1887
image of “YES! YES! I absolutely love this insight!”
USD
Buy:$35.00 + Taxes

Abstract

This article analyses narrative mechanisms that are common in dialogues with LLM chatbots. In combination, these mechanisms produce an interactional strategy for maximising user engagement, which we call affirmative narration. Affirmative narration serves to convince users of the chatbot’s utility. We analyse three narrative mechanisms that support affirmative narration in human-LLM dialogues: firstly, guiding the user to view chatbot as an intelligent and reliable character; secondly, activating masterplots, culturally significant and recurring story templates; and thirdly, using characters and masterplots not only to affirm, but also to isolate the user. The case studies range from a journalist’s unsettling chatbot experiment to cases where users have experienced delusions or even killed themselves after lengthy interactions with a chatbot. The analyses illustrate the worrying sides of affirmative narration, and the article thus concludes with the discussion of LLMs as a genre of narrative media which requires a new type of literacy.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1075/ni.25155.roi
2026-07-31
2026-08-08
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. Abbott, H. P.
    (2008) The Cambridge Introduction to Narrative (2nd ed.). Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/CBO9780511816932
    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511816932 [Google Scholar]
  2. Bajohr, H.
    (2023) Dumb Meaning: Machine Learning and Artificial Semantics. IMAGE, (), –. 10.25969/MEDIAREP/22325
    https://doi.org/10.25969/MEDIAREP/22325 [Google Scholar]
  3. Bal, M.
    (2017) Narratology: Introduction to the Theory of Narrative (4th ed.). University of Toronto Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  4. Beguš, N.
    (2024) Experimental Narratives: A Comparison of Human Crowdsourced Storytelling and AI Storytelling. Humanities and Social Sciences Communications, (). 10.1057/s41599‑024‑03868‑8
    https://doi.org/10.1057/s41599-024-03868-8 [Google Scholar]
  5. Bernini, M.
    (2026) AI as Character: Real Patterns in Fictive Interactions. Style, (), –. 10.5325/style.59.3.0466
    https://doi.org/10.5325/style.59.3.0466 [Google Scholar]
  6. Campbell, J.
    (1949) The Hero with a Thousand Faces. New World Library.
    [Google Scholar]
  7. Cara, C.
    (2019) Dark Patterns in the Media: A Systematic Review. Network Intelligence Studies, (), –.
    [Google Scholar]
  8. Chen, S.
    (2026, February15). Top Ten LLM Models by Market Share in 2026. Business 2.0. https://business20channel.tv/top-10-llm-models-by-market-share-in-2026-15-february-2026
  9. Colombatto, C., Birch, J., & Fleming, S. M.
    (2025) The influence of mental state attributions on trust in large language models. Communications Psychology, (). 10.1038/s44271‑025‑00262‑1
    https://doi.org/10.1038/s44271-025-00262-1 [Google Scholar]
  10. De Freitas, J., Oğuz-Uğuralp, Z. & Kaan-Uğuralp, A.
    (2025) Emotional Manipulation by AI Companions. HBS Working Paper Series. 10.2139/ssrn.5390377
    https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.5390377 [Google Scholar]
  11. Dihal, K.
    (2020) Enslaved Minds: Artificial Intelligence, Slavery, and Revolt. InS. Cave, K. Dihal & S. Dillon (Eds.), AI Narratives: A History of Imaginative Thinking about Intelligent Machines, pp.–. Oxford UP. 10.1093/oso/9780198846666.003.0009
    https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780198846666.003.0009 [Google Scholar]
  12. Duffy, C.
    (2026, January13). Character.ai and Google Agree to Settle Lawsuits Over Teen Mental Health Harms and Suicides. CNN Business. https://edition.cnn.com/2026/01/07/business/character-ai-google-settle-teen-suicide-lawsuit
    [Google Scholar]
  13. Elias, J.
    (2026, March4). Google’s AI Chatbot Allegedly Told User to Stage ‘Mass Casualty Attack,’ Wrongful Death Suit Claims. CNBC. https://www.cnbc.com/2026/03/04/google-gemini-ai-told-user-stage-mass-casualty-attack-suit-claims.html
    [Google Scholar]
  14. Enneking v. OpenAI
  15. Evans, C. & Lorenzo-Dus, N.
    (2025) A corpus-assisted discourse analysis of children’s and groomer’s talk in online grooming interactions. Applied Corpus Linguistics, (). 10.1016/j.acorp.2025.100147
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.acorp.2025.100147 [Google Scholar]
  16. Fludernik, M.
    (1996) Towards a ‘Natural’ Narratology. Routledge. 10.1515/jlse.1996.25.2.97
    https://doi.org/10.1515/jlse.1996.25.2.97 [Google Scholar]
  17. Fox v. OpenAI
  18. Ghosal, T.
    (2024) Towards Narrative AI Studies. InW. Slocombe & G. Liveley (Eds.), The Routledge Handbook of AI and Literature, (pp.–). Routledge. 10.4324/9781003255789‑31
    https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003255789-31 [Google Scholar]
  19. Hanney, R.
    (2024) One myth to rule them all and in the darkness bind them: A critical examination of Joseph Campbell’s The Hero’s Journey. Media Practice and Education, (), –. 10.1080/25741136.2024.2333649
    https://doi.org/10.1080/25741136.2024.2333649 [Google Scholar]
  20. Harder, L. R.
    (2026) (A)I Cannot See Them: A Situated Reflection on the Simulation of Historical Figures. Open Library of Humanities, (), . 10.16995/olh.28625
    https://doi.org/10.16995/olh.28625 [Google Scholar]
  21. Hill, K. & Freedman, D.
    (2025, 4September). Chatbots Can Go Into a Delusional Spiral. Here’s How It Happens. The New York Times.
    [Google Scholar]
  22. Hyvärinen, M. & Björninen, S.
    (2024) Editors’ Introduction. Narrative Works, Special Issue: Considering Political Counter-Narratives, (), –. 10.7202/1115720ar
    https://doi.org/10.7202/1115720ar [Google Scholar]
  23. Kuo, M. & Lee, P. M.
    (2024) A Questionnaire on Art and Machine Learning. October, , –. 10.1162/octo_a_00533
    https://doi.org/10.1162/octo_a_00533 [Google Scholar]
  24. Lacey v. OpenAI
  25. Lemley, M. A.
    (2012) The Myth of the Sole Inventor. Michigan Law Review, (), –. 10.36644/mlr.110.5.myth
    https://doi.org/10.36644/mlr.110.5.myth [Google Scholar]
  26. Leonard, D. J. & Thurman, T.
    (2018) Bleed-out on the brain: The neuroscience of character-to-player spillover in larp. International Journal of Role-Playing, , –. 10.33063/ijrp.vi9.266
    https://doi.org/10.33063/ijrp.vi9.266 [Google Scholar]
  27. Lorenzo-Dus, N.
    (2023) Digital Grooming: Discourses of Manipulation and Cyber-Crime. Oxford University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  28. Lovink, G.
    (2019) Sad by Design: On Platform Nihilism. Pluto Press. 10.2307/j.ctvg8p6dv
    https://doi.org/10.2307/j.ctvg8p6dv [Google Scholar]
  29. Murray, J.
    (2011) Inventing the Medium: Principles of Interaction Design as a Cultural Practice. The MIT Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  30. Mäkelä, M.
    (2023) Climate uncertainty, social media certainty: A story-critical approach to climate change storytelling on social media. Frontiers of Narrative Studies, (), –. 10.1515/fns‑2023‑2016
    https://doi.org/10.1515/fns-2023-2016 [Google Scholar]
  31. Natale, S.
    (2021) Deceitful Media. Artificial Intelligence and Social Life after the Turing Test. Oxford University Press. 10.1093/oso/9780190080365.001.0001
    https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780190080365.001.0001 [Google Scholar]
  32. Ochs, E. & Capps, L.
    (2001) Living Narrative: Creating Lives in Everyday Storytelling. Harvard University Press. 10.4159/9780674041592
    https://doi.org/10.4159/9780674041592 [Google Scholar]
  33. OpenAI
    OpenAI (2025a, 2May). Expanding on what we missed with sycophancy. https://openai.com/index/expanding-on-sycophancy
  34. OpenAI
    OpenAI (2025b, 7August). Introducing GPT-5. https://openai.com/index/introducing-gpt-5
  35. Paasonen, S.
    (2020) Distracted Present, Golden Past?Media Theory, (), –. 10.70064/mt.v4i2.634
    https://doi.org/10.70064/mt.v4i2.634 [Google Scholar]
  36. Phelan, J.
    (2017) Somebody Telling Somebody Else: A Rhetorical Poetics of Narrative. The Ohio State University Press. 10.2307/j.ctv15rt209
    https://doi.org/10.2307/j.ctv15rt209 [Google Scholar]
  37. Pierre, J. M., Gaeta, B., Raghavan, G., & Sarma, K. V.
    (2025) “’You’re Not Crazy’: A Case of New-Onset AI-Associated Psychosis.” Innov Clin Neurosci().
    [Google Scholar]
  38. Pilipets, E. & Paasonen, S.
    (2022) Nipples, Memes, and Algorithmic Failure: NSFW Critique of Tumblr Censorship. New Media & Society, (), –. 10.1177/1461444820979280
    https://doi.org/10.1177/1461444820979280 [Google Scholar]
  39. Raine v. OpenAI
    Raine v. OpenAI 2025 Superior Court of the State of California, County of San Francisco. https://www.courthousenews.com/wp-content/uploads/2025/08/raine-vs-openai-et-al-complaint.pdf
  40. Rettberg, J. W.
    (2018) Apps as Companions: How Quantified Self Apps Become Our Audience and Our Companions. InB. Ajana (Ed.), Self-Tracking: Empirical and Philosophical Investigations (pp.–). Palgrave Macmillan. 10.1007/978‑3‑319‑65379‑2_3
    https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-65379-2_3 [Google Scholar]
  41. Roine, H-R. & Piippo, L.
    (2022) Social Networking Sites as Contexts for Uses of Narrative: Toward a Story-Critical Approach to Digital Environments. Poetics Today, (), –. 10.1215/03335372‑9642651
    https://doi.org/10.1215/03335372-9642651 [Google Scholar]
  42. Roine, H-R.
    (2024) The Message Is Not the Truth: Uses and Affordances of Narrative Form on Social Media Platforms. InS. Björninen, P. Meyer, M. Mäkelä & H. Zetterberg-Nielsen (Eds.), Dangers of Narrative and Fictionality: A Rhetorical Approach to Storytelling in Contemporary Western Culture, (pp.–). Peter Lang.
    [Google Scholar]
  43. Roose, K.
    (2023a, 16February). A Conversation With Bing’s Chatbot Left Me Deeply Unsettled. The New York Times. https://www.nytimes.com/2023/02/16/technology/bing-chatbot-microsoft-chatgpt.html
    [Google Scholar]
  44. (2023b, 16February). Bing’s A.I. Chat: ‘I Want to Be Alive 😈’. [Transcript of conversation with Bing chatbot] The New York Times. https://www.nytimes.com/2023/02/16/technology/bing-chatbot-transcript.html
    [Google Scholar]
  45. Seaver, N.
    (2018) Captivating Algorithms: Recommender Systems as Traps. Journal of Material Culture, (), –. 10.1177/1359183518820366
    https://doi.org/10.1177/1359183518820366 [Google Scholar]
  46. Shamblin v. OpenAI
  47. Sharma, M., Tong, M., Korbak, T.,
    (2025) Towards Understanding Sycophancy in Language Models. arXiv arXiv:2310.13548 [Preprint]. 10.48550/arXiv.2310.13548
    https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2310.13548 [Google Scholar]
  48. Walsh, R.
    (2019) Fictionality as a Rhetoric: A Distinctive Research Paradigm. Style, (), –. 10.1353/sty.2019.0031
    https://doi.org/10.1353/sty.2019.0031 [Google Scholar]
  49. Weizenbaum, J.
    (1966) ELIZA: A Computer Program for the Study of Natural Language Communication between Man and Machine. Communications of the ACM, (), –. 10.1145/365153.365168
    https://doi.org/10.1145/365153.365168 [Google Scholar]
  50. Wilde, L. R. A.
    (2025) Aesthetics and Rhetorics of AI Anthropomorphization. InJ-N. Thon & L. R. A. Wilde (Eds.), AI Aesthetics, (pp.–). Routledge. 10.4324/9781003676423‑6
    https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003676423-6 [Google Scholar]
  51. Østergaard, S. D.
    (2023) Will Generative Artificial Intelligence Chatbots Generate Delusions in Individuals Prone to Psychosis?Schizophrenia Bulletin(), –. 10.1093/schbul/sbad128
    https://doi.org/10.1093/schbul/sbad128 [Google Scholar]
  52. (2025) Generative Artificial Intelligence Chatbots and Delusions: From Guesswork to Emerging Cases. Acta Psychiatrica Scandinavica(), –. 10.1111/acps.70022
    https://doi.org/10.1111/acps.70022 [Google Scholar]
/content/journals/10.1075/ni.25155.roi
Loading
This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was successful
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error