Volume 31, Issue 2
  • ISSN 1387-6740
  • E-ISSN: 1569-9935
Buy:$35.00 + Taxes



Victim/survivors of domestic violence are asked to tell their stories many times, in different contexts, and for different audiences. These stories are contextualized for the new context and audience at the same time that they become texts – entextualization – in that context. This article argues that narrative is produced via the co-processes of entextualization and contextualization (Silverstein & Urban, 1996). The co-processes of entextualization/contextualization in domestic violence narratives about staying and leaving violent relationships produce stories that comport with the status quo, as it is envisioned in the stories of the victim/survivors. Using staying/leaving stories of domestic violence victim/survivors, I show that entextualizations/contextualizations are (1) socioculturally saturated processes and (2) rhetorical arguments. I argue that narratives entextualize/contextualize events of domestic violence in ways that involve and comply with the status quo. Ultimately, these processes create discursive resources that reinforce domestic violence.


Article metrics loading...

Loading full text...

Full text loading...


  1. Bamberg, M.
    (2006) Stories: Big or small: Why do we care?Narrative inquiry, 16(1), 139–147. 10.1075/ni.16.1.18bam
    https://doi.org/10.1075/ni.16.1.18bam [Google Scholar]
  2. Baynham, M.
    (2003) Narratives in Space and Time. Narrative Inquiry, 13(2), 347–366. 10.1075/ni.13.2.07bay
    https://doi.org/10.1075/ni.13.2.07bay [Google Scholar]
  3. Bradley-Berry, D.
    (2000) Domestic Violence Sourcebook. LA: Lowell House.
    [Google Scholar]
  4. Carranza, I. E.
    (2015) Narrating and arguing. InA. De Fina & A. Georgakopoulou (Eds.), The Handbook of Narrative Analysis (57–75). John Wiley & Sons. 10.1002/9781118458204.ch3
    https://doi.org/10.1002/9781118458204.ch3 [Google Scholar]
  5. Carriere, K. R.
    (2014) Culture cultivating culture: The four products of the meaning-made world. Integrative Psychological and Behavioral Science, 48(3), 270–282. 10.1007/s12124‑013‑9252‑0
    https://doi.org/10.1007/s12124-013-9252-0 [Google Scholar]
  6. Clevenger, B. J. M., & Roe-Sepowitz, D.
    (2009) Shelter service utilization of domestic violence victims. Journal of Human Behavior in the Social Environment, 19(4), 359–374. 10.1080/10911350902787429
    https://doi.org/10.1080/10911350902787429 [Google Scholar]
  7. De Fina, A., & Perrino, S.
    (2011) Introduction: Interviews vs. ‘natural’ contexts: A false dilemma. Language in Society, 40(1), 1–11. 10.1017/S0047404510000849
    https://doi.org/10.1017/S0047404510000849 [Google Scholar]
  8. Fairclough, N.
    (1995) Critical discourse analysis; the critical study of language. Essex: Longman.
    [Google Scholar]
  9. (2001) Language and power. Pearson Education.
    [Google Scholar]
  10. Farmer, A., & Tiefenthaler, J.
    (2003) Explaining the recent decline in domestic violence. Contemporary Economic Policy, 21(2), 158–172. 10.1093/cep/byg002
    https://doi.org/10.1093/cep/byg002 [Google Scholar]
  11. Glassie, H.
    (1982) Passing the time in Ballymenone (Vol.6). Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  12. Hunter, R.
    (2006) Narratives of domestic violence. Sydney Law Review, 28(4), 733.
    [Google Scholar]
  13. Johnstone, B.
    (2008) Discourse analysis (Ed. 2). Blackwell Publishing.
    [Google Scholar]
  14. Kennedy, S., & Ruggles, S.
    (2014) Breaking up is hard to count: The rise of divorce in the United States, 1980–2010. Demography, 51(2), 587–598. 10.1007/s13524‑013‑0270‑9
    https://doi.org/10.1007/s13524-013-0270-9 [Google Scholar]
  15. Mahoney, M. R.
    (1991) Legal images of battered women: Redefining the issue of separation. Michigan Law Review, 90(1), 1–94. 10.2307/1289533
    https://doi.org/10.2307/1289533 [Google Scholar]
  16. National Coalition Against Domestic Violence
    National Coalition Against Domestic Violence (2019) National Statistics Domestic Violence Fact Sheet. https://ncadv.org/statistics
  17. National Intimate Partner and Sexual Violence Survey
    National Intimate Partner and Sexual Violence Survey (2017) cdc.gov/violenceprevention/datasources/nisvs/index.html
  18. Ochs, E.
    (1996) Linguistic resources for socializing humanity. Cambridge University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  19. O’Keefe, M.
    (2005) Teen dating violence: A review of risk factors and prevention efforts. National Electronic Network on violence against women, 1, 1–5.
    [Google Scholar]
  20. Ortner, S. B.
    (1996) Making gender: The politics and erotics of culture. Beacon Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  21. Ostrowski, C. J.
    (1996) The clothesline project: women’s stories of gender-related violence. Women and Language, 19(1), 37–41.
    [Google Scholar]
  22. Perelman, C., & Olbrechts-Tyteca, L.
    (1969) The new rhetoric: a treatise on argumentation, trans.J. Wilkinson and P. Weaver. Indiana: University of Notre Dame Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  23. Richie, B.
    (2018) Compelled to crime: The gender entrapment of battered, black women. Routledge. 10.4324/9781315656557
    https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315656557 [Google Scholar]
  24. Riggs, D. S., Caulfield, M. B., & Street, A. E.
    (2000) Risk for domestic violence: Factors associated with perpetration and victimization. Journal of clinical psychology, 56(10), 1289–1316. 10.1002/1097‑4679(200010)56:10<1289::AID‑JCLP4>3.0.CO;2‑Z
    https://doi.org/10.1002/1097-4679(200010)56:10<1289::AID-JCLP4>3.0.CO;2-Z [Google Scholar]
  25. Roulston, K., & Shelton, S. A.
    (2015) Reconceptualizing bias in teaching qualitative research methods. Qualitative Inquiry, 21(4), 332–342. 10.1177/1077800414563803
    https://doi.org/10.1177/1077800414563803 [Google Scholar]
  26. Schiffrin, D.
    (1996) Narrative as self-portrait: Sociolinguistic constructions of identity. Language in society, 25(2), 167–203. 10.1017/S0047404500020601
    https://doi.org/10.1017/S0047404500020601 [Google Scholar]
  27. Silverstein, M., & Urban, G.
    (Eds.) (1996) Natural histories of discourse. University of Chicago Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  28. Slunecko, T., & Hengl, S.
    (2007) Language, cognition, subjectivity: A dynamic constitution. InJ. Valsiner & A. Rosa (Eds.), The Cambridge handbook of sociocultural psychology (pp.40–61). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/CBO9780511611162.005
    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511611162.005 [Google Scholar]
  29. Stark, E.
    (2009) Coercive control: The entrapment of women in personal life. Oxford University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  30. Stokoe, E., & Edwards, D.
    (2007) Story formulations in talk-in-interaction. InM. Bamberg (Ed.), Narrative-State of the art (pp.69–79). Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins Publishing. 10.1075/bct.6.08sto
    https://doi.org/10.1075/bct.6.08sto [Google Scholar]
  31. Street, B. V.
    (1993) Culture is a Verb: Anthropological aspects of language and cultural. InLanguage and Culture: Papers from the Annual Meeting of the British Association of Applied Linguistics Held at Trevelyan College, University of Durham, September 1991 (Vol.7, p.23). Multilingual Matters.
    [Google Scholar]
  32. Trinch, S. L.
    (2003) Latinas’ narratives of domestic abuse: Discrepant versions of violence (Vol.17). John Benjamins Publishing. 10.1075/impact.17
    https://doi.org/10.1075/impact.17 [Google Scholar]
  33. (2005) Acquiring authority through the acquisition of genre: Latinas, intertextuality and violence. Speech, Language, and the Law, 12(1), 19–47. 10.1558/sll.2005.12.1.19
    https://doi.org/10.1558/sll.2005.12.1.19 [Google Scholar]
  34. Valsiner, J.
    (2007) Culture in minds and societies: Foundations of cultural psychology. SAGE Publications India.
    [Google Scholar]
  35. (2009) Cultural psychology today: Innovations and oversights. Culture & Psychology, 15(1), 5–39. 10.1177/1354067X08101427
    https://doi.org/10.1177/1354067X08101427 [Google Scholar]
  36. Walton-Moss, B. J., Manganello, J., Frye, V., & Campbell, J. C.
    (2005) Risk factors for intimate partner violence and associated injury among urban women. Journal of community health, 30(5), 377–389. 10.1007/s10900‑005‑5518‑x
    https://doi.org/10.1007/s10900-005-5518-x [Google Scholar]
  37. Young, K. G.
    (1987) Taleworlds and storyrealms. Dordrecht: Martinus Nijhoff. 10.1007/978‑94‑009‑3511‑2
    https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-009-3511-2 [Google Scholar]
  • Article Type: Research Article
Keyword(s): argument; contextualization; domestic violence; entextualization; status quo
This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was successful
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error