1887
  1. Home
  2. e-Journals
  3. Narrative Inquiry
  4. Volume 31, Issue 1
  5. Article
Volume 31, Issue 1
  • ISSN 1387-6740
  • E-ISSN: 1569-9935
USD
Buy:$35.00 + Taxes

Abstract

Abstract

My contribution traces the evolving notion of tellability in the study of narrative over the last thirty-odd years: Tellability was initially seen as an objective property of textual content, but research on narrative in real contexts of talk has increasingly recognized the various ways interactional factors can override content as grounds for relating a story. I advance a set of research strategies based on investigation of the discourse structures that accompany the negotiation of tellability in context and the syntactic markers of tellability, specifically requests for stories like “tell me” and “tell her,” correlating with features of recipient design in narration. This will reveal distinctions in presuppositions about who knows a story already, who else should be included, and who may conarrate, demonstrating how tellability varies from one participant to another even in the same context.

© John Benjamins Publishing Company
Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1075/ni.20062.nor
2020-10-01
2025-01-16

  • From This Site

    /content/journals/10.1075/ni.20062.nor
    dcterms_title,dcterms_subject,pub_keyword
    -contentType:Journal -contentType:Contributor -contentType:Concept -contentType:Institution
    10
    5
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. Bamberg, M.
    (2004) “I know it may sound mean to say this, but we couldn’t really care less about her anyway”: Form and Functions of ‘Slut-Bashing’ in 15-Year Olds. Human Development, 47, 331–353. doi:  10.1159/000081036
     https://doi.org/10.1159/000081036 [Google Scholar]
  2. Baroni, R.
    (2014) “Tellability” inthe living handbook of narratologyhttps://www.lhn.uni-hamburg.de/node/30.htmlCreated: 4. August 2011Revised: 18. April 2014. 10.1515/9783110316469.836
     https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110316469.836 [Google Scholar]
  3. Bateson, G.
    (1972) Steps to an Ecology of Mind. San Francisco, CA: Chandler.
     [Google Scholar]
  4. Biber, D., Conrad, S., & Leech, G.
    (2002) Longman Student Grammar of Spoken and Written English. Harlow: Pearson Education.
     [Google Scholar]
  5. Biber, D., Johansson, S., Leech, G., Conrad, S., & Finegan, E.
    (1999) Longman Grammar of Spoken and Written English. Harlow: Pearson Education.
     [Google Scholar]
  6. Blum-Kulka, S.
    (1993) ‘You gotta know how to tell a story’: Telling, tales, and tellers in and Israeli narrative events at dinner. Language in Society, 22, 361–402. 10.1017/S0047404500017280
     https://doi.org/10.1017/S0047404500017280 [Google Scholar]
  7. Blum-Kulka, S., & Snow, C. E.
    (1992) Developing autonomy for tellers, tales, and telling in family narrative events. Journal of Narrative and Life History, 2, 187–217. 10.1075/jnlh.2.3.02dev
     https://doi.org/10.1075/jnlh.2.3.02dev [Google Scholar]
  8. Chafe, W. L.
    (1994) Discourse, Consciousness, and Time. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
     [Google Scholar]
  9. Coupland, J., & Jaworski, A.
    (2003) Transgression and intimacy in recreational talk narratives. Research on Language and Social Interaction, 36, 85–106. 10.1207/S15327973RLSI3601_5
     https://doi.org/10.1207/S15327973RLSI3601_5 [Google Scholar]
  10. Georgakopoulou, A.
    (2005) Same old story? On the interactional dynamics of shared narratives. InU. M. Quasthoff & T. Becker (Eds.), Narrative Interaction (pp.223–242). Amsterdam: Benjamins. 10.1075/sin.5.12geo
     https://doi.org/10.1075/sin.5.12geo [Google Scholar]
  11. (2007) Small Stories, Interaction and Identities. Amsterdam: Benjamins. 10.1075/sin.8
     https://doi.org/10.1075/sin.8 [Google Scholar]
  12. Goffman, E.
    (1974) Frame Analysis. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
     [Google Scholar]
  13. Goodwin, C.
    (1987) Forgetfulness as an interactive resource. Social Psychological Quarterly, 50, 115–131. 10.2307/2786746
     https://doi.org/10.2307/2786746 [Google Scholar]
  14. Heritage, J.
    (2012a) Epistemics in action: Action formation and territories of knowledge. Research on Language and Social Interaction, 45(1), 1–29. doi:  10.1080/08351813.2012.646684
     https://doi.org/10.1080/08351813.2012.646684 [Google Scholar]
  15. (2012b) The Epistemic Engine: Sequence Organization and Territories of Knowledge. Research on Language and Social Interaction, 45(1), 30–52. doi:  10.1080/08351813.2012.646685
     https://doi.org/10.1080/08351813.2012.646685 [Google Scholar]
  16. Jefferson, G., Sacks, H., & Schegloff, E.
    (1987) Notes on laughter in the pursuit of intimacy. InG. Button & J. R. E. Lee (Eds.), Talk and Social Organisation (pp.152–327). Clevedon: Multilingual Matters.
     [Google Scholar]
  17. Jones, R. L.
    (2002) “That’s very rude, I shouldn’t be telling you that”: Older women talking about sex. Narrative Inquiry, 12(1), 121–143. 10.1075/ni.12.1.18jon
     https://doi.org/10.1075/ni.12.1.18jon [Google Scholar]
  18. Karatsu, M.
    (2012) Conversational Storytelling among Japanese Women: Conversational Circumstances and Tellability of Stories. Amsterdam: Benjamins. 10.1075/sin.16
     https://doi.org/10.1075/sin.16 [Google Scholar]
  19. Labov, W.
    (1972) Language in the Inner City. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press.
     [Google Scholar]
  20. (2013) The Language of Life and Death: The Transformation of Experience in Oral Narrative. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/CBO9781139519632
     https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139519632 [Google Scholar]
  21. Labov, W., & Fanshel, D.
    (1977) Therapeutic discourse. New York: Academic Press.
     [Google Scholar]
  22. Labov, W., & Waletzky, J.
    (1967) Narrative analysis: Oral versions of personal experience. InJ. Helm (Ed.), Essays on the Verbal and Visual Arts (pp.12–44). Seattle: University of Washington Press.
     [Google Scholar]
  23. Norrick, N. R.
    (1997) Twice-told tales: Collaborative narration of familiar stories. Language in Society, 26, 199–220. 10.1017/S004740450002090X
     https://doi.org/10.1017/S004740450002090X [Google Scholar]
  24. (2000) Conversational Narrative. Amsterdam: Benjamins. 10.1075/cilt.203
     https://doi.org/10.1075/cilt.203 [Google Scholar]
  25. (2004) Humor, tellability and conarration in conversation. Text, 24(1), 79–111. 10.1515/text.2004.005
     https://doi.org/10.1515/text.2004.005 [Google Scholar]
  26. (2005) The dark side of tellability. Narrative Inquiry, 15, 323–343. 10.1075/ni.15.2.07nor
     https://doi.org/10.1075/ni.15.2.07nor [Google Scholar]
  27. (2015) Narrative illocutionary acts direct and indirect. Journal of Pragmatics, 86, 94–99. 10.1016/j.pragma.2015.05.008
     https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2015.05.008 [Google Scholar]
  28. (2020) The epistemics of narrative performance in conversation. Narrative Inquiry, 30(2), 211–235. doi:  10.1075/ni.18095.nor
     https://doi.org/10.1075/ni.18095.nor [Google Scholar]
  29. Ochs, E., & Capps, L.
    (2001) Living Narrative: Creating Lives in Everyday Storytelling. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
     [Google Scholar]
  30. Polanyi, L.
    (1979) So what’s the point?Semiotica, 25, 207–41. 10.1515/semi.1979.25.3‑4.207
     https://doi.org/10.1515/semi.1979.25.3-4.207 [Google Scholar]
  31. Quasthoff, U.
    (1980) Erzählen in Gesprächen: Linguistische Untersuchungen zu Strukturen und Funktionen am Beispiel einer Kommunikationsform des Alltags. Tübingen: Narr.
     [Google Scholar]
  32. Ryave, A. L.
    (1978) On the Achievement of a Series of Stories. InJ. Schenkein (Ed.), Studies in the Organization of Conversational Interaction (pp.113–32). New York: Academic Press. 10.1016/B978‑0‑12‑623550‑0.50011‑2
     https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-623550-0.50011-2 [Google Scholar]
  33. Sacks, H.
    (1984) On doing “being ordinary.” InJ. M. Atkinson & J. Heritage (Eds.), Structures of social action: Studies in conversation analysis (pp.413–429). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
     [Google Scholar]
  34. (1992) Lectures on Conversation, 2vols. G. Jefferson (Ed.). Oxford: Blackwell.
     [Google Scholar]
  35. Sacks, H., Schegloff, E. A., & Jefferson, G.
    (1974) A simplest systematics for the organization of turn-taking for conversation. Language, 50, 696–735. doi:  10.1353/lan.1974.0010
     https://doi.org/10.1353/lan.1974.0010 [Google Scholar]
  36. Schegloff, E. A.
    (1995) Discourse as an interactional achievement III: the omnirelevance of action. Research on Language and Social Interaction, 28(3), 185–211. doi:  10.1207/s15327973rlsi2803_2
     https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327973rlsi2803_2 [Google Scholar]
  37. Stokoe, E., & Edwards, D.
    (2006) Story formulations in talk-in-interaction. Narrative Inquiry, 16, 56–65. 10.1075/ni.16.1.09sto
     https://doi.org/10.1075/ni.16.1.09sto [Google Scholar]
/content/journals/10.1075/ni.20062.nor
Loading
  • Article Type: Research Article
Keyword(s): conarration; context; conversation; epistemics; interaction; presupposition; recipient design; reminiscing; tellability

Most Cited

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was successful
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error