1887
image of Storytalk and complex constructions of nonhuman agency

Abstract

Abstract

Recent work in environmental philosophy has uncoupled the notion of agency from the human domain, arguing that the efficacy of nonhuman entities and processes can also be construed as a form of “agency.” In this paper, we study discursive constructions of nonhuman agency as they appear in a set of interviews revolving around fictional narratives. The participants were asked to read microfiction engaging with the nonhuman perspectives of entities such as a melting glacier or an endangered tree species. The analysis of the interviews centers on “complex” attributions of nonhuman agency – that is, attributions that involve a combination of agencies attributed to the nonhuman. We show that these complex attributions emerge more frequently in discussing the story (what we call the “storytalk”) than elsewhere in the interviews. We also explore the way in which such complex constructions of nonhuman agency challenge widespread assumptions about the natural world.

Available under the CC BY-NC 4.0 license.
Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1075/ni.21062.toi
2022-06-30
2022-08-12
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

/deliver/fulltext/10.1075/ni.21062.toi/ni.21062.toi.html?itemId=/content/journals/10.1075/ni.21062.toi&mimeType=html&fmt=ahah

References

  1. Alber, J.
    (2016) Unnatural Narrative: Impossible Worlds in Fiction and Drama. University of Nebraska Press. 10.2307/j.ctt1d4v147
    https://doi.org/10.2307/j.ctt1d4v147 [Google Scholar]
  2. Appel, M., & Richter, T.
    (2007) Persuasive Effects of Fictional Narratives Increase Over Time. Media Psychology, 10(1), 113–13410.1080/15213260701301194
    https://doi.org/10.1080/15213260701301194 [Google Scholar]
  3. Arduser, L.
    (2014) Agency in Illness Narratives: A Pluralistic Analysis. Narrative Inquiry, 24(1), 1–27. 10.1075/ni.24.1.01ard
    https://doi.org/10.1075/ni.24.1.01ard [Google Scholar]
  4. Barad, K.
    (2003) Posthumanist Performativity: Toward an Understanding of How Matter Comes to Matter. Signs: Journal of Women in Culture and Society, 28(3), 801–831. 10.1086/345321
    https://doi.org/10.1086/345321 [Google Scholar]
  5. Bernaerts, L., Caracciolo, M., Herman, L., & Vervaeck, B.
    (2014) The Storied Lives of Non-Human Narrators. Narrative, 22(1), 68–93. https://www.jstor.org/stable/24615410
    [Google Scholar]
  6. Braidotti, R.
    (2019) Posthuman Knowledge. Polity Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  7. Buell, L.
    (1995) The Environmental Imagination: Thoreau, Nature Writing, and the Formation of American Culture. Harvard University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  8. Caracciolo, M.
    (2021) Narrating the Mesh: Form and Story in the Anthropocene. University of Virginia Press. 10.2307/j.ctv1fqvm5p
    https://doi.org/10.2307/j.ctv1fqvm5p [Google Scholar]
  9. Coscieme, L., da Silva Hyldmo, H., Fernández-Llamazares, Á., Palomo, I., Mwampamba, T. H., Selomane, O., Sitas, N., Jaureguiberry, P., Takahashi, Y., Lim, M., Barral, M. P., Farinaci, J. S., Diaz-José, J., Ghosh, S., Ojino, J., Alassaf, A., Baatuuwie, B. N., Balint, L., Basher, Z., … Valle, M.
    (2020) Multiple Conceptualizations of Nature Are Key to Inclusivity and Legitimacy in Global Environmental Governance. Environmental Science & Policy, 104, 36–42. 10.1016/j.envsci.2019.10.018
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envsci.2019.10.018 [Google Scholar]
  10. Elliot, M. L., & Bonsall, A.
    (2018) Building Stories: Exploring Participant Experiences and Research Relationships. Narrative Inquiry, 28(2), 330–345. 10.1075/ni.17069.ell
    https://doi.org/10.1075/ni.17069.ell [Google Scholar]
  11. Evans, J.
    (2012) Social Constructions of Nature. InP. Daniels, M. Bradshaw, D. Shaw, J. Sidaway, & T. Hall (Eds.), An Introduction to Human Geography (pp.256–271). Pearson.
    [Google Scholar]
  12. Farrier, D.
    (2019) Anthropocene Poetics: Deep Time, Sacrifice Zones, and Extinction. University of Minnesota Press. 10.5749/j.ctvc5pcn9
    https://doi.org/10.5749/j.ctvc5pcn9 [Google Scholar]
  13. Fludernik, M.
    (1996) Towards a “Natural” Narratology. Routledge. 10.1515/jlse.1996.25.2.97
    https://doi.org/10.1515/jlse.1996.25.2.97 [Google Scholar]
  14. Garrard, G.
    (2004) Ecocriticism. Routledge. 10.4324/9780203644843
    https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203644843 [Google Scholar]
  15. Grusin, R.
    (Ed.) (2015) The Nonhuman Turn. University of Minnesota Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  16. Hansen, A.
    (2006) Tampering with Nature: ‘Nature’ and the ‘Natural’ in Media Coverage of Genetics and Biotechnology. Media, Culture & Society, 28(6), 811–834. 10.1177/0163443706067026
    https://doi.org/10.1177/0163443706067026 [Google Scholar]
  17. Haraway, D.
    (2016) Staying with the Trouble: Making Kin in the Chthulucene. Duke University Press. 10.1215/9780822373780
    https://doi.org/10.1215/9780822373780 [Google Scholar]
  18. Harré, R.
    (1993) Social Being. Blackwell.
    [Google Scholar]
  19. Herman, D.
    (2018) Narratology Beyond the Human: Storytelling and Animal Life. Oxford University Press. 10.1093/oso/9780190850401.001.0001
    https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780190850401.001.0001 [Google Scholar]
  20. Iovino, S., & Oppermann, S.
    (2014) Introduction: Stories Come to Matter. InS. Iovino & S. Oppermann (Eds.), Material Ecocriticism (pp.1–20). Indiana University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  21. (2012) Material ecocriticism: Materiality, agency, and modelsof narrativity. [email protected]: European Journal of Literature, Culture and Environment, 3(1). 10.37536/ECOZONA.2012.3.1.452
    https://doi.org/10.37536/ECOZONA.2012.3.1.452 [Google Scholar]
  22. Irvine, R.
    (2014) Deep time: an anthropological problem. Social Anthropology, 22(2), 157–172. 10.1111/1469‑8676.12067
    https://doi.org/10.1111/1469-8676.12067 [Google Scholar]
  23. James, E.
    (2015) The Storyworld Accord: Econarratology and Postcolonial Narratives. University of Nebraska Press. 10.2307/j.ctt1d9898m
    https://doi.org/10.2307/j.ctt1d9898m [Google Scholar]
  24. Keen, S.
    (2007) Empathy and the Novel. Oxford University Press. 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780195175769.001.0001
    https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780195175769.001.0001 [Google Scholar]
  25. Long, E.
    (2003) Book Clubs: Women and the Uses of Reading in Everyday Life. University of Chicago Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  26. Małecki, W., Pawłowski, B., Cieński, M., & Sorokowski, P.
    (2018) Can fiction make us kinder to other species? The impact of fiction on pro-animal attitudes and behavior. Poetics, 66, 54–63. 10.1016/j.poetic.2018.02.004
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.poetic.2018.02.004 [Google Scholar]
  27. Małecki, W., Pawłowski, B., & Sorokowski, P.
    (2016) Literary Fiction Influences Attitudes Toward Animal Welfare. PLOS ONE, 11(12), e0168695. 10.1371/journal.pone.0168695
    https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0168695 [Google Scholar]
  28. Marchand, J. S.
    (2018) Non-Human Agency. InR. Braidotti & M. Hlavajova (Eds.), Posthuman Glossary (pp.292–295). Bloomsbury. 10.5040/9781350030275
    https://doi.org/10.5040/9781350030275 [Google Scholar]
  29. McPhee, J.
    (1981) Basin and range. Macmillan.
    [Google Scholar]
  30. Olausson, U., & Uggla, Y.
    (2019) Celebrities Celebrifying Nature: The Discursive Construction of the Human-Nature Relationship in the ‘Nature Is Speaking’ Campaign. Celebrity Studies, 0(0), 1–18.
    [Google Scholar]
  31. Plumwood, V.
    (2009) Nature in the Active Voice. Australian Humanities Review, 46. australianhumanitiesreview.org/2009/05/01/nature-in-the-active-voice/. 10.22459/AHR.46.2009.10
    https://doi.org/10.22459/AHR.46.2009.10 [Google Scholar]
  32. Pope, R.
    (1998) The English Studies Book: An Introduction to Language, Literature and Culture. Routledge.
    [Google Scholar]
  33. Potter, J.
    (2004) Discourse Analysis. InM. Hardy & A. Bryman (Eds.), Handbook of Data Analysis (pp.607–624). Sage. 10.4135/9781848608184.n27
    https://doi.org/10.4135/9781848608184.n27 [Google Scholar]
  34. Schneider-Mayerson, M.
    (2018) The Influence of Climate Fiction: An Empirical Survey of Readers. Environmental Humanities, 10(2), 473–500. 10.1215/22011919‑7156848
    https://doi.org/10.1215/22011919-7156848 [Google Scholar]
  35. Schneider-Mayerson, M., Gustafson, A., Leiserowitz, A., Goldberg, M. H., Rosenthal, S. A., & Ballew, M.
    (2020a) Environmental Literature as Persuasion: An Experimental Test of the Effects of Reading Climate Fiction. Environmental Communication, 0(0), 1–16. 10.1080/17524032.2020.1814377
    https://doi.org/10.1080/17524032.2020.1814377 [Google Scholar]
  36. Schneider-Mayerson, M., Weik von Mossner, A., & Małecki, W. P.
    (2020b) Empirical Ecocriticism: Environmental Texts and Empirical Methods. ISLE: Interdisciplinary Studies in Literature and Environment, 27(2), 327–336. 10.1093/isle/isaa022
    https://doi.org/10.1093/isle/isaa022 [Google Scholar]
  37. Slovic, S.
    (1992) Seeking Awareness in American Nature Writing. University of Utah Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  38. Swann, J., & Allington, D.
    (2009) Reading Groups and the Language of Literary Texts: A Case Study in Social Reading. Language and Literature, 18(3), 247–264. 10.1177/0963947009105852
    https://doi.org/10.1177/0963947009105852 [Google Scholar]
  39. Todd, Z.
    (2008) Talking about Books: A Reading Group Study. Psychology of Aesthetics, Creativity, and the Arts, 2(4), 256–263. 10.1037/a0012701
    https://doi.org/10.1037/a0012701 [Google Scholar]
  40. Toivonen, H.
    (2022) Themes of climate change agency: a qualitative study on how people construct agency in relation to climate change. Humanities and Social Sciences Communications, 9(1), 1–11. 10.1057/s41599‑022‑01111‑w
    https://doi.org/10.1057/s41599-022-01111-w [Google Scholar]
  41. Trexler, A.
    (2015) Anthropocene Fictions: The Novel in a Time of Climate Change. University of Virginia Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  42. Trend, R. D.
    (2001) Deep time framework: A preliminary study of UK primary teachers’ conceptions of geological time and perceptions of geoscience. Journal of Research in Science Teaching: The Official Journal of the National Association for Research in Science Teaching, 38(2), 191–221. 10.1002/1098‑2736(200102)38:2<191::AID‑TEA1003>3.0.CO;2‑C
    https://doi.org/10.1002/1098-2736(200102)38:2<191::AID-TEA1003>3.0.CO;2-C [Google Scholar]
  43. Varis, E.
    (2019) Alien Overtures: Speculating about Nonhuman Experiences with Comic Book Characters. InS. Karkulehto, A.-K. Koistinen, & E. Varis (Eds.), Reconfiguring Human, Nonhuman and Posthuman in Literature and Culture (pp.79–107). Routledge. 10.4324/9780429243042‑7
    https://doi.org/10.4324/9780429243042-7 [Google Scholar]
  44. Wall, G.
    (1999) Science, Nature, and “The Nature of Things”: An Instance of Canadian Environmental Discourse, 1960–1994. The Canadian Journal of Sociology / Cahiers Canadiens de Sociologie, 24(1), 53–85. 10.2307/3341478
    https://doi.org/10.2307/3341478 [Google Scholar]
  45. Weik von Mossner, A.
    (2017) Affective Ecologies: Empathy, Emotion, and Environmental Narrative. Ohio State University Press. 10.2307/j.ctv11hpszq
    https://doi.org/10.2307/j.ctv11hpszq [Google Scholar]
  46. Wilinsky, C. L., & McCabe, A.
    (2021) Agency and Communion in Sexual Abuse Survivors’ Narratives. Narrative Inquiry, 31(1), 236–262. 10.1075/ni.20061.wil
    https://doi.org/10.1075/ni.20061.wil [Google Scholar]
  47. Williams, R.
    (1993) Keywords: A Vocabulary of Culture and Society. Oxford University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  48. Yamamoto, M.
    (2006) Agency and Impersonality: Their Linguistic and Cultural Manifestations. John Benjamins. 10.1075/slcs.78
    https://doi.org/10.1075/slcs.78 [Google Scholar]
http://instance.metastore.ingenta.com/content/journals/10.1075/ni.21062.toi
Loading
/content/journals/10.1075/ni.21062.toi
Loading

Data & Media loading...

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was successful
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error