1887
Volume 34, Issue 2
  • ISSN 1387-6740
  • E-ISSN: 1569-9935

Abstract

In this study, Greimas’s work on narrative structure is used to improve a specific practice: the research interview. In the social sciences, narrative interviewing often consists of collecting data from which a narrative is then constructed through analysis afterwards. In the interview method presented here, the interviewer instead prompts the interviewee to construct a narrative. We introduce the method, contextualize it by comparing it to previous and contemporary interview methods, and illustrate it with a small, sociolinguistic study: students ( = 12) from a humanities faculty and a science and engineering faculty at a Dutch university were interviewed about experiences with the use of different languages than the language of instruction in an international learning environment. The method allowed for smooth data collection, due to its narratively structured questioning and consequent rich data. Moreover, using narrative structures to guide the interview also facilitated easy analysis and comparison of the stories.

Available under the CC BY 4.0 license.
Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1075/ni.23079.moe
2024-04-26
2024-12-13
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

/deliver/fulltext/ni.23079.moe.html?itemId=/content/journals/10.1075/ni.23079.moe&mimeType=html&fmt=ahah

References

  1. Baboulene, D., Golding, A., Moenandar, S-J., & Van Renssen, F.
    (2018) You in motion: Stories and metaphors of becoming in narrative learning environments. InM. Hanne & A. Kaal (Eds.), Narrative and metaphor in education: Look both ways (pp.32–45). Routledge. 10.4324/9780429459191‑3
    https://doi.org/10.4324/9780429459191-3 [Google Scholar]
  2. Bod, R., & Kursell, J.
    (2015) Introduction: The humanities and the sciences. Isis106(2), 337–340. 10.1086/681993
    https://doi.org/10.1086/681993 [Google Scholar]
  3. Cenoz, J., & Gorter, D.
    (2021) Pedagogical Translanguaging. Cambridge University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  4. Cohen, Benjamin R.
    (2001) Science and humanities: Across two cultures and into science studies. Endeavour25(1), 8–12. 10.1016/S0160‑9327(00)01335‑1
    https://doi.org/10.1016/S0160-9327(00)01335-1 [Google Scholar]
  5. Collins, K.
    (2010) Advanced sampling designs in mixed research: Current practices and emerging trends in the social and behavioral sciences. InA. Tashakkori & C. Teddlie (Eds.), SAGE handbook of mixed methods in social & behavioral research (pp.353–378). Sage. 10.4135/9781506335193.n15
    https://doi.org/10.4135/9781506335193.n15 [Google Scholar]
  6. Denzin, N. K.
    (2001) The reflexive interview and a performative social science. Qualitative Research1(1), 23–46. 10.1177/146879410100100102
    https://doi.org/10.1177/146879410100100102 [Google Scholar]
  7. Dörnyei, Z.
    (2007) Research methods in applied linguistics. New York: Oxford University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  8. Duarte, J., & Van der Ploeg, M.
    (2019) Plurilingual lecturers in English medium instruction in the Netherlands: the key to plurilingual approaches in higher education?European Journal of Higher Education9(3), 268–284. 10.1080/21568235.2019.1602476
    https://doi.org/10.1080/21568235.2019.1602476 [Google Scholar]
  9. Ferguson, G.
    (2009) What next? Towards an agenda for classroom codeswitching research. International journal of bilingual education and bilingualism12(2), 231–241. 10.1080/13670050802153236
    https://doi.org/10.1080/13670050802153236 [Google Scholar]
  10. Fontana, A.
    (2001) Postmodern trends in interviewing. InJ. F. Gubrium & J. A. Holstein (Eds.), Handbook of interview research: Context and method (pp.160–174). Sage.
    [Google Scholar]
  11. García, O., & Li, W.
    (2014) Translanguaging: Language, Bilingualism and Education. Palgrave Macmillan. 10.1057/9781137385765
    https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137385765 [Google Scholar]
  12. Geertz, C.
    (1973) Thick Description: Toward an Interpretive Theory of Culture. InThe Interpretation of Cultures: Selected Essays (pp.3–30). New York.
    [Google Scholar]
  13. Given, Lisa M.
    2008 Convenience sample. InL. M. Given (Ed.), The Sage encyclopedia of qualitative research methods (pp.124–125). Sage. 10.4135/9781412963909.n68
    https://doi.org/10.4135/9781412963909.n68 [Google Scholar]
  14. Greimas, A. J.
    (1991) De betekenis als verhaal. Semiotische opstellen. Benjamins. 10.1075/sp.1
    https://doi.org/10.1075/sp.1 [Google Scholar]
  15. Greimas, A. J., & Courtés, J.
    (1982) Semiotics and language: An analytical dictionary. Indiana University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  16. Gubrium, J. F., & Holstein, J. A.
    (2003) Postmodern Interviewing. Sage. 10.4135/9781412985437
    https://doi.org/10.4135/9781412985437 [Google Scholar]
  17. (2009) Analyzing narrative reality. Sage. 10.4135/9781452234854
    https://doi.org/10.4135/9781452234854 [Google Scholar]
  18. Hoek, L. H.
    (1985) Literatuursemiotiek. InR. T. Segers (Ed.), Vormen van literatuurwetenschap: moderne richtingen en hun mogelijkheden voor tekstinterpretatie (pp.137–170). Wolters-Noordhoff.
    [Google Scholar]
  19. Holstein, J. A., & Gubrium, J. F.
    (1995) The active interview. Sage. 10.4135/9781412986120
    https://doi.org/10.4135/9781412986120 [Google Scholar]
  20. Jovchelovitch, S., & Bauer, M. W.
    (2000) Narrative interviewing. InM. W. Bauer & G. Gaskell (Eds.), Qualitative Researching with Text, Image and Sound. Sage. 10.4135/9781849209731.n4
    https://doi.org/10.4135/9781849209731.n4 [Google Scholar]
  21. Korthals Altes, L.
    (1992) Le salut par la fiction? Sens, valeurs et narrativité dans Le Roi des aulnes de Michel Tournier. Rodopi.
    [Google Scholar]
  22. (2014) Ethos and narrative interpretation: The negotiation of values in fiction. University of Nebraska Press. 10.2307/j.ctt1d9nm18
    https://doi.org/10.2307/j.ctt1d9nm18 [Google Scholar]
  23. Lin, A.
    (2013) Classroom code-switching: Three decades of research. Applied Linguistics Review, 4(1), 195–218. 10.1515/applirev‑2013‑0009
    https://doi.org/10.1515/applirev-2013-0009 [Google Scholar]
  24. Mueller, J. T.
    (2018) English as a lingua franca at the multilingual university. Foreign Language Education in Multilingual Classrooms, 71, 359–380. 10.1075/hsld.7.16mue
    https://doi.org/10.1075/hsld.7.16mue [Google Scholar]
  25. McAdams, D. P. [Google Scholar]
  26. Meretoja, H.
    (2018) The ethics of storytelling: Narrative hermeneutics, history, and the possible. Oxford University Press. 10.1093/oso/9780190649364.001.0001
    https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780190649364.001.0001 [Google Scholar]
  27. Mazak, C. M.
    (2016) Introduction: Theorizing translanguaging practices in higher education. InC. M. Mazak & K. S. Carroll (Eds.), Translanguaging in higher education: Beyond monolingual ideologies (pp.2–10). De Gruyter. 10.21832/9781783096657‑003
    https://doi.org/10.21832/9781783096657-003 [Google Scholar]
  28. Mishler, E. G.
    (1986) The analysis of interview-narratives. InT. R. Sarbin (Ed.), Narrative psychology: The storied nature of human conduct (pp.233–255). Praeger.
    [Google Scholar]
  29. Moenandar, S-J.
    (2018) When not to tell stories: Unnatural narrative in applied narratology. Frontiers of Narrative Studies, 4(1), 6–20. 10.1515/fns‑2018‑0002
    https://doi.org/10.1515/fns-2018-0002 [Google Scholar]
  30. Moenandar, S-J., Lucaci, M., & Duarte, J.
    (2022) “Or even Frisian, yes. No, no”: The negotiation of space for a minority language in narratives by pre-service teachers. Frontiers of Narrative Studies, 8(2), 224–249. 10.1515/fns‑2022‑2022
    https://doi.org/10.1515/fns-2022-2022 [Google Scholar]
  31. Moenandar, S-J., & Huisman, K.
    (2019) Storytelling as a tool for student career counselling. InS-J. Moenandar & N. K. Miller, Not ever absent: Storytelling in arts, culture and identity Formation, (pp.105–114). Brill.
    [Google Scholar]
  32. Murray, M., & Sools, A.
    (2015) Narrative research in clinical and health psychology. InP. Rohleder & A. C. Lyons (Eds.), Qualitative research in clinical and health psychology (pp.133–154). Palgrave Macmillan.
    [Google Scholar]
  33. Phelan, J.
    (1998) Narrative as rhetoric: Reading the spells of Porter’s “Magic”. InD. H. Richter (Ed.), The critical tradition (pp.796–808). Bedford Books.
    [Google Scholar]
  34. Philips, D.
    (2010) Epistemological distinctions and cultural politics: Educational reform and the Naturwissenschaft/Geisteswissenschaft distinction in nineteenth-century Germany. InU. Feest (Ed.), Historical perspectives on Erklären and Verstehen (pp.15–35). Springer. 10.1007/978‑90‑481‑3540‑0_2
    https://doi.org/10.1007/978-90-481-3540-0_2 [Google Scholar]
  35. Platt, J.
    (2001) The history of the interview. InJ. F. Gubrium & J. A. Holstein (Eds.), Handbook of interview research: Context and method (pp.33–54). Sage.
    [Google Scholar]
  36. Ricœur, P.
    (1992) Oneself as another. University of Chicago Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  37. Riessman, C. K.
    (2008) Narrative methods for the human sciences. Sage.
    [Google Scholar]
  38. Robichaud, D.
    (2003) Narrative institutions we organize by: The case of a municipal administration. InB. Czarniawska-Joerges & P. Gagliardi (Eds.), Narratives we organize by (pp.37–54). John Benjamins Publishing. 10.1075/aios.11.04rob
    https://doi.org/10.1075/aios.11.04rob [Google Scholar]
  39. Romero-Ivanova, Christina, Tara Kingsley, and Lance Mason
    . “Three conceptions of literacy: Media, narrative, and gaming literacies.” Oxford Bibliographies, 28 Aug. 2019, https://www.oxfordbibliographies.com/display/document/obo-9780199756810/obo-9780199756810-0224.xml. 10.1093/obo/9780199756810‑0224
    https://doi.org/10.1093/obo/9780199756810-0224 [Google Scholar]
  40. Snow, C. P.
    (1959) The two cultures and the scientific revolution. Cambridge University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  41. Stueber, K. R.
    (2012) Understanding versus explanation? How to think about the distinction between the human and the natural sciences. Inquiry, 55(1), 17–32. 10.1080/0020174X.2012.643621
    https://doi.org/10.1080/0020174X.2012.643621 [Google Scholar]
  42. Wengraf, T.
    (2001) Qualitative research interviewing: Biographic narrative and semi-structured methods. Sage. 10.4135/9781849209717
    https://doi.org/10.4135/9781849209717 [Google Scholar]
/content/journals/10.1075/ni.23079.moe
Loading
/content/journals/10.1075/ni.23079.moe
Loading

Data & Media loading...

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was successful
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error