1887
Volume 34, Issue 2
  • ISSN 1387-6740
  • E-ISSN: 1569-9935
USD
Buy:$35.00 + Taxes

Abstract

Abstract

This article investigates how the core features of narratives and the logic of storytelling are manifested in stories told by the developers and users of an information system and how they may adversely affect their perceptions of the ongoing implementation process. Information systems and the way they operate create a negative cycle where primarily problems possess . We identify a negative dominating the narratives surrounding information system projects. We examine an ongoing public sector healthcare information system project by analysing both the written narratives of frustrated health and social care professionals on a social media channel and the oral narratives told by employees of the project organisation. These stories reveal a narrative struggle and various strategies, such as positioning, used in sense-making. We suggest that a better understanding of how narratives function could help disentangle the sociotechnical issues involving information system developers and users.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1075/ni.22109.raa
2024-11-22
2024-12-13
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. Abbott, H. P.
    (2008) The Cambridge introduction to narrative (2nd ed.). Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/CBO9780511816932
    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511816932 [Google Scholar]
  2. Alvarez, R., & Urla, J.
    (2002) Tell me a good story: Using narrative analysis to examine information requirements interviews during an ERP implementation. ACM SIGMIS Database: The DATABASE for Advances in Information Systems, 33(1), 38–52. 10.1145/504350.504357
    https://doi.org/10.1145/504350.504357 [Google Scholar]
  3. Baghizadeh, Z., Cecez-Kecmanovic, D., & Schlagwein, D.
    (2020) Review and critique of the information systems development project failure literature: An argument for exploring information systems development project distress. Journal of Information Technology, 35(2), 123–142. 10.1177/0268396219832010
    https://doi.org/10.1177/0268396219832010 [Google Scholar]
  4. Bamberg, M.
    (1997) Positioning between structure and performance. Journal of Narrative and Life History, 7(1–4), 335–342. 10.1075/jnlh.7.42pos
    https://doi.org/10.1075/jnlh.7.42pos [Google Scholar]
  5. Bamberg, M., & Georgakopoulou, A.
    (2008) Small stories as a new perspective in narrative and identity analysis. Text & Talk, 28(3), 377–396. 10.1515/TEXT.2008.018
    https://doi.org/10.1515/TEXT.2008.018 [Google Scholar]
  6. Bansler, J. P., & Havn, E. C.
    (2004) When systems lose their identity. ECIS 2004 Proceedings, 151.
    [Google Scholar]
  7. Beath, C., Berente, N., Gallivan, M. J., & Lyytinen, K.
    (2013) Expanding the frontiers of information systems research: Introduction to the special issue. Journal of the Association for Information Systems, 14(4), 4. 10.17705/1jais.00330
    https://doi.org/10.17705/1jais.00330 [Google Scholar]
  8. Beaudry, A., & Pinsonneault, A.
    (2005) Understanding user responses to information technology: A coping model of user adaptation. MIS Quarterly, 493–524. 10.2307/25148693
    https://doi.org/10.2307/25148693 [Google Scholar]
  9. Bijker, W. E., Hughes, T. P., & Pinch, T. J.
    (1987) The social construction of technological systems. New directions in the sociology and history of technological systems. New Directions in the Sociology and History of Technological Systems, The MIT Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  10. Briggs, R. O., Nunamaker, J. F., & Sprague, R. H.
    (2010) Social aspects of sociotechnical systems. Journal of Management Information Systems, 27(1), 13–16. 10.2753/MIS0742‑1222270101
    https://doi.org/10.2753/MIS0742-1222270101 [Google Scholar]
  11. Brown, A. D., Stacey, P., & Nandhakumar, J.
    (2008) Making sense of sensemaking narratives. Human relations, 61(8), 1035–1062. 10.1177/0018726708094858
    https://doi.org/10.1177/0018726708094858 [Google Scholar]
  12. Bruner, J.
    (1991) The narrative construction of reality. Critical Inquiry, 18(1), 1–21. 10.1086/448619
    https://doi.org/10.1086/448619 [Google Scholar]
  13. Depperman, A.
    (2015) Positioning. InA. De Fina & A. Georgakopoulou (Eds.), The handbook of narrative analysis (pp.369–387). John Wiley & Sons. 10.1002/9781118458204.ch19
    https://doi.org/10.1002/9781118458204.ch19 [Google Scholar]
  14. Ferrari, A., Spoletini, P., & Debnath, S.
    (2022) How do requirements evolve during elicitation? An empirical study combining interviews and app store analysis. Requirements Engineering, 27(4), 489–519. 10.1007/s00766‑022‑00383‑7
    https://doi.org/10.1007/s00766-022-00383-7 [Google Scholar]
  15. Fludernik, M.
    (1996) Towards a “natural” narratology. Routledge. 10.1515/jlse.1996.25.2.97
    https://doi.org/10.1515/jlse.1996.25.2.97 [Google Scholar]
  16. Flyvbjerg, B.
    (2014) What you should know about megaprojects and why: An overview. Project Management Journal, 45(2), 6–19. 10.1002/pmj.21409
    https://doi.org/10.1002/pmj.21409 [Google Scholar]
  17. Gephart Jr, R. P.
    (2004) Sensemaking and new media at work. American Behavioral Scientist, 48(4), 479–495. 10.1177/0002764204270283
    https://doi.org/10.1177/0002764204270283 [Google Scholar]
  18. Griffith, T. L.
    (1999) Technology features as triggers for sensemaking. Academy of Management Review, 24(3), 472–488. 10.2307/259137
    https://doi.org/10.2307/259137 [Google Scholar]
  19. Gross, T., & Pekkola, S.
    (2010) Three levels of failure: Analysing a workflow management system. InReframing humans in information systems development (pp.191–210). Springer. 10.1007/978‑1‑84996‑347‑3_12
    https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-84996-347-3_12 [Google Scholar]
  20. Herman, D.
    (2009) Basic elements of narrative. John Wiley & Sons. 10.1002/9781444305920
    https://doi.org/10.1002/9781444305920 [Google Scholar]
  21. Herman, L., & Vervaeck, B.
    (2009) Narrative interest as cultural negotiation. Narrative, 17(1), 111–129. 10.1353/nar.0.0012
    https://doi.org/10.1353/nar.0.0012 [Google Scholar]
  22. Holmström, J., & Sawyer, S.
    (2011) Requirements engineering blinders: exploring information systems developers’ black-boxing of the emergent character of requirements. European Journal of Information Systems, 20(1), 34–47. 10.1057/ejis.2010.51
    https://doi.org/10.1057/ejis.2010.51 [Google Scholar]
  23. Hsiao, R.-L., Wu, S.-H., & Hou, S.-T.
    (2008) Sensitive cabbies: Ongoing sense-making within technology structuring. Information and Organization, 18(4), 251–279. 10.1016/j.infoandorg.2008.01.002
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.infoandorg.2008.01.002 [Google Scholar]
  24. Hühn, P.
    (2010) Eventfulness in British fiction. Walter de Gruyter.
    [Google Scholar]
  25. Jensen, T. B., & Aanestad, M.
    (2006) How healthcare professionals “make sense” of an electronic patient record adoption. Information Systems Management, 24(1), 29–42. 10.1080/10580530601036794
    https://doi.org/10.1080/10580530601036794 [Google Scholar]
  26. Jensen, T. B., & Aanestad, M.
    (2009) Integrated information infrastructure for healthcare: Case studies from Denmark and Norway. Infrastructures for Health Care, 181.
    [Google Scholar]
  27. Jensen, T. B., Kjærgaard, A., & Svejvig, P.
    (2009) Using institutional theory with sensemaking theory: A case study of information system implementation in healthcare. Journal of Information Technology, 24(4), 343–353. 10.1057/jit.2009.11
    https://doi.org/10.1057/jit.2009.11 [Google Scholar]
  28. Klendauer, R., Berkovich, M., Gelvin, R., Leimeister, J. M., & Krcmar, H.
    (2012) Towards a competency model for requirements analysts. Information Systems Journal, 22(6), 475–503. 10.1111/j.1365‑2575.2011.00395.x
    https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2575.2011.00395.x [Google Scholar]
  29. Kohli, R., & Tan, S. S. L.
    (2016) Electronic health records. MIS Quarterly, 40(3), 553–574. 10.25300/MISQ/2016/40.3.02
    https://doi.org/10.25300/MISQ/2016/40.3.02 [Google Scholar]
  30. Kähkönen, T., Alanne, A., Pekkola, S., & Smolander, K.
    (2017) Explaining the challenges in ERP development networks with triggers, root causes, and consequences. Communications of the Association for Information Systems, 40(1), 249–276. 10.17705/1CAIS.04011
    https://doi.org/10.17705/1CAIS.04011 [Google Scholar]
  31. Labov, W.
    (1997) Some further steps in narrative analysis. Journal of Narrative and Life History, 7(1–4), 395–415. 10.1075/jnlh.7.49som
    https://doi.org/10.1075/jnlh.7.49som [Google Scholar]
  32. Labov, W., & Waletzky, J.
    (1967) Narrative analysis: Oral versions of personal experience. InH. June (Ed.), Essays on verbal and visual arts. (pp.12–44). Washington UP.
    [Google Scholar]
  33. Lamb, R., & Kling, R.
    (2003) Reconceptualizing users as social actors in information systems research. MIS Quarterly, 197–236. 10.2307/30036529
    https://doi.org/10.2307/30036529 [Google Scholar]
  34. Lapointe, L., & Rivard, S.
    (2005) A multilevel model of resistance to information technology implementation. MIS Quarterly, 461–491. 10.2307/25148692
    https://doi.org/10.2307/25148692 [Google Scholar]
  35. Lee, A. S., Thomas, M., & Baskerville, R. L.
    (2015) Going back to basics in design science: From the information technology artifact to the information systems artifact. Information Systems Journal, 25(1), 5–21. 10.1111/isj.12054
    https://doi.org/10.1111/isj.12054 [Google Scholar]
  36. Lueg, K., & Wolff Lundholt, M.
    (Eds.) (2020) Routledge handbook of counter-narratives. Routledge. 10.4324/9780429279713
    https://doi.org/10.4324/9780429279713 [Google Scholar]
  37. Mäkelä, M.
    (2020) Through the cracks in the safety net: Narratives of personal experience countering the welfare system in social media and human interest journalism. InK. Lueg & M. Wolff Lundholt (Eds.), Routledge handbook of counter-narratives. (pp.389–401). Routledge. 10.4324/9780429279713‑36
    https://doi.org/10.4324/9780429279713-36 [Google Scholar]
  38. McHale, B.
    (1994) Whatever happened to descriptive poetics?InM. Bal & I. E. Boer (Eds.), The point of theory: Practices of cultural analysis. (pp.56–78). Amsterdam University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  39. Norrick, N.
    (2007) Conversational storytelling. InD. Herman (Ed.), The Cambridge companion to narrative. (pp.127–141). Cambridge UP. 10.1017/CCOL0521856965.009
    https://doi.org/10.1017/CCOL0521856965.009 [Google Scholar]
  40. Nurminen, M.
    (2020) “The big bang of chaotic masculine disruption.” A critical narrative analysis of radical masculinity movement’s counter-narrative strategies. InK. Lueg & M. Wolff Lundholt (Eds.), Routledge handbook of counter-narratives. (pp.351–362). Routledge. 10.4324/9780429279713‑32
    https://doi.org/10.4324/9780429279713-32 [Google Scholar]
  41. (2022) From swallowing the red pill to failing to build the wall: Allusive cognitive metaphors in advocating political and extremist views. Poetics Today, 43(2) 309–334. 10.1215/03335372‑9642637
    https://doi.org/10.1215/03335372-9642637 [Google Scholar]
  42. Orlikowski, W. J., & Gash, D. C.
    (1994) Technological frames: Making sense of information technology in organizations. ACM Transactions on Information Systems (TOIS), 12(2), 174–207. 10.1145/196734.196745
    https://doi.org/10.1145/196734.196745 [Google Scholar]
  43. Pitts, M. G., & Browne, G. J.
    (2004) Stopping behavior of systems analysts during information requirements elicitation. Journal of Management Information Systems, 21(1), 203–226. 10.1080/07421222.2004.11045795
    https://doi.org/10.1080/07421222.2004.11045795 [Google Scholar]
  44. Raatikainen, P.
    (2023) Sensemaking with narratives in enterprise system implementation projects. Tampere University. https://urn.fi/URN:ISBN:978-952-03-2868-9
    [Google Scholar]
  45. Raatikainen, P., Pekkola, S., Nurminen, M., & Mäkelä, M.
    (2021) Masterplots in information systems implementation. European Conference on Information Systems: Human Values Crisis in a Digitizing World, 1731.
    [Google Scholar]
  46. Royce, W. W.
    (1970) Managing the development of large software systems: Concepts and techniques. Proceedings of the 9th International Conference on Software Engineering, 328–338.
    [Google Scholar]
  47. Ryan, S. D., Harrison, D. A., & Schkade, L. L.
    (2002) Information-technology investment decisions: When do costs and benefits in the social subsystem matter?Journal of Management Information Systems, 19(2), 85–127. 10.1080/07421222.2002.11045725
    https://doi.org/10.1080/07421222.2002.11045725 [Google Scholar]
  48. Sarker, S., Chatterjee, S., Xiao, X., & Elbanna, A.
    (2019) The sociotechnical axis of cohesion for the IS discipline: Its historical legacy and its continued relevance. MIS Quarterly, 43(3), 695–720. 10.25300/MISQ/2019/13747
    https://doi.org/10.25300/MISQ/2019/13747 [Google Scholar]
  49. Schenk, K. D., Vitalari, N. P., & Davis, K. S.
    (1998) Differences between novice and expert systems analysts: What do we know and what do we do?Journal of Management Information Systems, 15(1), 9–50. 10.1080/07421222.1998.11518195
    https://doi.org/10.1080/07421222.1998.11518195 [Google Scholar]
  50. Smolander, K., Rossi, M., & Pekkola, S.
    (2021) Heroes, contracts, cooperation, and processes: Changes in collaboration in a large enterprise systems project. Information & Management, 58(2), 103407. 10.1016/j.im.2020.103407
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.im.2020.103407 [Google Scholar]
  51. Vidgen, R.
    (1997) Stakeholders, soft systems and technology: Separation and mediation in the analysis of information system requirements. Information Systems Journal, 7(1), 21–46. 10.1046/j.1365‑2575.1997.00003.x
    https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-2575.1997.00003.x [Google Scholar]
  52. Weick, K. E.
    (1990) Technology as equivoque: Sensemaking in new technologies. InP. S. Goodman & L. S. Sproull (Eds.), Technology and organizations (pp.1–44). Sproull and Associates (eds.), Jossey-Bass Publishers.
    [Google Scholar]
/content/journals/10.1075/ni.22109.raa
Loading
This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was successful
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error