Grammatical uniformity of tense and aspect

References

1. Andrews, E.
   (2012) Markedness. InR. I. Binnick (Ed.), The Oxford Handbook of Tense and Aspect (pp.212–236). New York: Oxford University Press.
   [Google Scholar]
2. Bal, M.
   (1985) Narratology: Introduction to the Theory of Narrative. Toronto: University of Toronto Press.
   [Google Scholar]
3. Barthes, R.
   (1975) An Introduction to the Structural Analysis of Narrative. (L. Duisit, Trans.). New Literary History: A Journal of Theory and Interpretation, 6(2), 237–72. 10.2307/468419
   https://doi.org/10.2307/468419 [Google Scholar]
4. Carruthers, J.
   (2012) Discourse and Text. InR. I. Binnick (Ed.), The Oxford Handbook of Tense and Aspect (pp.306–334). New York: Oxford University Press.
   [Google Scholar]
5. Damsteegt, T.
   (2004) The Present Tense in Modern Hindi Fiction. Groningen: Egbert Forsten.
   [Google Scholar]
6. Demirdache, H., & Uribe-Etxebarria, M.
   (2000) The Primitives of Temporal Relations. InR. Martin, D. Michaels & J. Uriagereka (Eds.), Step by Step: Essays on Minimalist Syntax in Honor of Howard Lasnik (pp.157–186). Cambridge: MIT Press.
   [Google Scholar]
7. Fleischman, S.
   (1990) Tense and Narrativity from Medieval Performance to Modern Fiction. Austin: University of Texas Press.
   [Google Scholar]
8. Fludernik, M.
   (1991) The Historical Present Tense Yet Again: Tense Switching and Narrative Dynamics in Oral and Quasi-Oral Storytelling. Text, 11(3), 365–98. 10.1515/text.1.1991.11.3.365
   https://doi.org/10.1515/text.1.1991.11.3.365 [Google Scholar]
9. Fludernik, M.
   (2003) Chronology, time, tense and experientiality in narrative. Language and Literature, 12(2), 117–134. 10.1177/0963947003012002295
   https://doi.org/10.1177/0963947003012002295 [Google Scholar]
10. Fludernik, M.
    (2012) Narratology and Literary Linguistics. InR. I. Binnick (Ed.), The Oxford Handbook of Tense and Aspect (pp.75–101). New York: Oxford University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
11. Genette, G.
    (1980) Narrative Discourse: An Essay in Method. Ithaca, New York: Cornell University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
12. Hopper, P. J.
    (1979) Aspect and Foregrounding in Discourse. InT. Givon (Ed.), Syntax and Semantics, Volume 12 Discourse and Syntax (pp.213–241). London: Academic Press.
    [Google Scholar]
13. Hornstein, N.
    (1990) As Time Goes By: Tense and Universal Grammar. Massachusetts Institute of Technology, 119–165.
    [Google Scholar]
14. Labov, W.
    (1973) Narrative Analysis: Oral Versions of Personal Experience. InJ. Helm (Ed.), Essays on Verbal and Visual Arts (pp.12–44). Seattle and London: University of Washington Press.
    [Google Scholar]
15. Norrick, N.
    (2007) Conversational storytelling. InD. Herman (Ed.), The Cambridge Companion to Narrative (pp.127–141). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/CCOL0521856965.009
    https://doi.org/10.1017/CCOL0521856965.009 [Google Scholar]
16. Reichenbach, H.
    (1947) Elements of Symbolic Logic. New York: Macmillan.
    [Google Scholar]
17. Rusva, M. H.
    (1987) Umrao Jān Adā. Delhi: Maqtaba Jamiya.
    [Google Scholar]
18. Schiffrin, D.
    (1981) Tense variation in narrative. Language, 57, 45–62. 10.1353/lan.1981.0011
    https://doi.org/10.1353/lan.1981.0011 [Google Scholar]
19. Smith, C.
    (1993) The Parameter of Aspect. Dordrecht: Kluwer.
    [Google Scholar]
20. Smith, C.
    (2003) Modes of Discourse. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/CBO9780511615108
    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511615108 [Google Scholar]
21. Thornborrow, J.
    (2000) The Construction of Conflicting Accounts in Public Participation TV. Language in Society, 29, 357–77. 10.1017/S004740450000302X
    https://doi.org/10.1017/S004740450000302X [Google Scholar]
22. Wallace, S.
    (1982) Figure and Ground: The Interrelationship of Linguistic Categories. InP. Hopper (Ed.), Studies in Transitivity (pp.201–223). New York: Academic Press.
    [Google Scholar]
23. Wolfson, N.
    (1982) The conversational Historical Present in American English narrative (Topics in Socio-Linguistics). Dordrecht: Foris. 10.1515/9783110851694
    https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110851694 [Google Scholar]