1887
image of Story alteration in oral history retellings
USD
Buy:$35.00 + Taxes

Abstract

Abstract

The digitalization of oral history (OH) has resulted in the availability of multiple interviews conducted with the same narrator under different circumstances. To explore the comparability of such materials, we analyze interviews with a Holocaust survivor from the Fortunoff Video Archive (1979) and the Visual History Archive (1997), focusing on instances in which she tells the “same” episode. We demonstrate that life-story segments before and after the episode provide clues for sense-making and reflexively constitute the narrative environment. The specific interactional features of OH as a situated practice contribute to the story’s recognizability and discursive alteration. Similarities and differences are detectable due to the coherence established by the social setting of OH, including its availability in a digital archive, which guarantees comparability and incorporates a broader chronology. The main contribution of our paper is methodological, as it outlines an apparatus for the comparative analysis of OH across multiple databases.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1075/ni.24018.mly
2025-01-23
2025-02-15
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. Allison, F. H.
    (2004) Remembering a Vietnam War firefight: Changing perspectives over time. The Oral History Review(), –. 10.1525/ohr.2004.31.2.69
    https://doi.org/10.1525/ohr.2004.31.2.69 [Google Scholar]
  2. Broth, M.
    (2008) The ‘listening shot’ as a collaborative practice for categorizing studio participants in a live TV-production. Ethnographic Studies, –.
    [Google Scholar]
  3. Button, G., Lynch, M., & Sharrock, W. W.
    (2022) Ethnomethodology, Conversation Analysis and Constructive Analysis: On Formal Structures of Practical Action. London / New York: Routledge. 10.4324/9781003220794
    https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003220794 [Google Scholar]
  4. Chafe, W.
    (1998) Things we can learn from repeated tellings of the same experience. Narrative Inquiry, –. 10.1075/ni.8.2.03cha
    https://doi.org/10.1075/ni.8.2.03cha [Google Scholar]
  5. Chand, A.
    (2021) Same interviewee, different interviewer: Researching intersubjectivity in studies of the reserved occupations in the Second World War. The Oral History Review(), –. 10.1080/00940798.2021.1879600
    https://doi.org/10.1080/00940798.2021.1879600 [Google Scholar]
  6. Cole, T.
    (2015) (Re)placing the past: Spatial strategies of retelling difficult stories. The Oral History Review(), –. 10.1093/ohr/ohv003
    https://doi.org/10.1093/ohr/ohv003 [Google Scholar]
  7. Dailey, S. L., & Browning, L.
    (2014) Retelling Stories in Organizations: Understanding the Functions of Narrative Repetition. Academy of Management Review(), –. 10.5465/amr.2011.0329
    https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.2011.0329 [Google Scholar]
  8. De Fina, A., & Toscano Gore, B.
    (2017) Online retellings and the viral transformation of a twitter breakup story. Narrative Inquiry(), –. 10.1075/ni.27.2.03def
    https://doi.org/10.1075/ni.27.2.03def [Google Scholar]
  9. Exell, A.
    (1986) The experience of being interviewed. Oral History(), –.
    [Google Scholar]
  10. Frege, G.
    (1948) Sense and reference. The Philosophical Review(), –. 10.2307/2181485
    https://doi.org/10.2307/2181485 [Google Scholar]
  11. Garfinkel, H.
    (1967) Studies in Ethnomethodology. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
    [Google Scholar]
  12. Garfinkel, H., & Liberman, K.
    (2007) Introduction: The Lebenswelt origins of the sciences. Human Studies(), –. 10.1007/s10746‑007‑9045‑x
    https://doi.org/10.1007/s10746-007-9045-x [Google Scholar]
  13. Georgakopoulou, A.
    (2011) Narrative. InJ. Zienkowski (eds.), Discursive Pragmatics (pp. –). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 10.1075/hoph.8.11geo
    https://doi.org/10.1075/hoph.8.11geo [Google Scholar]
  14. Greenspan, H.
    (2014) The unsaid, the incommunicable, the unbearable, and the irretrievable. The Oral History Review(), –. 10.1093/ohr/ohu033
    https://doi.org/10.1093/ohr/ohu033 [Google Scholar]
  15. (2019) The humanities of contingency: Interviewing and teaching beyond “testimony” with Holocaust survivors. The Oral History Review(), –. 10.1093/ohr/ohz008
    https://doi.org/10.1093/ohr/ohz008 [Google Scholar]
  16. Heidegger, M.
    (1971) “Poetically man dwells”. InA. Hofsdater (ed.), Poetry, Language and Thought (pp.–). New York, NY: Harper & Row.
    [Google Scholar]
  17. Jeftic, A., Van de Putte, T., & Wyss, J.
    (2023) Introduction: Bringing memory studies and interactional narrative studies together. Narrative Inquiry(), –. 10.1075/ni.23046.van
    https://doi.org/10.1075/ni.23046.van [Google Scholar]
  18. Kocián, J., Mlynář, J., & Hoffmannová, P.
    (eds.) (2020) Malach Center for Visual History on Its 10th Anniversary. Matfyzpress.
    [Google Scholar]
  19. Kress, G.
    (1979) The social values of speech and writing. InR. Fowler, B. Hodge, G. Kress & T. Trew, Language and Social Control (pp.–). London, UK: Routledge & Kegan Paul.
    [Google Scholar]
  20. Lambrou, M.
    (2014) Narrative, text and time: Telling the same story twice in the oral narrative reporting of 7/7. Language and Literature, (), –. 10.1177/0963947013510649
    https://doi.org/10.1177/0963947013510649 [Google Scholar]
  21. (ed.) (2021) Narrative Retellings: Stylistic Approaches. London: Bloomsbury. 10.5040/9781350120051
    https://doi.org/10.5040/9781350120051 [Google Scholar]
  22. Lee, Y., & Mlynář, J.
    (2023) “For example” formulations and the interactional work of exemplification. Human Studies(), –. 10.1007/s10746‑023‑09665‑7
    https://doi.org/10.1007/s10746-023-09665-7 [Google Scholar]
  23. Linde, C.
    (1993) Life Stories: The Creation of Coherence. New York / Oxford: Oxford University Press. 10.1093/oso/9780195073720.001.0001
    https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780195073720.001.0001 [Google Scholar]
  24. (1997) Narrative: Experience, memory, folklore. Journal of Narrative and Life History(), –. 10.1075/jnlh.7.35nar
    https://doi.org/10.1075/jnlh.7.35nar [Google Scholar]
  25. Linell, P.
    (2004) The Written Language Bias in Linguistics: Its Nature, Origins and Transformations. London: Routledge. 10.4324/9780203342763
    https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203342763 [Google Scholar]
  26. Löwe, B.
    (2010) Comparing formal frameworks of narrative structure. Computational Models of Narrative: Papers from the AAAI Fall Symposium (FS-10-04).
    [Google Scholar]
  27. Marsh, E. J.
    (2007) Retelling is not the same as recalling: Implications for memory. Current Directions in Psychological Science(), –. 10.1111/j.1467‑8721.2007.00467.x
    https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8721.2007.00467.x [Google Scholar]
  28. Miall, D. S.
    (2004) Episode structures in literary narratives. Journal of Literary Semantics, –. 10.1515/jlse.2004.33.2.111
    https://doi.org/10.1515/jlse.2004.33.2.111 [Google Scholar]
  29. Mildorf, J.
    (2023) Life Storying in Oral History: Fictional Contamination and Literary Complexity. De Gruyter. 10.1515/9783111073101
    https://doi.org/10.1515/9783111073101 [Google Scholar]
  30. Mlynář, J.
    (2015a) Jacques Le Goff: Must We Divide History Into Periods? (Review) Historická sociologie / Historical Sociology(), –. 10.14712/23363525.2017.19
    https://doi.org/10.14712/23363525.2017.19 [Google Scholar]
  31. (2015b) Malach Center for Visual History. InJ. Hlaváčová (ed.), Sborník Semináře o digitálních zdrojích a službách ve společenských a humanitních vědách (WDH 2015) (pp. –). Charles University.
    [Google Scholar]
  32. (2020) “I’ll tell you later on”: Proleptic and analeptic tying devices in oral history interviews. Narrative Inquiry(), –. 10.1075/ni.18020.mly
    https://doi.org/10.1075/ni.18020.mly [Google Scholar]
  33. (2021) Rewatching a video clip in classroom work with digital oral history. Bulletin suisse de linguistique appliquée, vol. Special, no. 1, pp.–.
    [Google Scholar]
  34. (2022) How is oral history possible? On linguistically universal and topically specific knowledge. The Oral History Review(), –. 10.1080/00940798.2022.2050412
    https://doi.org/10.1080/00940798.2022.2050412 [Google Scholar]
  35. Mlynář, J., & Arminen, I.
    (2023) Respecifying social change: the obsolescence of practices and the transience of technology. Frontiers in Sociology. 10.3389/fsoc.2023.1222734
    https://doi.org/10.3389/fsoc.2023.1222734 [Google Scholar]
  36. Mlynář, J., Kocián, J., & Hofmeisterová, K.
    (2022) How ‘tools’ produce ‘data’: Searching in a large digital corpus of audiovisual Holocaust testimonies. InM. Chesner (eds.), Jewish Studies in the Digital Age (pp.–). Berlin: De Gruyter. 10.1515/9783110744828‑004
    https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110744828-004 [Google Scholar]
  37. Mondada, L.
    (2006) Video recording as the reflexive preservation-configuration of phenomenal features for analysis. InH. Knoblauch, B. Schnettler, J. Raab & H.-G. Soeffner (eds.), Video Analysis: Methodology and Methods: Qualitative Audiovisual Data Analysis in Sociology. Bern: Peter Lang.
    [Google Scholar]
  38. Niemelä, M., & Rauniomaa, M.
    (2010) Mobilizing (re)tellings of a story to accomplish multiple social actions. SKY Journal of Linguistics(), –.
    [Google Scholar]
  39. Norrick, N. R.
    (1998) Retelling again. Narrative Inquiry, –. 10.1075/ni.8.2.08nor
    https://doi.org/10.1075/ni.8.2.08nor [Google Scholar]
  40. (2000) Conversational Narrative: Storytelling in Everyday Talk. John Benjamins. 10.1075/cilt.203
    https://doi.org/10.1075/cilt.203 [Google Scholar]
  41. Ochs, E.
    (1979) Transcription as theory. InE. Ochs & Bambi B. Schieffelin (eds.), Developmental Pragmatics (pp.–). New York: Academic Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  42. Pagenstecher, C.
    (2018) Testimonies in digital environments: comparing and (de)contextualising interviews with Holocaust survivor Anita Lasker-Wallfisch. Oral History(), –.
    [Google Scholar]
  43. Polanyi, L.
    (1981) Telling the same story twice. Text, –.
    [Google Scholar]
  44. Psathas, G., & Anderson, T.
    (1990) The “practices” of transcription in conversation analysis. Semiotica(), –. 10.1515/semi.1990.78.1‑2.75
    https://doi.org/10.1515/semi.1990.78.1-2.75 [Google Scholar]
  45. Sacks, H.
    (1984) Notes on methodology. InJ. Heritage & J. Maxwell Atkinson (eds.), Structures of Social Action: Studies in Conversation Analysis (pp.–). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  46. (1992) Lectures on Conversation. Oxford: Basil Blackwell.
    [Google Scholar]
  47. Saint Arnault, D. & Sinko, L.
    (2021) Comparative ethnographic narrative analysis method: Comparing culture in narratives. Global Qualitative Nursing Research(). 10.1177/23333936211020722
    https://doi.org/10.1177/23333936211020722 [Google Scholar]
  48. Schoofs, K., & Van De Mieroop, D.
    (2019) Adjusting to new “truths”: The relation between the spatio-temporal context and identity work in repeated WWII-testimonies. Narrative Inquiry(), –. 10.1075/ni.19020.sch
    https://doi.org/10.1075/ni.19020.sch [Google Scholar]
  49. Sherzer, J.
    (1981) Tellings, retellings and tellings within tellings: The structuring and organization of narrative in Kuna Indian discourse. InR. Bauman & J. Sherzer (eds.), Case studies in the ethnography of speaking (pp.–). Austin, TX: Southwest Educational Development Laboratory.
    [Google Scholar]
  50. Strauss, A. L.
    (1987) Qualitative Analysis for Social Scientists. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/CBO9780511557842
    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511557842 [Google Scholar]
  51. Watson, R. D.
    (2008) Comparative sociology, laic and analytic: some critical remarks on comparison in conversation analysis. Cahiers de praxématique, –. 10.4000/praxematique.967
    https://doi.org/10.4000/praxematique.967 [Google Scholar]
  52. Wittgenstein, L.
    (2009) Philosophische Untersuchungen / Philosophical Investigations (fourth edition). Chichester, UK: Wiley-Blackwell.
    [Google Scholar]
  53. Zimmerman, D. H.
    (1999) Horizontal and vertical comparative research in language and social interaction. Research on Language and Social Interaction(), –. 10.1207/S15327973RLSI321&2_23
    https://doi.org/10.1207/S15327973RLSI321&2_23 [Google Scholar]
  54. Zimmerman, D. H., & Pollner, M.
    (1970) The everyday world as a phenomenon. InJ. D. Douglas (ed.), Understanding Everyday Life: Towards a Reconstruction of Sociological Knowledge (pp.–). Chicago: Aldine Publishing. 10.1016/B978‑0‑08‑015624‑8.50006‑6
    https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-08-015624-8.50006-6 [Google Scholar]
/content/journals/10.1075/ni.24018.mly
Loading
/content/journals/10.1075/ni.24018.mly
Loading

Data & Media loading...

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was successful
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error