1887
Volume 30, Issue 1
  • ISSN 1387-6740
  • E-ISSN: 1569-9935
USD
Buy:$35.00 + Taxes

Abstract

Abstract

This article investigates an interactional phenomenon in which oral history interview participants deal with temporal structure in extended storytelling. It is based on the observation that while narrating a life story, participants routinely use its temporal structure as an organizing principle of the interview. Drawing inspiration from Sacks’ notion of tying devices and Genette’s distinction of prolepsis/analepsis, I have identified two forms of practices that interrelate storytelling sequences in an interview. For the first form, I propose the term analeptic tying: in this practice, turns produced earlier are treated as a resource for the current turn. For the second form, I propose the term proleptic tying, which refers to planned turns of speech that have yet to be produced being treated as a resource. I discuss the proleptic and analeptic tying devices in relation to relevant research in ethnomethodology/conversation analysis, which is the approach taken in this article.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1075/ni.18020.mly
2020-03-10
2020-08-11
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. Bakhtin, M. M.
    (1986) Speech Genres and Other Late Essays. Austin, TX, USA: University of Texas Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  2. Boden, D., & Bielby, D. D.
    (1983) The past as resource: A conversational analysis of elderly talk. Human Development26(6), 308–319. doi:  10.1159/000272892
    https://doi.org/10.1159/000272892 [Google Scholar]
  3. Boden, D.
    (1997) Temporal Frames: Time and Talk in Organizations. Time & Society6(1), 5–33. doi:  10.1177/0961463X97006001001
    https://doi.org/10.1177/0961463X97006001001 [Google Scholar]
  4. Bruner, J. S.
    (1990) Acts of Meaning. Cambridge, MA, USA: Harvard University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  5. Bublitz, W.
    (1998) Cohesion and coherence. InJ.-O. Östman & J. Verschueren (Eds.), Handbook of Pragmatics Online.
    [Google Scholar]
  6. Burns, S. L.
    (2012) ‘Lecturing’s Work’: A Collaborative Study with Harold Garfinkel. Human Studies35(2), 175–192. doi:  10.1007/s10746‑012‑9228‑y
    https://doi.org/10.1007/s10746-012-9228-y [Google Scholar]
  7. Cicourel, A. V.
    (1974) Cognitive Sociology: Language and Meaning in Social Interaction. New York, NY, USA: The Free Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  8. Coulter, J.
    (1995) The Sacks Lectures. Human Studies18(2–3), 327–336. doi:  10.1007/BF01323215
    https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01323215 [Google Scholar]
  9. Dunaway, D. K., & Baum, W. K.
    (Eds.) (1996) Oral History: An Interdisciplinary Anthology (2nd Ed.). Walnut Creek, CA, USA: AltaMira Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  10. Fisher, W.
    (1987) Human Communication as Narration. Columbia, SC, USA: South Carolina University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  11. Garfinkel, H.
    (1967) Studies in Ethnomethodology. Englewood Cliffs, NJ, USA: Prentice Hall.
    [Google Scholar]
  12. (1991) Respecification: Evidence for locally produced, naturally accountable phenomena of order*, logic, reason, meaning, method, etc. in and as of the essential haecceity of immortal ordinary society, (I) – an announcement of studies. InG. Button (Ed.), Ethnomethodology and the Human Sciences (pp.10–19). Cambridge, United Kingdom: Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/CBO9780511611827.003
    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511611827.003 [Google Scholar]
  13. (2002) Ethnomethodology’s Program: Working Out Durkheim’s Aphorism (Edited by Anne Warfield Rawls). Lanham, MD, USA: Rowman & Littlefield.
    [Google Scholar]
  14. Garfinkel, H., & Sacks, H.
    (1970) On Formal Structures of Practical Actions. InJ. C. McKinney & E. A. Tiryakian (Eds.), Theoretical Sociology: Perspectives and Developments (pp.338–366). New York, NY, USA: Appleton-Century-Crofts.
    [Google Scholar]
  15. Genette, G.
    (1983) Narrative Discourse: An Essay in Method. Ithaca, NY, USA: Cornell University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  16. González-Martínez, E.
    (2011) Just telling what is going to happen: The initial phase of a judicial social investigation interview. Nottingham French Studies, 50(2), 154–176. 10.3366/nfs.2011‑2.008
    https://doi.org/10.3366/nfs.2011-2.008 [Google Scholar]
  17. Goodwin, Ch.
    (1984) Notes on story structure and the organization of participation. InJ. Heritage & P. Atkinson (Eds.), Structures of Social Action (pp.225–246). Cambridge, MA, USA: Cambridge University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  18. Hasan, R.
    (1984) Coherence and cohesive harmony. InJ. Flood (Ed.), Understanding Reading Comprehension (pp.181–219). Delaware, DE, USA: International Reading Association.
    [Google Scholar]
  19. Heritage, J.
    (1985) Analyzing news interviews: Aspects of the production of talk for an overhearing audience. InT. A. van Dijk (Ed.), Handbook of Discourse Analysis Vol. 3 (pp.95–117). London, United Kingdom: Academic Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  20. Heritage, J., & Watson, D. R.
    (1979) Formulations as Conversational Objects. InG. Psathas (Ed.), Everyday language: Studies in ethnomethodology (pp.123–162). New York, NY, USA: Irvington Publishers.
    [Google Scholar]
  21. (1980) Aspects of the properties of formulations in natural conversations: Some instances analysed. Semiotica, 30(3/4), 245–262. doi:  10.1515/semi.1980.30.3‑4.245
    https://doi.org/10.1515/semi.1980.30.3-4.245 [Google Scholar]
  22. Heritage, J., & Clayman, S.
    (2010) Talk in Interaction: Interactions, Identities and Institutions. Chichester, NH, USA: Wiley-Blackwell. 10.1002/9781444318135
    https://doi.org/10.1002/9781444318135 [Google Scholar]
  23. Hester, S. & Francis, D.
    (1994) Doing data: the local organization of a sociological interview. British Journal of Sociology, 45(4), 675–695. doi:  10.2307/591889
    https://doi.org/10.2307/591889 [Google Scholar]
  24. Jefferson, G.
    (1978) Sequential Aspects of Storytelling in Conversation. InJ. Schenkein (Ed.), Studies in the Organization of Conversational Interaction (pp.219–248). New York: Academic Press. 10.1016/B978‑0‑12‑623550‑0.50016‑1
    https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-623550-0.50016-1 [Google Scholar]
  25. (1985) On the interactional unpackaging of a ‘gloss’. Language in Society, 14(4), 435–466. 10.1017/S0047404500011465
    https://doi.org/10.1017/S0047404500011465 [Google Scholar]
  26. (2004) Glossary of transcript symbols with an introduction. InG. H. Lerner (Ed.), Conversation Analysis: Studies from the first generation (pp.13–31). Amsterdam, Netherlands: John Benjamins. 10.1075/pbns.125.02jef
    https://doi.org/10.1075/pbns.125.02jef [Google Scholar]
  27. Kasper, G., & Prior, M. T.
    (2015) Analyzing Storytelling in TESOL Interview Research. TESOL Quarterly, 49(2), 226–255. doi:  10.1002/tesq.169
    https://doi.org/10.1002/tesq.169 [Google Scholar]
  28. Labov, W., & Waletzky, J.
    (1967) Narrative analysis: Oral versions of personal experience. InJ. Helm (Ed.), Essays on the Verbal and Visual Arts. Seattle, WA, USA: University of Washington Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  29. Leudar, I., & Nekvapil, J.
    (2011) Practical historians and adversaries: 9/11 revisited. Discourse & Society, 22(1), 66–85. doi:  10.1177/0957926510382840
    https://doi.org/10.1177/0957926510382840 [Google Scholar]
  30. Lynch, M.
    (2017) Garfinkel, Sacks and Formal Structures: Collaborative origins, divergences and the vexed unity of ethnomethodology and conversation analysis. Keynote address atIIEMCA 2017: A Half-Century of Studies, International Institute for Ethnomethodology and Conversation Analysis, Westerville, OH, USA, 10.–13. 7. 2017. Available from: https://radicalethno.org/documents/lynchbanquet.pdf (accessed on11. 11. 2017)
  31. McAdams, D. P.
    (1993) The Stories We Live By: Personal Myths and the Making of the Self. New York, NY, USA / London, United Kingdom: Guilford Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  32. Mlynář, J.
    (2015) Malach Center for Visual History. InJ. Hlaváčová (Ed.), Sborník Semináře o digitálních zdrojích a službách ve společenských a humanitních vědách (WDH 2015) (pp.83–89). Prague, Czech Republic: Charles University.
    [Google Scholar]
  33. Mondada, L.
    (2006) Video recording as the reflexive preservation and configuration of phenomenal features for analysis. InH. Knoblauch, J. Raab, J. H.-G. Soeffner & B. Schnettler (Eds.), Video Analysis (pp.51–68). Bern: Peter Lang.
    [Google Scholar]
  34. Mondada, L., Svensson, H., & Van Schepen, N.
    (2015) ‘Why that not now’: participants’ orientations towards several organizational layers in social interaction. Bulletin suisse de linguistique appliquée, (101), 51–71.
    [Google Scholar]
  35. Olick, J. K., & Robbins, J.
    (1998) Social Memory Studies: From ‘Collective Memory’ to the Historical Sociology of Mnemonic Practices. Annual Review of Sociology, 24, 105–140. doi:  10.1146/annurev.soc.24.1.105
    https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.soc.24.1.105 [Google Scholar]
  36. Ricoeur, P.
    (1983) Time and Narrative I. Chicago, IL, USA: University of Chicago Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  37. (1985) Time and Narrative III. Chicago, IL, USA: University of Chicago Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  38. Ryave, A. L.
    (1978) On the achievement of a series of stories. InJ. Schenkein (Ed.), Studies in the Organization of Conversational Interaction (pp.113–132). New York, NY, USA: Academic Press. 10.1016/B978‑0‑12‑623550‑0.50011‑2
    https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-623550-0.50011-2 [Google Scholar]
  39. Sacks, H.
    (1992) Lectures on Conversation I–II. Oxford, United Kingdom: Blackwell.
    [Google Scholar]
  40. Sacks, H., Schegloff, E. A., & Jefferson, G.
    (1974) A Simplest Systematics for the Organization of Turn-Taking in Conversation. Language, 50(4, 1), 696–735. doi:  10.2307/412243
    https://doi.org/10.2307/412243 [Google Scholar]
  41. Schegloff, E. A.
    (1990) On the organization of sequences as a source of ‘coherence’ in talk-in-interaction. InB. Dorval (Ed.): Conversational organization and its development (pp.51–78). Norwood, NY, USA: Ablex.
    [Google Scholar]
  42. (1997) ‘Narrative analysis’ thirty years later. Journal of Narrative and Life History, 7(1–4), 97–106. doi:  10.1075/jnlh.7.11nar
    https://doi.org/10.1075/jnlh.7.11nar [Google Scholar]
  43. (2007) Sequence Organization in Interaction: A Primer in Conversation Analysis, Volume1. New York, NY, USA: Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/CBO9780511791208
    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511791208 [Google Scholar]
  44. Sidnell, J.
    (2010) Conversation Analysis: An Introduction. Chichester, United Kingdom: Wiley-Blackwell.
    [Google Scholar]
  45. Silverman, D.
    (1998) Harvey Sacks: Social science and conversation analysis. Cambridge, United Kingdom: Polity Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  46. Stokoe, E., & Edwards, D.
    (2006) Story formulations in talk-in-interaction. Narrative Inquiry, 16(1), 56–65. doi:  10.1075/ni.16.1.09sto
    https://doi.org/10.1075/ni.16.1.09sto [Google Scholar]
  47. Thomson, A.
    (2007) Four Paradigm Transformations in Oral History. The Oral History Review, 34(1), 49–70. 10.1525/ohr.2007.34.1.49
    https://doi.org/10.1525/ohr.2007.34.1.49 [Google Scholar]
  48. USC Shoah Foundation
    USC Shoah Foundation (2012) Interviewer Guidelines. Available from: https://sfi.usc.edu/sites/default/files/docfiles/USCSF_Interviewer_Guidelines_Oct%202012.pdf (accessed on19. 2. 2018)
    [Google Scholar]
  49. Watson, R.
    (2008) Comparative Sociology, Laic and Analytic: Some Critical Remarks on Comparison in Conversation Analysis. Cahiers de praxématique, 50, 203–244.
    [Google Scholar]
  50. White, H.
    (1973) Metahistory: The Historical Imagination in Nineteenth-Century Europe. Baltimore, MD, USA / London, United Kingdom: The Johns Hopkins University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  51. Zimmerman, D. E., & Pollner, M.
    (1970) The Everyday World as a Phenomenon. InJ. D. Douglas (Ed.), Understanding Everyday Life: Toward the Reconstruction of Sociological Knowledge (pp.80–103). Chicago, IL, USA: Aldine.
    [Google Scholar]
http://instance.metastore.ingenta.com/content/journals/10.1075/ni.18020.mly
Loading
/content/journals/10.1075/ni.18020.mly
Loading

Data & Media loading...

  • Article Type: Research Article
Keyword(s): conversation analysis , ethnomethodology , oral history , storytelling , temporality and time
This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was successful
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error