“I’ll tell you later on”

References

1. Bakhtin, M. M.
   (1986) Speech Genres and Other Late Essays. Austin, TX, USA: University of Texas Press.
   [Google Scholar]
2. Boden, D., & Bielby, D. D.
   (1983) The past as resource: A conversational analysis of elderly talk. Human Development26(6), 308–319. doi:  10.1159/000272892
   https://doi.org/10.1159/000272892 [Google Scholar]
3. Boden, D.
   (1997) Temporal Frames: Time and Talk in Organizations. Time & Society6(1), 5–33. doi:  10.1177/0961463X97006001001
   https://doi.org/10.1177/0961463X97006001001 [Google Scholar]
4. Bruner, J. S.
   (1990) Acts of Meaning. Cambridge, MA, USA: Harvard University Press.
   [Google Scholar]
5. Bublitz, W.
   (1998) Cohesion and coherence. InJ.-O. Östman & J. Verschueren (Eds.), Handbook of Pragmatics Online.
   [Google Scholar]
6. Burns, S. L.
   (2012) ‘Lecturing’s Work’: A Collaborative Study with Harold Garfinkel. Human Studies35(2), 175–192. doi:  10.1007/s10746‑012‑9228‑y
   https://doi.org/10.1007/s10746-012-9228-y [Google Scholar]
7. Cicourel, A. V.
   (1974) Cognitive Sociology: Language and Meaning in Social Interaction. New York, NY, USA: The Free Press.
   [Google Scholar]
8. Coulter, J.
   (1995) The Sacks Lectures. Human Studies18(2–3), 327–336. doi:  10.1007/BF01323215
   https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01323215 [Google Scholar]
9. Dunaway, D. K., & Baum, W. K.
   (Eds.) (1996) Oral History: An Interdisciplinary Anthology (2nd Ed.). Walnut Creek, CA, USA: AltaMira Press.
   [Google Scholar]
10. Fisher, W.
    (1987) Human Communication as Narration. Columbia, SC, USA: South Carolina University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
11. Garfinkel, H.
    (1967) Studies in Ethnomethodology. Englewood Cliffs, NJ, USA: Prentice Hall.
    [Google Scholar]
12. Garfinkel, H.
    (1991) Respecification: Evidence for locally produced, naturally accountable phenomena of order*, logic, reason, meaning, method, etc. in and as of the essential haecceity of immortal ordinary society, (I) – an announcement of studies. InG. Button (Ed.), Ethnomethodology and the Human Sciences (pp.10–19). Cambridge, United Kingdom: Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/CBO9780511611827.003
    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511611827.003 [Google Scholar]
13. Garfinkel, H.
    (2002) Ethnomethodology’s Program: Working Out Durkheim’s Aphorism (Edited by Anne Warfield Rawls). Lanham, MD, USA: Rowman & Littlefield.
    [Google Scholar]
14. Garfinkel, H., & Sacks, H.
    (1970) On Formal Structures of Practical Actions. InJ. C. McKinney & E. A. Tiryakian (Eds.), Theoretical Sociology: Perspectives and Developments (pp.338–366). New York, NY, USA: Appleton-Century-Crofts.
    [Google Scholar]
15. Genette, G.
    (1983) Narrative Discourse: An Essay in Method. Ithaca, NY, USA: Cornell University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
16. González-Martínez, E.
    (2011) Just telling what is going to happen: The initial phase of a judicial social investigation interview. Nottingham French Studies, 50(2), 154–176. 10.3366/nfs.2011‑2.008
    https://doi.org/10.3366/nfs.2011-2.008 [Google Scholar]
17. Goodwin, Ch.
    (1984) Notes on story structure and the organization of participation. InJ. Heritage & P. Atkinson (Eds.), Structures of Social Action (pp.225–246). Cambridge, MA, USA: Cambridge University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
18. Hasan, R.
    (1984) Coherence and cohesive harmony. InJ. Flood (Ed.), Understanding Reading Comprehension (pp.181–219). Delaware, DE, USA: International Reading Association.
    [Google Scholar]
19. Heritage, J.
    (1985) Analyzing news interviews: Aspects of the production of talk for an overhearing audience. InT. A. van Dijk (Ed.), Handbook of Discourse Analysis Vol. 3 (pp.95–117). London, United Kingdom: Academic Press.
    [Google Scholar]
20. Heritage, J., & Watson, D. R.
    (1979) Formulations as Conversational Objects. InG. Psathas (Ed.), Everyday language: Studies in ethnomethodology (pp.123–162). New York, NY, USA: Irvington Publishers.
    [Google Scholar]
21. Heritage, J., & Watson, D. R.
    (1980) Aspects of the properties of formulations in natural conversations: Some instances analysed. Semiotica, 30(3/4), 245–262. doi:  10.1515/semi.1980.30.3‑4.245
    https://doi.org/10.1515/semi.1980.30.3-4.245 [Google Scholar]
22. Heritage, J., & Clayman, S.
    (2010) Talk in Interaction: Interactions, Identities and Institutions. Chichester, NH, USA: Wiley-Blackwell. 10.1002/9781444318135
    https://doi.org/10.1002/9781444318135 [Google Scholar]
23. Hester, S. & Francis, D.
    (1994) Doing data: the local organization of a sociological interview. British Journal of Sociology, 45(4), 675–695. doi:  10.2307/591889
    https://doi.org/10.2307/591889 [Google Scholar]
24. Jefferson, G.
    (1978) Sequential Aspects of Storytelling in Conversation. InJ. Schenkein (Ed.), Studies in the Organization of Conversational Interaction (pp.219–248). New York: Academic Press. 10.1016/B978‑0‑12‑623550‑0.50016‑1
    https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-623550-0.50016-1 [Google Scholar]
25. Jefferson, G.
    (1985) On the interactional unpackaging of a ‘gloss’. Language in Society, 14(4), 435–466. 10.1017/S0047404500011465
    https://doi.org/10.1017/S0047404500011465 [Google Scholar]
26. Jefferson, G.
    (2004) Glossary of transcript symbols with an introduction. InG. H. Lerner (Ed.), Conversation Analysis: Studies from the first generation (pp.13–31). Amsterdam, Netherlands: John Benjamins. 10.1075/pbns.125.02jef
    https://doi.org/10.1075/pbns.125.02jef [Google Scholar]
27. Kasper, G., & Prior, M. T.
    (2015) Analyzing Storytelling in TESOL Interview Research. TESOL Quarterly, 49(2), 226–255. doi:  10.1002/tesq.169
    https://doi.org/10.1002/tesq.169 [Google Scholar]
28. Labov, W., & Waletzky, J.
    (1967) Narrative analysis: Oral versions of personal experience. InJ. Helm (Ed.), Essays on the Verbal and Visual Arts. Seattle, WA, USA: University of Washington Press.
    [Google Scholar]
29. Leudar, I., & Nekvapil, J.
    (2011) Practical historians and adversaries: 9/11 revisited. Discourse & Society, 22(1), 66–85. doi:  10.1177/0957926510382840
    https://doi.org/10.1177/0957926510382840 [Google Scholar]
30. Lynch, M.
    (2017) Garfinkel, Sacks and Formal Structures: Collaborative origins, divergences and the vexed unity of ethnomethodology and conversation analysis. Keynote address atIIEMCA 2017: A Half-Century of Studies, International Institute for Ethnomethodology and Conversation Analysis, Westerville, OH, USA, 10.–13. 7. 2017. Available from: https://radicalethno.org/documents/lynchbanquet.pdf (accessed on11. 11. 2017)
31. McAdams, D. P.
    (1993) The Stories We Live By: Personal Myths and the Making of the Self. New York, NY, USA / London, United Kingdom: Guilford Press.
    [Google Scholar]
32. Mlynář, J.
    (2015) Malach Center for Visual History. InJ. Hlaváčová (Ed.), Sborník Semináře o digitálních zdrojích a službách ve společenských a humanitních vědách (WDH 2015) (pp.83–89). Prague, Czech Republic: Charles University.
    [Google Scholar]
33. Mondada, L.
    (2006) Video recording as the reflexive preservation and configuration of phenomenal features for analysis. InH. Knoblauch, J. Raab, J. H.-G. Soeffner & B. Schnettler (Eds.), Video Analysis (pp.51–68). Bern: Peter Lang.
    [Google Scholar]
34. Mondada, L., Svensson, H., & Van Schepen, N.
    (2015) ‘Why that not now’: participants’ orientations towards several organizational layers in social interaction. Bulletin suisse de linguistique appliquée, (101), 51–71.
    [Google Scholar]
35. Olick, J. K., & Robbins, J.
    (1998) Social Memory Studies: From ‘Collective Memory’ to the Historical Sociology of Mnemonic Practices. Annual Review of Sociology, 24, 105–140. doi:  10.1146/annurev.soc.24.1.105
    https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.soc.24.1.105 [Google Scholar]
36. Ricoeur, P.
    (1983) Time and Narrative I. Chicago, IL, USA: University of Chicago Press.
    [Google Scholar]
37. Ricoeur, P.
    (1985) Time and Narrative III. Chicago, IL, USA: University of Chicago Press.
    [Google Scholar]
38. Ryave, A. L.
    (1978) On the achievement of a series of stories. InJ. Schenkein (Ed.), Studies in the Organization of Conversational Interaction (pp.113–132). New York, NY, USA: Academic Press. 10.1016/B978‑0‑12‑623550‑0.50011‑2
    https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-623550-0.50011-2 [Google Scholar]
39. Sacks, H.
    (1992) Lectures on Conversation I–II. Oxford, United Kingdom: Blackwell.
    [Google Scholar]
40. Sacks, H., Schegloff, E. A., & Jefferson, G.
    (1974) A Simplest Systematics for the Organization of Turn-Taking in Conversation. Language, 50(4, 1), 696–735. doi:  10.2307/412243
    https://doi.org/10.2307/412243 [Google Scholar]
41. Schegloff, E. A.
    (1990) On the organization of sequences as a source of ‘coherence’ in talk-in-interaction. InB. Dorval (Ed.): Conversational organization and its development (pp.51–78). Norwood, NY, USA: Ablex.
    [Google Scholar]
42. Schegloff, E. A.
    (1997) ‘Narrative analysis’ thirty years later. Journal of Narrative and Life History, 7(1–4), 97–106. doi:  10.1075/jnlh.7.11nar
    https://doi.org/10.1075/jnlh.7.11nar [Google Scholar]
43. Schegloff, E. A.
    (2007) Sequence Organization in Interaction: A Primer in Conversation Analysis, Volume1. New York, NY, USA: Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/CBO9780511791208
    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511791208 [Google Scholar]
44. Sidnell, J.
    (2010) Conversation Analysis: An Introduction. Chichester, United Kingdom: Wiley-Blackwell.
    [Google Scholar]
45. Silverman, D.
    (1998) Harvey Sacks: Social science and conversation analysis. Cambridge, United Kingdom: Polity Press.
    [Google Scholar]
46. Stokoe, E., & Edwards, D.
    (2006) Story formulations in talk-in-interaction. Narrative Inquiry, 16(1), 56–65. doi:  10.1075/ni.16.1.09sto
    https://doi.org/10.1075/ni.16.1.09sto [Google Scholar]
47. Thomson, A.
    (2007) Four Paradigm Transformations in Oral History. The Oral History Review, 34(1), 49–70. 10.1525/ohr.2007.34.1.49
    https://doi.org/10.1525/ohr.2007.34.1.49 [Google Scholar]
48. USC Shoah Foundation
    USC Shoah Foundation (2012) Interviewer Guidelines. Available from: https://sfi.usc.edu/sites/default/files/docfiles/USCSF_Interviewer_Guidelines_Oct%202012.pdf (accessed on19. 2. 2018)
    [Google Scholar]
49. Watson, R.
    (2008) Comparative Sociology, Laic and Analytic: Some Critical Remarks on Comparison in Conversation Analysis. Cahiers de praxématique, 50, 203–244.
    [Google Scholar]
50. White, H.
    (1973) Metahistory: The Historical Imagination in Nineteenth-Century Europe. Baltimore, MD, USA / London, United Kingdom: The Johns Hopkins University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
51. Zimmerman, D. E., & Pollner, M.
    (1970) The Everyday World as a Phenomenon. InJ. D. Douglas (Ed.), Understanding Everyday Life: Toward the Reconstruction of Sociological Knowledge (pp.80–103). Chicago, IL, USA: Aldine.
    [Google Scholar]