1887
Volume 28, Issue 1
  • ISSN 1387-6740
  • E-ISSN: 1569-9935
USD
Buy:$35.00 + Taxes

Abstract

Abstract

Previous research has argued that narrative is an evolutionary adaptation, offering advantages in terms of survival and reproductive successes. It is yet unclear, however, narratives may promote our fitness to survive. Integrating developments in narrative theory, evolutionary psychology, communication science, and cognitive neuroscience, this article presents a Mental Simulation Model that explains the mechanisms through which narratives prepare us for potential life-threatening events in the future. The model proposes that the design features of narrative (setting, perspective, and action) facilitate various distinctive processes of mental simulation (transportation, identification, and action simulation). It is argued that these simulation processes are capable of enhancing our fitness to survive in distinct but complementary ways. The article offers testable propositions and discusses empirical implications.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1075/ni.17049.kri
2018-09-27
2019-12-14
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. Arora, S., Aggarwal, R., Sirimanna, P., Moran, A., Grantcharov, T., Kneebone, R., … Darzi, A.
    (2011) Mental practice enhances surgical technical skills: A randomized controlled study. Annals of Surgery, 253(2), 265–270. doi: 10.1097/SLA.0b013e318207a789
    https://doi.org/10.1097/SLA.0b013e318207a789 [Google Scholar]
  2. Aziz-Zadeh, L., Wilson, S. M., Rizzolatti, G., & Iacoboni, M.
    (2006) Congruent embodied representations for visually presented actions and linguistic phrases describing actions. Current Biology, 16(18), 1818–1823. doi: 10.1016/j.cub.2006.07.060
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cub.2006.07.060 [Google Scholar]
  3. Bakhtin, M. M.
    (1981) Forms of time and of the chronotope in the novel: Notes toward a historical poetics. InM. Holquist (Ed.), The dialogic imagination: Four essays by M. M. Bakhtin (pp.84–258). Austin: University of Texas Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  4. Bal, P. M., & Veltkamp, M.
    (2013) How does fiction reading influence empathy? An experimental investigation on the role of emotional transportation. PloS one, 8(1), e55341. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0055341
    https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0055341 [Google Scholar]
  5. Barsalou, L. W.
    (1999) Perceptions of perceptual symbols. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 22(04), 637–660. doi: 10.1017/S0140525X99532147
    https://doi.org/10.1017/S0140525X99532147 [Google Scholar]
  6. (2008) Grounded cognition. Annu. Rev. Psychol., 59, 617–645. doi: 10.1146/annurev.psych.59.103006.093639
    https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.psych.59.103006.093639 [Google Scholar]
  7. Boyd, B.
    (2009) On the origin of stories: Evolution, cognition, and fiction. Harvard: Harvard University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  8. Bruner, J. S.
    (1986) Actual minds, possible worlds. Harvard: Harvard University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  9. Carroll, J.
    (1995) Evolution and literary theory. Human Nature, 6(2), 119–134. doi: 10.1007/BF02734174
    https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02734174 [Google Scholar]
  10. (2005) Human nature and literary meaning: A theoretical model illustrated with a critique of Pride and Prejudice. InJ. Gottschall & D. S. Wilson (Eds.), The literary animal: Evolution and the nature of narrative (pp.76–106). Evanston, Illinois: Northwestern University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  11. (2011) Reading human nature: Literary Darwinism in theory and practice. Albany: SUNY Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  12. Carroll, P., & Shepperd, J. A.
    (2009) Preparedness, mental simulations, and future outlooks. InK. D. Markman, W. M. P. Klein & J. A. Suhr (Eds.), Handbook of imagination and mental simulation (pp.425–440). New York: Psychology Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  13. Decety, J., & Ingvar, D. H.
    (1990) Brain structures participating in mental simulation of motor behavior: A neuropsychological interpretation. Acta Psychologica, 73(1), 13–34. doi: 10.1016/0001‑6918(90)90056‑L
    https://doi.org/10.1016/0001-6918(90)90056-L [Google Scholar]
  14. Dissanayake, E.
    (1995) Homo aestheticus: Where art comes from and why. Seattle: University of Washington Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  15. (2000) Art and intimacy: How the arts began. Seattle: University of Washington Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  16. Emmott, C.
    (1997) Narrative comprehension: A discourse perspective. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  17. Farner, G.
    (2014) Literary fiction: The ways we read narrative literature. New York: Bloomsbury Academic.
    [Google Scholar]
  18. Fischer, M. H., & Zwaan, R. A.
    (2008) Embodied language: A review of the role of the motor system in language comprehension. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 61(6), 825–850. doi: 10.1080/17470210701623605
    https://doi.org/10.1080/17470210701623605 [Google Scholar]
  19. Fodor, J. A.
    (1976) The language of thought. Sussex: Harvester Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  20. Fodor, J. A., & Pylyshyn, Z. W.
    (1988) Connectionism and cognitive architecture: A critical analysis. Cognition, 28(1), 3–71. doi: 10.1016/0010‑0277(88)90031‑5
    https://doi.org/10.1016/0010-0277(88)90031-5 [Google Scholar]
  21. Genette, G.
    (1980) Narrative discourse. Oxford: Blackwell.
    [Google Scholar]
  22. Gerardin, E., Sirigu, A., Lehéricy, S., Poline, J. -B., Gaymard, B., Marsault, C., … Le Bihan, D.
    (2000) Partially overlapping neural networks for real and imagined hand movements. Cerebral Cortex, 10(11), 1093–1104. doi: 10.1093/cercor/10.11.1093
    https://doi.org/10.1093/cercor/10.11.1093 [Google Scholar]
  23. Gerrig, R. J.
    (1993) Experiencing narrative worlds: On the psychological activities of reading. New Haven & London: Yale University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  24. Glenberg, A. M., & Kaschak, M. P.
    (2002) Grounding language in action. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 9(3), 558–565. doi: 10.3758/BF03196313
    https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03196313 [Google Scholar]
  25. Gottschall, J., & Wilson, D. S.
    (2005) The literary animal: Evolution and the nature of narrative. Evanston, Illinois: Northwestern University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  26. Green, M. C., Aldao, A., Pollack, B., Rozin, P., & Small, A.
    (2004) Effect of story details on transportation into narrative worlds and identification with characters. Paper presented at theIGEL conference, University of Pennsylvania, Department of Psychology, Edmonton.
    [Google Scholar]
  27. Green, M. C., & Brock, T. C.
    (2000) The role of transportation in the persuasiveness of public narratives. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 79(5), 701–721. doi: 10.1037/0022‑3514.79.5.701
    https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.79.5.701 [Google Scholar]
  28. Green, M. C., & Donahue, J. K.
    (2009) Simulated worlds: Transportation into narratives. In: K. Markman, W. M. Klein, & J. A. Stuhr (Eds.), Handbook of imagination and mental simulation (pp.241–256). New York: Psychology Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  29. Hauk, O., Johnsrude, I., & Pulvermüller, F.
    (2004) Somatotopic representation of action words in human motor and premotor cortex. Neuron, 41(2), 301–307. doi: 10.1016/S0896‑6273(03)00838‑9
    https://doi.org/10.1016/S0896-6273(03)00838-9 [Google Scholar]
  30. Jeannerod, M.
    (2001) Neural simulation of action: A unifying mechanism for motor cognition. Neuroimage, 14(1), S103–S109. doi: 10.1006/nimg.2001.0832
    https://doi.org/10.1006/nimg.2001.0832 [Google Scholar]
  31. Kaschak, M. P., Zwaan, R. A., Aveyard, M., & Yaxley, R. H.
    (2006) Perception of auditory motion affects language processing. Cognitive Science, 30(4), 733–744. doi: 10.1207/s15516709cog0000_54
    https://doi.org/10.1207/s15516709cog0000_54 [Google Scholar]
  32. Kidd, D. C., & Castano, E.
    (2013) Reading literary fiction improves theory of mind. Science, 342(6156), 377–380. doi: 10.1126/science.1239918
    https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1239918 [Google Scholar]
  33. Labov, W.
    (2006) Narrative pre-construction. Narrative Inquiry, 16(1), 37–45. doi: 10.1075/ni.16.1.07lab
    https://doi.org/10.1075/ni.16.1.07lab [Google Scholar]
  34. Leech, G. N., & Short, M.
    (2007) Style in fiction: A linguistic introduction to English fictional prose. Harlow: Pearson Longman.
    [Google Scholar]
  35. Mandler, J. M.
    (1984) Stories, scripts, and scenes: Aspects of schema theory. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
    [Google Scholar]
  36. Mar, R. A., & Oatley, K.
    (2008) The function of fiction is the abstraction and simulation of social experience. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 3(3), 173–192. doi: 10.1111/j.1745‑6924.2008.00073.x
    https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1745-6924.2008.00073.x [Google Scholar]
  37. Niles, J. D.
    (2010) Homo narrans: The poetics and anthropology of oral literature. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  38. Oatley, K.
    (2016) Fiction: Simulation of Social Worlds. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 20(8), 618–628.10.1016/j.tics.2016.06.002
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tics.2016.06.002 [Google Scholar]
  39. Ochs, E., & Capps, L.
    (1996) Narrating the self. Annual Review of Anthropology, 25, 19–43. doi: 10.1146/annurev.anthro.25.1.19
    https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.anthro.25.1.19 [Google Scholar]
  40. Omaha World-Herald
    Omaha World-Herald (2007, December6). ‘Horror of massacre hits home.’ p.04A.
    [Google Scholar]
  41. Panero, M. E., Weisberg, D. S., Black, J., Goldstein, T. R., Barnes, J. L., Brownell, H., & Winner, E.
    (2016) Does reading a single passage of literary fiction really improve theory of mind? An attempt at replication. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 111(5), e46–e54.10.1037/pspa0000064
    https://doi.org/10.1037/pspa0000064 [Google Scholar]
  42. Raposo, A., Moss, H. E., Stamatakis, E. A., & Tyler, L. K.
    (2009) Modulation of motor and premotor cortices by actions, action words and action sentences. Neuropsychologia, 47(2), 388–396. doi: 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2008.09.017
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2008.09.017 [Google Scholar]
  43. Rimmon-Kenan, S.
    (2002) Narrative fiction: Contemporary poetics (2nd ed.). New York: Routledge.
    [Google Scholar]
  44. Rizzolatti, G.
    (2005) The mirror neuron system and its function in humans. Anatomy and Embryology, 210(5), 419–421. doi: 10.1007/s00429‑005‑0039‑z
    https://doi.org/10.1007/s00429-005-0039-z [Google Scholar]
  45. Samur, D., Tops, M., & Koole, S. L.
    (2017) Does a single session of reading literary fiction prime enhanced mentalising performance? Four replication experiments of Kidd and Castano (2013). Cognition and Emotion, 1–15.
    [Google Scholar]
  46. Sanford, A. J., & Emmott, C.
    (2012) Mind, brain and narrative. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. doi: 10.1017/CBO9781139084321
    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139084321 [Google Scholar]
  47. Scalise Sugiyama, M.
    (2001a) Food, foragers, and folklore: The role of narrative in human subsistence. Evolution and Human Behavior, 22(4), 221–240. doi: 10.1016/S1090‑5138(01)00063‑0
    https://doi.org/10.1016/S1090-5138(01)00063-0 [Google Scholar]
  48. (2001b) Narrative theory and function: Why evolution matters. Philosophy and Literature, 25(2), 233–250. doi: 10.1353/phl.2001.0035
    https://doi.org/10.1353/phl.2001.0035 [Google Scholar]
  49. (2005) Reverse-engineering narrative: Evidence of special design. InJ. Gottschall & D. S. Wilson (Eds.), The literary animal: Evolution and the nature of narrative (pp.177–196). Evanston, Illinois: Northwestern University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  50. Schacter, D. L., Addis, D. R., & Buckner, R. L.
    (2007) Remembering the past to imagine the future: The prospective brain. Nature Reviews Neuroscience, 8(9), 657–661. doi: 10.1038/nrn2213
    https://doi.org/10.1038/nrn2213 [Google Scholar]
  51. Schank, R. C., & Abelson, R. P.
    (1975) Scripts, Plans, and Knowledge. Proceedings of the Fourth International Joint Conference on Artifical Intelligence, Tblisi, Georgia.
    [Google Scholar]
  52. Segal, E. M.
    (1995) Narrative comprehension and the role of deictic shift theory. InJ. F. Duchan, G. A. Bruder & L. E. Hewitt (Eds.), Deixis in narrative: A cognitive science perspective (pp.3–17). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
    [Google Scholar]
  53. Suddendorf, T., & Corballis, M. C.
    (2007) The evolution of foresight: What is mental time travel, and is it unique to humans?Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 30(03), 299–313. doi: 10.1017/S0140525X07001975
    https://doi.org/10.1017/S0140525X07001975 [Google Scholar]
  54. Szpunar, K. K.
    (2010) Episodic future thought an emerging concept. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 5(2), 142–162. doi: 10.1177/1745691610362350
    https://doi.org/10.1177/1745691610362350 [Google Scholar]
  55. The Associated Press
    The Associated Press (2007, April16). ‘Gunman killed 21, wounds 21 at Virginia Tech shooting before being killed’.
    [Google Scholar]
  56. The Denver Post
    The Denver Post (2012, July21). ‘Disbelief, horror, worry and then, finally, relief.’ p.6A.
    [Google Scholar]
  57. The New York Times
    The New York Times (2007, April 17) ‘Drumbeat of shots, broken by pauses to reload.’ p.1.
    [Google Scholar]
  58. The New York Times
    The New York Times (2012, July21). ‘Gunman kills 12 at Colorado theater; Scores are wounded, reviving debate.’ p.1.
    [Google Scholar]
  59. The Virginian-Pilot
    The Virginian-Pilot (2007, April19). ‘In tech aftermath, mom, son rush desparately to connect.’ p.A1.
    [Google Scholar]
  60. The Washington Post
    The Washington Post (2007, April19). ‘That was the desk I chose to die under.’ p.A01.
    [Google Scholar]
  61. The Washington Post
    The Washington Post (2012, December16). ‘Seeking calm amid the terror.’ p.A01.
    [Google Scholar]
  62. Tooby, J., & Cosmides, L.
    (2001) Does beauty build adapted minds? Toward an evolutionary theory of aesthetics, fiction, and the arts. SubStance, 30(1), 6–27. doi: 10.1353/sub.2001.0017
    https://doi.org/10.1353/sub.2001.0017 [Google Scholar]
  63. USA Today
    USA Today (2008, February18). ‘Student, shot in head, ran back for girlfriend.’ p.3A.
    [Google Scholar]
  64. Van Dijk, T. A., & Kintsch, W.
    (1983) Strategies of discourse comprehension. New York: Academic Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  65. Van Krieken, K., Hoeken, H., & Sanders, J.
    (2015) From reader to mediated witness: The engaging effects of journalistic crime narratives. Journalism & Mass Communication Quarterly, 92(3), 580–596. doi: 10.1177/1077699015586546
    https://doi.org/10.1177/1077699015586546 [Google Scholar]
  66. (2017) Evoking and measuring identification with narrative characters: A linguistic cues framework. Frontiers in Psychology, 8, 1190. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2017.01190
    https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2017.01190 [Google Scholar]
  67. Van Krieken, K., Sanders, J., & Hoeken, H.
    (2016) Blended viewpoints, mediated witnesses: A cognitive linguistic approach to news narratives. InB. Dancygier, W. -l. Lu & A. Verhagen (Eds.), Viewpoint and the fabric of meaning: Form and use of viewpoint tools across languages and modalities (pp.145–168). Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.10.1515/9783110365467‑007
    https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110365467-007 [Google Scholar]
  68. Weinberg, R.
    (2008) Does imagery work? Effects on performance and mental skills. Journal of Imagery Research in Sport and Physical Activity, 3(1), 1–21. doi: 10.2202/1932‑0191.1025
    https://doi.org/10.2202/1932-0191.1025 [Google Scholar]
  69. Willems, R. M., Hagoort, P., & Casasanto, D.
    (2010) Body-specific representations of action verbs: Neural evidence from right-and left-handers. Psychological Science, 21(1), 67–74. doi: 10.1177/0956797609354072
    https://doi.org/10.1177/0956797609354072 [Google Scholar]
  70. Williams, G. C.
    (1966) Adaptation and natural selection: A critique of some current evolutionary thoughts. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  71. Yaxley, R. H., & Zwaan, R. A.
    (2007) Simulating visibility during language comprehension. Cognition, 105(1), 229–236. doi: 10.1016/j.cognition.2006.09.003
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cognition.2006.09.003 [Google Scholar]
  72. Zwaan, R. A.
    (1999) Situation models and the mental leap into imagined worlds. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 8(1), 15–18. doi: 10.1111/1467‑8721.00004
    https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-8721.00004 [Google Scholar]
  73. (2004) The immersed experiencer: Toward an embodied theory of language comprehension. InB. H. Ross (Ed.), The psychology of learning and motivation (Vol.44, pp.35–62). New York: Academic Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  74. Zwaan, R. A., & Radvansky, G. A.
    (1998) Situation models in language comprehension and memory. Psychological Bulletin, 123(2), 162–185. doi: 10.1037/0033‑2909.123.2.162
    https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.123.2.162 [Google Scholar]
  75. Zwaan, R. A., & Taylor, L. J.
    (2006) Seeing, acting, understanding: Motor resonance in language comprehension. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 135, 1–11. doi: 10.1037/0096‑3445.135.1.1
    https://doi.org/10.1037/0096-3445.135.1.1 [Google Scholar]
http://instance.metastore.ingenta.com/content/journals/10.1075/ni.17049.kri
Loading
/content/journals/10.1075/ni.17049.kri
Loading

Data & Media loading...

  • Article Type: Research Article
Keyword(s): action simulation , adaptation , identification , mental simulation , narrative and transportation
This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was successful
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error