1887
Volume 28, Issue 2
  • ISSN 1387-6740
  • E-ISSN: 1569-9935
USD
Buy:$35.00 + Taxes

Abstract

Abstract

This paper focuses on the performance of small stories from two Cambodian men interviewed by the researcher about the relationships they form with men from the Global North. The analysis attends to the empirical significance of these performances by focusing on the mobilization of affect as an interactional linguistic and narrative resource that foregrounds social action in this context. In this way, these small stories reveal how these men may challenge and reshape dominant social discourses at this sexualised North/South interface. Bringing to the field of narrative inquiry approaches from queer linguistics, and Southern perspectives, this paper is therefore tasked with exploring what the field may potentially gain from these areas, especially regarding the theoretical and methodological possibilities of a North/South dialogue in the production of knowledge.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1075/ni.17062.row
2018-10-19
2019-12-15
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. Bamberg, M.
    (2004) Considering counter narratives. InM. Bamberg & M. Andrews (Eds.), Considering counter-narratives: Narrating, resisting, making sense (pp.351–371). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.10.1075/sin.4.43bam
    https://doi.org/10.1075/sin.4.43bam [Google Scholar]
  2. Bamberg, M., & Georgakopoulou, A.
    (2008) Small stories as a new perspective in narrative and identity analysis. Text & Talk-An Interdisciplinary Journal of Language, Discourse Communication Studies, 28(3), 377–396.
    [Google Scholar]
  3. Brickell, K., & Springer, S.
    (Eds.) (2017) The handbook of contemporary Cambodia. Abingdon: Routledge.
    [Google Scholar]
  4. Copland, F., & Creese, A.
    (2015) Linguistic ethnography: Collecting, analysing and presenting data. London: SAGE.10.4135/9781473910607
    https://doi.org/10.4135/9781473910607 [Google Scholar]
  5. De Fina, A.
    (2013) Positioning level 3: Connecting local identity displays to macrosocial processes. Narrative Inquiry, 23(1), 40–61.10.1075/ni.23.1.03de
    https://doi.org/10.1075/ni.23.1.03de [Google Scholar]
  6. De Fina, A., & Georgakopoulou, A.
    (2012) Analyzing narrative: Discourse and sociolinguistic perspectives. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  7. Gardner, R.
    (2001) When listeners talk: Response tokens and listener stance. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.10.1075/pbns.92
    https://doi.org/10.1075/pbns.92 [Google Scholar]
  8. Georgakopoulou, A.
    (2006) Thinking big with small stories in narrative and identity analysis. Narrative inquiry, 16(1), 122–130.10.1075/ni.16.1.16geo
    https://doi.org/10.1075/ni.16.1.16geo [Google Scholar]
  9. Gilbert, K. R.
    (2001) The emotional nature of qualitative research. Boca Raton, FL: CRC Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  10. Hepburn, A., & Potter, J.
    (2012) Crying and crying responses. InA. Perakyla & M. Sorjonen (Eds.), Emotion in interaction (pp.195–211). Oxford: Oxford University Press.10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199730735.003.0009
    https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199730735.003.0009 [Google Scholar]
  11. Heritage, J.
    (2011) Territories of knowledge, territories of experience: empathic moments in interaction. InT. Stivers, L. Mondada & J. Steensig (Eds.), The morality of knowledge in conversation (pp.159–183). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9780511921674.008
    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511921674.008 [Google Scholar]
  12. Heuveline, P.
    (2017) Households and family processes. InK. Brickell & S. Springer (Eds.), The handbook of contemporary Cambodia (pp.315–325). Abingdon: Routledge.
    [Google Scholar]
  13. Hoefinger, H.
    (2013) Sex, love and money in Cambodia: professional girlfriends and transactional relationships. New York: Routledge.10.4324/9780203550786
    https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203550786 [Google Scholar]
  14. Hoefinger, H., Ly, P., & Srun, S.
    (2017) Sex politics and moral panics: LGBT communities, sex/entertainment workers and sexually active youth in Cambodia. InK. Brickell & S. Springer (Eds.), The handbook of contemporary Cambodia (pp.315–325). Abingdon: Routledge.
    [Google Scholar]
  15. Hymes, D.
    (1996) Ethnography, linguistics, narrative inequality. Toward an understanding of voice. London: Taylor and Francis.
    [Google Scholar]
  16. Jackson, P. A.
    (2001) Pre-gay, post-queer: Thai perspectives on proliferating gender/sex diversity in Asia. InG. Sullivan & P. A. Jackson (Eds.), Gay and lesbian Asia: Culture, identity, community (pp.1–26). New York: Harrington Park Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  17. Katigbak, E. O.
    (2015) Moralizing emotional remittances: transnational familyhood and translocal moral economy in the Philippines’ ‘Little Italy’. Global Networks, 15(4), 519–535.10.1111/glob.12092
    https://doi.org/10.1111/glob.12092 [Google Scholar]
  18. Kong, T. S. K., Mahoney, D., & Plummer, K.
    (2003) Queering the interview. InJ. Holstein & J. F. Gubrium (Eds.), Inside Interviewing: New Lenses, New Concerns (pp.91–110). Thousand Oaks: SAGE.
    [Google Scholar]
  19. Lawless, E. J.
    (2001) Women escaping violence: Empowerment through narrative. Columbia: University of Missouri Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  20. Lazar, M.
    (2017) Homonationalist discourse as a politics of pragmatic resistance in Singapore’s Pink Dot movement: Towards a southern praxis. Journal of Sociolinguistics, 21(3), 420–441.10.1111/josl.12239
    https://doi.org/10.1111/josl.12239 [Google Scholar]
  21. Leap, W. L.
    (2011) Queer linguistics, sexuality, and discourse analysis. InJ. P. Gee & M. Handford (Eds.), The Routledge handbook of discourse analysis (pp.558–571). Abingdon: Routledge.
    [Google Scholar]
  22. Levon, E.
    (2015) Integrating intersectionality in language, gender, and sexuality research. Language and Linguistics Compass, 9(7), 295–308.10.1111/lnc3.12147
    https://doi.org/10.1111/lnc3.12147 [Google Scholar]
  23. Marais, A.
    (2015) ‘Performing identity’: A narrative analysis of young people’s talk of intimate partner violence. Narrative Inquiry, 25(2), 242–263.10.1075/ni.25.2.03mar
    https://doi.org/10.1075/ni.25.2.03mar [Google Scholar]
  24. Milani, T. M.
    (2014) Marginally speaking. Multilingual Margins: A journal of multilingualism from the periphery, 1(1), 9–20.
    [Google Scholar]
  25. (2015) Language and citizenship: Broadening the agenda. Journal of Language and Politics, 14(3), 319–334.10.1075/jlp.14.3.01mil
    https://doi.org/10.1075/jlp.14.3.01mil [Google Scholar]
  26. Milani, T. M., & Lazar, M. M.
    (2017) Seeing from the South: Discourse, gender and sexuality from southern perspectives. Journal of Sociolinguistics, 21(3), 307–319.10.1111/josl.12241
    https://doi.org/10.1111/josl.12241 [Google Scholar]
  27. Motschenbacher, H., & Stegu, M.
    (2013) Queer linguistic approaches to discourse. Discourse and Society, 24(5), 519–535.10.1177/0957926513486069
    https://doi.org/10.1177/0957926513486069 [Google Scholar]
  28. Pavlenko, A.
    (2007) Autobiographical narratives as data in applied linguistics. Applied Linguistics, 28(2), 163–188.10.1093/applin/amm008
    https://doi.org/10.1093/applin/amm008 [Google Scholar]
  29. Peck, A., & Stroud, C.
    (2015) Skinscapes. Linguistic Landscape, 1(1), 133–151.10.1075/ll.1.1‑2.08pec
    https://doi.org/10.1075/ll.1.1-2.08pec [Google Scholar]
  30. Potter, J., & Hepburn, A.
    (2008) Discursive constructionism. InJ. A. Holstein & J. F. Gubrium (Eds.), Handbook of constructionist research (pp.275–293). New York: Guildford.
    [Google Scholar]
  31. Prior, M. T.
    (2016) Emotion and Discourse in L2 Narrative Research. Bristol: Multilingual Matters.
    [Google Scholar]
  32. Riessman, C. K.
    (1993) Narrative analysis. Boston University: Sage Publications.
    [Google Scholar]
  33. Rooke, A.
    (2010) Queer in the field: on emotions, temporality, and performativity in ethnography. InK. Brown & C. J. Nash (Eds.), Queer methods and methodologies: Intersecting queer theories and social science research (pp.25–41). Farnham: Ashgate.
    [Google Scholar]
  34. Rowlett, B. J. L.
    (in press). “The lines are blurred”: Same sex relationships and the local practice of sponsorship in Cambodia. Gender and Language, 13(2).
    [Google Scholar]
  35. Rowlett, B. J. L., & King, B. W.
    (2017) Language education, gender, and sexuality. InS. May & T. McCarty (Eds.), Encyclopedia of language and education (pp.85–97). New York: Springer.
    [Google Scholar]
  36. Schiffrin, D.
    (1996) Narrative as self-portrait: Sociolinguistic constructions of identity. Language in Society, 25, 167–203.10.1017/S0047404500020601
    https://doi.org/10.1017/S0047404500020601 [Google Scholar]
  37. Sharpley, R., & McGrath, P.
    (2017) Tourism in Cambodia: Opportunities and challenges. InK. Brickell & S. Springer (Eds.), The handbook of contemporary Cambodia (pp.87–98). Abingdon: Routledge.
    [Google Scholar]
  38. Talmy, S.
    (2010) Qualitative interviews in applied linguistics: From research instrument to social practice. Annual Review of Applied Linguistics, 30, 128–148.10.1017/S0267190510000085
    https://doi.org/10.1017/S0267190510000085 [Google Scholar]
  39. Turner, J. H., & Stets, J. E.
    (2005) The sociology of emotions. New York: Cambridge.10.1017/CBO9780511819612
    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511819612 [Google Scholar]
  40. Van De Mieroop, D., & Clifton, J.
    (2016) Life stories. InJ. Östman & J. Verschueren (Eds.), Handbook of Pragmatics (pp.1–20). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.10.1075/hop.20.lif2
    https://doi.org/10.1075/hop.20.lif2 [Google Scholar]
  41. Ward, N.
    (2006) Non-lexical conversational sounds in American English. Pragmatics and Cognition, 14, 113–184.10.1075/pc.14.1.08war
    https://doi.org/10.1075/pc.14.1.08war [Google Scholar]
  42. Wetherell, M.
    (2012) Affect and Emotion: A New Social Science Understanding. London: Sage Publications.10.4135/9781446250945
    https://doi.org/10.4135/9781446250945 [Google Scholar]
  43. Yep, G. A.
    (2003) The violence of heteronormativity in communication studies: Notes on injury, healing, queer world-making. InG. A. Yep, K. E. Lovaas & J. P. Elia (Eds.), Queer Theory and Communication: From Disciplining Queers to Queering the Discipline (s) (pp.11–60). Binghampton, NY: Harrington Park Press.
    [Google Scholar]
http://instance.metastore.ingenta.com/content/journals/10.1075/ni.17062.row
Loading
This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was successful
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error