and personal history of post qualitative research; Toward “post inquiry.” Journal of Curriculum Theorizing, 30(2), 2–20.
    [Google Scholar]
  2. Adams St. Pierre, E., & Roulston, K.
    (2006) The state of qualitative inquiry: A contested science. International Journal of Qualitative Studies in Education, 19(6), 673–684. doi: 10.1080/09518390600975644
    https://doi.org/10.1080/09518390600975644 [Google Scholar]
  3. Abes, E. S.
    (2009) Theoretical borderlands: using multiple theoretical perspectives to challenge inequitable power structures in student development theory. Journal of College Student Development, 50(2), 141–156. doi: 10.1353/csd.0.0059
    https://doi.org/10.1353/csd.0.0059 [Google Scholar]
  4. Anzaldúa, G.
    (1987) Borderlands-La Frontera: The new mestiza. Ann Arbor, MI: Aunt Lute Books.
    [Google Scholar]
  5. Birks, M. J., Chapman, Y., & Francis, K.
    (2007) Breaching the wall: Interviewing people from other cultures. Journal of Transcultural Nursing, 18(2), 150–156. doi: 10.1177/1043659606298617
    https://doi.org/10.1177/1043659606298617 [Google Scholar]
  6. Bruner, J.
    (2002) Making stories: Law, literature, life. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press
    [Google Scholar]
  7. (1990) Acts of meaning. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  8. Butler, J.
    (1993) Poststructuralism and postmarxism. Diacritics, 23(4), 3–11. doi: 10.2307/465304
    https://doi.org/10.2307/465304 [Google Scholar]
  9. (1995) Conscience doth makes subjects of us all. Yale French Studies, 88, 6–26. doi: 10.2307/2930099
    https://doi.org/10.2307/2930099 [Google Scholar]
  10. (2009) Critique, dissent, disciplinarity. Critical Inquiry, 35, 773–795. doi: 10.1086/599590
    https://doi.org/10.1086/599590 [Google Scholar]
  11. Chong, S. S. H.
    (2008) ‘‘Look, an Asian!’’ The politics of racial interpellation in the wake of the Virginia Tech shootings. Journal of Asian American Studies, 11, 27–60. doi: 10.1353/jaas.2008.0007
    https://doi.org/10.1353/jaas.2008.0007 [Google Scholar]
  12. Crenshaw, K.
    (1989) Demarginalizing the intersection of race and sex: A black feminist critique of antidiscrimination doctrine, Feminist theory and antiracist politics. University of Chicago Legal Forum, 139–167.
    [Google Scholar]
  13. (2012) From private violence to mass incarceration: Thinking intersectionally about women, race, and social control. UCLA Law Review, 59, 1418–1472.
    [Google Scholar]
  14. Cho, S., Crenshaw, K., & McCall, L.
    (2013) Toward a field of intersectionality studies: Theory, applications, and praxis. Signs, 38(4), 785–810. doi: 10.1086/669608
    https://doi.org/10.1086/669608 [Google Scholar]
  15. Delbanco, A.
    (2012) College, what it was, is, and should be. Princeton, NJ : Princeton University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  16. Gilligan, C.
    (1989) Teaching Shakespeare’s sister: Notes from the underground of female adolescence. InC. Gilligan, N. P. Lyons, & T. J. Hanmer (Eds.). Making connections, the relational worlds of adolescent girls at Emma Willard School. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  17. Gilligan, C., & Attanucci, J.
    (1989) Two moral orientations: Gender differences and similarities. Merrill-Palmer Quarterly, 34(3), 223–237.
    [Google Scholar]
  18. Gilligan, C.
    (1992) In a different voice: Psychological theory and women’s development. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  19. (1993) In a different voice; Psychological theory and women’s development. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  20. (1995) Hearing the difference: Theorizing connection. Hypatia, 10(2), 120–127. doi: 10.1111/j.1527‑2001.1995.tb01373.x
    https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1527-2001.1995.tb01373.x [Google Scholar]
  21. Gilligan, C., Kreider, H., & O’Neill, K.
    (1995) Transforming psychological inquiry: Clarifying and strengthening connections. Psychoanalytic Review, 82, 801–826.
    [Google Scholar]
  22. Gilligan, C., Spencer, R., Weinberg, K. M., & Bertsch, T.
    (2006) On the listening guide, a voice-centered relational method. InS. N. Hesse-Biber & P. Leavy (Eds.). Emergent methods in social research. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.10.4135/9781412984034.n12
    https://doi.org/10.4135/9781412984034.n12 [Google Scholar]
  23. Gilligan, C.
    (2011) Joining the resistance. Malden, MA: Polity Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  24. (2015) Introduction: The Listening Guide Method of psychological inquiry. Qualtiative Psychology, 2(1), 66–79.
    [Google Scholar]
  25. Harding, S.
    (1993) Rethinking standpoint epistemology: What is “strong objectivity”?. InL. Alcoff & E. Potter (Eds.), Feminist epistemologies. New York: Routledge.
    [Google Scholar]
  26. Kim, C. J.
    (2000) Bitter fruit: The politics of Black-Korean conflict in New York City. New Haven: Yale University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  27. Lather, P.
    (2000) Against empathy, Voice and authenticity. Transgressive methodology. Special issue of Women, Gender and Research, 4, 16–25. Reprinted inA. Y. Youngblood & L. Mazzei (Eds.), Voice in qualitative inquiry. New York: Routledge.
    [Google Scholar]
  28. (2009) Getting lost: Feminist efforts toward a double(d) science. Frontiers, 30(1), 222–230. doi: 10.1353/fro.0.0032
    https://doi.org/10.1353/fro.0.0032 [Google Scholar]
  29. Noy, C.
    (2008) Sampling knowledge; the hermeneutics of snowball sampling in qualitative research. International Journal of Social Research Methodology, 11(4), 327–344. doi: 10.1080/13645570701401305
    https://doi.org/10.1080/13645570701401305 [Google Scholar]
  30. Park, G.
    (2010) Becoming a “model minority”: Acquisition, construction and enactment of American identity for Korean immigrant students. Urban Review, 43(5), 620–635. doi: 10.1007/s11256‑010‑0164‑8
    https://doi.org/10.1007/s11256-010-0164-8 [Google Scholar]
  31. Park, K.
    (1997) The Korean American dream: Immigrants and small business in New York City. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  32. Rasmussen, W. S., & Tilton, R. S.
    (1999) George Washington: The man behind the myths. Charlottesville, VA: The University Press of Virginia.
    [Google Scholar]
  33. Song, M. H.
    (2008) Communities of remembrance: Reflections on the Virginia Tech shooting and the race. Journal of Asian American Studies, 11, 1–26. doi: 10.1353/jaas.2008.0006
    https://doi.org/10.1353/jaas.2008.0006 [Google Scholar]
  34. Taylor, J. M., Gilligan, C., & Sullivan, A. M.
    (1997) Between the voice and silence. Women and girls, race and relationships. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  35. Tomlinson, B.
    (2013) To tell the truth and not get trapped: Desire, distance and intersectionality at the scene of argument. Journal of Women and Culture in Society, 38(4) 993–1017. doi: 10.1086/669571
    https://doi.org/10.1086/669571 [Google Scholar]
  36. Woodcock, C.
    (2016) The Listening Guide: A how-to approach on ways to promote educational democracy. International Journal of Qualitative Methods, 1–10.
    [Google Scholar]
  37. Wu, F.
    (2002) Yellow: Race in America beyond black and white. New York: Basic Books.
    [Google Scholar]
  38. Yoo, H. C., & Lee, R. M.
    (2009) Does ethnic identity buffer or exacerbate the effects of frequent racial discrimination on situational well-being of Asian Americans?Asian American Journal of Psychology, 5(1), 70–87. doi: 10.1037/1948‑1985.S.1.70
    https://doi.org/10.1037/1948-1985.S.1.70 [Google Scholar]
  39. Yoshikawa, H.
    (2011) Immigrants raising citizens: Undocumented parents and their children. New York: Russell Sage Foundation.
    [Google Scholar]
http://instance.metastore.ingenta.com/content/journals/10.1075/ni.17018.gra
Loading
/content/journals/10.1075/ni.17018.gra
Loading

Data & Media loading...

  • Article Type: Research Article
Keyword(s): identity narratives , Korean American women , qualitative methods and the Listening Guide
This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was successful
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error