1887
Volume 29, Issue 2
  • ISSN 1387-6740
  • E-ISSN: 1569-9935
USD
Buy:$35.00 + Taxes

Abstract

Abstract

The article presents a method for studying the factuality of narrative as a rhetoric. The need for such a method is apparent in the so-called post-truth climate, which sees us witnessing debates about semantic chimeras like “alternative facts” and “fake news.” The article arrives at its method by tackling challenges arising both in narrative theory and in fictionality studies. This involves developing models that let us take into account both the effects of local discursive features and the “macrogeneric” and “generic” frames guiding expectations about how communication is meant to work. The method is used in analysis of one of the controversial stories by the journalist Claas Relotius, who is currently being investigated in the forgery scandal of the magazine .

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1075/ni.19024.bjo
2019-10-16
2020-09-26
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. Adam, J.-M.
    (1985) Quels types de textes ? (What kinds of text ?). Français dans le Monde, (192), 39–43.
    [Google Scholar]
  2. Arendt, H.
    (2006) Between past and future: Eight exercises in political thought. New York: Penguin.
    [Google Scholar]
  3. Barthes, R.
    (1986) The rustle of language. (R. Howard, Trans.). Berkeley: University of California Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  4. Bender, J. B.
    (2012) Ends of enlightenment. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  5. Cohn, D.
    (1999) The distinction of fiction. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  6. Currie, G.
    (1990) The nature of fiction. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/CBO9780511897498
    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511897498 [Google Scholar]
  7. Dällenbach, L.
    (1989) The mirror in the text. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  8. Davis, L. J.
    (1997) Factual fictions: The origins of the English novel. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  9. Dawson, P.
    (2015) Ten theses against fictionality. Narrative, 23(1), 74–100. 10.1353/nar.2015.0006
    https://doi.org/10.1353/nar.2015.0006 [Google Scholar]
  10. Fichtner, U.
    (2018, December20). Reporter forgery: Der Spiegel reveals internal fraud. Spiegel online. Retrieved fromwww.spiegel.de/international/zeitgeist/claas-relotius-reporter-forgery-scandal-a-1244755.html
    [Google Scholar]
  11. Fludernik, M.
    (1996) Towards a “natural” narratology. London/New York: Routledge. 10.4324/9780203432501
    https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203432501 [Google Scholar]
  12. (2000) Genres, text types, or discourse modes? Narrative modalities and generic categorization. Style, 34(2), 274–292.
    [Google Scholar]
  13. (2013) Factual narrative: A missing narratological paradigm. Germanisch-Romanische Monatsschrift, 63(1), 117–134.
    [Google Scholar]
  14. (2018) The fiction of the rise of fictionality. Poetics Today, 39(1), 67–92. 10.1215/03335372‑4265071
    https://doi.org/10.1215/03335372-4265071 [Google Scholar]
  15. Gallagher, C.
    (2006) The rise of fictionality. InF. Moretti (Ed.), The novel (pp.336–363). Princeton: Princeton University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  16. Gjerlevsen, S. Z.
    (2016) A novel history of fictionality. Narrative, 24(2), 174–189. 10.1353/nar.2016.0008
    https://doi.org/10.1353/nar.2016.0008 [Google Scholar]
  17. Harshaw, B.
    (1984) Fictionality and fields of reference: Remarks on a theoretical framework. Poetics Today, 5(2), 227–251. 10.2307/1771931
    https://doi.org/10.2307/1771931 [Google Scholar]
  18. Hatavara, M., & Mildorf, J.
    (2017) Fictionality, narrative modes, and vicarious storytelling. Style, 51(3), 391–408.
    [Google Scholar]
  19. Herman, D.
    (1999) Narratologies: New perspectives on narrative analysis. Columbus: Ohio State University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  20. (2009) Basic elements of narrative. Chichester: Wiley-Blackwell. 10.1002/9781444305920
    https://doi.org/10.1002/9781444305920 [Google Scholar]
  21. Hollowell, J.
    (1977) Fact & fiction: The new journalism and the nonfiction novel. Chapel Hill: University of North Carolina Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  22. Hyvönen, A.-E.
    (2018) Careless speech: Conceptualizing post-truth politics. New Perspectives, 26(3), 31–55.
    [Google Scholar]
  23. Lamarque, P.
    (2014) The opacity of narrative. London: Rowman & Littlefield.
    [Google Scholar]
  24. Mäkelä, M.
    (2018) Lessons from the Dangers of narrative project: Toward a story-critical narratology. Tekstualia, 1(4), 175–186.
    [Google Scholar]
  25. Mulligan, K. & Correia, F.
    (2017) Facts. InThe Stanford encyclopedia of philosophy (Winter 2017 Ed.), E. N. Zalta (Ed.). Retrieved fromhttps://plato.stanford.edu/archives/win2017/entries/facts/
    [Google Scholar]
  26. Nielsen, H. S., & Gjerlevsen, S. Z.
    (In press.) Distinguishing fictionality. InC. Maagaard, M. W. Lundholt, & D. Schäbler Eds. Fictionality and factuality: Blurred borders in narrations of identity. Odense: University Press of Southern Denmark.
    [Google Scholar]
  27. Nielsen, H. S., Phelan, J., & Walsh, R.
    (2015) Ten theses about fictionality. Narrative, 23(1), 61–73. 10.1353/nar.2015.0005
    https://doi.org/10.1353/nar.2015.0005 [Google Scholar]
  28. Phelan, J.
    (1996) Narrative as rhetoric: Technique, audiences, ethics, ideology. Columbus: Ohio State University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  29. (2005) Living to tell about it: A rhetoric and ethics of character narration. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  30. Poovey, M.
    (1998) History of the modern fact. Chicago: University of Chicago Press. 10.7208/chicago/9780226675183.001.0001
    https://doi.org/10.7208/chicago/9780226675183.001.0001 [Google Scholar]
  31. Relotius, C.
    (2016a, July14). Refugees: Syrian orphans toil away in factories in Turkey. Der Spiegel, Retrieved fromwww.spiegel.de/international/world/refugees-syrian-orphans-toil-away-in-factories-in-turkey-a-1102610.html
    [Google Scholar]
  32. (2016b, July9). Schicksale: Königskinder. Der Spiegel. Retrieved fromwww.spiegel.de/spiegel/print/d-145742868.html
    [Google Scholar]
  33. Searle, J. R.
    (1975) The logical status of fictional discourse. New Literary History, 6(2), 319–332. 10.2307/468422
    https://doi.org/10.2307/468422 [Google Scholar]
  34. Sternberg, M.
    (2003) Universals of narrative and their cognitivist fortunes (I). Poetics Today, 24(2), 297–395. 10.1215/03335372‑24‑2‑297
    https://doi.org/10.1215/03335372-24-2-297 [Google Scholar]
  35. (2010) Narrativity: From objectivist to functional paradigm. Poetics Today, 31(3), 507–659. 10.1215/03335372‑2010‑004
    https://doi.org/10.1215/03335372-2010-004 [Google Scholar]
  36. Walsh, R.
    (2007) The rhetoric of fictionality: Narrative theory and the idea of fiction. Columbus: Ohio State University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  37. Werlich, E.
    (1975) Typologie der Texte: Entwurf eines textlinguistischen Modells zur Grundlegung einer Textgrammatik. Heidelberg: Quelle & Meyer.
    [Google Scholar]
  38. Wolfe, T., & Johnson, E. W.
    (1973) The new journalism: With an anthology. New York: Harper and Row.
    [Google Scholar]
http://instance.metastore.ingenta.com/content/journals/10.1075/ni.19024.bjo
Loading
  • Article Type: Research Article
Keyword(s): discourse functions , factuality , feature journalism , fictionality , macrogeneric frames and narrative
This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was successful
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error