1887
image of Small stories with big implications
USD
Buy:$35.00 + Taxes

Abstract

Abstract

In this paper we examine reports of poetic confluence, in which one person’s utterances seems to connect with another’s unspoken or unarticulated thoughts. We argue that analysis of these narratives can be investigated as a window onto social reality, and as a site in which social realities are produced, especially with respect to identity work. We show how this approach complements and develops from the small story paradigm in narrative inquiry. In our discussion we try to identify common principles that may underpin work on both the content of poetic confluence narratives, and the work done in the features of those narratives.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1075/ni.20013.woo
2020-10-29
2020-11-29
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. Aronson, J. K.
    (2006) Anecdotes that provide definite evidence. British Medical Journal, 333, 1267–1269. 10.1136/bmj.39036.666389.94
    https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.39036.666389.94 [Google Scholar]
  2. Augoustinos, M., & Tileagã, C.
    (2012) Twenty five years of discursive psychology. British Journal of Social Psychology, 51(3), 405–412. doi:  10.1111/j.2044‑8309.2012.02096.x
    https://doi.org/10.1111/j.2044-8309.2012.02096.x [Google Scholar]
  3. Balint, M.
    (1956) Notes on parapsychology and parapsychological healing. International Journal of Psycho-analysis, 36(1), 31–35.
    [Google Scholar]
  4. Bamberg, M.
    (2006) Stories: Big or small: Why do we care?Narrative Inquiry, 16(1), 139–147. 10.1075/ni.16.1.18bam
    https://doi.org/10.1075/ni.16.1.18bam [Google Scholar]
  5. Bamberg, M., & Georgakopoulou, A.
    (2008) Small stories as a new perspective in narrative and identity analysis. Text and Talk, 28(3), 377–396. 10.1515/TEXT.2008.018
    https://doi.org/10.1515/TEXT.2008.018 [Google Scholar]
  6. Beach, W. A.
    (1993) The delicacy of preoccupation. Text and Performance Quarterly, 13(4), 299–312. 10.1080/10462939309366059
    https://doi.org/10.1080/10462939309366059 [Google Scholar]
  7. Blackman, L.
    (2012) Immaterial bodies: Affect, embodiment, mediation. London: Sage. 10.4135/9781446288153
    https://doi.org/10.4135/9781446288153 [Google Scholar]
  8. Brennan, T.
    (2004) The Transmission of Affect. Ithaca/London: Cornell University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  9. Burton, N.
    (2012) Getting personal: Thoughts on therapeutic action through the interplay of intimacy, affect and consciousness. Psychoanalytic Dialogues, 22(6), 662–678. doi:  10.1080/10481885.2012.735588
    https://doi.org/10.1080/10481885.2012.735588 [Google Scholar]
  10. De Peyer, J.
    (2016) Uncanny communication and the porous mind. Psychoanalytic Dialogues, 26(2), 156–174. doi:  10.1080/10481885.2016.1144978
    https://doi.org/10.1080/10481885.2016.1144978 [Google Scholar]
  11. Edwards, D., & Potter, J.
    (2005) Discursive psychology, mental states and descriptions. InH. te Molder & J. Potter (Eds.), Conversation and cognition (pp.241–259). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/CBO9780511489990.012
    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511489990.012 [Google Scholar]
  12. Ehrenwald, J.
    (1951) New dimensions of deep analysis: A study of telepathy in interpersonal relationships. London: George Allen and Unwin.
    [Google Scholar]
  13. Freud, S.
    (1975) The psychopathology of everyday life. (A. Tyson, Trans.). Harmondsworth: Penguin. (original work published 1901).
    [Google Scholar]
  14. Georgakopoulou, A.
    (2006) Thinking big with small stories in narrative and identity analysis. Narrative Inquiry, 16(1), 122–130. 10.1075/ni.16.1.16geo
    https://doi.org/10.1075/ni.16.1.16geo [Google Scholar]
  15. (2007) Small stories, interaction and identities. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins. 10.1075/sin.8
    https://doi.org/10.1075/sin.8 [Google Scholar]
  16. (2008) On MSN with buff boys’ Self- and other-identity claims in the context of small stories. Journal of Sociolinguistics. 12: 597–626. 10.1111/j.1467‑9841.2008.00384.x
    https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9841.2008.00384.x [Google Scholar]
  17. (2015) Small stories research: Methods-analysis-outreach. InA. De Fina & A. Georgakopoulou (Eds.), The handbook of narrative analysis (pp.255–271). John Wiley and Sons.
    [Google Scholar]
  18. (2016) From narrating the self to posting self(ies): A small stories approach to selfies. Open Linguistics, 2, 300–317. 10.1515/opli‑2016‑0014
    https://doi.org/10.1515/opli-2016-0014 [Google Scholar]
  19. (2017) Sharing the moment as small stories. The interplay between practices and affordances in the social media-curation of lives. Narrative Inquiry, 27(2), 311–333. 10.1075/ni.27.2.06geo
    https://doi.org/10.1075/ni.27.2.06geo [Google Scholar]
  20. Georgalou, M.
    (2015) Small stories of the Greek crisis on facebook. Social Media + Society, 1, 1–15. 10.1177/2056305115605859
    https://doi.org/10.1177/2056305115605859 [Google Scholar]
  21. Goffman, E.
    (1967) Interaction ritual: Essays in face-to-face behavior. New York: Pantheon.
    [Google Scholar]
  22. (1971) Relations in public: Micro studies of the public order. New York: Basic Books.
    [Google Scholar]
  23. Hayward, R., Wooffitt, R. & Woods, C.
    (2015) The transgressive that: Making the world uncanny. Discourse Studies, 17(6), 703–72. doi:  10.1177/1461445615611784
    https://doi.org/10.1177/1461445615611784 [Google Scholar]
  24. Heritage, J.
    (2014) Epistemics in conversation. InJ. Sidnell & T. Stivers, (Eds.), The handbook of conversation analysis (pp.370–394). Oxford: Wiley, Blackwell.
    [Google Scholar]
  25. Hester, S., & P. Eglin
    (1997) Culture in action: Studies in membership categorization analysis. Washington, D.C.: University Press of America.
    [Google Scholar]
  26. Heyes, C. M.
    (1993) Anecdotes, training, trapping and triangulating: do animals attribute mental states?Animal Behaviour, 46, 177–188. 10.1006/anbe.1993.1173
    https://doi.org/10.1006/anbe.1993.1173 [Google Scholar]
  27. Hollós, I.
    (1933) The psychopathology of everyday telepathic appearances. (Orig. Psychopathologie alltaglicher telepathischer Erscheinungen). Imago, 19, 539–546.
    [Google Scholar]
  28. Holt, E.
    (1996) Reporting on talk: the use of direct reported speech in conversation. Research on Language and Social Interaction, 29(3), 219–245. 10.1207/s15327973rlsi2903_2
    https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327973rlsi2903_2 [Google Scholar]
  29. Holt, E., & Clift, R.
    (2006) Reporting talk: Reported speech in interaction. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/CBO9780511486654
    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511486654 [Google Scholar]
  30. Hufford, D.
    (1982) The terror that comes in the night: An experience-centred study of supernatural assault traditions. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  31. Jakobson, R.
    (1960) Closing statement: Linguistics and poetics. InT. A. Sebeok (Ed.), Style in language (pp.350–377). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  32. Jefferson, G.
    (1978) Sequential aspects of storytelling in conversation. InJ. Schenkein (Ed.); Studies in the organization of conversational interaction (pp.219–248). New York: Academic Press. 10.1016/B978‑0‑12‑623550‑0.50016‑1
    https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-623550-0.50016-1 [Google Scholar]
  33. (1996) On the poetics of ordinary talk. Text and Performance Quarterly, 16(1), 1–61. 10.1080/10462939609366132
    https://doi.org/10.1080/10462939609366132 [Google Scholar]
  34. Juzwik, M., & Ives, D.
    (2010) Small stories as a resource for positioning teller identity: Identity-in-interaction in an urban language classroom. Narrative Inquiry, 20, 37–61. 10.1075/ni.20.1.03juz
    https://doi.org/10.1075/ni.20.1.03juz [Google Scholar]
  35. Lerner, G.
    (1992) Assisted storytelling: Deploying shared knowledge as a practical matter. Qualitative Sociology, 15(3), 247–271. 10.1007/BF00990328
    https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00990328 [Google Scholar]
  36. MacKay, D. G.
    (1980) Speech errors: Retrospect and prospect. InV. A. Fromkin (Ed.), Errors in linguistic performance: Slips of the tongue, ear, pen, and hand (pp.319–332), New York: Academic Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  37. Mandelbaum, J.
    (1987) Couples sharing stories. Communication Quarterly, 35(2), 144–170. 10.1080/01463378709369678
    https://doi.org/10.1080/01463378709369678 [Google Scholar]
  38. Menninghaus, W., Wagner, V., Wassiliwizky, E., Jacobsen, T., & Knoop, C. A.
    (2017) The emotional and aesthetic powers of parallelistic diction. Poetics, 63, 47–59. doi:  10.1016/j.poetic.2016.12.001
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.poetic.2016.12.001 [Google Scholar]
  39. Michael, M.
    (2012) Anecdote. InC. Lury & N. Wakeford (Eds.), Inventive methods: The happening of the social (pp35–46). London: Routledge.
    [Google Scholar]
  40. Miller, V.
    (2015) Resonance as a social phenomenon. Sociological Research Online, 20(2), 9. doi:  10.5153/sro.3557
    https://doi.org/10.5153/sro.3557 [Google Scholar]
  41. Norman, D. A.
    (1981) Categorization of action slips. Psychological Review, 88(1), 1–15. 10.1037/0033‑295X.88.1.1
    https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-295X.88.1.1 [Google Scholar]
  42. Person, R. F.
    (2015) From conversation to oral tradition: A simplest systematics for oral traditions. London: Taylor Francis. 10.4324/9781315657264
    https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315657264 [Google Scholar]
  43. Redman, P.
    (2009) Affect revisited: Transference-countertransference and the unconscious dimensions of affective, felt and emotional experience. Subjectivity, 26, 51–68.
    [Google Scholar]
  44. Rosenbaum, R.
    (2011) Exploring the other dark continent: Parallels between psi phenomena and the psychotherapeutic process. The Psychoanalytic Review, 98(1), 57–90. 10.1521/prev.2011.98.1.57
    https://doi.org/10.1521/prev.2011.98.1.57 [Google Scholar]
  45. Ryan, M.
    (2008) Small stories, big issues: Tracing complex subjectivities of high school students in interactional talk. Critical Discourse Analysis, 5, 217–229. 10.1080/17405900802131728
    https://doi.org/10.1080/17405900802131728 [Google Scholar]
  46. Sacks, H.
    (1984) On doing “Being Ordinary”. InJ. M. Atkinson & J. Heritage (Eds.), Structures of social action: Studies in conversation analysis (pp.413–429). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. (Edited byG. Jeffersonfrom unpublished lectures: Spring 1970: lecture 1.)
    [Google Scholar]
  47. (1992) Lectures on conversation (Vol.1) (G. Jefferson & E. A. Schegloff, Eds.). Oxford/Cambridge, Mass.: Basil Blackwell.
    [Google Scholar]
  48. Sacks, H., Schegloff, E. A., & Jefferson, G.
    (1974) A simplest systematics for the organisation of turn-taking for conversation. Language, 50, 696–735. 10.1353/lan.1974.0010
    https://doi.org/10.1353/lan.1974.0010 [Google Scholar]
  49. Sáenz-Arroyo, A., Roberts, C. M., Torre, J., & Cariño-Olbvera, M.
    (2005) Using fishers’ anecdotes, Naturalists’ observations and grey literature to reassess marine species art risk: the case of the Gulf grouper in the Gulf of Mexico. Fish and Fisheries, 6, 121–133. 10.1111/j.1467‑2979.2005.00185.x
    https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-2979.2005.00185.x [Google Scholar]
  50. Schegloff, E. A.
    (2003) On ESP puns. InP. Glenn, C. D. LeBaron & J. Mandelbaum (Eds.), Studies in language and social interaction: In honour of Robert Hopper (pp.452–460). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
    [Google Scholar]
  51. Smith, D. E.
    (1978) ’K is mentally ill’: the anatomy of a factual account. Sociology, 12, 23–53. 10.1177/003803857801200103
    https://doi.org/10.1177/003803857801200103 [Google Scholar]
  52. Spreckels, J.
    (2008) Identity negotiation in small stories among German adolescent girls. Narrative Inquiry, 18, 393–413. 10.1075/ni.18.2.11spr
    https://doi.org/10.1075/ni.18.2.11spr [Google Scholar]
  53. Stockbridge, G. & Wooffitt, R.
    (2019) Coincidence by design. Qualitative Research, 19(4), 437–454. doi:  10.1177/1468794118773238
    https://doi.org/10.1177/1468794118773238 [Google Scholar]
  54. Tallis, R.
    (2007) Anecdotes, data and the curse of the media case study. Medico-Legal Journal, 75(4), 139–142. 10.1258/rsmmlj.75.4.139
    https://doi.org/10.1258/rsmmlj.75.4.139 [Google Scholar]
  55. Torn, A.
    (2011) Chronotopes of madness and recovery. Narrative Inquiry, 21(1), 130–150. doi: 10.1075/ni.21.2.07tor
    https://doi.org/10.1075/ni.21.2.07tor [Google Scholar]
  56. Tovares, A.
    (2010) All in the family: Small stories and narrative construction of a shared family identity that includes pets. Narrative Inquiry, 20(1), 1–19. doi:  10.1075/ni.20.1.01tov
    https://doi.org/10.1075/ni.20.1.01tov [Google Scholar]
  57. Watson, C.
    (2007) ‘Small stories’ and the doing of professional identities in learning to teach. Narrative Inquiry, 17(2), 371–389. doi:  10.1075/ni.17.2.11wat
    https://doi.org/10.1075/ni.17.2.11wat [Google Scholar]
  58. Widdicombe, S. & Wooffitt, R.
    (1995) The language of youth subcultures: Social identity in action. Hemel Hempstead: Harvester Wheatsheaf.
    [Google Scholar]
  59. Wooffitt, R.
    (1991) ‘I was just doing X… when Y’: some inferential properties of a device in accounts of paranormal experiences. Text, 11(2), 267–288. 10.1515/text.1.1991.11.2.267
    https://doi.org/10.1515/text.1.1991.11.2.267 [Google Scholar]
  60. (1992) Telling tales of the unexpected: The organisation of factual discourse. Hemel Hempstead: Harvester Wheatsheaf.
    [Google Scholar]
  61. (2001) Raising the dead: reported speech in medium-sitter interaction. Discourse Studies, 3(3), 351–374. 10.1177/1461445601003003005
    https://doi.org/10.1177/1461445601003003005 [Google Scholar]
  62. (2017) Relational psychoanalysis and anomalous communication: Continuities and discontinuities in psychoanalysis and telepathy. History of the Human Sciences, 31(1), 118–137. 10.1177/0952695116684311
    https://doi.org/10.1177/0952695116684311 [Google Scholar]
  63. (2018) Shared subjectivities: Enigmatic moments and mundane intimacies. Subjectivity, 11(1): 40–56. 10.1057/s41286‑017‑0041‑y
    https://doi.org/10.1057/s41286-017-0041-y [Google Scholar]
  64. (2019) Poetic confluence: A sociological analysis of an enigmatic moment. Psychoanalytic Dialogues: The International Journal of Relational Perspectives, 29(3), 328–345. doi:  10.1080/10481885.2019.1614838
    https://doi.org/10.1080/10481885.2019.1614838 [Google Scholar]
  65. Wooffitt, R. & Gilbert, H.
    (2008) Discourse, rhetoric and the accomplishment of mediumship in stage demonstrations. Mortality, 13(3), 222–240. 10.1080/13576270802181616
    https://doi.org/10.1080/13576270802181616 [Google Scholar]
  66. Wooffitt, R. & Holt, N.
    (2011) Introspective discourse and the poetics of subjective experience. Research on Language and Social Interaction, 44(2), 135–156. 10.1080/08351813.2011.567097
    https://doi.org/10.1080/08351813.2011.567097 [Google Scholar]
  67. Wooffitt, R., Jackson, C., Reed, D., Ohashi, Y. & Hughes, I.
    (2013) Self-identity, authenticity and the Other: The spirits and audience management in stage mediumship. Language and Communication, 33(2), 93–105. doi:  10.1016/j.langcom.2013.01.003
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.langcom.2013.01.003 [Google Scholar]
http://instance.metastore.ingenta.com/content/journals/10.1075/ni.20013.woo
Loading
  • Article Type: Research Article
Keywords: small stories; poetic confluence; anecdote; identity work; parallelism
This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was successful
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error