1887
image of Older adults’ conversations and the emergence of “narrative crystals”
USD
Buy:$35.00 + Taxes

Abstract

Abstract

Energized by seminal scholarship within narrative studies; communication studies of aging and dementia; and formulaic language, we examined a wide range of stories told multiple times within two different longitudinal collections of verbal interactions involving two women in their 80s (one US American; one French). Based on multifaceted analyses of these longitudinal series of stories, we identified a new type of narrative, the “narrative crystal”. We characterize the internal formal architecture of two illustrative crystals (one from each corpus) before illuminating how such crystals function for their speakers as reassuring interactional “stepping stones” within their larger discourse surroundings. Our findings sketch a possible developmental process regarding how meaningful personal experiences come to be transformed over the lifespan: from the inchoate qualities of first-time tellings shaped by the interaction, through incrementally increased stability over the course of many tellings, to reach the highly durable nature of narrative crystals.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1075/ni.21075.ger
2022-03-10
2022-05-21
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. Astell, A. J., Ellis, M. P., Alm, N., Dye, R., & Gowans, G.
    (2010) Stimulating people with dementia to reminisce using personal and generic photographs. International Journal of Computers in Healthcare, 1(2), 177–198. 10.1504/IJCIH.2010.037461
    https://doi.org/10.1504/IJCIH.2010.037461 [Google Scholar]
  2. Bamberg, M. G. W.
    (1997) Positioning between structure and performance. Journal of Narrative and Life History, 7(1–4), 335–342. 10.1075/jnlh.7.42pos
    https://doi.org/10.1075/jnlh.7.42pos [Google Scholar]
  3. Bamberg, M. G. W., & Georgakopoulou, A.
    (2008) Small stories as a new perspective in narrative and identity analysis. Text & Talk, 28(3), 377–396. 10.1515/TEXT.2008.018
    https://doi.org/10.1515/TEXT.2008.018 [Google Scholar]
  4. Barth-Weingarten, D., Schumann, E., & Wohlfahrt, R.
    (2012) Da capo al fine? Beobachtungen zu Vorgeformtheit von Prosodie und Phonetik in Retold Stories. Gesprächsforschung, 13, 322–352.
    [Google Scholar]
  5. Boersma, P.
    (2001) Praat, a system for doing phonetics by computer. Glot International, 5 (9/10), 341–347.
    [Google Scholar]
  6. Carranza, I. E.
    (1998) Low-narrativity narratives and argumentation. Narrative Inquiry, 8(2), 287–317. 10.1075/ni.8.2.04car
    https://doi.org/10.1075/ni.8.2.04car [Google Scholar]
  7. Chafe, W. L.
    (1998) Things we can learn from repeated tellings of the same experience. Narrative Inquiry, 8(2), 269–285. 10.1075/ni.8.2.03cha
    https://doi.org/10.1075/ni.8.2.03cha [Google Scholar]
  8. Coupland, N., Coupland, J., Giles, H., & Henwood, K.
    (1988) Accommodating the elderly: Invoking and extending a theory. Language in Society, 17(01), 1–41. 10.1017/S0047404500012574
    https://doi.org/10.1017/S0047404500012574 [Google Scholar]
  9. Davis, B.
    (2011) Intentional stance and Lucinda Greystone: Embodied memory in conversational reminiscence by a speaker with Alzheimer’s disease. InP. McPherron & V. Ramanathan (Eds.), Language and social processes [LSP]: Vol. 2. Language, body, and health (pp.75–104). De Gruyter Mouton. 10.1515/9781934078204.75
    https://doi.org/10.1515/9781934078204.75 [Google Scholar]
  10. Frankenberg, C., Weiner, J., Knebel, M., Abulimiti, A., Toro, P., Herold, C. J., Schultz, T., & Schröder, J.
    (2021) Verbal fluency in normal aging and cognitive decline: Results of a longitudinal study. Computer Speech & Language, 68, 101195. 10.1016/j.csl.2021.101195
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.csl.2021.101195 [Google Scholar]
  11. Gerstenberg, A.
    (2014) The same old story? – prosodic features in narratives of old age as cues for genre description. Cahiers De Linguistique Française, 31, 87–92.
    [Google Scholar]
  12. (2015) A sociolinguistic perspective on vocabulary richness in a seven-year comparison of older adults. InA. Gerstenberg & A. Voeste (Eds.), Impact: Studies in language and society: Volume 37. Language development: The lifespan perspective (pp.109–127). Benjamins. 10.1075/impact.37.06ger
    https://doi.org/10.1075/impact.37.06ger [Google Scholar]
  13. (2019) Generational styles in oral storytelling: What can be learned from narrative priming?Narrative Inquiry, 29(1), 1–28. 10.1075/ni.18042.ger
    https://doi.org/10.1075/ni.18042.ger [Google Scholar]
  14. (2020) Pragmatic development in the (middle and) later stages of life. InK. P. Schneider & E. Ifantidou (Eds.), Handbooks of pragmatics: Vol. 13. Developmental and clinical pragmatics (HOPS 13) (pp.209–234). De Gruyter Mouton. 10.1515/9783110431056‑010
    https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110431056-010 [Google Scholar]
  15. Goldman-Eisler, F.
    (1961) The significance of changes in the rate of articulation. Language and Speech, 4(3), 171–174. 10.1177/002383096100400305
    https://doi.org/10.1177/002383096100400305 [Google Scholar]
  16. Hamilton, H. E.
    (1994) Conversations with an Alzheimer’s patient: An interactional sociolinguistic study. Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/CBO9780511627774
    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511627774 [Google Scholar]
  17. (2008) Narrative as snapshot: Glimpses into the past in Alzheimer’s discourse. Narrative Inquiry, 18(1), 53–82. 10.1075/ni.18.1.04ham
    https://doi.org/10.1075/ni.18.1.04ham [Google Scholar]
  18. (2019) Language, dementia and meaning making: Navigating challenges of cognition and face in everyday life. Palgrave Macmillan. 10.1007/978‑3‑030‑12021‑4
    https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-12021-4 [Google Scholar]
  19. Hamilton, H. E., & Baffy, M.
    (2014) Preparing for performance: Identity shaping through script editing in an early memory loss support group. InR. W. Schrauf & N. Müller (Eds.), Dialogue and dementia: Cognitive and communicative resources for engagement (pp.213–244). Taylor and Francis.
    [Google Scholar]
  20. Hamilton, H. E., & Hamaguchi, T.
    (2015) Discourse and aging. InD. Tannen, H. E. Hamilton, & D. Schiffrin (Eds.), The handbook of discourse analysis (2nd ed., pp.705–727). Wiley Blackwell.
    [Google Scholar]
  21. Harrell Jr., F. E.
    (2021) Package Hmisc, Harrell Miscellaneous, Version 4.6-0. https://hbiostat.org/R/Hmisc/
    [Google Scholar]
  22. Hydén, L.-C., & Örulv, L.
    (2009) Narrative and identity in Alzheimer’s disease: A case study. Journal of Aging Studies, 23(4), 205–214. 10.1016/j.jaging.2008.01.001
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jaging.2008.01.001 [Google Scholar]
  23. Jacewicz, E., Fox, R. A., O’Neill, C., & Salmons, J.
    (2009) Articulation rate across dialect, age, and gender. Language Variation and Change, 21(2), 233–256. 10.1017/S0954394509990093
    https://doi.org/10.1017/S0954394509990093 [Google Scholar]
  24. Jefferson, G.
    (1978) Sequential aspects of storytelling. InJ. Schenkein (Ed.), Language, thought, and culture. Studies in the organization of conversational interaction (pp.219–248). Academic Press. 10.1016/B978‑0‑12‑623550‑0.50016‑1
    https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-623550-0.50016-1 [Google Scholar]
  25. Kemper, S.
    (1990) Adults’ diaries: Changes made to written narratives across the life span. Discourse Processes, 14, 207–233. 10.1080/01638539009544754
    https://doi.org/10.1080/01638539009544754 [Google Scholar]
  26. Kreiman, J., & Sidtis, D.
    (2011) Foundations of voice studies: An interdisciplinary approach to voice production and perception. Wiley-Blackwell. 10.1002/9781444395068
    https://doi.org/10.1002/9781444395068 [Google Scholar]
  27. Labov, W.
    (1972) Language in the inner city. Studies in the Black English vocabulary. Blackwell.
    [Google Scholar]
  28. Linde, C.
    (1993) Life stories: The creation of coherence. Oxford University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  29. Mead, G. H.
    (1934) Mind, self, and society. University of Chicago Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  30. Mehrabian, A.
    (1971) Nonverbal betrayal of feeling. Journal of Experimental Research in Personality, 5, 64–73.
    [Google Scholar]
  31. Norrick, N. R.
    (1998) Retelling stories in spontaneous conversation. Discourse Processes, 25, 75–97. 10.1080/01638539809545021
    https://doi.org/10.1080/01638539809545021 [Google Scholar]
  32. Ochs, E., & Capps, L.
    (2001) Living narrative: Creating lives in everyday storytelling. Harvard University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  33. Pasupathi, M., & Mansour, E.
    (2006) Adult age differences in autobiographical reasoning in narratives. Developmental Psychology, 42(5), 798–808. 10.1037/0012‑1649.42.5.798
    https://doi.org/10.1037/0012-1649.42.5.798 [Google Scholar]
  34. Pope, C., & Davis, B. H.
    (2011) Finding a balance: The Carolinas Conversation Collection. Corpus Linguistics and Linguistic Theory, 7(1), 143–161. 10.1515/cllt.2011.007
    https://doi.org/10.1515/cllt.2011.007 [Google Scholar]
  35. Quené, H.
    (2008) Multilevel modeling of between-speaker and within-speaker variation in spontaneous speech tempo. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 123(2), 1104–1113. 10.1121/1.2821762
    https://doi.org/10.1121/1.2821762 [Google Scholar]
  36. R Development Core Team
    R Development Core Team (2021) R: A language and environment for statistical computing (r x64 4.1.0). R Foundation for Statistical Computing. www.r-project.org
    [Google Scholar]
  37. Ramscar, M., Hendrix, P., Shaou, C., Milin, P., & Baayen, R. H.
    (2014) The myth of cognitive decline: Non-linear dynamics of lifelong learning. Topics in Cognitive Science, 6, 5–42. 10.1111/tops.12078
    https://doi.org/10.1111/tops.12078 [Google Scholar]
  38. RStudio Team
    RStudio Team (2021) R studio workbench. R Foundation for Statistical Computing. https://www.rstudio.com
    [Google Scholar]
  39. Sacks, H., Schegloff, E. A., & Jefferson, G.
    (1974) A simplest systematics for the organization of turn-taking for conversation. Language, 50(4), 696–735. 10.1353/lan.1974.0010
    https://doi.org/10.1353/lan.1974.0010 [Google Scholar]
  40. Schegloff, E. A., & Sacks, H.
    (1973) Opening up closings. Semiotica, 8(4), 289–327. 10.1515/semi.1973.8.4.289
    https://doi.org/10.1515/semi.1973.8.4.289 [Google Scholar]
  41. Schumann, E., Gülich, E., Lucius-Hoene, G., & Pfänder, S.
    (Eds.) (2015) Wiedererzählen. Formen und Funktionen einer kulturellen Praxis. Transcript. 10.14361/9783839428511
    https://doi.org/10.14361/9783839428511 [Google Scholar]
  42. Tannen, D.
    (2007) Talking voices: Repetition, dialogue, and imagery in conversational discourse (2nd ed). Cambridge University Press. site.ebrary.com/lib/alltitles/docDetail.action?docID=10209478. 10.1017/CBO9780511618987
    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511618987 [Google Scholar]
  43. (2008) ‘We’ve never been close, we’re very different’. Three narrative types in sister discourse. Narrative Inquiry, 18(2), 206–229. 10.1075/ni.18.1.03tan
    https://doi.org/10.1075/ni.18.1.03tan [Google Scholar]
  44. Whitaker, H. A.
    (1983) Towards a brain model of automatization: A short essay. Advances in Psychology, 12, 199–214. 10.1016/S0166‑4115(08)61992‑5
    https://doi.org/10.1016/S0166-4115(08)61992-5 [Google Scholar]
  45. Wickham, H.
    (2016) Ggplot2: Elegant graphics for data analysis (2nd ed.). Springer. 10.1007/978‑3‑319‑24277‑4
    https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-24277-4 [Google Scholar]
  46. Wickham, H., François, R., Henry, L., & Müller, K.
    (2021) Package dplyr: A Grammar of Data Manipulation. https://CRAN.R-project.org/package=dplyr
    [Google Scholar]
  47. Wray, A., & Perkins, M. R.
    (2000) The functions of formulaic language: An integrated model. Language and Communication, 20(1), 1–28. 10.1016/S0271‑5309(99)00015‑4
    https://doi.org/10.1016/S0271-5309(99)00015-4 [Google Scholar]
http://instance.metastore.ingenta.com/content/journals/10.1075/ni.21075.ger
Loading
/content/journals/10.1075/ni.21075.ger
Loading

Data & Media loading...

  • Article Type: Research Article
Keywords: aging ; family discourse ; retelling ; formulaic language ; narrative ; dementia ; memory
This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was successful
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error