1887
Volume 29, Issue 2
  • ISSN 1387-6740
  • E-ISSN: 1569-9935
USD
Buy:$35.00 + Taxes

Abstract

Abstract

This article studies the use of literature and narrative strategies of online antifeminist movements. These movements classified under the umbrella term , wage ideological narrative warfare to endorse a misogynistic worldview. The case at hand concentrates on the radical faction of neomasculinity and its attempts to reinterpret the Western canon of literature. I propose that neomasculine readings of novels such as Vladimir Nabokov’s are careless interpretations that ground themselves on specific traits of the texts while ignoring others. These readings attempt to evoke a sense of recognition in the community that believes in an alleged feminist conspiracy against men. Careless interpretations borrow from post-truth rhetoric and the feminist literary theory tradition of reading against the grain. When confronted over their controversial views, neomasculine figures renarrativize readings to benefit the promotion of neomasculine perspectives. This strategic use of literature is part of the narrative warfare discussed in detail.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1075/ni.19019.nur
2019-10-16
2019-12-14
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. About
    About (2019) Return of Kings. [Blog post] Retrieved fromwww.returnofkings.com/about
    [Google Scholar]
  2. Allan, J. A.
    (2016) Phallic affect, or why men’s rights activists have feelings. Men and Masculinities, 19(1), 22–41. 10.1177/1097184X15574338
    https://doi.org/10.1177/1097184X15574338 [Google Scholar]
  3. Anna Karenina is one of the earliest examples of red pill truth (2014a, May13). Return of Kings. [Blog post] Retrieved fromwww.returnofkings.com/34204/anna-karenina-is-one-of-the-earliest-examples-of-red-pill-truth
    [Google Scholar]
  4. Arendt, H.
    (2006) Between past and future: Eight exercises in political thought. London: Penguin. (Original work published 1961.)
    [Google Scholar]
  5. Crenshaw, K.
    (1991) Mapping the margins: Intersectionality, identity politics, and violence against women of color. Stanford Law Review, 43(6), 1241–1299. 10.2307/1229039
    https://doi.org/10.2307/1229039 [Google Scholar]
  6. Culler, J.
    (1975) Structuralist poetics: Structuralism, linguistics and the study of literature. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul. 10.4324/9780203449769
    https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203449769 [Google Scholar]
  7. De Fina, A., & Toscano Gore, B.
    (2017) Online retellings and the viral transformation of a Twitter breakup story. Narrative Inquiry, 27(2), 235–260. doi:  10.1075/ni.27.2.03def
    https://doi.org/10.1075/ni.27.2.03def [Google Scholar]
  8. Dostoyevsky and the narcissistic roots of insecurity (2015, February5). Return of Kings. [Blog post] Retrieved fromwww.returnofkings.com/54487/dostoyevsky-and-the-narcissistic-roots-of-insecurity
    [Google Scholar]
  9. Felski, R.
    (2003) Literature after feminism. Chicago/London: The University of Chicago Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  10. (2008) Uses of literature. Malden, MA/Oxford: Blackwell Publishing. 10.1002/9781444302790
    https://doi.org/10.1002/9781444302790 [Google Scholar]
  11. Fetterley, J.
    (1978) The resisting reader. A feminist approach to American fiction. Bloomington, IN: Indiana University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  12. Fish, S.
    (1980) Is there a text in this class? The authority of interpretive communities. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  13. Ging, D.
    (2017) Alphas, betas, and incels: Theorizing the masculinities of the manosphere. Men and Masculinities, 1–20. doi:  10.1177/1097184X17706401
    https://doi.org/10.1177/1097184X17706401 [Google Scholar]
  14. Ging, D., & Siapera, E.
    (2018) Special issue on online misogyny. Feminist Media Studies, 18(4), 515–524. doi:  10.1080/14680777.2018.1447345
    https://doi.org/10.1080/14680777.2018.1447345 [Google Scholar]
  15. Gotell, L., & Dutton, E.
    (2016) Sexual violence in the ‘manosphere’: Antifeminist men’s rights discourses on rape. International Journal for Crime, Justice and Social Democracy, 5(2), 65–80. 10.5204/ijcjsd.v5i2.310
    https://doi.org/10.5204/ijcjsd.v5i2.310 [Google Scholar]
  16. Guyer, S.
    (2013) The ends of misreading: Propaganda, democracy, literature. InJ. Auerbach & E. Castronovo (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of propaganda studies (pp.366–377). New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  17. Hyvönen, A.-E.
    (2018) Careless speech: Conceptualizing post-truth politics. New Perspectives, 26(3), 1–25.
    [Google Scholar]
  18. 9 important lessons from a Clockwork Orange (2017, November27). Return of Kings. [Blog post] Retrieved fromwww.returnofkings.com/138016/9-important-lessons-from-a-clockwork-orange
    [Google Scholar]
  19. 8 important lessons from the classic novel Lolita (2017, November7). Return of Kings. [Blog post] Retrieved fromwww.returnofkings.com/134210/8-important-lessons-from-the-classic-novel-lolita
    [Google Scholar]
  20. Jane, E.
    (2017) Systemic misogyny exposed: Translating rapeglish from the manosphere with a random rape threat generator. International Journal of Cultural Studies, 1–20. doi:  10.1177/1367877917734042
    https://doi.org/10.1177/1367877917734042 [Google Scholar]
  21. Kelly, A.
    (2017) The alt-right: Reactionary rehabilitation for white masculinity. Soundings: A Journal of Politics and Culture, 66, 68–78. 10.3898/136266217821733688
    https://doi.org/10.3898/136266217821733688 [Google Scholar]
  22. Marwick, A. E., & Lewis, R.
    (2017) Media manipulation and disinformation online. Data & Society Research Institute.
    [Google Scholar]
  23. Marwick, A. E., & Caplan, R.
    (2018) Drinking male tears: Language, the manosphere, and networked harassment. Feminist Media Studies, 18(4), 543–559. 10.1080/14680777.2018.1450568
    https://doi.org/10.1080/14680777.2018.1450568 [Google Scholar]
  24. Millett, K.
    (1970) Sexual politics. New York: Doubleday.
    [Google Scholar]
  25. Nagle, A.
    (2017) Kill all normies. Online culture wars from 4chan and Tumblr to Trump and the alt-right. Winchester: Zero Books.
    [Google Scholar]
  26. Nurminen, M.
    (2020) “The big bang of chaotic masculine disruption”: A critical narrative analysis of radical masculinity movement’s counter-narrative strategies. InK. Lueg & M. Lundholt (Eds.), The Routledge handbook of counter-narratives. London/New York: Routledge. Manuscript submitted for publication.
    [Google Scholar]
  27. O’Neill, R.
    (2018) Seduction. Men, masculinity and mediated intimacy. Medford, MA: Polity.
    [Google Scholar]
  28. Piekut, A.
    (2017) “Brown eyes are not the same as blue eyes.” Educational narratives, identities and positioning in adult education in Denmark. Narrative Inquiry, 27(2), 381–400. 10.1075/ni.27.2.09pie
    https://doi.org/10.1075/ni.27.2.09pie [Google Scholar]
  29. Presser, L.
    (2018) Inside story: How narratives drive mass harm. Oakland, CA: University of California Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  30. Salmon, C.
    (2010) Storytelling: Bewitching the modern mind. (D. Macey, Trans.). London: Verso.
    [Google Scholar]
  31. Saresma, T.
    (2017) Fictitious memories of the nostalgic past: Racialised gender melancholy in the manosphere. InM. Mikula (Ed.), Remembering home in a time of mobility: Memory, nostalgia and melancholy (pp.151–165). Cambridge: Cambridge Scholars Publishing.
    [Google Scholar]
  32. Suiter, J.
    (2016) Post-truth politics. Political Insight, 7(3), 25–27. 10.1177/2041905816680417
    https://doi.org/10.1177/2041905816680417 [Google Scholar]
  33. Valizadeh, D.
    (2014, May28). Elliot Rodger is the first male feminist mass murderer. Return of Kings. [Blog post] Retrieved fromwww.returnofkings.com/36397/elliot-rodger-is-the-first-male-feminist-mass-murderer
    [Google Scholar]
  34. (2015a, February16). How to stop rape. Roosh V. [Blog post] Retrieved fromhttps://www.rooshv.com/how-to-stop-rape
    [Google Scholar]
  35. (2015b, June8). Narrative warfare. Roosh V. [Blog post] Retrieved fromhttps://www.rooshv.com/narrative-warfare
    [Google Scholar]
  36. Warhol-Down, R., & Price Herndl, D.
    (Eds.) (2009) Feminisms redux: An anthology of literary theory and criticism. New Brunswick, NJ: Rutgers University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  37. Wendling, M.
    (2019, March18). Christchurch shootings: The rising new threat of far-right violence. BBC. Retrieved fromhttps://www.bbc.com/news/blogs-trending-47596446
    [Google Scholar]
  38. Zuckerberg, D.
    (2018) Not all dead white men. Classics and misogyny in digital age. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press. 10.4159/9780674989801
    https://doi.org/10.4159/9780674989801 [Google Scholar]
http://instance.metastore.ingenta.com/content/journals/10.1075/ni.19019.nur
Loading
  • Article Type: Research Article
Keyword(s): antifeminism , instrumental narratives , literary canon , manosphere , post-truth and resistant reading
This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was successful
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error