1887
Volume 29, Issue 2
  • ISSN 1387-6740
  • E-ISSN: 1569-9935
USD
Buy:$35.00 + Taxes
Preview this article:
Zoom in
Zoomout

Real fictions, Page 1 of 1

| /docserver/preview/fulltext/ni.19025.bro-1.gif

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1075/ni.19025.bro
2019-10-16
2020-01-24
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. Andersson, G.
    (2016) The charge against classical and post-classical narratologies’ “Epistemic” approach to literary fiction. InM. Hatavara, M. Hyvärinen, M. Mäkelä, & F. Mäyrä (Eds.), Narrative theory, literature, and new media. Narrative minds and virtual worlds (pp.50–66). New York/London: Routledge.
    [Google Scholar]
  2. Andersson, G. & Sandberg, T.
    (2018) Sameness versus difference in narratology: Two approaches to narrative fiction. Narrative, 26(3), 241–261. 10.1353/nar.2018.0012
    https://doi.org/10.1353/nar.2018.0012 [Google Scholar]
  3. Andrews, M.
    (2014) Narrating moments of political change. InP. Nesbitt-Larking, C. Kinnvall, & T. Capelos (Eds.), The Palgrave handbook of global political psychology (pp.353–368). London: Palgrave Macmillan. 10.1007/978‑1‑137‑29118‑9_20
    https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-137-29118-9_20 [Google Scholar]
  4. Austin, J. L.
    (1975) How to do things with words (2nd ed.). Oxford: Oxford University Press. 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780198245537.001.0001
    https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780198245537.001.0001 [Google Scholar]
  5. Ball, J.
    (2017) Post-truth: How bullshit conquered the world. London: Biteback Publishing.
    [Google Scholar]
  6. Banfield, A.
    (1982) Unspeakable sentences: Narration and representation in the language of fiction. Abingdon/New York: Routledge & Kenan Paul.
    [Google Scholar]
  7. Bareis, J. A. & Nordrum, L.
    (2015) How to make believe: The fictional truth of representational arts. Berlin: De Gruyter. 10.1515/9783110443875
    https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110443875 [Google Scholar]
  8. Bareis, J. A.
    (2008) The role of fictionality in narrative theory. InL-Å. Skalin (Ed.), Narrativity, fictionality, and literariness: The narrative turn and the study of literary fiction (pp.155–175). Örebro Studies in Literary History and Criticism 7, Örebro University.
    [Google Scholar]
  9. Bell, A.
    (2019) ‘Digital fictionality: Possible worlds theory, ontology, and hyperlinks’. InA. Bell & M.-L. Ryan (Eds.), Possible worlds theory and contemporary narratology (pp.249–271). Lincoln/Nebraska: Nebraska University Press. 10.2307/j.ctv8xng0c.15
    https://doi.org/10.2307/j.ctv8xng0c.15 [Google Scholar]
  10. Booth, W. C.
    (1983) The rhetoric of fiction (2nd ed.). London: Penguin Books. 10.7208/chicago/9780226065595.001.0001
    https://doi.org/10.7208/chicago/9780226065595.001.0001 [Google Scholar]
  11. Browse, S.
    (2017) Between truth, sincerity and satire. InR. van den Akker, A. Gibbons, & T. Vermeulen (Eds.), Metamodernism: Historicity, affect and depth after postmodernism (pp.167–182). New York: Rowman and Littlefield.
    [Google Scholar]
  12. (in press). Straight talking honest politics: rhetorical style and ethos in the mediated politics of metamodernity. InH. Ringrow & S. Pihlaja Eds. Contemporary media stylistics. London: Bloomsbury.
    [Google Scholar]
  13. Bruss, E.
    (1976) Autobiographical acts: The changing situation of a literary genre. Baltimore, MA/London: The John Hopkins University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  14. Cohn, D.
    (1978) Transparent minds. Narrative modes for presenting consciousness in fiction. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  15. (1990) Signposts of fictionality: A narratological perspective. Poetics Today, 11(4), 775–804. 10.2307/1773077
    https://doi.org/10.2307/1773077 [Google Scholar]
  16. (1999) The distinction of fiction. Baltimore/London: The John Hopkins University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  17. Colbert, S.
    (2006, April28). Stephen Colbert roasts Bush at Whitehouse correspondent’s dinner. [Video file.] Retrieved fromhttps://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2X93u3anTco
    [Google Scholar]
  18. Currie, G.
    (1990) The nature of fiction. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/CBO9780511897498
    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511897498 [Google Scholar]
  19. (2010) Narrative and narrators: A philosophy. Oxford: Oxford University Press. 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199282609.001.0001
    https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199282609.001.0001 [Google Scholar]
  20. Dawson, Paul
    (2015) Ten thesis against fictionality. Narrative, 23(1), 74–100. 10.1353/nar.2015.0006
    https://doi.org/10.1353/nar.2015.0006 [Google Scholar]
  21. D’Ancona, M.
    (2017) Post-truth: The new war on truth and how to fight back. London: Ebury Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  22. Davis, E.
    (2017) Post-truth: Peak bullshit – and what we can do about it. London: Little, Brown.
    [Google Scholar]
  23. Doležel, L.
    (1976) Narrative semantics. PTL, 1, 129–151.
    [Google Scholar]
  24. (1980) Truth and authenticity in narrative. Poetics Today, 1(3), 7–25. 10.2307/1772407
    https://doi.org/10.2307/1772407 [Google Scholar]
  25. (1988) Mimesis and possible worlds. Poetics Today, 9(3), 475–496. 10.2307/1772728
    https://doi.org/10.2307/1772728 [Google Scholar]
  26. (1998) Possible worlds of fiction and history. New Literary History, 29(4), 785–809. 10.1353/nlh.1998.0039
    https://doi.org/10.1353/nlh.1998.0039 [Google Scholar]
  27. (1998) Heterocosmica: Fiction and possible worlds. Baltimore, MA: The John Hopkins University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  28. Fairclough, N.
    (2000) New labour, new language?London/New York: Routledge.
    [Google Scholar]
  29. Federman, R.
    (1981 [1975]) Surfiction – Four propositions in form of an introduction. InR. Federman (Ed.) Surfiction: Fiction now and tomorrow (2nd ed.). Athens, OH: Ohio University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  30. Felski, R.
    (2008) Uses of literature. Malden, MA/Oxford: Blackwell Publishing. 10.1002/9781444302790
    https://doi.org/10.1002/9781444302790 [Google Scholar]
  31. Fetterley, J.
    (1978) The Resisting reader. A feminist approach to American fiction. Bloomington, IN: Indiana University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  32. Fish, W.
    (2016) “‘Post-truth’ politics and illusory democracy”. Psychotherapy and Politics International, 14(3), 211–213. 10.1002/ppi.1387
    https://doi.org/10.1002/ppi.1387 [Google Scholar]
  33. Flaxman, S., Sharad, G. & Rao, J. M.
    (2016) Filter bubbles, echo chambers, and online news consumption. Public Opinion Quarterly, 80(S1), 298–320. 10.1093/poq/nfw006
    https://doi.org/10.1093/poq/nfw006 [Google Scholar]
  34. Fludernik, M.
    (1993) The fictions of language and the languages of fiction. The linguistic representation of speech and consciousness. London: Routledge.
    [Google Scholar]
  35. (1996) Towards a “natural” narratology. London/New York: Routledge. 10.4324/9780203432501
    https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203432501 [Google Scholar]
  36. (2000) Genres, text types, or discourse modes? Narrative modalities and generic categorization. Style, 34(2), 274–292.
    [Google Scholar]
  37. (2001) Fiction vs. non-fiction: Narratological differentiations. InJ. Helbig (Ed.), Erzählen und Erzähltheorie im 20. Jahrhundert. Festschrift für Wilhelm Füger (pp.85–103). Heidelberg: Winter.
    [Google Scholar]
  38. (2018) The fiction of the rise of fictionality. Poetics Today, 39(1), 67–92. 10.1215/03335372‑4265071
    https://doi.org/10.1215/03335372-4265071 [Google Scholar]
  39. Fludernik, M. & Nielsen, H. S.
    (in press). Fictionality Studies from Europe: An Introduction. Arcadia.
    [Google Scholar]
  40. Foucault, M.
    (1984) Truth and power. InP. Rabinow (Ed.), The Foucault Reader (pp.51–75). London: Penguin.
    [Google Scholar]
  41. Frus, P.
    (1994) The politics and poetics of journalistic narrative. The timely and the timeless. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/CBO9780511527159
    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511527159 [Google Scholar]
  42. Gallagher, C.
    (2006) The rise of fictionality. InF. Moretti (Ed.), The Novel, Volume 1: History, Geography, and Culture (pp.336–363). Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  43. (2011) What would Napolean do? Historical, fictional, and counterfactual characters. New Literary History, 42(2), 315–336. 10.1353/nlh.2011.0014
    https://doi.org/10.1353/nlh.2011.0014 [Google Scholar]
  44. Gavins, J.
    (2007) Text world theory: An introduction. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press. 10.3366/edinburgh/9780748622993.001.0001
    https://doi.org/10.3366/edinburgh/9780748622993.001.0001 [Google Scholar]
  45. Genette, G.
    (1990) Fictional narrative, factual narrative. Poetics Today, 2(4), 755–774. 10.2307/1773076
    https://doi.org/10.2307/1773076 [Google Scholar]
  46. (1993) Fiction & diction, (C. Porter, trans.). Ithaca/London: Cornell University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  47. Gibbons, A.
    (2014) Fictionality and ontology. InP. Stockwell & S. Whiteley (Eds.) The Cambridge handbook of stylistics (pp.408–423). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/CBO9781139237031.031
    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139237031.031 [Google Scholar]
  48. (2018) Autonarration, I, and odd address in Ben Lerner’s autofictional novel 10:04. InA. Gibbons & A. Macrae (Eds.), Pronouns in literature: Positions and perspectives in language (pp.75–96). London: Palgrave Macmillan. 10.1057/978‑1‑349‑95317‑2_5
    https://doi.org/10.1057/978-1-349-95317-2_5 [Google Scholar]
  49. Gorman, D.
    (2005) Fiction, theories of. InD. Herman, M. Jahn, & M.-L. Ryan (Eds.), Routledge encyclopedia of narrative theory (pp.163–167). London/New York: Routledge.
    [Google Scholar]
  50. Grishakova, M.
    (2008) Literariness, fictionality, and the theory of possible worlds. InL.-Å. Skalin (Ed.), Narrativity, fictionality, and literariness: The narrative turn and the study of literary fiction (pp.57–76). Örebro Studies in Literary History and Criticism 7, Örebro University.
    [Google Scholar]
  51. Hamburger, K.
    (1973) The logic of literature. Bloomington/London: Indiana University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  52. Hannan, J.
    (2018) Trolling ourselves to death? Social media and post-truth politics. European Journal of Communication, 33(2), 214–226. 10.1177/0267323118760323
    https://doi.org/10.1177/0267323118760323 [Google Scholar]
  53. Hansen, P. K.
    (2005) When fact becomes fiction. On extra-textual unreliable narration. InL.-Å. Skalin (Ed.), Fact and fiction in narrative. An interdisciplinary approach (pp.283–307). Örebro Studies in Literary History and Criticism 4, Örebro University.
    [Google Scholar]
  54. Harshaw (Hrushovski), B.
    (1984) Fictionality and frames of reference: Remarks on a theoretical framework. Poetics Today, 5(2), 227–251. 10.2307/1771931
    https://doi.org/10.2307/1771931 [Google Scholar]
  55. Harsin, J.
    (2015) ‘Regimes of posttruth, post politics and attention economics’. Communication, Culture and Critique, 8, 327–333. 10.1111/cccr.12097
    https://doi.org/10.1111/cccr.12097 [Google Scholar]
  56. (2018) Post-truth populism: The French anti-gender theory movement and cross-cultural similarities. Communication, culture and Critique, 11, 35–52. 10.1093/ccc/tcx017
    https://doi.org/10.1093/ccc/tcx017 [Google Scholar]
  57. Hatavara, M. & Mildorf, J.
    (2017a) Hybrid fictionality and vicarious narrative experience. Narrative, 25(1), 65–82. 10.1353/nar.2017.0004
    https://doi.org/10.1353/nar.2017.0004 [Google Scholar]
  58. (2017b) Fictionality, narrative modes, and vicarious storytelling. Style, 51(3), 392–408.
    [Google Scholar]
  59. Herman, D.
    (2002) Story logic: Problems and possibilities of narrative. Lincoln: University of Nebraska Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  60. (2011) Introduction. InD. Herman (Ed.), The Emergence of mind. Representations of consciousness in narrative discourse in English (pp.1–42). Lincoln/London: The University of Nebraska Press. 10.2307/j.ctt1df4fwq.4
    https://doi.org/10.2307/j.ctt1df4fwq.4 [Google Scholar]
  61. Hyvönen, A-E.
    (2018) Careless speech: Conceptualizing post-truth politics. New Perspectives, 26(3), 1–25.
    [Google Scholar]
  62. Iser, W.
    (1993) The fictive and the imaginary: Charting literary anthropology. Baltimore, MA/ London: The John Hopkins University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  63. Ishiguro, K.
    (2015) The Buried Giant. London: Faber & Faber.
    [Google Scholar]
  64. Iversen, S. & Nielsen, H. S.
    (2016) The politics of fictionality in documentary form: The act of killing and The ambassador. European Journal of English Studies, 20(3), 249–262. 10.1080/13825577.2016.1230389
    https://doi.org/10.1080/13825577.2016.1230389 [Google Scholar]
  65. Jenkins, H.
    (2006) Convergence culture: Where old and new media collide. New York: New York University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  66. Kelly Garrett, R.
    (2009) Echo chambers online? Politically motivated selective exposure among internet users. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 14(2), 265–285. 10.1111/j.1083‑6101.2009.01440.x
    https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1083-6101.2009.01440.x [Google Scholar]
  67. Keyes, R.
    (2004) The post-truth era: Dishonesty and deception in contemporary life. New York: St Martins Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  68. Klastrup, L. & Tosca, S.
    (2004) Transmedial worlds – Rethinking cyberworld design. Proceedings of the 2004 International Conference on Cyberworlds (2004), 409–16. 10.1109/CW.2004.67
    https://doi.org/10.1109/CW.2004.67 [Google Scholar]
  69. Klauk, T. & Köppe, T.
    (2014) Fiktonalität: Ein interdisziplinäres Handbuch. Berlin: de Gruyter. 10.1515/9783110322606
    https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110322606 [Google Scholar]
  70. Klein, N.
    (2017) No is not Enough. London: Allen Lane.
    [Google Scholar]
  71. Kuhn, M. & Thon, J.-N.
    (2017) Transmedial narratology: Current approaches. Narrative, 25(3), 253–255. 10.1353/nar.2017.0014
    https://doi.org/10.1353/nar.2017.0014 [Google Scholar]
  72. Kukkonen, K. & Nielsen, H. S.
    (2018) Fictionality: Cognition and exceptionality. Poetics Today39(3), 473–494. 10.1215/03335372‑7032704
    https://doi.org/10.1215/03335372-7032704 [Google Scholar]
  73. Lamarque, P. & Olsen, S. H.
    (1994) Truth, fiction, and literature. Oxford: Clarendon.
    [Google Scholar]
  74. Lejeune, P.
    (1989) On autobiography, (K. Leary, trans.). Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  75. Lewandowsky, S., Ecker, U. K. H. & Cook, J.
    (2017) Beyond misinformation: Understanding and coping with the “post-truth” era. Journal of Applied Research in Memory and Cognition, 6, 353–369. 10.1016/j.jarmac.2017.07.008
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jarmac.2017.07.008 [Google Scholar]
  76. Lewis, D.
    (1983) Truth in fiction. Philosophy Papers, Volume1. Oxford: Oxford University Press. 10.1093/0195032047.003.0015
    https://doi.org/10.1093/0195032047.003.0015 [Google Scholar]
  77. Löschnigg, M.
    (1999) Narratological categories and the (non-)distinction between factual and fictional narratives. InJ. Pier (Ed.), Recent trends in narratological research (pp.31–48), Tours: Presses Universitaires François-Rabelais. Retrieved frombooks.openedition.ord/pufr/3946. 10.4000/books.pufr.3946
    https://doi.org/10.4000/books.pufr.3946 [Google Scholar]
  78. Lubbock, P.
    (1921) The craft of fiction. London: Jonathan Cape.
    [Google Scholar]
  79. Mair, J.
    (2017) Post-truth anthropology. Anthropology Today, 33(3), 3–4. 10.1111/1467‑8322.12346
    https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-8322.12346 [Google Scholar]
  80. McHale, B.
    (1978) Free indirect discourse: A survey of recent accounts. Poetics and Theory of Literature, 3, 249–287.
    [Google Scholar]
  81. (2016) Afterword: A new normal?InM. Hatavara, M. Hyvärinen, M. Mäkelä, & F. Mäyrä (Eds.), Narrative Theory, Literature, and New Media. Narrative Minds and Virtual Worlds (pp.295–304). New York/London: Routledge.
    [Google Scholar]
  82. McIntyre, L.
    (2018) Post-truth. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press. 10.7551/mitpress/11483.001.0001
    https://doi.org/10.7551/mitpress/11483.001.0001 [Google Scholar]
  83. Munoz, J.
    (2017) Somatic markers, rhetoric and post-truth. Frontiers in psychology. 8, article 1273. 10.3389/fpsyg.2017.01273
    https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2017.01273 [Google Scholar]
  84. Nielsen, H. S.
    (2010) Natural authors, unnatural narration. InJ. Alber & M. Fludernik (Eds.), Postclassical narratology: Approaches and analyses. Columbus, OH: The Ohio State University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  85. (2011) Unnatural Narratology, Impersonal Voices, Real Authors, and Non-Communicative Narration. InJ. Alber and R. Heinze (Eds.), Unnatural Narratives, Unnatural Narratology (pp.71–88). Berlin: De Gruyter. 10.1515/9783110229042.71
    https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110229042.71 [Google Scholar]
  86. Nielsen, H. S., Phelan, J., & Walsh, R.
    (2015) Ten theses about fictionality. Narrative, 23(1), 61–73. 10.1353/nar.2015.0005
    https://doi.org/10.1353/nar.2015.0005 [Google Scholar]
  87. Pariser, E.
    (2011) Filter bubbles: What the internet is hiding from you. London: Penguin.
    [Google Scholar]
  88. Pavel, T.
    (1975) ‘Possible worlds in literary semantics’. The Journal of Aesthetics and Art Criticism, 34(2), 165–176. 10.2307/430073
    https://doi.org/10.2307/430073 [Google Scholar]
  89. (1986) Fictional worlds. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  90. Pearce, M.
    (2001) “Getting behind the image”: personality politics in a Labour Party election broadcast. Language and Literature, 10(3), 211–220. 10.1177/0973‑9470‑20010803‑02
    https://doi.org/10.1177/0973-9470-20010803-02 [Google Scholar]
  91. Phelan, J.
    (2005) Living to tell about it: A rhetoric and ethics of character narration. Ithaca/ London: Cornell University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  92. (2016) Local fictionality within global non-fiction: Roz Chast’s Why can’t we talk about something more pleasant?. Enthymema, 16, 19–31.
    [Google Scholar]
  93. (2017) Fictionality. a/b: Auto/Biography Studies, 32(2), 235–238. 10.1080/08989575.2017.1288008
    https://doi.org/10.1080/08989575.2017.1288008 [Google Scholar]
  94. (2018) Fictionality, audiences, and character: A rhetorical alternative to Catherine Gallagher’s “Rise of fictionality”. Poetics Today, 39(1), 113–129. 10.1215/03335372‑4265095
    https://doi.org/10.1215/03335372-4265095 [Google Scholar]
  95. Phelan, J. & Nielsen, H. S.
    (2017) Why There Are No One-to-One Correspondences among Fictionality, Narrative, and Techniques: A Response to Mari Hatavara and Jarmila Mildorf. Narrative, 25(1), 83–91. 10.1353/nar.2017.0005
    https://doi.org/10.1353/nar.2017.0005 [Google Scholar]
  96. Polletta, F., & Lee, J.
    (2006) Is telling stories good for democracy? Rhetoric in public deliberation after 9/11. American Sociological Review, 71(5), 699–723. 10.1177/000312240607100501
    https://doi.org/10.1177/000312240607100501 [Google Scholar]
  97. Prince, G.
    (1991) Narratology, narrative, and meaning. (A. Noble, trans.). Poetics Today, 12(3), 543–552. 10.2307/1772650
    https://doi.org/10.2307/1772650 [Google Scholar]
  98. Prior, M.
    (2013) Media and political polarisation. Annual Review of Political Science, 16, 101–127. 10.1146/annurev‑polisci‑100711‑135242
    https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-polisci-100711-135242 [Google Scholar]
  99. Punday, D.
    (2010) Five Strands of Fictionality: The Institutional Construction of Contemporary American Fiction. Columbus: Ohio State University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  100. Ronen, R.
    (1994) Possible worlds in literary theory. New York: Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/CBO9780511597480
    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511597480 [Google Scholar]
  101. Roscoe, J. & Hight, C.
    (2001) Faking it: Mock-documentary and the subversion of factuality. Manchester: Manchester University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  102. Ryan, M.-L.
    (1980) Fiction, non-factuals, and the principle of minimal departure. Poetics, 9(4), 403–422. 10.1016/0304‑422X(80)90030‑3
    https://doi.org/10.1016/0304-422X(80)90030-3 [Google Scholar]
  103. (1985) The modal structure of narrative universes. Poetics, 6(4), 717–755. 10.2307/1771963
    https://doi.org/10.2307/1771963 [Google Scholar]
  104. (1991) Possible worlds, artificial intelligence and narrative theory. Bloomington/ Indiapolis, IN: Indiana University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  105. (2006) Avatars of story. Minneapolis/London: University of Minnesota Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  106. (2008) Transfictionality across media. InJ. Pier & J. Á. García Landa (Eds.), Theorizing Narrativity (pp.387–417). Berlin/New York: Walter de Gruyter. 10.1515/9783110969801.385
    https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110969801.385 [Google Scholar]
  107. Schaeffer, J.-M.
    (2010) Why fiction? (D. Cohn, trans.). Lincoln, NE/London: University of Nebraska Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  108. (2012) Fictional vs. factual narration. InP. Hühn, J. C. Meister, J. Pier, & W. Schmid (Eds.), The living handbook of narratology. Hamburg: Hamburg University. Retrieved fromwww.lhn.uni-hamburg.de/article/fictional-vs-factual-narration
    [Google Scholar]
  109. Searle, J. R.
    (1975) The logical status of fictional discourse. New Literary History, 6(2), 319–332. 10.2307/468422
    https://doi.org/10.2307/468422 [Google Scholar]
  110. Simpson, P.
    (2003) On the discourse of satire: Towards a stylistic model of satirical humour. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins. 10.1075/lal.2
    https://doi.org/10.1075/lal.2 [Google Scholar]
  111. Skalin, L-Å.
    (2008) “Telling a story”. Reflections on fictional and non-fictional narratives. InL.-Å. Skalin (Ed.), Narrativity, fictionality, and literariness: The narrative turn and the study of literary fiction (pp.201–260). Örebro Studies in Literary History and Criticism 7, Örebro University.
    [Google Scholar]
  112. Sperber, D. & Wilson, D.
    (1986) Relevance, communication and cognition. Oxford: Blackwell.
    [Google Scholar]
  113. Spolsky, E.
    (2015) The contracts of fiction: Cognition, culture, community. Oxford: Oxford University Press. 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780190232146.001.0001
    https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780190232146.001.0001 [Google Scholar]
  114. Tallis, B.
    (2016) Living in post-truth: Power/knowledge/responsibility. New Perspectives, 24(1), 7–18.
    [Google Scholar]
  115. Tompkins, J. P.
    (1980) (Ed.) Reader-response criticism: From formalism to post-structuralism. Baltimore, MA/London: John Hopkins University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  116. van den Akker, R., Gibbons, A., & Vermeulen, T.
    (2017) (Eds.), Metamodernism: Historicity, affect, and depth after postmodernism. London: Rowman and Littlefield.
    [Google Scholar]
  117. Vermeulen, T.
    (2015) The New “Depthiness”. E.Flux61. Retrieved fromwww.e-flux.com/journal/61/61000/the-new-depthiness/
    [Google Scholar]
  118. Watt, I.
    (2001) The rise of the novel. Studies in Defoe, Richardson and Fielding. Berkeley/Los Angeles: University of California Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  119. Walsh, R.
    (2005) The pragmatics of narrative fictionality. InJ. Phelan & P. J. Rabinowitz (Eds.), A Companion to Narrative Theory (pp.150–164). Oxford: Blackwell. 10.1002/9780470996935.ch10
    https://doi.org/10.1002/9780470996935.ch10 [Google Scholar]
  120. (2007) The rhetoric of fictionality. Columbus, OH: The Ohio State University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  121. Walton, K.
    (1990) Mimesis as make believe: On the foundations of the representational arts. Cambridge, MA/London: Harvard University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  122. Werth, P.
    (1999) Text worlds: Representing conceptual space in discourse. Harlow: Longman.
    [Google Scholar]
  123. White, H.
    (1978) Tropics of discourse. Essays in cultural criticism. Baltimore: The Johns Hopkins University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  124. Wilderkamp, A., van Montfoort, I. & van Ruiswijk, W.
    (1980) Fictionality and convention. Poetics, 9(5–6), 547–567. 10.1016/0304‑422X(80)90006‑6
    https://doi.org/10.1016/0304-422X(80)90006-6 [Google Scholar]
  125. Zetterberg Gjerlevsen, S.
    (2016a) A novel history of fictionality. Narrative, 24(2), 174–189. 10.1353/nar.2016.0008
    https://doi.org/10.1353/nar.2016.0008 [Google Scholar]
  126. (2016b) Fictionality. InP. Hühn (Eds.), The living handbook of narratology, Hamburg: Hamburg University. Retrieved fromwww.lhn.uni-hamburg.de/article/fictionality
    [Google Scholar]
  127. (2017) How to do things with fictionality: Approaching fictionality through speech act theory. InS. S. Grumsen, P. K. Hansen, R. A. Kraglund, & H. S. Nielsen (Eds.), Expectations: Reader assumptions and author intentions in narrative discourse (pp.73–96). Odense: Medusa.
    [Google Scholar]
  128. (2018) The threshold of fiction. Poetics Today, 39(1), 93–111. 10.1215/03335372‑4265083
    https://doi.org/10.1215/03335372-4265083 [Google Scholar]
  129. Zipfel, F.
    (2014) Fiction across media: Toward a transmedial concept of fictionality. InM.-L. Ryan & J.-N. Thon (Eds.), Storyworlds across Media: Towards a Media-Conscious Narratology (pp.103–125). Lincoln, NE/London: University of Nebraska Press. 10.2307/j.ctt1d9nkdg.9
    https://doi.org/10.2307/j.ctt1d9nkdg.9 [Google Scholar]
http://instance.metastore.ingenta.com/content/journals/10.1075/ni.19025.bro
Loading
/content/journals/10.1075/ni.19025.bro
Loading

Data & Media loading...

  • Article Type: Research Article
This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was successful
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error