1887
  1. Home
  2. e-Journals
  3. Narrative Inquiry
  4. Volume 26, Issue 1
  5. Article
Volume 26, Issue 1
  • ISSN 1387-6740
  • E-ISSN: 1569-9935
USD
Buy:$35.00 + Taxes

Abstract

This article presents a conversation analytic examination of a telephone call in which a teenage girl updates her friend about developments in a relationship. The telling is in three phases, from initial reluctance, through first kiss to first sexual contact. Drawing on the notion of lower and upper bounded tellability, I analyse the talk for what is constructed as tellable and as taboo. Eminently tellable, the kiss is a directly named activity, details are sought, and it is assessed in a delighted way. In contrast, the sexual activity is not named and instead is referred to as ‘stuff’. The details of ‘stuff’ are not pursued, and the activity is assessed with (playful) disapproval. The telling speaks to normative gendered sexual expectations for teenage girls in the UK. In talking about personal experience of sexual conduct but without talking in any detail, these speakers position themselves as morally respectable.

© 2016 John Benjamins Publishing Company
Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1075/ni.26.1.08jac
2016-12-05
2023-05-28

  • From This Site

    /content/journals/10.1075/ni.26.1.08jac
    dcterms_title,dcterms_subject,pub_keyword
    -contentType:Journal -contentType:Contributor -contentType:Concept -contentType:Institution
    10
    5
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. Allen, L
    (2003) Girls want sex, boys want love: Resisting dominant discourses of (hetero) sexuality. Sexualities, 6(2), 215–236. doi: 10.1177/1363460703006002004
     https://doi.org/10.1177/1363460703006002004 [Google Scholar]
  2. Angelides, S
    (2012) The ‘Second Sexual Revolution’, moral panic, and the evasion of teenage sexual subjectivity. Women’s History Review, 21(5), 831–847. doi: 10.1080/09612025.2012.658169
     https://doi.org/10.1080/09612025.2012.658169 [Google Scholar]
  3. Aral, S.O. , & Manhart, L.E
    (2009) “Someone naughty for tonight”: Sex partner recruitment venues and associated STI risk. Sexually Transmitted Infections, 85(4), 239–240. doi: 10.1136/sti.2008.035378
     https://doi.org/10.1136/sti.2008.035378 [Google Scholar]
  4. Bamberg, M.G
    (1997) Positioning between structure and performance. Journal of narrative and life history, 7(1–4), 335–342. doi: 10.1075/jnlh.7.42pos
     https://doi.org/10.1075/jnlh.7.42pos [Google Scholar]
  5. Billig, M
    (2006) A psychoanalytic discursive psychology: From consciousness to unconsciousness. Discourse Studies, 8(1), 17–24. doi: 10.1177/1461445606059546
     https://doi.org/10.1177/1461445606059546 [Google Scholar]
  6. Broad, K
    (2011) Coming out for parents, families and friends of lesbians and gays: From support group grieving to love advocacy. Sexualities, 14(4), 399–415. doi: 10.1177/1363460711406792
     https://doi.org/10.1177/1363460711406792 [Google Scholar]
  7. Clayman, S
    (2010) Address terms in the service of other actions: The case of news interview talk. Discourse & Communication, 4(2), 161–183. doi: 10.1177/1750481310364330
     https://doi.org/10.1177/1750481310364330 [Google Scholar]
  8. Crawford, M. , & Popp, D
    (2003) Sexual double standards: A review and methodological critique of two decades of research. Journal of Sex Research, 40(1), 13–26. doi: 10.1080/00224490309552163
     https://doi.org/10.1080/00224490309552163 [Google Scholar]
  9. De Fina, A
    (2008) Who tells which story and why? Micro and macro contexts in narrative. Text & Talk - An Interdisciplinary Journal of Language, Discourse Communication Studies, 28(3), 421–442. doi: 10.1515/TEXT.2008.020
     https://doi.org/10.1515/TEXT.2008.020 [Google Scholar]
  10. (2009) Narratives in interview — The case of accounts: For an interactional approach to narrative genres. Narrative Inquiry, 19(2), 233–258. doi: 10.1075/ni.19.2.03def
     https://doi.org/10.1075/ni.19.2.03def [Google Scholar]
  11. De Fina, A. , & Georgakopoulou, A
    (2008) Analysing narratives as practices. Qualitative Research, 8(3), 379–387. doi: 10.1177/1468794106093634
     https://doi.org/10.1177/1468794106093634 [Google Scholar]
  12. Drew, P
    (1987) Po-faced receipts of teases. Linguistics, 25(1), 219–253. doi: 10.1515/ling.1987.25.1.219
     https://doi.org/10.1515/ling.1987.25.1.219 [Google Scholar]
  13. (1992) Contested evidence in courtroom cross-examination: The case of a trial for rape. In P. Drew & J. Heritage (Eds.), Talk at work: Interaction in institutional settings (pp.470–520). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
     [Google Scholar]
  14. Drew, P. , & Walker, T
    (2009) Going too far: Complaining, escalating and disaffiliation. Journal of Pragmatics, 41(12), 2400–2414. doi: 10.1016/j.pragma.2008.09.046
     https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2008.09.046 [Google Scholar]
  15. Egan, R.D
    (2013) Becoming sexual: A critical appraisal of the sexualization of girls. Cambridge: John Wiley & Sons.
     [Google Scholar]
  16. Egan, R.D. , & Hawkes, G.L
    (2008) Endangered girls and incendiary objects: Unpacking the discourse on sexualization. Sexuality & Culture, 12(4), 291–311. doi: 10.1007/s12119‑008‑9036‑8
     https://doi.org/10.1007/s12119-008-9036-8 [Google Scholar]
  17. (2012) Sexuality, youth and the perils of endangered innocence: How history can help us get past the panic. Gender and Education, 24(3), 269–284. doi: 10.1080/09540253.2012.666232
     https://doi.org/10.1080/09540253.2012.666232 [Google Scholar]
  18. Elliott, S
    (2010) Parents’ constructions of teen sexuality: Sex panics, contradictory discourses, and social inequality. Symbolic Interaction, 33(2), 191–212. doi: 10.1525/si.2010.33.2.191
     https://doi.org/10.1525/si.2010.33.2.191 [Google Scholar]
  19. Gilligan, C
    (1982) In a different voice. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
     [Google Scholar]
  20. Gilmore, S. , Delamater, J. , & Wagstaff, D
    (1996) Sexual decision making by inner city black adolescent males: A focus group study. Journal of Sex Research, 33(4), 363–371. doi: 10.1080/00224499609551854
     https://doi.org/10.1080/00224499609551854 [Google Scholar]
  21. Goffman, E
    (1967) Interaction ritual: Essays in face-to-face behavior. London: Aldine
     [Google Scholar]
  22. Goodwin, C
    (1986) Audience diversity, participation and interpretation. Text, 6(3), 283–316.
     [Google Scholar]
  23. Griffin, C
    (2007) Being dead and being there research interviews, sharing hand cream and the preference for analysing naturally occurring data’. Discourse Studies, 9(2), 246–269. doi: 10.1177/1461445607075340
     https://doi.org/10.1177/1461445607075340 [Google Scholar]
  24. Hammersley, M
    (2003) Analytics are no substitute for methodology: A response to Speer and Hutchby. Sociology, 37, 339–352. doi: 10.1177/0038038503037002007
     https://doi.org/10.1177/0038038503037002007 [Google Scholar]
  25. Heath, C. , Hindmarsh, J. , & Luff, P
    (2010) Video in qualitative research: Analysing social interaction in everyday life. London: Sage.
     [Google Scholar]
  26. Harris, M.B
    (2013) School experiences of gay and lesbian youth: The invisible minority. London: Routledge.
     [Google Scholar]
  27. Heritage, J
    (2012) The epistemic engine: Sequence organization and territories of knowledge. Research on Language & Social Interaction, 45(1), 30–52. doi: 10.1080/08351813.2012.646685
     https://doi.org/10.1080/08351813.2012.646685 [Google Scholar]
  28. (2013) Turn-initial position and some of its occupants. Journal of Pragmatics, 57, 331–337. doi: 10.1016/j.pragma.2013.08.025
     https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2013.08.025 [Google Scholar]
  29. Hirst, J
    (2004) Researching young people’s sexuality and learning about sex: Experience, need, and sex and relationship education. Culture, Health & Sexuality, 6(2), 115–129. doi: 10.1080/13691050310001600969
     https://doi.org/10.1080/13691050310001600969 [Google Scholar]
  30. (2013) ‘It’s got to be about enjoying yourself’: Young people, sexual pleasure, and sex and relationships education. Sex Education, 13(4), 423–436. doi: 10.1080/14681811.2012.747433
     https://doi.org/10.1080/14681811.2012.747433 [Google Scholar]
  31. Hutchby, I
    (2002) Resisting the incitement to talk in child counselling: Aspects of the utterance ‘I don’t know’. Discourse studies, 4(2), 147–168. doi: 10.1177/14614456020040020201
     https://doi.org/10.1177/14614456020040020201 [Google Scholar]
  32. Jackson, S
    (1982) Childhood and sexuality. Oxford: Blackwell
     [Google Scholar]
  33. Jefferson, G
    (1984) Stepwise transition from talk about a trouble to inappropriately next-positioned matters. In J.M. Atkinson & J. Heritage (Eds.), Structures of social action: Studies in conversation analysis (pp.191–222). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
     [Google Scholar]
  34. Jefferson, G. , Sacks, H. , & Schegloff, E.A
    (1987) Notes on laughter in the pursuit of intimacy. In G. Button & J.R.E. Lee (Eds.), Talk and social organisation (pp.152–205). Clevedon: Multilingual Matters.
     [Google Scholar]
  35. Karatsu, M
    (2012) Conversational storytelling among Japanese women : Conversational circumstances, social circumstances and tellability of stories. Amsterdam: John Benjamins Publishing Company. doi: 10.1075/sin.16
     https://doi.org/10.1075/sin.16 [Google Scholar]
  36. Kitzinger, C
    (2000) Doing feminist conversation analysis. Feminism & Psychology, 10(2), 163–193. doi: 10.1177/0959353500010002001
     https://doi.org/10.1177/0959353500010002001 [Google Scholar]
  37. (2005a) Heteronormativity in action: Reproducing the heterosexual nuclear family in after-hours medical calls. Social Problems, 52(4), 477–498. doi: 10.1525/sp.2005.52.4.477
     https://doi.org/10.1525/sp.2005.52.4.477 [Google Scholar]
  38. (2005b) “ Speaking as a Heterosexual:” (How) does sexuality matter for talk-in-interaction?Research on Language and Social Interaction, 38(3), 221–265. doi: 10.1207/s15327973rlsi3803_2
     https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327973rlsi3803_2 [Google Scholar]
  39. (2006) Talking sex and gender. In P. Drew , G. Raymond , & D. Weinberg (Eds.), Talk and interaction in social research methods. London: Sage.
     [Google Scholar]
  40. Kitzinger, C. , & Frith, H
    (1999) Just say no? The use of conversation analysis in developing a feminist perspective on sexual refusal. Discourse & Society, 10(3), 293–316. doi: 10.1177/0957926599010003002
     https://doi.org/10.1177/0957926599010003002 [Google Scholar]
  41. Labov, W
    (1972) Some principles of linguistic methodology. Language in Society, 1(1), 97–120. doi: 10.1017/S0047404500006576
     https://doi.org/10.1017/S0047404500006576 [Google Scholar]
  42. Labov, W. , & Fanshel, D
    (1977) Therapeutic discourse. New York: Academic Press.
     [Google Scholar]
  43. Labov, W. , & Waletsky, J
    (1967) Narrative analysis: Oral versions of personal experience. Journal of Narrative and Life History, 7, 3–38. doi: 10.1075/jnlh.7.02nar
     https://doi.org/10.1075/jnlh.7.02nar [Google Scholar]
  44. Land, V. , & Kitzinger, C
    (2005) Speaking as a lesbian: Correcting the heterosexist presumption. Research on Language and Social Interaction, 38(4), 371–416. doi: 10.1207/s15327973rlsi3804_1
     https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327973rlsi3804_1 [Google Scholar]
  45. Lees, S
    (1986) Losing out: Sexuality and adolescent girls. London: Hutchinson.
     [Google Scholar]
  46. Lerner, G.H
    (1996) On the” semi-permeable” character of grammatical units in conversation: Conditional entry into the turn space of another speaker. Studies in interactional sociolinguistics, 13, 238–276.
     [Google Scholar]
  47. (2003) Selecting next speaker: The context-sensitive operation of a context-free organization. Language in Society, 32(02), 177–201. doi: 10.1017/S004740450332202X
     https://doi.org/10.1017/S004740450332202X [Google Scholar]
  48. Lynch, M
    (2002) From naturally occurring data to naturally organized ordinary activities: Comment on Speer. Discourse Studies, 4(4), 531–537. doi: 10.1177/14614456020040040801
     https://doi.org/10.1177/14614456020040040801 [Google Scholar]
  49. Mandelbaum, J
    (2013) Storytelling in conversation. In J. Sidnell & T. Stivers (Eds.), The handbook of conversation analysis (pp.492–507). Chichester: John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.
     [Google Scholar]
  50. Martin, K.A
    (1996) Puberty, sexuality, and the self: Boys and girls at adolescence. London: Psychology Press.
     [Google Scholar]
  51. McAdams, D.P
    (2006) The problem of narrative coherence. Journal of Constructivist Psychology, 19(2), 109–125. doi: 10.1080/10720530500508720
     https://doi.org/10.1080/10720530500508720 [Google Scholar]
  52. Mishler, E.G
    (1986) The analysis of interview-narratives. In T.R. Sarbin (Ed.), Narrative psychology: The storied nature of human conduct (pp.233–255). New York: Praeger
     [Google Scholar]
  53. Morrison, D.M. , Masters, N.T. , Wells, E.A. , Casey, E. , Beadnell, B. , & Hoppe, M.J
    (2015) “He enjoys giving her pleasure”: Diversity and complexity in young men’s sexual scripts. Archives of Sexual Behaviour, 44(3), 655–68. doi: 10.1007/s10508‑014‑0354‑7
     https://doi.org/10.1007/s10508-014-0354-7 [Google Scholar]
  54. Norrick, N
    (2000) Conversational narrative: Storytelling in everyday talk. Amsterdam: John Benjamins Publishing. doi: 10.1075/cilt.203
     https://doi.org/10.1075/cilt.203 [Google Scholar]
  55. (2005) The dark side of tellability. Narrative Inquiry, 15(2), 323–343. doi: 10.1075/ni.15.2.07nor
     https://doi.org/10.1075/ni.15.2.07nor [Google Scholar]
  56. Ochs, E. , & Capps, L
    (2001) Living narrative: Creating lives in everyday storytelling. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
     [Google Scholar]
  57. Ogden, R
    (2013) Clicks and percussives in English conversation. Journal of the International Phonetic Association, 43(3), 299–320. doi: 10.1017/S0025100313000224
     https://doi.org/10.1017/S0025100313000224 [Google Scholar]
  58. Phillips, L.M
    (2000) Flirting with danger: Young women’s reflections on sexuality and domination. New York: NYU Press.
     [Google Scholar]
  59. Potter, J
    (2002) ‘Two Kinds of Natural’. Discourse Studies, 4, 539–42. doi: 10.1177/14614456020040040901
     https://doi.org/10.1177/14614456020040040901 [Google Scholar]
  60. Potter, J. , & Hepburn, A
    (2005) Qualitative interviews in psychology: Problems and possibilities. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 2(4), 281–307. doi: 10.1191/1478088705qp045oa
     https://doi.org/10.1191/1478088705qp045oa [Google Scholar]
  61. (2007) Life is out there. A comment on Griffin. Discourse Studies, 9(2), 276–282. doi: 10.1177/1461445607075348
     https://doi.org/10.1177/1461445607075348 [Google Scholar]
  62. Raymond, G
    (2003) Grammar and social organization: Yes/no interrogatives and the structure of responding. American Sociological Review, 68(6), 939–967. doi: 10.2307/1519752
     https://doi.org/10.2307/1519752 [Google Scholar]
  63. Reber, E
    (2012) Affectivity in interaction: Sound objects in English. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. doi: 10.1075/pbns.215
     https://doi.org/10.1075/pbns.215 [Google Scholar]
  64. Rendle-Short, J
    (2005) ‘I’ve got a paper-shuffler for a husband’: Indexing sexuality on talk-back radio. Discourse & Society, 16(4), 561–578. doi: 10.1177/0957926505053057
     https://doi.org/10.1177/0957926505053057 [Google Scholar]
  65. Renold, E. , & Ringrose, J
    (2008) Regulation and rupture. Mapping tween and teenage girls’ resistance to the heterosexual matrix. Feminist Theory, 9(3), 313–338. doi: 10.1177/1464700108095854
     https://doi.org/10.1177/1464700108095854 [Google Scholar]
  66. (2011) Schizoid subjectivities? Re-theorizing teen girls’ sexual cultures in an era of ‘sexualization’. Journal of Sociology, 47(4), 389–409. doi: 10.1177/1440783311420792
     https://doi.org/10.1177/1440783311420792 [Google Scholar]
  67. Ringrose, J. , & Renold, E
    (2012) Slut-shaming, girl power and ‘sexualisation’: Thinking through the politics of the international SlutWalks with teen girls. Gender and Education, 24(3), 333–343. doi: 10.1080/09540253.2011.645023
     https://doi.org/10.1080/09540253.2011.645023 [Google Scholar]
  68. Sacks, H
    (1974) An analysis of the course of a joke’s telling in conversation. In R. Bauman & J.F. Sherzer (Eds.), Explorations in the ethnography of speaking (pp.337–353). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
     [Google Scholar]
  69. (1984) Notes on methodology. In J.M. Atkinson & J. Heritage (Eds.), Structures of social action: Studies in conversation analysis (pp.21–27). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
     [Google Scholar]
  70. (1992) Lectures on conversation (Vols 1 & 2). Oxford: Blackwell.
     [Google Scholar]
  71. Sacks, H. , Schegloff, E.A. , & Jefferson, G
    (1974) A simplest systematics for the organization of turn-taking for conversation. Language, 50(4), 696–735. doi: 10.1353/lan.1974.0010
     https://doi.org/10.1353/lan.1974.0010 [Google Scholar]
  72. Schalet, A.T
    (2011) Not under my roof: Parents, teens, and the culture of sex. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press. doi: 10.7208/chicago/9780226736204.001.0001
     https://doi.org/10.7208/chicago/9780226736204.001.0001 [Google Scholar]
  73. Scharff, C
    (2010) Silencing differences: The ‘unspoken’ dimensions of ‘speaking for others’. InSecrecy and silence in the research process. Feminist Reflections (pp.83–95). London and New York: Routledge.
     [Google Scholar]
  74. Schegloff, E.A
    (1968) Sequencing in conversational openings. American Anthropologist, 70(6), 1075–1095. doi: 10.1525/aa.1968.70.6.02a00030
     https://doi.org/10.1525/aa.1968.70.6.02a00030 [Google Scholar]
  75. (2007) Sequence organization in interaction: A primer in conversation analysis (Vol. 1). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press. doi: 10.1017/CBO9780511791208
     https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511791208 [Google Scholar]
  76. (2009) One perspective on conversation analysis: Comparative perspectives. Conversation analysis: Comparative perspectives, 27, 357.
     [Google Scholar]
  77. Speer, S.A
    (2012) Feminist conversation analysis: Who needs it?Qualitative Research in Psychology, 9(4), 292–297. doi: 10.1080/14780887.2011.635132
     https://doi.org/10.1080/14780887.2011.635132 [Google Scholar]
  78. Speer, S.A. , & Hutchby, I
    (2003) ‘From ethics to analytics: Aspects of participants’ orientations to the presence and relevance of recording devices.’ Sociology, 37, 315–37.
     [Google Scholar]
  79. Schegloff, E.A. , & Lerner, G.H
    (2009) Beginning to respond: Well-prefaced responses to wh-questions. Research on Language and Social Interaction, 42(2), 91–115. doi: 10.1080/08351810902864511
     https://doi.org/10.1080/08351810902864511 [Google Scholar]
  80. Speer, S.A. , & Stokoe, E
    (2011) Conversation and gender. Cambridge University Press. doi: 10.1017/CBO9780511781032
     https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511781032 [Google Scholar]
  81. Stivers, T
    (2008) Stance, alignment, and affiliation during storytelling: When nodding is a token of affiliation. Research on Language and Social Interaction, 41(1), 31–57. doi: 10.1080/08351810701691123
     https://doi.org/10.1080/08351810701691123 [Google Scholar]
  82. Stokoe, E.H. , & Edwards, D
    (2006) Story formulations in talk-in-interaction. Narrative Inquiry, 16(1), 56–65. doi: 10.1075/ni.16.1.09sto
     https://doi.org/10.1075/ni.16.1.09sto [Google Scholar]
  83. Tolman, D.L
    (1994) Doing desire: Adolescent girls’ struggles for/with sexuality. Gender & Society, 8(3), 324–342. doi: 10.1177/089124394008003003
     https://doi.org/10.1177/089124394008003003 [Google Scholar]
  84. (2002) Dilemmas of desire: Teenage girls talk about sexuality. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
     [Google Scholar]
  85. Tolman, D.L. , Hirschman, C. , & Impett, E.A
    (2005) There is more to the story: The place of qualitative research on female adolescent sexuality in policy making. Sexuality Research & Social Policy, 2(4), 4–17. doi: 10.1525/srsp.2005.2.4.4
     https://doi.org/10.1525/srsp.2005.2.4.4 [Google Scholar]
  86. Tolman, D.L. , Spencer, R. , Rosen‐Reynoso, M. , & Porche, M.V
    (2003) Sowing the seeds of violence in heterosexual relationships: Early adolescents narrate compulsory heterosexuality. Journal of Social Issues, 59(1), 159–178. doi: 10.1111/1540‑4560.t01‑1‑00010
     https://doi.org/10.1111/1540-4560.t01-1-00010 [Google Scholar]
  87. Tsui, A
    (1991) The pragmatic functions of I don’t know. Text-Interdisciplinary Journal for the Study of Discourse, 11(4), 607–622. doi: 10.1515/text.1.1991.11.4.607
     https://doi.org/10.1515/text.1.1991.11.4.607 [Google Scholar]
  88. Weatherall, A
    (2011) I don’t know as a prepositioned epistemic hedge. Research on Language & Social Interaction, 44(4), 317–337. doi: 10.1080/08351813.2011.619310
     https://doi.org/10.1080/08351813.2011.619310 [Google Scholar]
  89. Whelan, P
    (2012) Oxymoronic and sociologically monstrous? Feminist Conversation Analysis. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 9(4), 279–291. doi: 10.1080/14780887.2011.634360
     https://doi.org/10.1080/14780887.2011.634360 [Google Scholar]
  90. Wilkinson, S. , & Kitzinger, C
    (2003) Constructing identities: A feminist conversation analytic approach to positioning in action. In R. Harré & F. Moghaddam (Eds.), The self and others: Positioning individuals and groups in personal, political, and cultural contexts (pp.157–180). Westport, CT: Praeger.
     [Google Scholar]
  91. (2014) Conversation analysis in language and gender studies. In S. Erlich , M. Meyerhoff , & J. Holmes (Eds.), The handbook of language, gender and sexuality (2nd ed., pp.41–160). Oxford, UK: Wiley Blackwell.
     [Google Scholar]
  92. Woods, C. , & Wooffitt, R
    (2014) Telling the moment: Seeing a UFO. Narrative Inquiry, 24(2), 239–258. doi: 10.1075/ni.24.2.04woo
     https://doi.org/10.1075/ni.24.2.04woo [Google Scholar]
  93. Wowk, M.T
    (2007) Kitzinger’s feminist conversation analysis: Critical observations. Human Studies, 30(2), 131–155. doi: 10.1007/s10746‑007‑9051‑z
     https://doi.org/10.1007/s10746-007-9051-z [Google Scholar]
  94. Wright, M
    (2011) On clicks in English talk-in-interaction. Journal of the International Phonetic Association, 41(2), 207–229. doi: 10.1017/S0025100311000144
     https://doi.org/10.1017/S0025100311000144 [Google Scholar]
http://instance.metastore.ingenta.com/content/journals/10.1075/ni.26.1.08jac
Loading
  • Article Type: Research Article
Keyword(s): Conversation analysis; storytelling; teenage sexuality; tellability

Most Cited

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was successful
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error