1887
  1. Home
  2. e-Journals
  3. Narrative Inquiry
  4. Volume 32, Issue 2
  5. Article
Volume 32, Issue 2
  • ISSN 1387-6740
  • E-ISSN: 1569-9935
USD
Buy:$35.00 + Taxes

Abstract

Abstract

This study illustrates how personal narratives of victimized self serve two Kazakh-speaking village neighbors to accomplish self-presentation during a mealtime interaction. Integrating Goffman’s (1959) theorization of self-presentation with narrative positioning (Bamberg, 1997Schiffrin, 1996) and Muslim cultural practices (e.g., Al Zidjaly, 2006), this study conceptualizes mealtime conversations as frontstage and examines two victimhood narratives after providing the sequential overview of the twelve narratives occurred in the interaction. The analysis illustrates how linguistic construction of agentive and epistemic selves of the narrators position them as victims (whose personal items are stolen) in relation to other neighbors (who do the act of stealing) in the story world. This juxtaposition of “I” vs. “Others” in the story world allows the neighbor-tellers to present an idealized self (morally superior neighbors) and function as a team by getting lower hand and aligning with one another against a third party (morally wrong neighbors) in the interaction.

© John Benjamins Publishing Company
Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1075/ni.19112.kul
2021-02-22
2023-09-25

  • From This Site

    /content/journals/10.1075/ni.19112.kul
    dcterms_title,dcterms_subject,pub_keyword
    -contentType:Journal -contentType:Contributor -contentType:Concept -contentType:Institution
    10
    5
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. Al Zidjaly, N.
    (2006) Disability and anticipatory discourse: The interconnectedness of local and global aspects of talk. Communication & Medicine, 3(2), 101–112. 10.1515/CAM.2006.013
     https://doi.org/10.1515/CAM.2006.013 [Google Scholar]
  2. (2012) What has happened to Arabs? Identity and face management online. Multilingua, 31(4), 413–439. 10.1515/multi‑2012‑0019
     https://doi.org/10.1515/multi-2012-0019 [Google Scholar]
  3. (2017) Memes as reasonably hostile laments: A discourse analysis of political dissent in Oman. Discourse & Society, 28(6), 573–594. 10.1177/0957926517721083
     https://doi.org/10.1177/0957926517721083 [Google Scholar]
  4. Bamberg, M.
    (1997) Positioning between structure and performance. Journal of Narrative and Life History, 7(1), 335–342. 10.1075/jnlh.7.42pos
     https://doi.org/10.1075/jnlh.7.42pos [Google Scholar]
  5. Bamberg, M., & Georgakopoulou, A.
    (2008) Small stories as a new perspective in narrative and identity analysis. Text & Talk, 28(3), 377–396. 10.1515/TEXT.2008.018
     https://doi.org/10.1515/TEXT.2008.018 [Google Scholar]
  6. Beeman, W.
    (1986) Language, status, and power in Iran. Bloomington, IN: Indiana University Press.
     [Google Scholar]
  7. Branner, R.
    (2005) Humorous disaster and success stories among female adolescents in Germany. InU. M. Quasthoff and T. Becker (Eds.) Narrative interaction (pp.113–48), Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins. 10.1075/sin.5.06bra
     https://doi.org/10.1075/sin.5.06bra [Google Scholar]
  8. Coates, J.
    (2001) My mind is with you: story sequences in the talk of male friends. Narrative Inquiry, 11(1), 1–21. 10.1075/ni.11.1.04coa
     https://doi.org/10.1075/ni.11.1.04coa [Google Scholar]
  9. De Fina, A.
    (2008) Who tells which story and why? Micro and macro contexts in narrative. Text & Talk, 28(3), 421–442. 10.1515/TEXT.2008.020
     https://doi.org/10.1515/TEXT.2008.020 [Google Scholar]
  10. De Fina, A., & Georgakopoulou, A.
    (2012) Analyzing Narratives. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
     [Google Scholar]
  11. Deppermann, A.
    (2007) Using the other for oneself: Conversational practices of representing out-group members among adolescents. InM. Bamberg, A. De Fina, & D. Schiffrin (Eds.), Selves and Identities in Narrative and Discourse (pp.273–294). Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins. 10.1075/sin.9.13dep
     https://doi.org/10.1075/sin.9.13dep [Google Scholar]
  12. Eder, D. & Enke, J. L.
    (1991) The structure of gossip: Opportunities and constraints on collective expression among adolescents. American Sociological Review, 56(4), 494–508. 10.2307/2096270
     https://doi.org/10.2307/2096270 [Google Scholar]
  13. Emler, N.
    (1994) Gossip, reputation, and social adaptation. InR. Goodman and A. Ben-Ze’ev (Eds.), Good Gossip (pp.117–138). Lawrence: University of Kansas Press.
     [Google Scholar]
  14. Georgakopoulou, A.
    (1998) Narrative performances: A study of modern Greek storytelling. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins. 10.1075/pbns.46
     https://doi.org/10.1075/pbns.46 [Google Scholar]
  15. Gluckman, M.
    (1963) Gossip and scandal. Current Anthropology, 4(3), 307–316. 10.1086/200378
     https://doi.org/10.1086/200378 [Google Scholar]
  16. Goffman, E.
    (1959) The presentation of self in everyday life. Garden City, NY: Doubleday Anchor.
     [Google Scholar]
  17. Goodwin, M. H.
    (1990) Tactical uses of stories: Participation frameworks within girls’ and boys’ disputes. Discourse Processes, 13(1), 33–71. 10.1080/01638539009544746
     https://doi.org/10.1080/01638539009544746 [Google Scholar]
  18. Goodwin, C.
    (1979) The interactional construction of a sentence in natural conversation. InG. Psanthas (ed.), Everyday language: Studies in ethnomethodology (pp.97–121). New York: Irvington Press.
     [Google Scholar]
  19. (1984) Notes on story structure and the organization of participation. InM. Atkinson and J. Heritage (Eds.), Structures of social action (pp.255–246). London, UK: Cambridge University Press.
     [Google Scholar]
  20. Gordon, C.
    (2003) Aligning as a team: Forms of conjoined participation in (stepfamily) interaction. Research on language and social interaction, 36(4), 395–431. 10.1207/S15327973RLSI3604_4
     https://doi.org/10.1207/S15327973RLSI3604_4 [Google Scholar]
  21. Gumperz, J. J.
    (1982) Discourse strategies. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/CBO9780511611834
     https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511611834 [Google Scholar]
  22. Gumperz, J.I.
    (1992) Contextualization and understanding. InA. Duranti and C. Goodwin (Eds.), Rethinking context (pp.229–252). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
     [Google Scholar]
  23. Hegland, M. E.
    (1998) Flagellation and fundamentalism: (trans)forming meaning, identity, and gender through Pakistani women’s rituals of mourning. American Ethnologist, 25(2), 240–266. 10.1525/ae.1998.25.2.240
     https://doi.org/10.1525/ae.1998.25.2.240 [Google Scholar]
  24. Holmes, J.
    (2000) Politeness, power and provocation: How humour functions in the workplace. Discourse Studies, 2(2) 159–185. 10.1177/1461445600002002002
     https://doi.org/10.1177/1461445600002002002 [Google Scholar]
  25. Keller-Cohen, D. & Gordon, C.
    (2003) “On trial”: Metaphor in telling the life story. Narrative Inquiry, 13(1), 1–40. 10.1075/ni.13.1.01kel
     https://doi.org/10.1075/ni.13.1.01kel [Google Scholar]
  26. Kendall, S. and Tannen, D.
    (2001) Discourse and Gender. InD. Schiffrin, D. Tannen, & H. E. Hamilton (Eds.), The Handbook of Discourse Analysis (pp.548–567). Malden, MA: Blackwell.
     [Google Scholar]
  27. Jacoby, S., & Ochs, E.
    (1995) Co-construction: An introduction. Research on Language and Social Interaction, 28(3), 171–183. 10.1207/s15327973rlsi2803_1
     https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327973rlsi2803_1 [Google Scholar]
  28. Jefferson, G.
    (1979) A technique for inviting laughter and its subsequent acceptance/ declination. InG. Psathas (Ed.), Everyday language: Studies in ethnomethodology (pp.79–96). New York: Irvington Press.
     [Google Scholar]
  29. (1988) On the Sequential Organization of Troubles-Talk in Ordinary Conversation. Social Problems, 35(4), 418–441.   10.2307/800595
     https://doi.org/10.2307/800595 [Google Scholar]
  30. Jefferson, G., & Lee, J. R. E.
    (1981) The rejection of advice: Managing the problematic convergence of a ‘troubles-telling’ and a ‘service encounter’. Journal of Pragmatics, 5(5), 399–422. 10.1016/0378‑2166(81)90026‑6
     https://doi.org/10.1016/0378-2166(81)90026-6 [Google Scholar]
  31. Jägervi, L.
    (2014) Who wants to be an ideal victim? A narrative analysis of crime victims’ self-presentation. Journal of Scandinavian studies in criminology and crime prevention, 15(1), 73–88. 10.1080/14043858.2014.893479
     https://doi.org/10.1080/14043858.2014.893479 [Google Scholar]
  32. Labov, W.
    (1972) The transformation of experience in narrative syntax. InW. Labov (Ed.), Language in the inner city: Studies in the Black English Vernacular (pp.354–96). Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press.
     [Google Scholar]
  33. Labov, W., and Waletzky, J.
    (1967) Narrative Analysis: oral versions of personal experience. InJ. Helm (Ed.), Essays on the verbal and visual arts (pp.12–44). Seattle/London: University of Washington Press.
     [Google Scholar]
  34. Lerner, G.H.
    (1992) Assisted storytelling: deploying shared knowledge as a practical matter. Qualitative Sociology, 15(3), 247–271. 10.1007/BF00990328
     https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00990328 [Google Scholar]
  35. Lerner, G. H.
    (1993) Collectivities in action: Establishing the relevance of conjoined participation in conversation. Text-Interdisciplinary Journal for the Study of Discourse, 13(2), 213–246. 10.1515/text.1.1993.13.2.213
     https://doi.org/10.1515/text.1.1993.13.2.213 [Google Scholar]
  36. Mandelbaum, J.
    (1987) Couples sharing stories. Communication Quarterly, 35(2), 144–170. 10.1080/01463378709369678
     https://doi.org/10.1080/01463378709369678 [Google Scholar]
  37. Marais, A.
    (2015) A narrative analysis of young people’s talk of intimate partner violence. Narrative Inquiry, 25(2), 242–263. 10.1075/ni.25.2.03mar
     https://doi.org/10.1075/ni.25.2.03mar [Google Scholar]
  38. Meanwell, E.
    (2013) Profaning the past to salvage the present: The symbolically reconstructed pasts of homeless shelter residents. Symbolic Interaction, 36(4), 439–456. 10.1002/symb.79
     https://doi.org/10.1002/symb.79 [Google Scholar]
  39. Morris, C.
    (2018) ‘You can’t stand on a corner and talk about it…’: Medicinal cannabis use, impression management and the analytical status of interviews. Methodological Innovations, 11(1), 1–12.   10.1177/2059799118768422
     https://doi.org/10.1177/2059799118768422 [Google Scholar]
  40. Mulholland, J.
    (1996) A series of story turns: Intertextuality and collegiality. Text-Interdisciplinary Journal for the Study of Discourse, 16(4), 535–556. 10.1515/text.1.1996.16.4.535
     https://doi.org/10.1515/text.1.1996.16.4.535 [Google Scholar]
  41. Norrick, N.
    (2000) Conversational narrative: Storytelling in everyday talk. Amsterdam/ Philadelphia: John Benjamins. 10.1075/cilt.203
     https://doi.org/10.1075/cilt.203 [Google Scholar]
  42. Ochs, E., & L. Capps
    (2001) Living Narrative: Creating Life in everyday Storytelling. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
     [Google Scholar]
  43. Omelicheva, M. Y.
    (2011) Islam in Kazakhstan: a survey of contemporary trends and sources of securitization. Central Asian Survey, 30(2), 243–256. 10.1080/02634937.2011.567069
     https://doi.org/10.1080/02634937.2011.567069 [Google Scholar]
  44. Raymond, G., & Heritage, J.
    (2006) The epistemics of social relations: Owning grandchildren. Language in Society, 35(5), 677–705. 10.1017/S0047404506060325
     https://doi.org/10.1017/S0047404506060325 [Google Scholar]
  45. Sacks, H.
    ([1970] 1992) Second stories; “Mm hm”; story prefaces; “local news”; tellability. InG. Jefferson (Ed.), Harvey Sacks: Lectures on conversation, (pp.3–16). Oxford: Blackwell.
     [Google Scholar]
  46. Sacks, H., & Jefferson, G.
    (1995) Lectures on conversation. Oxford, UK: Blackwell. 10.1002/9781444328301
     https://doi.org/10.1002/9781444328301 [Google Scholar]
  47. Schiffrin, D.
    (1990) The management of a co-operative self during argument: The role of opinions and stories. InA. D. Grimshaw (Ed.), Conflict talk: Sociolinguistic investigations of arguments in conversations (pp.241–259). Cambridge: Cambridge University.
     [Google Scholar]
  48. (1996) Narrative as self-portrait: Sociolinguistic construction of identity. Language in Society, 25(2), 167–203. 10.1017/S0047404500020601
     https://doi.org/10.1017/S0047404500020601 [Google Scholar]
  49. Suls, J. M.
    (1977) Gossip as social comparison. Journal of Communication, 27(1), 164–168. 10.1111/j.1460‑2466.1977.tb01812.x
     https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1460-2466.1977.tb01812.x [Google Scholar]
  50. Swan, D., & Linehan, C.
    (2000) Positioning as a means of understanding the narrative construction of self: A story of lesbian escorting. Narrative inquiry, 10(2), 403–427. 10.1075/ni.10.2.06swa
     https://doi.org/10.1075/ni.10.2.06swa [Google Scholar]
  51. Tannen, D.
    (1990) You just don’t understand: Women and men in conversation. New York: Morrow.
     [Google Scholar]
  52. (1994) Gender and Discourse. New York/Oxford: Oxford University Press.
     [Google Scholar]
  53. (1984 [2005]) Conversational style: Analyzing talk among friends. New York: Oxford University Press.
     [Google Scholar]
  54. (1989 [2007]) Talking voices: Repetition, dialogue, and imagery in conversational discourse. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
     [Google Scholar]
  55. Tovares, A.
    (2006) Public media, private talk: Gossip about a TV show as ‘quotidian hermeneutics.’ Text & Talk, 26(4–5), 463–491. 10.1515/TEXT.2006.019
     https://doi.org/10.1515/TEXT.2006.019 [Google Scholar]
  56. Trinch, S.
    (2007) The pragmatic use of gender in Latina women’s legal narratives of abuse. International Journal of Speech Language and the Law, 14(1), 51. 10.1558/ijsll.v14i1.51
     https://doi.org/10.1558/ijsll.v14i1.51 [Google Scholar]
  57. Wilce, J.
    (2005) Traditional laments and postmodern regrets: The circulation of discourse in metacultural context. Journal of Linguistic Anthropology, 15(1), 602–617. 10.1525/jlin.2005.15.1.60
     https://doi.org/10.1525/jlin.2005.15.1.60 [Google Scholar]
  58. Wortham, S. E.
    (2000) Interactional positioning and narrative self-construction. Narrative inquiry, 10(1), 157–184. 10.1075/ni.10.1.11wor
     https://doi.org/10.1075/ni.10.1.11wor [Google Scholar]
  59. Yemelianova, G. M.
    (2014) Islam, national identity and politics in contemporary Kazakhstan. Asian Ethnicity, 15(3), 286–301. 10.1080/14631369.2013.847643
     https://doi.org/10.1080/14631369.2013.847643 [Google Scholar]
  60. Yerkovich, S.
    (1977) Gossiping as a way of speaking. Journal of Communication, 1(1), 192–196. 10.1111/j.1460‑2466.1977.tb01817.x
     https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1460-2466.1977.tb01817.x [Google Scholar]
http://instance.metastore.ingenta.com/content/journals/10.1075/ni.19112.kul
Loading
Presenting self and aligning as a team through narratives of victimhood among Kazakh-speaking village neighbors
Narrative Inquiry 32, 309 (2022); https://doi.org/10.1075/ni.19112.kul
/content/journals/10.1075/ni.19112.kul
/content/journals/10.1075/ni.19112.kul
Loading

Data & Media loading...

  • Article Type: Research Article
Keyword(s): alignment; idealized self; Kazakh; mealtime conversation; narrative positioning; neighbors; rural community; self-presentation; teams; victimhood

Most Cited

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was successful
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error