Volume 30, Issue 2
  • ISSN 1387-6740
  • E-ISSN: 1569-9935
Buy:$35.00 + Taxes



This paper looks at two highly prevalent actions in naturally-occurring talk: stance-taking and storytelling. Stance-taking and storytelling have been shown to co-occur often (e.g. Siromaa, 2012), and this is especially the case in reading group talk, a discursive environment in which speakers are engaged in the joint enterprise of assessing the meaning and quality of a shared object: a written narrative text (e.g. a novel). Insights from conversation analysis and dialogic syntax are used to analyse interactional data from several reading group meetings, with a focus on the types of storytelling that are found in this talk, the relationship between the various stories told in sequence in the talk – including the relationship between the written narrative text and the spoken narratives, and the ways in which stance-taking and storytelling are intertwined.


Article metrics loading...

Loading full text...

Full text loading...


  1. Adichie, C. N.
    (2013) Americanah. New York: A. A. Knopf.
    [Google Scholar]
  2. Allington, D., & Swann, J.
    (2009) Researching literary reading as social practice. Language and Literature, 18(3), 219–230. 10.1177/0963947009105850
    https://doi.org/10.1177/0963947009105850 [Google Scholar]
  3. Anward, J.
    (2004) Lexeme recycled. How categories emerge from interaction. Logos and Language, 5(2), 31–46.
    [Google Scholar]
  4. Benwell, B.
    (2009) ‘A pathetic and racist and awful character’: ethnomethodological approaches to the reception of diasporic fiction. Language and Literature, 18(3), 300–315. 10.1177/0963947009105855
    https://doi.org/10.1177/0963947009105855 [Google Scholar]
  5. (2012) Common-sense anti-racism in book group talk: the role of reported speech. Discourse & Society, 23(4), 356–376. 10.1177/0957926512441106
    https://doi.org/10.1177/0957926512441106 [Google Scholar]
  6. Biber, D., Johansson, S., Leech, G., Conrad, S., & Finegan, E.
    (1999) The Longman grammar of spoken and written English. London: Longman.
    [Google Scholar]
  7. Bolden, G. B., & Mandelbaum, J.
    (2017) The use of conversational co-remembering to corroborate contentious claims. Discourse Studies, 19(1), 3–29. 10.1177/1461445616683593
    https://doi.org/10.1177/1461445616683593 [Google Scholar]
  8. Bruner, J.
    (1986) Actual minds, possible worlds. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  9. Chaucer, G.
    (2008) The riverside Chaucer (3rd ed.). F. N. Robinson (Ed.). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  10. Coates, J.
    (2001) “My mind is with you”: story sequences in the talk of male friends. Narrative Inquiry, 11(1), 81–101. 10.1075/ni.11.1.04coa
    https://doi.org/10.1075/ni.11.1.04coa [Google Scholar]
  11. Collinson, I.
    (2009) Everyday readers: reading and popular culture. London: Equinox. 10.1558/isbn.9781845533557
    https://doi.org/10.1558/isbn.9781845533557 [Google Scholar]
  12. Du Bois, J. W.
    (2007) The stance triangle. InR. Englebretson (Ed.), Stancetaking in discourse: subjectivity, evaluation, interaction (pp.139–182). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 10.1075/pbns.164.07du
    https://doi.org/10.1075/pbns.164.07du [Google Scholar]
  13. (2014) Towards a dialogic syntax. Cognitive Linguistics, 25(3), 359–410. 10.1515/cog‑2014‑0024
    https://doi.org/10.1515/cog-2014-0024 [Google Scholar]
  14. Du Bois, J. W., & Giora, R.
    (2014) From cognitive-functional linguistics to dialogic syntax. Cognitive Linguistics, 25(3), 351–357. 10.1515/cog‑2014‑0023
    https://doi.org/10.1515/cog-2014-0023 [Google Scholar]
  15. Goodwin, M. H.
    (1990) He-Said-She-Said: Talk as social organization among black children. Bloomington, IN: Indiana University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  16. Haddington, P.
    (2004) Stance taking in news interviews. SKY Journal of Linguistics, 17, 101–142.
    [Google Scholar]
  17. Hartley, J.
    (2002) The reading groups book: 2002–2003 edition. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  18. Helisten, M.
    (2017) Resumptions as multimodal achievements in conversational (story)tellings. Journal of Pragmatics, 112(1), 1–19. 10.1016/j.pragma.2017.01.014
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2017.01.014 [Google Scholar]
  19. Hutchby, I., & Wooffitt, R.
    (2008) Conversation analysis. Cambridge: Polity Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  20. Jefferson, G.
    (1978) Sequential aspects of storytelling in conversation. InJ. Schenkein (Ed.), Studies in the organization of conversation (pp.219–248). New York: Academic Press. 10.1016/B978‑0‑12‑623550‑0.50016‑1
    https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-623550-0.50016-1 [Google Scholar]
  21. (1996) On the poetics of ordinary talk. Text and Performance Quarterly, 16(1), 1–61. 10.1080/10462939609366132
    https://doi.org/10.1080/10462939609366132 [Google Scholar]
  22. Kingsolver, B.
    (2012) Flight behaviour. London: Harper Collins.
    [Google Scholar]
  23. Labov, W.
    (1972) Language in the inner city: studies in the Black English vernacular. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  24. Long, E.
    (1992) Textual interpretation as collective action. InJ. Boyrain (Ed.), The Ethnography of Reading (pp.180–211). Berkeley: University of California Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  25. (2003) Book clubs: women and the uses of reading in everyday life. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  26. (2004) Literature as a spur to collective action: the diverse perspectives of nineteenth and twentieth-century reading groups. Poetics Today, 25(2), 335–359. 10.1215/03335372‑25‑2‑335
    https://doi.org/10.1215/03335372-25-2-335 [Google Scholar]
  27. Mills, M.
    (1998) The restraint of beasts. London: Bloomsbury.
    [Google Scholar]
  28. Nir, B., Dori-Hacohen, G., & Maschler, Y.
    (2013) Formulations on Israeli talk radio: from actions and sequences to stance via dialogic syntax. Discourse Studies, 16(4), 534–571. 10.1177/1461445613519525
    https://doi.org/10.1177/1461445613519525 [Google Scholar]
  29. Nissi, R.
    (2013) Decrypting the text: the construction and function of disagreement in Bible study sessions. Text & Talk, 33(6), 771–791. 10.1515/text‑2013‑0033
    https://doi.org/10.1515/text-2013-0033 [Google Scholar]
  30. Norrick, N.
    (2005) Interactional remembering in conversational narrative. Journal of Pragmatics, 37(11), 1819–1844. 10.1016/j.pragma.2005.04.005
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2005.04.005 [Google Scholar]
  31. (2011) Conversational recipe telling. Journal of Pragmatics, 43, 2740–2761. 10.1016/j.pragma.2011.04.010
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2011.04.010 [Google Scholar]
  32. Peplow, D.
    (2016) Talk about books: a study of reading groups. London: Bloomsbury.
    [Google Scholar]
  33. Peplow, D., Swann, J., Trimarco, P., & Whiteley, S.
    (2016) Reading group discourse: integrating cognitive and sociocultural perspectives. London: Routledge.
    [Google Scholar]
  34. Pomerantz, A.
    (1984) Agreeing and disagreeing with assessments: some features of preferred/dispreferred turn shapes. InJ. M. Atkinson & J. Heritage (Eds.), Structures of social action: studies in conversation analysis (pp.57–101). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  35. Procter, J., & Benwell, B.
    (2014) Reading across worlds: transnational book groups and the reception of difference. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
    [Google Scholar]
  36. Radway, J. A.
    (1987) Reading the romance: women, patriarchy, and popular culture. London: Verso.
    [Google Scholar]
  37. (1997) A feeling for books: the book-of-the-month club, literary taste, and middle-class desire. Chapel Hill: University of North Carolina Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  38. Riessmann, C.
    (1993) Narrative analysis. London: SAGE.
    [Google Scholar]
  39. Sacks, H.
    (1974) An analysis of the course of a joke’s telling in conversation. InR. Bauman & J. F. Sherzer (Eds.), Explorations in the ethnography of speaking (pp.337–353). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  40. (1978) Some technical considerations of a dirty joke. InJ. Schenkein (Ed.), Studies in the organization of conversation (pp.249–269). New York: Academic Press. 10.1016/B978‑0‑12‑623550‑0.50017‑3
    https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-623550-0.50017-3 [Google Scholar]
  41. (1995) Lectures on conversation (Vols.1–2). G. Jefferson (Ed.). Oxford: Blackwell. 10.1002/9781444328301
    https://doi.org/10.1002/9781444328301 [Google Scholar]
  42. Sakita, T. I.
    (2006) Parallelism in conversation: resonance, schematization, and extension from the perspective of dialogic syntax and cognitive linguistics. Pragmatics & Cognition, 14(3), 467–500. 10.1075/pc.14.3.03sak
    https://doi.org/10.1075/pc.14.3.03sak [Google Scholar]
  43. Selting, M.
    (2012) Complaint stories and subsequent complaint stories with affect displays. Journal of Pragmatics, 44(4), 387–415. 10.1016/j.pragma.2012.01.005
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2012.01.005 [Google Scholar]
  44. Siromaa, M.
    (2012) Resonance in conversational second stories: a dialogic resource for stance taking. Text and Talk, 32(4), 525–545. 10.1515/text‑2012‑0025
    https://doi.org/10.1515/text-2012-0025 [Google Scholar]
  45. Stivers, T.
    (2008) Stance, alignment, and affiliation during storytelling: when nodding is a token of affiliation. Research on Language and Social Interaction, 41(1), 31–57. 10.1080/08351810701691123
    https://doi.org/10.1080/08351810701691123 [Google Scholar]
  46. Svennevig, J.
    (2003) Echo answers in native/non-native interaction. Pragmatics, 13(2), 285–309. 10.1075/prag.13.2.04sve
    https://doi.org/10.1075/prag.13.2.04sve [Google Scholar]
  47. Swann, J., & Allington, D.
    (2009) Reading groups and the language of literary texts: a case study in social reading. Language and Literature, 18(3), 247–264. 10.1177/0963947009105852
    https://doi.org/10.1177/0963947009105852 [Google Scholar]
  48. Tannen, D.
    (1987) Repetition in conversation: towards a poetics of talk. Language, 63(3), 574–605. 10.2307/415006
    https://doi.org/10.2307/415006 [Google Scholar]
  49. Whiteley, S.
    (2011) Text world theory, real readers and emotional responses to The Remains of the Day. Language and Literature, 20(1), 23–42. 10.1177/0963947010377950
    https://doi.org/10.1177/0963947010377950 [Google Scholar]

Data & Media loading...

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was successful
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error