1887
image of The moral work of becoming a professional
USD
Buy:$35.00 + Taxes

Abstract

Abstract

In contemporary working life, art-based initiatives are increasingly used in organizational training and development. For artists, this has created new employment opportunities as creative entrepreneurs who provide specialist services for workplaces. In this article, we study the dynamics of such encounters through the narrated accounts of training professionals. Our data come from a professional mentoring program where the working pairs of artists and consultants shared stories about their customer projects. By using conversation analysis as a method, we analyze the way stories are interactionally accomplished in peer group sessions of the program. In particular, we analyze how participants produce different versions of the narrated events, and by so doing, negotiate the questions of blame and accountability with regard to professional action. In conclusion, we discuss stories and storytelling as organizational practice through which the moral order and legitimacy of the program is sustained and the boundaries of the profession constructed.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1075/ni.20056.nis
2021-06-08
2021-12-03
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. Adams, J. & Owens, A.
    (2015) Creativity and democracy in education: The practice and politics of education through the arts. Routledge. 10.4324/9781315815404
    https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315815404 [Google Scholar]
  2. Angouri, J. & Meredith, M.
    (2010) Corporate meetings as genre: A study of the role of the chair in corporate meeting talk. Text & Talk, 30(6), 615–636. 10.1515/text.2010.030
    https://doi.org/10.1515/text.2010.030 [Google Scholar]
  3. Arminen, A.
    (2004) Second stories: The salience of interpersonal communication for mutual help in Alcoholics Anonymous. Journal of Pragmatics, 36(2), 319–347. 10.1016/j.pragma.2003.07.001
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2003.07.001 [Google Scholar]
  4. Arminen, I.
    (2005) Institutional interaction: Studies of talk at work. Ashgate.
    [Google Scholar]
  5. Berthoin Antal, A. , Woodilla, J. & Johansson Sköldberg, U.
    (2016) Artistic interventions in organisations introduction. In U. Johansson Sköldberg , J. Woodilla & A. Berthoin Antal (Eds.), Artistic interventions in organizations: Research, theory, practice (pp.3–17). Routledge.
    [Google Scholar]
  6. Bruner, J.
    (1990) Acts of meaning. Harvard University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  7. Clift, R. & Holt, E.
    (2010) Introduction. In E. Holt & R. Clift (Eds.), Reported talk: Reported speech in interaction (pp.1–15). Cambridge University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  8. Czarniawska, B.
    (1997) Narrating the organization: Dramas of institutional identity. The University of Chicago Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  9. De Vos, J.
    (2012) Psychologisation in times of globalization. Routledge. 10.4324/9780203115459
    https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203115459 [Google Scholar]
  10. Dewey, J.
    (1933/1998) Analysis of reflective thinking: From how we think. In L. A. Hickman & T. M. Alexander (Eds.), The essential Dewey, Volume 2: Ethics, logic, psychology (pp.137–144). Indiana University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  11. Djordjilovic, O.
    (2012) Displaying and developing team identity in workplace meetings – A multimodal perspective. Discourse Studies, 14(1), 111–127. 10.1177/1461445611427205
    https://doi.org/10.1177/1461445611427205 [Google Scholar]
  12. Drew, P. & Holt, E.
    (1988) Complainable matters: The use of idiomatic expressions in making complaints. Social problems, 35(4), 398–417. 10.2307/800594
    https://doi.org/10.2307/800594 [Google Scholar]
  13. Edwards, D.
    (1997) Discourse and cognition. Sage.
    [Google Scholar]
  14. Fenton, C. & Langley, A.
    (2011) Strategy as practice and the narrative turn. Organization Studies, 32(9), 1171–1196. 10.1177/0170840611410838
    https://doi.org/10.1177/0170840611410838 [Google Scholar]
  15. Gabriel, Y.
    (1995) The unmanaged organization: Stories, fantasies and subjectivity. Organization Studies, 16(3), 477–501. 10.1177/017084069501600305
    https://doi.org/10.1177/017084069501600305 [Google Scholar]
  16. Goodwin, C.
    (1984) Notes on story structure and the organization of participation. In J. M. Atkinson & J. Heritage (Eds.), Structures of social action: Studies in conversation analysis (pp.225–246). Cambridge University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  17. (1994) Professional vision. American Anthropologist, 96(3), 606–633. 10.1525/aa.1994.96.3.02a00100
    https://doi.org/10.1525/aa.1994.96.3.02a00100 [Google Scholar]
  18. Gratton, L.
    (2011) The shift: The future of work is already here. William Collins.
    [Google Scholar]
  19. Halonen, M.
    (2002) Kertominen terapian välineenä: Tutkimus vuorovaikutuksesta myllyhoidon ryhmäterapiassa [Telling as a therapeutical device: A study of interaction in Minnesota-model group therapy]. Finnish Literature Society.
    [Google Scholar]
  20. Hautamäki, A. & Oksanen, K.
    (2011) Tulevaisuuden kulttuuriosajat: Näkökulmia moderniin elämään ja työhön. [Culture specialists of the future: Insights into modern life and work]. Committee for the Future, Parliament of Finland, Publications5/2011.
    [Google Scholar]
  21. Heinonen, S. , Ruotsalainen, J. & Kurki, S.
    (2012) Luova tulevaisuustila ja tulevaisuuden osaamisen ennakointi [Creative foresight space and foresight of future skills]. Finland Futures Research Centre.
    [Google Scholar]
  22. Holt, E.
    (2000) Reporting and reacting: Concurrent responses to reported speech. Research on Language and Social Interaction, 33(4), 425–54. 10.1207/S15327973RLSI3304_04
    https://doi.org/10.1207/S15327973RLSI3304_04 [Google Scholar]
  23. Housley, W. & Fitzgerald, R.
    (2015) Introduction to membership categorization analysis. In W. Housley & R. Fitzgerald (Eds.), Advances in membership categorization analysis (pp.1–22). Sage. 10.4135/9781473917873.n1
    https://doi.org/10.4135/9781473917873.n1 [Google Scholar]
  24. Jayyusi, L.
    (1984) Categorization and the moral order. Routledge & Kegan Paul.
    [Google Scholar]
  25. Jefferson, G.
    (1978) The sequential aspects of story telling in conversation. In J. Schenkein (Ed.), Studies in the organization of conversational interaction (pp.219–248). Academic Press. 10.1016/B978‑0‑12‑623550‑0.50016‑1
    https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-623550-0.50016-1 [Google Scholar]
  26. Karvonen, U. , Pietilä, P. & Tainio, L.
    (2018) Sankareita ja hirviöopettajia: Sukupuoli luokanopettajaopiskelijoiden kokemuskertomuksissa [Heros and monster teachers: Gender in teacher students’ oral narratives of experience]. In R. Rinne , N. Haltia , S. Lempinen & T. Kaunisto (Eds.), Eriarvoistuva maailma – tasa-arvoistava koulu [Unequalising world – equalising school] (pp.367–388). The Finnish Educational Research Association.
    [Google Scholar]
  27. Kong, K.
    (2014) Professional discourse. Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/CBO9781139177962
    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139177962 [Google Scholar]
  28. Laitinen, L.
    (1995) Nollapersoona [Zero person]. Virittäjä, 99, 337–358.
    [Google Scholar]
  29. Labov, W.
    (1972) Language in the inner city: Studies in the Black English vernacular. University of Pennsylvania Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  30. Larsson, M. , & Lundholm, S. E.
    (2013) Talking work in a bank: A study of organizing properties of leadership in work interactions. Human Relations, 66(8), 1101–1129. 10.1177/0018726712465452
    https://doi.org/10.1177/0018726712465452 [Google Scholar]
  31. Lehikoinen, K.
    (2013a) Training artists for innovation: Guidelines for curriculum development. In J. Heinsius & K. Lehikoinen (Eds.), Training artists for innovation: Competencies for new contexts (pp.64–83). Theatre Academy of the Uniarts Helsinki.
    [Google Scholar]
  32. (2013b) Qualification framework for artists in artistic interventions. In J. Heinsius & K. Lehikoinen (Eds), Training artists for innovation: Competencies for new contexts (pp.49–63). Theatre Academy of the Uniarts Helsinki.
    [Google Scholar]
  33. (2018) Setting the context: Expanding professionalism in the arts – A Paradigm Shift?In B. Revelli (Ed.) Careers in the arts: Visions for the future (pp.17–30). ELIA.
    [Google Scholar]
  34. Lehikoinen, K. , Pässilä, A. , Martin, M. & Pulkki, M.
    (Eds.) (2016) Taiteilija kehittäjänä: Taiteelliset interventiot työssä [Artist as a developer: Artistic interventions at work]. University of Arts Helsinki.
    [Google Scholar]
  35. Lerner, G.
    (1992) Assisted storytelling: Deploying shared knowledge as a practical matter. Qualitative Sociology, 15(3), 247–271. 10.1007/BF00990328
    https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00990328 [Google Scholar]
  36. Maclean, M. , Harvey, C. , Golant, B. & Sillince, J.
    (2020) The role of innovation narratives in accomplishing organizational ambidexterity. Strategic Organization. Published online ahead-of-print. 10.1177/1476127019897234
    https://doi.org/10.1177/1476127019897234 [Google Scholar]
  37. Moerman, M.
    (1987) Talking culture: Ethnography and conversation analysis. University of Pennsylvania Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  38. Morgan, S. & Dennehy, R. F.
    (1997) The power of organizational storytelling: A management development perspective. The Journal of Management Development, 16(7), 494–501.
    [Google Scholar]
  39. Nissi, R. & Pälli, P.
    (2020) Textual artefacts at the centre of sensemaking: The use of discursive-material resources in constructing joint understanding in organisational workshops. Discourse Studies, 22(2), 123–145. 10.1177/1461445619893794
    https://doi.org/10.1177/1461445619893794 [Google Scholar]
  40. Ochs, E. & Capps, L.
    (2001) Living narrative: Creating lives in everyday storytelling. MA: Harvard University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  41. Pomerantz, A.
    (1986) Extreme case formulations: A way of legitimizing claims. Human Studies, 9, 219–230. 10.1007/BF00148128
    https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00148128 [Google Scholar]
  42. Pässilä, A.
    (2012) Reflexive model of research-based theatre – Processing innovation at the crossroads of theatre, reflection and practice-based innovation activities. Lappeenranta University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  43. Pässilä, A. , Oikarinen, T. & Kallio, A.
    (2013) Creating dialogue by storytelling. Journal of Workplace Learning, 25(3), 159–177. 10.1108/13665621311306547
    https://doi.org/10.1108/13665621311306547 [Google Scholar]
  44. Robinson, J. D.
    (2012) Overall structural organization. In J. Sidnell & T. Stivers (Eds.), The handbook of conversation analysis (pp.257–280). Wiley-Blackwell. 10.1002/9781118325001.ch13
    https://doi.org/10.1002/9781118325001.ch13 [Google Scholar]
  45. Sacks, H.
    (1974) An analysis of the course of a joke’s telling in conversation. In R. Bauman & J. Sherzer (Eds.), Explorations in the ethnography of speaking (pp.337–353). Cambridge University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  46. (1992) Lectures on conversation, Volume 1. Basil Blackwell.
    [Google Scholar]
  47. Schiuma, G.
    (2011) The value of arts for business. Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/CBO9780511852015
    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511852015 [Google Scholar]
  48. Schön, D. A.
    (1983) The reflective practitioner: How professionals think in action. Maurice Temple Smith.
    [Google Scholar]
  49. Schnurr, S. & Van De Mieroop, D.
    (2017) Introduction: A kaleidoscopic view of identity struggles at work. In D. Van De Mieroop & S. Schnurr (Eds.), Identity Struggles: Evidence from workplaces around the world (pp.1–18). John Benjamins. 10.1075/dapsac.69.01sch
    https://doi.org/10.1075/dapsac.69.01sch [Google Scholar]
  50. Selting, M.
    2010 Affectivity in conversational storytelling: An analysis of displays of anger or indignation in complaint stories. Pragmatics, 20(2), 229–277. 10.1075/prag.20.2.06sel
    https://doi.org/10.1075/prag.20.2.06sel [Google Scholar]
  51. Stokoe, E. & Edwards, D.
    2006 Story formulations in talk-in-interaction. In M. Bamberg (Ed.), Narrative – State of the art (pp.56–65). John Benjamins. 10.1075/ni.16.1.09sto
    https://doi.org/10.1075/ni.16.1.09sto [Google Scholar]
  52. Susskind, R. & Susskind, D.
    (2015) The future of the professions: How technology will transform the work of human experts. Oxford University Press. 10.1093/oso/9780198713395.001.0001
    https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780198713395.001.0001 [Google Scholar]
  53. Svinhufvud, K. , Voutilainen, L. & Weiste, E.
    (2017) Normalizing in student counseling: Counselors’ responses to students’ problem descriptions. Discourse Studies, 19(2), 196–215. 10.1177/1461445617691704
    https://doi.org/10.1177/1461445617691704 [Google Scholar]
  54. Vince, R.
    (2002) Organizing reflection. Management Learning, 33(1), 63–78. 10.1177/1350507602331003
    https://doi.org/10.1177/1350507602331003 [Google Scholar]
  55. Vehviläinen, S.
    (2001) Evaluative advice in educational counseling: The use of disagreement in the “stepwise entry” to advice. Research on Language and Social Interaction, 34(3), 371–398. 10.1207/S15327973RLSI34‑3_4
    https://doi.org/10.1207/S15327973RLSI34-3_4 [Google Scholar]
  56. Vince, R. & Reynolds, M.
    (2009) Reflection, reflective practice and organizing reflection. In S. J. Armstrong & C. V. Fukami (Eds.), The SAGE Handbook of management learning, education and development (pp.89–103). Sage.10.4135/9780857021038.n5
    https://doi.org/10.4135/9780857021038.n5 [Google Scholar]
  57. Zimmerman, D. H.
    (1998) Identity, context and interaction. In C. Antaki & S. Widdicombe (Eds.), Identities in talk (pp.87–106). Sage.
    [Google Scholar]
http://instance.metastore.ingenta.com/content/journals/10.1075/ni.20056.nis
Loading
/content/journals/10.1075/ni.20056.nis
Loading

Data & Media loading...

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was successful
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error