1887
  1. Home
  2. e-Journals
  3. Narrative Inquiry
  4. Volume 35, Issue 1
  5. Article
Volume 35, Issue 1
  • ISSN 1387-6740
  • E-ISSN: 1569-9935
USD
Buy:$35.00 + Taxes

Abstract

Abstract

This paper examines how disaster-related discourses are produced in storytelling, and whether and in what way these discourses may change in the second telling. We examine two sets of retold stories taken from a corpus of 123 retold stories about the 2010/2011 Canterbury earthquakes in New Zealand. Findings indicate that these storytellers tell structurally similar stories, yet implement subtle linguistic changes which produce different positionings and discourses in the two tellings. We draw on positioning analysis and the ethnomethodological concept of tellability to show how, in the first telling, the storytellers orient to and produce discourses of , whereas in the second telling they produce discourses of . We argue that the positioning and discursive strategies used in disaster stories may change drastically over time, showing how retold stories of the same event change to meet the evolving realities of the teller and their post-disaster community.

© John Benjamins Publishing Company
Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1075/ni.22107.bla
2023-04-28
2026-02-12

  • From This Site

    /content/journals/10.1075/ni.22107.bla
    dcterms_title,dcterms_subject,pub_keyword
    -contentType:Journal -contentType:Contributor -contentType:Concept -contentType:Institution
    10
    5
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. Bamberg, M.
    (1997) Positioning between structure and performance. Journal of Narrative and Life History, 7(1–4), 335–342. 10.1075/jnlh.7.42pos
     https://doi.org/10.1075/jnlh.7.42pos [Google Scholar]
  2. (2008) Twice-told-tales: Small story analysis and the process of identity formation. InT. Sugiman, K. J. Gergen, W. Wagner, & Y. Yamada (Eds.), Meaning in action: Constructions, narratives, and representations (pp.183–204). 10.1007/978‑4‑431‑74680‑5_11
     https://doi.org/10.1007/978-4-431-74680-5_11 [Google Scholar]
  3. Chafe, W. L.
    (1980) The depoyment of consciousness in the production of narrative. InW. L. Chafe (Ed.), The pear stories: Cognitive, cultural and linguistic aspects of narrative production (pp.9–50). Ablex Publishing.
     [Google Scholar]
  4. (1998) Things we can learn from repeated tellings of the same experience. Narrative Inquiry, 8(2), 269–285. 10.1075/ni.8.2.03cha
     https://doi.org/10.1075/ni.8.2.03cha [Google Scholar]
  5. Davies, B., & Harré, R.
    (1990) Positioning: The discursive production of selves. Journal of the Theory of Social Behaviour, 20(1), 43–63. 10.1111/j.1468‑5914.1990.tb00174.x
     https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-5914.1990.tb00174.x [Google Scholar]
  6. De Fina, A., & Georgakopoulou, A.
    (2012) Analyzing narrative: Discourse and sociolinguistic perspectives. Cambridge University Press.
     [Google Scholar]
  7. Foucault, M.
    (1980) Power/knowledge: Selected interviews and other writings 1972–1977 (C. Gordon, L. Marshall, J. Mepham, & K. Soper, Trans.C. GordonEd.). Pantheon Books.
     [Google Scholar]
  8. Fromont, R., & Hay, J.
    (2012) LaBB-CAT: An Annotation Store. Paper presented at theProceedings of Australasian Language Technology Association Workshop, Dunedin.
     [Google Scholar]
  9. Gee, J. P.
    (1991) A linguistic approach to narrative. Journal of Narrative and Life History, 1(1), 15–39. 10.1075/jnlh.1.1.03ali
     https://doi.org/10.1075/jnlh.1.1.03ali [Google Scholar]
  10. (2011) An introduction to discourse analysis: Theory and method (Third ed.). Routledge.
     [Google Scholar]
  11. Goffman, E.
    (1986) Frame analysis. Northeastern University Press.
     [Google Scholar]
  12. Goodwin, C.
    (2006) Interactive footing. InE. Holt & R. Clift (Eds.), Reporting talk: Reported speech in interaction (pp.16–46). Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/CBO9780511486654.003
     https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511486654.003 [Google Scholar]
  13. Habermas, T., & Berger, N.
    (2011) Retelling everyday emotional events: Condensation, distancing, and closure. Cognition and Emotion, 25(2), 206–219. 10.1080/02699931003783568
     https://doi.org/10.1080/02699931003783568 [Google Scholar]
  14. Heritage, J.
    (1984) Garfinkel and ethnomethodology. Polity.
     [Google Scholar]
  15. Holt, E.
    (2009) Reported speech. InS. D’hondt, J.-O. Östman, & J. Verscheuren (Eds.), The pragmatics of interaction (pp.190–205). John Benjamins. 10.1075/hoph.4.11hol
     https://doi.org/10.1075/hoph.4.11hol [Google Scholar]
  16. (2017) Indirect reported speech in storytelling: Its position, design, and uses. Research on Language and Social Interaction, 50(2), 171–187. 10.1080/08351813.2017.1301302
     https://doi.org/10.1080/08351813.2017.1301302 [Google Scholar]
  17. Korobov, N.
    (2001) Reconciling theory with method: From conversation analysis and critical discourse analysis to positioning analysis. Forum Qualitative Sozialforschung / Forum: Qualitative Social Research, 2(3). 10.17169/fqs‑2.3.906
     https://doi.org/10.17169/fqs-2.3.906 [Google Scholar]
  18. Labov, W.
    (1972) Language in the inner city: Studies in the Black English vernacular. University of Pennsylvania Press.
     [Google Scholar]
  19. Labov, W., & Waletzky, J.
    (1967) Narrative analysis: Oral versions of personal experience. InJ. Helm (Ed.), Proceedings of the 1966 Annual Spring Meeting of the American Ethnological Society (pp.12–44): University of Washington Press.
     [Google Scholar]
  20. Li, Y., Li, H., Decety, J., & Lee, K.
    (2013) Experiencing a natural disaster alters children’s altruistic giving. Psychological Science, 24(9), 1686–1695. 10.1177/0956797613479975
     https://doi.org/10.1177/0956797613479975 [Google Scholar]
  21. Local, J.
    (1992) Continuing and restarting. InP. Auer & A. Di Luzio (Eds.), The contextualization of language (pp.273–296). John Benjamins. 10.1075/pbns.22.18loc
     https://doi.org/10.1075/pbns.22.18loc [Google Scholar]
  22. Mandelbaum, J.
    (2013) Storytelling in conversation. InJ. Sidnell & T. Stivers (Eds.), The handbook of conversation analysis (pp.492–507). Wiley-Blackwell.
     [Google Scholar]
  23. Matthewman, S., & Uekusa, S.
    (2021) Theorizing disaster communitas. Theory and Society, 501, 965–984. 10.1007/s11186‑021‑09442‑4
     https://doi.org/10.1007/s11186-021-09442-4 [Google Scholar]
  24. Mazeland, H.
    (2007) Parenthetical sequences. Journal of Pragmatics, 39(10), 1816–1869. 10.1016/j.pragma.2007.05.005
     https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2007.05.005 [Google Scholar]
  25. Michel, L. M.
    (2007) Personal responsibility and volunteering after a natural disaster: The case of Hurricane Katrina. Sociological Spectrum, 27(6), 633–652. 10.1080/02732170701533855
     https://doi.org/10.1080/02732170701533855 [Google Scholar]
  26. Mishler, E. G.
    (2004) Historians of the self: Restorying lives, revising identities. Research in Human Development, 1(1&2), 101–121. 10.1207/s15427617rhd0101&2_6
     https://doi.org/10.1207/s15427617rhd0101&2_6 [Google Scholar]
  27. Norrick, N. R.
    (1998) Retelling stories in spontaneous conversation. Discourse Processes, 25(1), 75–97. 10.1080/01638539809545021
     https://doi.org/10.1080/01638539809545021 [Google Scholar]
  28. (2000) Conversational narrative: Storytelling in everyday talk. John Benjamins. 10.1075/cilt.203
     https://doi.org/10.1075/cilt.203 [Google Scholar]
  29. Passerini, E.
    (2000) Disasters as agents of social change in recovery and reconstruction. Natural Hazards Review, 1(2), 67–72. 10.1061/(ASCE)1527‑6988(2000)1:2(67)
     https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)1527-6988(2000)1:2(67) [Google Scholar]
  30. Phan, T. Q., & Airoldi, E. M.
    (2015) A natural experiment of social network formation and dynamics. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 112(21), 6595–6600. 10.1073/pnas.1404770112
     https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1404770112 [Google Scholar]
  31. Pomerantz, A.
    (1986) Extreme case formulations: A way of legitimizing claims. Human Studies, 91, 219–229. 10.1007/BF00148128
     https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00148128 [Google Scholar]
  32. Potter, J., & Wetherell, M.
    (1987) Discourse and social psychology: Beyond attitudes and behaviour. Sage.
     [Google Scholar]
  33. Sacks, H.
    (1995a) Lectures on conversation, volume 1 (G. JeffersonEd.). Blackwell (Original work published in 1992). 10.1002/9781444328301
     https://doi.org/10.1002/9781444328301 [Google Scholar]
  34. (1995b) Lectures on conversation, volume 2 (G. JeffersonEd.). Blackwell (Original work published in 1992). 10.1002/9781444328301
     https://doi.org/10.1002/9781444328301 [Google Scholar]
  35. Schiff, B., Skillingstead, H., Archibald, O., Arasim, A., & Peterson, J.
    (2006) Consistency and change in the repeated narratives of Holocaust survivors. Narrative Inquiry, 16(2), 349–377. 10.1075/ni.16.2.07sch
     https://doi.org/10.1075/ni.16.2.07sch [Google Scholar]
  36. Schiffrin, D.
    (2006) In other words: Variation in reference and narrative. Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/CBO9780511616273
     https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511616273 [Google Scholar]
  37. Tannen, D.
    (2007) Talking voices: Repetition, dialogue, and imagery in conversational discourse (2 ed.). Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/CBO9780511618987
     https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511618987 [Google Scholar]
  38. Uekusa, S., Matthewman, S., & Lorenz, D. F.
    (2022) Conceptualising disaster social capital: what it is, why it matters, and how it can be enhanced. Disasters, 46(1), 56–79. 10.1111/disa.12470
     https://doi.org/10.1111/disa.12470 [Google Scholar]
  39. Walker, G.
    (2013) Phonetics and prosody in conversation. InT. Stivers & J. Sidnell (Eds.), The handbook of conversation analysis (pp.455–474). Wiley-Blackwell.
     [Google Scholar]
  40. Walsh, L., Hay, J., Bent, D., King, J., & Millar, P.
    (2013) The UC QuakeBox Project: Creation of a community-focused research archive. New Zealand English Journal, 271, 20–32.
     [Google Scholar]
  41. Wang, L.
    (2020) Using tellability to analyze entrepreneurial narratives in the classroom. Narrative Inquiry, 31(2), 381–409. 10.1075/ni.19030.wan
     https://doi.org/10.1075/ni.19030.wan [Google Scholar]
/content/journals/10.1075/ni.22107.bla
Loading
Shifting discourses of togetherness and heroism in retold earthquake stories
Narrative Inquiry 35, 70 (2025); https://doi.org/10.1075/ni.22107.bla
/content/journals/10.1075/ni.22107.bla
/content/journals/10.1075/ni.22107.bla
Loading

Data & Media loading...

  • Article Type: Research Article
Keyword(s): disaster; discourses; narrative; positioning; tellability

Most Cited

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was successful
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error