1887
Volume 35, Issue 1
  • ISSN 1387-6740
  • E-ISSN: 1569-9935
USD
Buy:$35.00 + Taxes

Abstract

Abstract

This study explored Mandarin-speaking children’s independent ability in using conjunctions to relate events in personal narration. Twenty three-year-olds, twenty four-year-olds, twenty five-year-olds and twenty six-year-olds participated, and they were prompted to tell personal stories. Conjunctions were assessed in terms of the use of seven types of connectives. With age, Mandarin-speaking children used more diversified conjunctions and produced more conjunctions in their personal narratives. Significant differences were found across age groups in the frequency of sequential, temporal, and simple connectives, but the proportional use of these three connectives did not differ across age groups. No gender differences were found in the use of any of the connectives. Mandarin-speaking children relied on sequential, temporal and simple connectives to relate events in their narratives, and the use of causal, additive, adversative and conditional connectives were rare. Chinese mothers’ greater emphasis on knowledge, social rules and moral standards may contribute to this.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1075/ni.22031.zha
2023-04-28
2025-12-07
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. Bayat, N., Cetin, M., & Temizkol, S.
    (2014) Children’s levels of comprehending connectives. 5th World Conference on Learning, Teaching and Educational Leadership.
    [Google Scholar]
  2. Berk, L. E.
    (2013) Child Development (9th edition). Pearson.
    [Google Scholar]
  3. Berman, R. A.
    (1995) Narrative Competence and Storytelling Performance: How Children Tell Stories in Different Contexts. Journal of Narrative and Life History, 51, 285–313. 10.1075/jnlh.5.4.01nar
    https://doi.org/10.1075/jnlh.5.4.01nar [Google Scholar]
  4. Berman, R. A., & Slobin, D. I.
    (1994) Relating events in narrative: A crosslinguistic developmental study. Lawrence Erlbaum.
    [Google Scholar]
  5. Bloom, L., Lahey, M., Hood, L., Lifter, K., & Fiess, K.
    (1980) Complex sentences: acquisition of syntactic connectives and the semantic relations they encode. Journal of Child Language, 71, 235–261. 10.1017/S0305000900002610
    https://doi.org/10.1017/S0305000900002610 [Google Scholar]
  6. Chang, C.
    (1998) The development of autonomy in preschool Mandarin Chinese-speaking children’s play narratives. Narrative Inquiry, 81, 77–111. 10.1075/ni.8.1.05cha
    https://doi.org/10.1075/ni.8.1.05cha [Google Scholar]
  7. (2000) Narrative performance across contexts and over time: Preschool Chinese children and mothers [Doctoral Dissertation]. Harvard University.
  8. (2004) Telling stories of experiences: Narrative development of young Chinese children. Applied Psycholinguistics, 25(1), 83–104. 10.1017/S0142716404001055
    https://doi.org/10.1017/S0142716404001055 [Google Scholar]
  9. Cicchetti, D. V., & Feinstein, A. R.
    (1990) High agreement but low kappa: II. Resolving the paradoxes. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology, 43(6), 551–558. 10.1016/0895‑4356(90)90159‑M
    https://doi.org/10.1016/0895-4356(90)90159-M [Google Scholar]
  10. Diessel, H.
    (2004) The acquisition of complex sentences. Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/CBO9780511486531
    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511486531 [Google Scholar]
  11. Duggleby, S., Tang, W., & Kuo-Newhouse, A.
    (2015) Does the use of connective words in written assessments predict high school students’ reading and writing achievement?Reading psychology, 371, 511–532. 10.1080/02702711.2015.1066910
    https://doi.org/10.1080/02702711.2015.1066910 [Google Scholar]
  12. Evers-Vermeul, J., & Sanders, T.
    (2008) The emergence of Dutch and English connectives: How cumulative complexity explains the order of acquisition. Journal of Child Language, 36(4), 829–854. 10.1017/S0305000908009227
    https://doi.org/10.1017/S0305000908009227 [Google Scholar]
  13. Feinstein, A. R., & Cicchetti, D. V.
    (1990) High agreement but low kappa: I. The problems of two paradoxes. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology, 43(6), 543–549. 10.1016/0895‑4356(90)90158‑L
    https://doi.org/10.1016/0895-4356(90)90158-L [Google Scholar]
  14. Fivush, R., Haden, C., & Adam, S.
    (1995) Structure and coherence of preschoolers’ personal narratives over time: Implications for childhood amnesia. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 601, 32–56. 10.1006/jecp.1995.1030
    https://doi.org/10.1006/jecp.1995.1030 [Google Scholar]
  15. Glenn-Applegate, K., Breit-Smith, A., Justice, L. M., & Piasta, S. B.
    (2010) Artfulness in young children’s spoken narratives. Early Education and Development, 21(3), 468–493. 10.1080/10409280903440620
    https://doi.org/10.1080/10409280903440620 [Google Scholar]
  16. Glória, Y. A. L., Hanauer, L. P., Wiethan, F. M., Nóro, L. A., & Mota, H. B.
    (2016) The use of conjunctions by children with typical language development. CoDAS28(3), 221–225. 10.1590/2317‑1782/20162015107
    https://doi.org/10.1590/2317-1782/20162015107 [Google Scholar]
  17. Griffith, P. L., Ripich, D. N., & Dastoli, S. L.
    (1986) Story structure, cohesion, and propositions in story recalls by learning-disabled and nondisabled children. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research, 15(6), 539–555. 10.1007/BF01067635
    https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01067635 [Google Scholar]
  18. Gulzow, I., Bartlitz, V., Kuehnast, M., Golcher, F., and Bittner, D.
    (2018) The adversative connectives aber and but in conversational corpora. Journal of Child Language, 45(5), 1212–1226. 10.1017/S0305000917000630
    https://doi.org/10.1017/S0305000917000630 [Google Scholar]
  19. Labov, W.
    (1972) Language in the inner city. University of Pennsylvania Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  20. MacWhinney, B.
    (2000) The CHILDES project: tools for analyzing talk (3rd ed.). Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
    [Google Scholar]
  21. McCabe, A., & Bliss, S. L.
    (2003) Patterns of narrative discourse: a multicultural, life span approach. Pearson Allyn & Bacon.
    [Google Scholar]
  22. McCabe, A., & Peterson, C.
    (1997) Meaningful ‘mistakes’: The systematicity of children’s connectives in narrative discourse and the social origins of this usage about the past. InJ. Costermans & M. Fayol (Eds.), Processing interclausal relationships: Studies in the production and comprehension of text (pp.139–154). Lawrence Erlbaum.
    [Google Scholar]
  23. McCabe, A.
    (1997) Developmental and cross-cultural aspects of children’s narration. InM. Bamberg (ed.), Narrative development: Six approaches (pp.137–174). Erlbaum.
    [Google Scholar]
  24. Miller, J. F., & Chapman, R. S.
    (1981) The relation between age and mean length of utterance in morphemes. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, 24(2), 154–161. 10.1044/jshr.2402.154
    https://doi.org/10.1044/jshr.2402.154 [Google Scholar]
  25. Miller, P. J., Wiley, A. R., Fung, H., & Liang, C.
    (1997) Personal storytelling as a medium of socialization in Chinese and American families. Child Development, 68(3), 557–568. 10.2307/1131678
    https://doi.org/10.2307/1131678 [Google Scholar]
  26. Minami, M.
    (1996) Japanese preschool children’s narrative development. First Language, 161, 339–363. 10.1177/014272379601604805
    https://doi.org/10.1177/014272379601604805 [Google Scholar]
  27. Peterson, C., & McCabe, A.
    (1983) Developmental psycholinguistics: Three ways of looking at a child’s narrative. Plenum Press. 10.1007/978‑1‑4757‑0608‑6
    https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4757-0608-6 [Google Scholar]
  28. (1991a) Children’s connective use and narrative macrostructure. InA. McCabe & C. Peterson (Eds.), Developing narrative structure (pp.29–53). Erlbaum.
    [Google Scholar]
  29. (1991b) On the threshold of the storyrealm: Semantic versus pragmatic use of connectives in narratives. Merrill-Palmer Quarterly, 37(3), 445–464.
    [Google Scholar]
  30. Preece, A.
    (1987) The range of narrative forms conversationally produced by young children. Journal of Child Language, 14(2), 353–373. 10.1017/S0305000900012976
    https://doi.org/10.1017/S0305000900012976 [Google Scholar]
  31. Sah, W. H.
    (2013) Global and local connections in Mandarin-speaking children’s narratives: A developmental study based on the frog story. InA. McCabe & C. J. Chang (Eds.), Chinese Language Narration: Culture, cognition, and emotion. John Benjamins. 10.1075/sin.19.06sah
    https://doi.org/10.1075/sin.19.06sah [Google Scholar]
  32. Sanders, T. J. M.
    (1997) Semantic and pragmatic sources of coherence: On the categorization of coherence relations in context. Discourse Processes241, 119–47. 10.1080/01638539709545009
    https://doi.org/10.1080/01638539709545009 [Google Scholar]
  33. Tomasello, M.
    (2003) Constructing a language: a usage-based theory of language acquisition. Harvard University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  34. Van Veen, R., Evers-Vermeul, J., Sanders, T., & Van Den Bergh, H.
    (2013) The influence of input on connective acquisition: a growth curve analysis of English ‘because’ and German weil’. Journal of Child Language, 40(5), 1003–1031. 10.1017/S0305000912000451
    https://doi.org/10.1017/S0305000912000451 [Google Scholar]
  35. Van Veen, R., Evers-Vermeul, J., Sanders, T., & Van den Bergh, H.
    (2009) Parental input and connective acquisition: a growth curve analysis. First Language, 29(3), 266–288. 10.1177/0142723708101679
    https://doi.org/10.1177/0142723708101679 [Google Scholar]
  36. Viera, A. J., & Garrett, J. M.
    (2005) Understanding interobserver agreement: the kappa statistic. Family Medicine, 37(5), 360–363.
    [Google Scholar]
  37. Wang, Q., & Leichtman, M. D.
    (2000) Same beginning, different stories: A comparison of American and Chinese children’s narratives. Child Development, 71(5), 1329–1346. 10.1111/1467‑8624.00231
    https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-8624.00231 [Google Scholar]
  38. Yue, G. A., Freedman, D. G., & Parker, C.
    (1997) The pattern of mother-child relationship and cultural transfer in China. Journal of Tianjing Normal University, 31, 34–41.
    [Google Scholar]
  39. Zhang, F. F., McCabe, A., Ye, J. Q., Wang, Y.
    (2019) A Developmental Study of the Narrative Components and Patterns of Chinese Children Aged Three to Six Years. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research, 48(2): 477–500. 10.1007/s10936‑018‑9614‑3
    https://doi.org/10.1007/s10936-018-9614-3 [Google Scholar]
/content/journals/10.1075/ni.22031.zha
Loading
/content/journals/10.1075/ni.22031.zha
Loading

Data & Media loading...

  • Article Type: Research Article
Keyword(s): Chinese narration; conjunctions; gender differences; personal narratives
This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was successful
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error