Volume 31, Issue 1
  • ISSN 1387-6740
  • E-ISSN: 1569-9935
Buy:$35.00 + Taxes



This paper addresses issues related to narrative, cognition, and culture within the framework of foreign- or second-language (L2) narrative discourse, using a methodology of connecting the story- and language-related qualities of narrative discourse. The term “coherence” refers to whether or not a text makes sense at a global level, whereas “cohesion” describes the linguistic relationships among clauses in a narrative, such as how its surface linguistic elements are linked together at a local level. The paper (1) examines oral narratives, (2) reveals how both coherence and cohesion serve as the twin engines of narrative, and (3) emphasizes the significance of noting not only the narrative content/structure but also the appropriate use of linguistic devices, to identify language-specific ways of expressing affective elements in narrative. That is, the paper suggests the importance of developing conceptual understanding of L2 forms (e.g., grammatical variables) and their stylistic significance.


Article metrics loading...

Loading full text...

Full text loading...


  1. Bakeman, R., & Gottman, J. M.
    (1997) Observing interaction: An introduction to sequential analysis (2nd ed.). New York: Cambridge University Press. doi:  10.1017/CBO9780511527685
    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511527685 [Google Scholar]
  2. Bamberg, M.
    (1987) The acquisition of narratives: Learning to use language. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. doi:  10.1515/9783110854190
    https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110854190 [Google Scholar]
  3. Berman, R.
    (1996) Form and function in developing narrative abilities: The case of ‘and.’ InD. I. Slobin, J. Gerhardt, A. Kytatzis, & J. Guo (Eds.), Social interaction, context, and language: Essays in honor of Susan Ervin-Tripp (pp.243–268). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
    [Google Scholar]
  4. (1997) Narrative theory and narrative development: The Labovian impact. Journal of Narrative and Life History, 7(1–4), 235–244. doi:  10.1075/jnlh.7.29nar
    https://doi.org/10.1075/jnlh.7.29nar [Google Scholar]
  5. Berman, R. A.
    (2004a) The role of context in developing narrative abilities. InS. Strömqvist & L. Verhoeven (Eds.), Relating events in narrative, Volume 2: Typological and contextual perspectives (pp.261–280). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
    [Google Scholar]
  6. (2004b) Between emergence and mastery: The long developmental route of language acquisition. InB. A. Berman (Ed.), Language development across childhood and adolescence (pp.9–34). Amsterdam, The Netherlands: John Benjamins. doi: 10.1075/tilar.3
    https://doi.org/10.1075/tilar.3 [Google Scholar]
  7. Berman, R. A., & Slobin, D. I.
    (1994) Relating events in narrative: A crosslinguistic developmental study. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
    [Google Scholar]
  8. Blum-Kulka, S.
    (2004) The role of peer interaction in later pragmatic development. InB. A. Berman (Ed.), Language development across childhood and adolescence (pp.191–210). Amsterdam, The Netherlands: John Benjamins. doi:  10.1075/tilar.3
    https://doi.org/10.1075/tilar.3 [Google Scholar]
  9. Chafe, W. L.
    (1980) The pear stories: Cognitive, cultural, and linguistic aspects of narrative production. Norwood, NJ: Ablex.
    [Google Scholar]
  10. Ervin-Tripp, S. M., & Küntay, A.
    (1997) The occasioning and structure of conversational stories. InT. Givón (Ed.), Conversation: Cognitive, communicative and social perspectives (pp.133–166). Amsterdam, The Netherlands: John Benjamins. doi:  10.1075/tsl.34
    https://doi.org/10.1075/tsl.34 [Google Scholar]
  11. Kang, J. Y.
    (2003) On the ability to tell good stories in another language: Analysis of Korean EFL learners’ oral “frog story” narratives. Narrative Inquiry, 13(1), 127–149. doi:  10.1075/ni.13.1.05kan
    https://doi.org/10.1075/ni.13.1.05kan [Google Scholar]
  12. (2006) Producing culturally appropriate narratives in English as a foreign language: A discourse analysis of Korean EFL learners’ written narratives. Narrative Inquiry, 16(2), 379–407. doi:  10.1075/ni.16.2.08kan
    https://doi.org/10.1075/ni.16.2.08kan [Google Scholar]
  13. (2012) How do narrative and language skills relate to each other?: Investigation of young Korean EFL learners’ oral narratives. Narrative Inquiry, 22(2), 307–331. doi:  10.1075/ni.22.2.06yus
    https://doi.org/10.1075/ni.22.2.06yus [Google Scholar]
  14. Kimura, H.
    (2014) Koto, kokoro, kotoba – Genjitsu o kotoba ni suru shiten – [Things, mind, and words: A perspective that puts reality into words]. InK. Karasawa & T. Hayashi (Eds.), Jin-bun-chi 1 Kokoro to kotoba no mēkyū [Humanities 1: Labyrinth of mind and words] (97–118). Tokyo: University of Tokyo Press.
  15. Kuno, S.
    (1987) Functional syntax: Anaphora, discourse and empathy. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  16. Kuno, S., & Kaburaki, E.
    (1977) Empathy and syntax. Linguistic Inquiry, 8(4), 627–672. https://www.jstor.org/stable/4178011
    [Google Scholar]
  17. Labov, W.
    (1972) Language in the inner city: Studies in the Black English vernacular. Philadelphia, PA: University of Pennsylvania Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  18. (1997) Some further steps in narrative analysis. Journal of Narrative and Life History, 7(1–4), 395–415. doi:  10.1075/jnlh.7.49som
    https://doi.org/10.1075/jnlh.7.49som [Google Scholar]
  19. (2006) Narrative pre-construction. Narrative Inquiry, 16(1), 37–45. doi:  10.1075/ni.16.1.07lab
    https://doi.org/10.1075/ni.16.1.07lab [Google Scholar]
  20. (2013) The language of life and death: The transformation of experience in oral narrative. New York: Cambridge University Press. doi:  10.1017/CBO9781139519632
    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139519632 [Google Scholar]
  21. Labov, W., & Waletzky, J.
    (1967) Narrative analysis: Oral versions of personal experience. InJune Helm (Ed.), Essays on the verbal and visual arts: Proceedings of the 1966 annual spring meeting of the American Ethnological Society (pp.12–44). Seattle, WA: University of Washington Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  22. Landis, J. R., & Koch, G. G.
    (1977) The measurement of observer agreement for categorical data. Biometrics, 33(1), 159–174. 10.2307/2529310
    https://doi.org/10.2307/2529310 [Google Scholar]
  23. Mayer, M.
    (1969) Frog, where are you?New York: Dial Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  24. Maynard, S. K.
    (1990) An introduction to Japanese grammar and communication strategies. Tokyo: The Japan Times.
    [Google Scholar]
  25. Minami, M.
    (2002) Culture-specific language styles: The development of oral narrative and literacy. Clevedon, UK: Multilingual Matters. 10.21832/9781853595752
    https://doi.org/10.21832/9781853595752 [Google Scholar]
  26. (2011) Telling stories in two languages: Multiple approaches to understanding English-Japanese bilingual children’s narratives. Charlotte, NC: Information Age Publishing.
    [Google Scholar]
  27. (2015a) Narrative, cognition, and socialization. InA. De Fina & A. Georgakopoulou (Eds.), The handbook of narrative analysis (pp.76–96). Malden, MA: Wiley-Blackwell. doi:  10.1002/9781118458204.ch4
    https://doi.org/10.1002/9781118458204.ch4 [Google Scholar]
  28. (2015b) Narrative development in L1 Japanese. InM. Nakayama (Ed.), Handbook of Japanese psycholinguistics (pp.181–215). Berlin/Boston, MA: De Gruyter Mouton. doi:  10.1515/9781614511212‑013
    https://doi.org/10.1515/9781614511212-013 [Google Scholar]
  29. (2016) The influence of topic choice on narrative proficiency by learners of Japanese as a foreign language. InM. Minami (Ed.), Handbook of Japanese applied linguistics (pp.223–251). Berlin/Boston: De Gruyter Mouton. doi:  10.1515/9781614511830‑013
    https://doi.org/10.1515/9781614511830-013 [Google Scholar]
  30. (2019) Connecting L1 and L2 acquisition: From the perspective of macro and micro narrative structure. Journal of Japanese Linguistics, 35(2), 143–164. doi:  10.1515/jjl‑2019‑2008
    https://doi.org/10.1515/jjl-2019-2008 [Google Scholar]
  31. Minami, M., & McCabe, A.
    (1991) Haiku as a discourse regulation device: Stanza analysis of Japanese children’s personal narratives. Language in Society, 20(4), 577–599. doi:  10.1017/S0047404500016730
    https://doi.org/10.1017/S0047404500016730 [Google Scholar]
  32. (1995) Rice balls and bear hunts: Japanese and North American family narrative patterns. Journal of Child Language, 22(2), 423–445. doi:  10.1017/S0305000900009867
    https://doi.org/10.1017/S0305000900009867 [Google Scholar]
  33. Ohta, A. S.
    (2017) From SCOBA development to implementation in concept-based instruction: Conceptualizing and teaching Japanese addressee honorifics as expressing modes of self. Language and Sociocultural Theory, 4(2), 187–218. 10.1558/lst.31492
    https://doi.org/10.1558/lst.31492 [Google Scholar]
  34. Peng, G.
    (2016) Nitchū ryōgo no voisu ni mirareru shiten no arikata [Perspectives in Japanese and Chinese voices]. InM. Ono & Q. Li (Eds.), Gengo no shukansei [Language subjectivity] (pp.35–51). Tokyo: Kurosio Publishers.
  35. Peterson, C., & McCabe, A.
    (1983) Developmental psycholinguistics: Three ways of looking at a child’s narrative. New York: Plenum. 10.1007/978‑1‑4757‑0608‑6
    https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4757-0608-6 [Google Scholar]
  36. (1991) Linking children’s connective use and narrative macrostructure. InA. McCabe & C. Peterson (Eds.), Developing narrative structure (pp.29–53). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
    [Google Scholar]
  37. Polanyi, L.
    (1985) Telling the American story. Norwood, NJ: Ablex.
    [Google Scholar]
  38. Riessman, C. K.
    (2008) Narrative methods for the human sciences. Los Angeles, CA: Sage Publications.
    [Google Scholar]
  39. Toolan, M. J.
    (1988) Narrative: A critical linguistic introduction. London: Routledge.
    [Google Scholar]
  40. Yamanashi, M.
    (2009) Cognitive syntax: Gestalt of grammar. Tokyo: Taishukan Publishing.
    [Google Scholar]

Data & Media loading...

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was successful
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error