Volume 28, Issue 1
  • ISSN 1387-6740
  • E-ISSN: 1569-9935
Buy:$35.00 + Taxes



In this study I examine a corpus of former refugee narratives published by the nonprofit Refugee Council of Australia (RCOA) on their website in 2011. In order to investigate the relationship between the constituent parts and the narrative as a whole, I use critical discourse analysis to examine the strategic use of person, quantified temporal phrases, broader thematic elements, and the constitution of “former refugee narrative” as a genre. I conclude that the RCOA dominates temporality and maintains authority over the narratives through specifically applied quantification yet captures the necessary subjective and emotional material of the refugee experience to achieve the authenticity the co-narratives need to be well-received by the public. Thus, by manipulating hermeneutic composability, the RCOA evidences an objective, authoritative portrayal yet captures a subjective experience worth telling, and by manipulating intertextual gaps they appeal to the Australian nationalism implicit in the contemporary political climate.


Article metrics loading...

Loading full text...

Full text loading...


  1. Australian Government, Department of Immigration and Border Protection
    Australian Government, Department of Immigration and Border Protection (2017a, April18). Abolition and replacement of the 457 visa – Government reforms to employer sponsored skilled migration visas. Canberra, Australia. Retrieved fromhttps://www.border.gov.au/Trav/Work/457-abolition-replacement
    [Google Scholar]
  2. Australian Government, Department of Immigration and Border Protection
    Australian Government, Department of Immigration and Border Protection (2017b, April18). Temporary Work (Skilled) visa (subclass 457). Canberra, Australia. Retrieved fromhttps://www.border.gov.au/Trav/Visa-1/457-
    [Google Scholar]
  3. Baker, P., & McEnery, T.
    (2005) A corpus-based approach to discourses of refugees and asylum seekers in UN and newspaper texts. Journal of Language and Politics, 4(2), 197–226. doi: 10.1075/jlp.4.2.04bak
    https://doi.org/10.1075/jlp.4.2.04bak [Google Scholar]
  4. Baker, P., Gabrielatos, C., KhosraviNik, M., Krzyz̊anowski, M., McEnery, T. & Wodak, R.
    (2008) A useful methodological synergy? Combining critical discourse analysis and corpus linguistics to examine discourses of refugees and asylum seekers in the UK press. Discourse & Society, 19(3), 273–306. doi: 10.1177/0957926508088962
    https://doi.org/10.1177/0957926508088962 [Google Scholar]
  5. Bauman, R., & Briggs, C. L.
    (1990) Poetics and performance as critical perspectives on language and social life. Annual Review of Anthropology, 19, 59–88. doi: 10.1146/annurev.an.19.100190.000423
    https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.an.19.100190.000423 [Google Scholar]
  6. Bauman, R.
    (1996) Any man who keeps more’n one hound’ll lie to you: A contextual study of expressive lying. InD. Brenneis & R. Macaulay (Eds.), The matrix of language (pp.160–181). Boulder, CO: Westview Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  7. Blommaert, J.
    (2001) Investigating narrative inequality: African asylum seekers’ stories in Belgium. Discourse & Society, 12(4), 413–449. doi: 10.1177/0957926501012004002
    https://doi.org/10.1177/0957926501012004002 [Google Scholar]
  8. (2009) Language, asylum, and the National Order. Current Anthropology, 50(4), 415–441. doi: 10.1086/600131
    https://doi.org/10.1086/600131 [Google Scholar]
  9. Briggs, C. L., & Bauman, R.
    (1992) Genre, Intertextuality, and Social Power. Journal of Linguistic Anthropology, 2(2), 131–172. doi: 10.1525/jlin.1992.2.2.131
    https://doi.org/10.1525/jlin.1992.2.2.131 [Google Scholar]
  10. Bruner, J.
    (1991) The narrative construction of reality. Critical Inquiry, 18(1), 1–24. doi: 10.1086/448619
    https://doi.org/10.1086/448619 [Google Scholar]
  11. Bucholtz, M., & Hall, K.
    (2004) Language and identity. InA. Duranti (Ed.), A companion to linguistic anthropology (pp.369–394). Malden, MA: Blackwell.
    [Google Scholar]
  12. Clyne, M.
    (2005) The use of exclusionary language to manipulate opinion: John Howard, asylum seekers and the reemergence of political incorrectness in Australia. Journal of Language and Politics, 4(2), 173–196. doi: 10.1075/jlp.4.2.03cly
    https://doi.org/10.1075/jlp.4.2.03cly [Google Scholar]
  13. Corcoran, C.
    (2004) A critical examination of the use of language analysis interviews in asylum proceedings: A case study of a West African seeking asylum in the Netherlands. Speech, Language and the Law, 11(2), 200–221. doi: 10.1558/sll.2004.11.2.200
    https://doi.org/10.1558/sll.2004.11.2.200 [Google Scholar]
  14. Ewick, P., & Silbey, Susan S.
    (1995) Subversive stories and hegemonic tales: Toward a sociology of narrative. Law & Society Review, 29(2), 197–226. doi: 10.2307/3054010
    https://doi.org/10.2307/3054010 [Google Scholar]
  15. Gabrielatos, C., & Baker, P.
    (2008) Fleeing, sneaking, flooding: A corpus analysis of discursive constructions of refugees and asylum seekers in the UK Press, 1996–2005. Journal of English Linguistics, 36(1), 5–38. doi: 10.1177/0075424207311247
    https://doi.org/10.1177/0075424207311247 [Google Scholar]
  16. Gee, J. P.
    (2005) An introduction to discourse analysis: Theory and method. New York: Routledge.
    [Google Scholar]
  17. Harvey, P. & Knox, H.
    (2015) Roads: An anthropology of infrastructure and expertise. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  18. Hodges, A.
    (2011) The “war on terror” narrative. Oxford: Oxford University Press, Inc. doi: 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199759590.001.0001
    https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199759590.001.0001 [Google Scholar]
  19. Jacquemet, M.
    (2009) Transcribing refugees: The entextualization of asylum seekers’ hearings in a transidiomatic environment. Text & Talk, 29(5), 525–546. doi: 10.1515/TEXT.2009.028
    https://doi.org/10.1515/TEXT.2009.028 [Google Scholar]
  20. (2011) Crosstalk 2.0: Asylum and communicative breakdowns. Text & Talk, 31(4), 475–497. doi: 10.1515/text.2011.023
    https://doi.org/10.1515/text.2011.023 [Google Scholar]
  21. KhosraviNik, M.
    (2009) The representation of refugees, asylum seekers and immigrants in British newspapers during the Balkan conflict (1999) and the British general election (2005). Discourse & Society, 20(4), 477–498. doi: 10.1177/0957926509104024
    https://doi.org/10.1177/0957926509104024 [Google Scholar]
  22. Labov, W.
    (1972) Sociolinguistic patterns. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  23. Malkki, L.
    (1992) National Geographic: The rooting of peoples and the territorialization of national identity among scholars and refugees. Cultural Anthropology, 7(1), 22–44. doi: 10.1525/can.1992.7.1.02a00030
    https://doi.org/10.1525/can.1992.7.1.02a00030 [Google Scholar]
  24. Massola, J.
    (2017a, April18). Malcolm Turnbull to abolish 457 immigration work visas. The Sydney Morning Herald. Retrieved fromwww.smh.com.au/federal-politics/political-news/malcolm-turnbull-to-abolish-457-immigration-work-visas-20170418-gvmw34.html
    [Google Scholar]
  25. (2017b, April20). Malcolm Turnbull reveals tough new citizenship crackdown. The Sydney Morning Herald. Retrieved fromwww.smh.com.au/federal-politics/political-news/speak-english-respect-our-values-malcolm-turnbulls-next-citizenship-crackdown-20170419-gvnq0y.html
    [Google Scholar]
  26. Refugee Council of Australia
    Refugee Council of Australia (2013, May). Who we are. Retrieved fromwww.refugeecouncil.org.au/about-us-2/who-we-are/.
    [Google Scholar]
  27. Refugee Council of Australia
    Refugee Council of Australia (2014a, March). Refugee stories. Retrieved fromwww.refugeecouncil.org.au/fact-sheets/who-are-refugees/refugee-stories/
    [Google Scholar]
  28. Refugee Council of Australia
    Refugee Council of Australia (2014b, December). What we do. Retrieved fromwww.refugeecouncil.org.au/about-us-2/what-we-do/.
    [Google Scholar]
  29. Smith-Khan, L.
    (2017) Telling stories: Credibility and the representation of social actors in Australian asylum appeals. Discourse & Society, 28(5), 512–534.10.1177/0957926517710989
    https://doi.org/10.1177/0957926517710989 [Google Scholar]
  30. Taylor, C.
    (1979) Interpretation and the Sciences of Man. InP. Rabinow and W. M. Sullivan (Eds.), Interpretive social science: A reader (pp.25–71). Berkeley: University of California Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  31. Vogl, A.
    (2013) Telling stories from start to finish: Exploring the demand for narrative in refugee testimony. Griffith Law Review, 22(1), 63–86. doi: 10.1080/10383441.2013.10854767
    https://doi.org/10.1080/10383441.2013.10854767 [Google Scholar]
  32. White, G.
    (2004) Nation, state, and territory: Origins, evolutions, and relationships, Volume 1. Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield Publishers, Inc.
    [Google Scholar]
  33. Zagor, M.
    (2014) Recognition and narrative identities: Is refugee law redeemable?InF. Jenkins, M. Nolan and K. Rubenstein (Eds.), Allegiance and identity in a globalised world (pp.311–353). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press. doi: 10.1017/CBO9781139696654.021
    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139696654.021 [Google Scholar]

Data & Media loading...

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was successful
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error