Ta as an emergent language practice of audience design in CMC

References

1. Allan, K., Capone, A., & Kecskees, I.
   (Eds.) (2016) Pragmemes and theories of language use. Springer. 10.1007/978‑3‑319‑43491‑9
   https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-43491-9 [Google Scholar]
2. Androutsopoulos, J.
   (2012) “Greeklish”: Transliteration practice and discourse in the context of computer-mediated digraphia. InA. M. Jaffe, J. K. Androutsopoulos, M. Sebba, & S. A. Johnson (Eds.), Orthography as social action. Scripts, spelling, identity and power (pp.359–392). de Gruyter Mouton. 10.1515/9781614511038.359
   https://doi.org/10.1515/9781614511038.359 [Google Scholar]
3. Androutsopoulos, J.
   (2014) Languaging when contexts collapse: Audience design in social networking. Discourse, Context & Media, 4(5), 62–73. 10.1016/j.dcm.2014.08.006
   https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dcm.2014.08.006 [Google Scholar]
4. Association of Internet Researchers (AoIR)
   Association of Internet Researchers (AoIR) (2012a) Ethical Decision-Making and Internet Research: Recommendations from the AoIR Ethics Committee. aoir.org/ethics/
5. Association of Internet Researchers (AoIR)
   Association of Internet Researchers (AoIR) (2012b) Appendix 1, AoIR Guidelines: Ethical Decision Making and Internet Research Ethics. Ethics Graphic. aoir.org/ethics/
6. Bach, K. & Harnish, R. M.
   (1979) Linguistic Communication and Speech Acts. The MIT Press.
   [Google Scholar]
7. Baker, A.
   (2016) Feeling like stories: Empathy and narrative engagement (unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Sheffield, White Rose eThese Online). etheses.whiterose.ac.uk/14293/
8. Bakhtin, M.
   (1981) The dialogic imagination: four essays. https://hdl-handle-net.login.ezproxy.library.ualberta.ca/2027/heb.09354
9. Bamberg, M.
   (2012) Narrative analysis. InH. Cooper, P. M. Camic, D. L. Long, A. T. Panter, D. Rindskopf, & K. J. Sher (Eds.), APA handbook of research methods in psychology, Vol 2: Research designs: Quantitative, qualitative, neuropsychological, and biological (pp.85–102). American Psychological Association. 10.1037/13620‑006
   https://doi.org/10.1037/13620-006 [Google Scholar]
10. Barthes, R., & Duisit, L.
    (1975) An Introduction to the Structural Analysis of Narrative. New Literary History, 6(2), 237–272. 10.2307/468419
    https://doi.org/10.2307/468419 [Google Scholar]
11. Baym, N., & boyd, d.
    (2012) Socially Mediated Publicness: An Introduction. Journal of Broadcasting & Electronic Media, 56(3), 320–329. 10.1080/08838151.2012.705200
    https://doi.org/10.1080/08838151.2012.705200 [Google Scholar]
12. Bell, A.
    (2001) Back in style: Reworking audience design. InP. Eckert & J. R. Rickford (Eds.), Style and sociolinguistic variation (pp.139–169). Cambridge University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
13. Bell, A., & Ensslin, A.
    (2011) “I know what it was. You know what it was”: Second-Person narration in hypertext fiction. Narrative, 19(3), 311–329. 10.1353/nar.2011.0020
    https://doi.org/10.1353/nar.2011.0020 [Google Scholar]
14. boyd, d.
    (2008) Taken out of context: American teen sociality in networked publics. (unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of California, Berkeley, SSRN).   10.2139/ssrn.1344756
    https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.1344756
15. boyd, d., & Ellison, N. B.
    (2008) Social network sites: Definition, history, and scholarship. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 13(1), 210–230. 10.1111/j.1083‑6101.2007.00393.x
    https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1083-6101.2007.00393.x [Google Scholar]
16. Brown, R., & Gilman, A.
    (1960) The pronouns of power and solidarity. InT. A. Sebeok (Ed.), Style in language (pp.253–276). Cambridge: Technology Press of Massachusetts Institute of Technology.
    [Google Scholar]
17. Cao, X.
    (2014) The effects of narrative perspectives and gender similarity to a victim on sympathy and support for aid to people in need. Studies in Media and Communication, 2(1).   10.11114/smc.v2i1.329
    https://doi.org/10.11114/smc.v2i1.329 [Google Scholar]
18. Chan, C. H.
    (2011) The Europeanization of modern written Chinese: a case study of the changing third person pronouns in the twentieth century and beyond. Peter Lang.
    [Google Scholar]
19. Chang, Y., Li, Y., Yan, J., & Kumar, V.
    (2019) Getting more likes: the impact of narrative person and brand image on customer–brand interactions. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 47(6), 1027–1045. 10.1007/s11747‑019‑00632‑2
    https://doi.org/10.1007/s11747-019-00632-2 [Google Scholar]
20. Clark, H. H.
    (1992) Arenas of language use. University of Chicago Press.
    [Google Scholar]
21. Cohen, J.
    (2001) Defining identification: A theoretical look at the identification of audiences with media character. Mass Communication & Society, 41, 245–264. 10.1207/S15327825MCS0403_01
    https://doi.org/10.1207/S15327825MCS0403_01 [Google Scholar]
22. Coulmas, F.
    (1996) The Blackwell encyclopedia of writing systems. Blackwell.
    [Google Scholar]
23. Dailey-O’Cain, J.
    (2017) Trans-National English in social media communities. Palgrave Macmillan. 10.1057/978‑1‑137‑50615‑3
    https://doi.org/10.1057/978-1-137-50615-3 [Google Scholar]
24. Dayter, D.
    (2015) Small stories and extended narratives on Twitter. Discourse, Context & Media, 101, 19–26. 10.1016/j.dcm.2015.05.003
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dcm.2015.05.003 [Google Scholar]
25. De Fina, A., & Georgakopoulou, A.
    (2012) Analyzing narrative : discourse and sociolinguistic perspectives. Cambridge University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
26. de Graaf, A., Hoeken, H., Sanders, J., & Beentjes, J.
    (2012) Identification as a mechanism of narrative persuasion. Communication Research, 391, 802–823. 10.1177/0093650211408594
    https://doi.org/10.1177/0093650211408594 [Google Scholar]
27. Deringer, L., Gast, V., Haas, F., & Rudolf, O.
    (2015) Impersonal uses of the second person singular and generalized empathy: An exploratory corpus study of English, German and Russian. InL. Gardellle & S. Sorlin (Eds.), The Pragmatics of Personal Pronouns (pp.311–334). John Benjamins Publishing Company. 10.1075/slcs.171.15der
    https://doi.org/10.1075/slcs.171.15der [Google Scholar]
28. Deumert, A.
    (2014) Sociolinguistics and mobile communication. Edinburgh University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
29. Eberl, M.
    (2020) Double trouble. InS. Rüdiger & D. Dayter (Eds.), Corpus approaches to social media: Studies in corpus linguistics (pp.131–146). John Benjamins Publishing Company. 10.1075/scl.98.06ebe
    https://doi.org/10.1075/scl.98.06ebe [Google Scholar]
30. Esquivel, O. J. D.
    (2019) Exploring the Filipinization of the English language in a digital age: An identity apart from other world Englishes. Journal of English as an International Language, 14(1), 58–72.
    [Google Scholar]
31. Gibbons, A., & Macrae, A.
    (Eds.) (2018) Pronouns in literature: Positions and perspectives in language. Palgrave Macmillan. 10.1057/978‑1‑349‑95317‑2
    https://doi.org/10.1057/978-1-349-95317-2 [Google Scholar]
32. Gottlieb, N.
    (2010) Playing with language in e-Japan: Old wine in new bottles. Japanese Studies, 30(3), 393–407. 10.1080/10371397.2010.518600
    https://doi.org/10.1080/10371397.2010.518600 [Google Scholar]
33. Harrison, M.
    (2008) The Paradox of fiction and the ethics of empathy: Reconceiving Dickens’s realism. Narrative, 16(3), 256–278. www.jstor.org/stable/30219607
    [Google Scholar]
34. Hartung, F., Burke, M., Hagoort, P., & Willems, R. M.
    (2016) Taking Perspective: Personal Pronouns Affect Experiential Aspects of Literary Reading. PLOS ONE, 11(5).   10.1371/journal.pone.0154732
    https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0154732 [Google Scholar]
35. Harvey, K. J., Brown, B., Crawford, P., MacFarlane, A., & McPherson, A.
    (2007) “Am I normal?” Teenagers, sexual health and the Internet. Social Science and Medicine, 651, 771–781. 10.1016/j.socscimed.2007.04.005
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.socscimed.2007.04.005 [Google Scholar]
36. Herring, S. C.
    (2004) Computer-Mediated Discourse Analysis. In Designing for Virtual Communities in the Service of Learning (pp.338–376). Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/CBO9780511805080.016
    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511805080.016 [Google Scholar]
37. Horie, K., & Shimura, M.
    (2003) Overt anaphoric expressions, empathy, and the uchi-soto distinction in Japanese. Proceedings of the 2nd Seoul International Conference on Discourse and Cognitive Linguistics, 297–310.
    [Google Scholar]
38. Hu, S. S. 胡心馨
    (2015) 公益敘事廣告中不同人稱情境對同理心影響之效果研究. “gongyixushi guanggaozhong butong renchengqingjing dui tonglixin yingxiang zhi xiaoguo yanjiu” [The effect of different personal pronouns in narrative advertisement on empathy, attitudes and behavioral intention.]. (Unpublished Master’s thesis, Shih Hsin University, Taiwan, National Digital Library of Theses and Dissertations in Taiwan). https://hdl.handle.net/11296/zr5f4b
39. Khuman, B., & Madhumita, G.
    (2018) Ungendered narrative: A new genre in the making. Concentric: Literary and Cultural Studies, 44(2), 271–293.  10.6240/concentric.lit.201809.44(2).0011
    https://doi.org/10.6240/concentric.lit.201809.44(2).0011 [Google Scholar]
40. Keen, S.
    (2006) A theory of narrative empathy. Narrative, 14(3), 207–236. 10.1353/nar.2006.0015
    https://doi.org/10.1353/nar.2006.0015 [Google Scholar]
41. Koopman, E. M.
    (2015) Empathic reactions after reading: The role of genre, personal factors and affective responses. Poetics, 501, 62–79. 10.1016/j.poetic.2015.02.008
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.poetic.2015.02.008 [Google Scholar]
42. Lange, P.
    (2008) Publicly private and privately public: Social networking on YouTube, Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 13(1), 361–380. 10.1111/j.1083‑6101.2007.00400.x
    https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1083-6101.2007.00400.x [Google Scholar]
43. Lee, C. K.-M.
    (2007) Affordances and text-making practices in online instant messaging. Written Communication, 24(3), 223–249. 10.1177/0741088307303215
    https://doi.org/10.1177/0741088307303215 [Google Scholar]
44. Litt, E.
    (2012) Knock, knock. Who’s there? The imagined audience. Journal of Broadcasting & Electronic Media, 56(3), 330–345. 10.1080/08838151.2012.705195
    https://doi.org/10.1080/08838151.2012.705195 [Google Scholar]
45. Majors, K.
    (2013) Children’s perceptions of their imaginary companions and the purposes they serve: An exploratory study in the United Kingdom. Childhood, 20(4), 550–565. 10.1177/0907568213476899
    https://doi.org/10.1177/0907568213476899 [Google Scholar]
46. Norman, J.
    (1988) Chinese. Cambridge University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
47. Page, R., Barton, D., Unger, J. W., & Zappavigna, M.
    (2014) Researching Language and Social Media. Routledge. 10.4324/9781315771786
    https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315771786 [Google Scholar]
48. Richardson, B.
    (2006) Unnatural voices: extreme narration in modern and contemporary fiction. Ohio State University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
49. Robertson, W. C.
    (2019) Why can’t I speak in kanji?: Indexing social identities through marked script use in Japanese manga. Discourse, Context & Media, 301. 10.1016/j.dcm.2019.04.003
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dcm.2019.04.003 [Google Scholar]
50. Seale, C.
    (2006) Gender accommodation in online cancer support groups. Health, 10(3), 345–360. 10.1177/1363459306064495
    https://doi.org/10.1177/1363459306064495 [Google Scholar]
51. Seale, C., Charteris-Black, J., MacFarlane, A., & McPherson, A.
    (2013) Interviews and Internet Forums: A Comparison of Two Sources of Qualitative Data. InC. Hine (Ed.), Virtual Research Methods (Vol.31). 41–60. SAGE Publications, Ltd.  10.4135/9781446286142
    https://doi.org/10.4135/9781446286142 [Google Scholar]
52. Seale, C., Charteris-Black, J., & Ziebland, S.
    (2006) Gender, cancer experience and Internet use: A comparative keyword analysis of interviews and online cancer support groups. Social Science and Medicine, 62(10), 2577–2590. 10.1016/j.socscimed.2005.11.016
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.socscimed.2005.11.016 [Google Scholar]
53. Seargeant, P., Tagg, C., & Ngampramuan, W.
    (2012) Language choice and addressivity strategies in Thai-English social network interactions. Journal of Sociolinguistics, 16(4), 510–531. 10.1111/j.1467‑9841.2012.00540.x
    https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9841.2012.00540.x [Google Scholar]
54. Sebba, M.
    (2011) Spelling and society : The culture and politics of orthography around the world. Cambridge University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
55. Seiffge-Krenke, I.
    (1997) Imaginary companions in adolescence: A sign of a deficient or positive development?Journal of Adolescence, 20(2), 137–154. 10.1006/jado.1996.0072
    https://doi.org/10.1006/jado.1996.0072 [Google Scholar]
56. Sluchinski, K.
    (forthcoming) Ta as a Facilitator of Empathy in Chinese CMC Narratives. Chinese Language and Discourse.
    [Google Scholar]
57. Sluchinski, K.
    (2020) A Discursive Pragmatic Approach to the Third Person Pronoun ta in Chinese Computer Mediated Communication. East Asian Pragmatics, 5 (2), 247–277. 10.1558/eap.39165
    https://doi.org/10.1558/eap.39165 [Google Scholar]
58. Sluchinski, K.
    (2019) Genderless Narratives: The Pragmatics of ta in Chinese Social Media. InK. Martin (Ed.), The 2019 Annual Conference of the Canadian Linguistic Association: 2019 Congress of the Humanities and Social Sciences. cla-acl.ca/actes-2019-proceedings/;   10.6084/m9.figshare.11362526
    https://doi.org/10.6084/m9.figshare.11362526 [Google Scholar]
59. Sluchinski, K., & Gallant, J.
    (2020) Abstract: One-size-fits-all: Psycholinguistic self-paced reading experiment supporting discourse analysis of the non-standard, gender-neutral mandarin pronoun ‘TA.’ DisCorX 2021: Discourse in corpus and experimental data: bridging the methodological gap.  10.6084/M9.FIGSHARE.12299015.V1
    https://doi.org/10.6084/M9.FIGSHARE.12299015.V1 [Google Scholar]
60. Spolsky, B.
    (2004) Language policy. Cambridge University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
61. Squire et al.
    Squire et al. (2014) What is narrative research?Bloomsbury Academic. 10.5040/9781472545220
    https://doi.org/10.5040/9781472545220 [Google Scholar]
62. Strange, J. J.
    (2002) How fictional tales wag real-world beliefs: Models and mechanisms of narrative influence. InM. C. Green, J. J. Strange, & T. C. Brock (Eds.), Narrative impact: Social and cognitive foundations (pp.263–286). Lawrence Erlbaum Associates Publishers.
    [Google Scholar]
63. Tagg, C., & Seargeant, P.
    (2012) Writing systems at play in Thai-English online interactions. Writing Systems Research, 4(2), 195–213. 10.1080/17586801.2011.628583
    https://doi.org/10.1080/17586801.2011.628583 [Google Scholar]
64. Taylor, M., Hulette, A. C., & Dishion, T. J.
    (2010) Longitudinal outcomes of young high-risk adolescents with imaginary companions. Developmental Psychology, 46(6), 1632–1636. 10.1037/a0019815
    https://doi.org/10.1037/a0019815 [Google Scholar]
65. Unseth, P.
    (2005) Sociolinguistic parallels between choosing scripts and languages. Written Language and Literacy, 8(1), 19–42. 10.1075/wll.8.1.02uns
    https://doi.org/10.1075/wll.8.1.02uns [Google Scholar]
66. Utell, J.
    (2016) Engagements with narrative. Routledge.
    [Google Scholar]
67. van Lissa, C., Caracciolo, M., van Leuveren, B., & van Durren, T.
    (2016) Difficult empathy. The effect of narrative perspective on readers’ engagement with a first-person narrator. Diegesis: Interdisziplinäres E-Journal Für Erzählforschung, 5(1), 43–63.
    [Google Scholar]
68. Wardle, E., & Downs, D.
    (2014) Writing about writing: a college reader. Bedford/St. Martin’s.
    [Google Scholar]
69. Whiteman, N.
    (2012) Undoing ethics: rethinking practice in online research. Springer. 10.1007/978‑1‑4614‑1827‑6
    https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4614-1827-6 [Google Scholar]
70. Wilkinson, D., & Thelwall, M.
    (2013) Researching Personal Information on the Public Web: Methods and Ethics. InC. Hine (Ed.), Virtual Research Methods (Vol.41). 139–156. SAGE Publications, Ltd.   10.4135/9781446286142
    https://doi.org/10.4135/9781446286142 [Google Scholar]
71. Yang, C.
    (2007) Chinese Internet language: A sociolinguistic analysis of adaptations of the Chinese writing system. Language@Internet4(2), 1–17.
    [Google Scholar]
72. Yuan, E. J.
    (2012) Language as social practice on the Chinese Internet. InK. St. Amant, & S. Kelsey (Eds.), Computer-Mediated communication across cultures: International interactions in online environments (pp.266–281). Hershey, PA: IGI Global. 10.4018/978‑1‑60960‑833‑0.ch018
    https://doi.org/10.4018/978-1-60960-833-0.ch018 [Google Scholar]
73. Zhan, X. H. 詹秀华
    (2013) 说“TA”. “shuo ‘TA’” [Let’s talk about “TA”] 廊坊师范学院学报 （社会科学版） “Langfangshifanxueyuanxuebao (shehuikexue ban)” [Journal of Langfang Teachers College (Social Sciences Edition)], 29(6), 36–38.
    [Google Scholar]
74. Zhong, Z. J. 钟之静
    (2015) 网络新词汇ta 的第三人称代词三分法意义的分析. “Wanglouxincihui ta de di san renchengdaici san fenfayiyi de fenxi”. [Analysis of the three meanings of the third person pronoun new Internet word ta] 湖北科技学院学报 “hubeijiaoxuexueyuanxuebao” [Journal of Hubei University of Science and Technology], 35(5), 77–79.
    [Google Scholar]
75. Zimmer, M.
    (2010) But the data is already public: on the ethics of research in Facebook. Moral Luck, Social Networking Sites, and Trust on the Web, (4), 313. 10.1007/s10676‑010‑9227‑5
    https://doi.org/10.1007/s10676-010-9227-5 [Google Scholar]