1887
Volume 27, Issue 1
  • ISSN 1387-6740
  • E-ISSN: 1569-9935
USD
Buy:$35.00 + Taxes

Abstract

Trials are touchstones, which highlight rationalities of narrative identity construction. This study seeks to explore these rationalities from the perspective of young defendants. Predicated on narrative interviews before and after trials as well as on participant observations of the respective trials, we reconstruct identity-related categorizations of young defendants. Based on “Membership Categorization Analysis”, our focus is on the young defendants’ narrative depiction of their biographical criminal history and their self-presentation as subjects that have been (un)fairly treated and sentenced by penal professionals. Empirically, we use a case study to elaborate on the intricate challenge of identity construction when a severe punishment is imminent. Our results indicate a strategic form of narration, which mirrors the complexities and uncertainties of a trial.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1075/ni.27.1.04dol
2017-07-21
2019-08-24
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. Andersson, K.
    (2008) Constructing young masculinity. Discourse & Society, 19, 139–161. doi: 10.1177/0957926507085949
    https://doi.org/10.1177/0957926507085949 [Google Scholar]
  2. Antaki, C. , & Widdicombe, S.
    (1998) Identity as an Achievement and as a Tool. In C. Antaki , & S. Widdicombe (Eds.), Identities in Talk (pp.1–14). London: Sage.
    [Google Scholar]
  3. Arnauld, A. v. , & Martini, S.
    (2015) Unreliable Narration in Law Courts. In V. Nünning (Eds.), Unreliable Narration and Trustworthiness (pp.347–370). Berlin: De Gruyter.
    [Google Scholar]
  4. Ashworth, A. , & Roberts, J.
    (2012) Sentencing: Theory, Principle, and Practice. In M. Maguire , R. Morgan , & R. Reiner (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of criminology (pp.866–894). (5th ed.). Oxford, NY: Oxford University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  5. Atkinson, J. M. , & Drew, P.
    (1979) Order in court: The organisation of verbal interaction in judicial settings. London: Macmillan. doi: 10.1007/978‑1‑349‑04057‑5
    https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349-04057-5 [Google Scholar]
  6. Bamberg, M.
    (2004) Considering counter narratives. In M. G. W. Bamberg & M. Andrews (Eds.), Considering counter narratives (pp.351–371). Amsterdam: J. Benjamins. doi: 10.1075/sin.4.43bam
    https://doi.org/10.1075/sin.4.43bam [Google Scholar]
  7. (2012) Narrative Practices and Identity Navigation. In J. A. Holstein & J. F. Gubrium (Eds.), Varieties of Narrative Analysis (pp.99–124). Los Angeles: Sage. doi: 10.4135/9781506335117.n6
    https://doi.org/10.4135/9781506335117.n6 [Google Scholar]
  8. Brookman, F.
    (2015) The Shifting Narratives of Violent Offenders. In L. Presser & S. Sandberg (Eds.), Narrative Criminology (pp.207–234). New York: NYU.
    [Google Scholar]
  9. Brooks, P. & Gewirtz, P. D.
    (Eds.) (1996) Law’s stories. New Haven: Yale University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  10. Burns, S. L.
    (2005) Ethnographies of law and social control. Amsterdam, NL: Emerald.
    [Google Scholar]
  11. Butler, F.
    (2011) Rush to Judgment: Prisoners’ Views of Juvenile Justice. Western Criminology Review, 12(3), 106–119.
    [Google Scholar]
  12. Drew, P.
    (1992) Contested evidence in courtroom cross-examination: the case of a trial for rape. In P. Drew , & J. Heritage (Eds), Talk at work (pp.470–520). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  13. Ewick, P. , & Silbey, S. S.
    (1995) Subversive Stories and Hegemonic Tales: Toward a Sociology of Narrative. Law & Society Review, 29(2), 197–226. doi: 10.2307/3054010
    https://doi.org/10.2307/3054010 [Google Scholar]
  14. Fitzgerald, R.
    (2012) Membership categorization analysis: Wild and promiscuous or simply the joy of Sacks?Discourse Studies, 14(3), 305–311. doi: 10.1177/1461445612440776
    https://doi.org/10.1177/1461445612440776 [Google Scholar]
  15. Hazel, N. , Hagell, A. & Brazier, L.
    (2002) Young Offenders’ Perceptions of their Experiences in the Criminal Justice System. (Policy Research Bureau).
    [Google Scholar]
  16. Heritage, J.
    (1990/1991) Intention, Meaning and Strategy: Observations on Constraints on Interaction Analysis. Research on Language and Social Interaction, 24, 311–332. doi: 10.1080/08351819009389345
    https://doi.org/10.1080/08351819009389345 [Google Scholar]
  17. Hester, S. & Eglin, P.
    (1997) Membership Categorization Analysis: An Introduction. In S. Hester & P. Eglin (Eds.), Culture in Action (pp.1–23). Washington, D.C.: University Press of America.
    [Google Scholar]
  18. Housley, W. & Fitzgerald, R.
    (2002) The reconsidered model of membership categorization analysis. Qualitative Research, 2(I), 59–83. doi: 10.1177/146879410200200104
    https://doi.org/10.1177/146879410200200104 [Google Scholar]
  19. Jackson, B. S.
    (1996) “Anchored narratives” and the interface of law, psychology and semiotics. Legal and Criminological Psychology, 1(1), 17–45. doi: 10.1111/j.2044‑8333.1996.tb00305.x
    https://doi.org/10.1111/j.2044-8333.1996.tb00305.x [Google Scholar]
  20. Jayyusi, L.
    (1984) Categorization and the Moral Order. Boston: Routledge.
    [Google Scholar]
  21. Komter, M.
    (1997) Remorse, Redress, and Reform: Blame-Taking in the Courtroom. In M. Travers & J. F. Manzo (Eds.), Law in action (pp.239–264). Aldershot: Ashgate.
    [Google Scholar]
  22. (2013) Conversation Analysis in the Courtroom. In J. Sidnell , & T. Stivers (Eds.), The Handbook of Conversation Analysis (pp.612–629). Chichester, West Sussex: Wiley-Blackwell.
    [Google Scholar]
  23. Labov, W. & Waletzky, J.
    (1967) Narrative Analysis: Oral Versions of Personal Experience. In J. Helm (Ed.). Essays on the Verbal and Visual Arts (pp.12–44). Seattle: University of Washington Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  24. Lee, J.
    (1984) Innocent Victims and Evil-Doers. Women’s Studies International Forum, 7(1), 69–73. doi: 10.1016/0277‑5395(84)90086‑4
    https://doi.org/10.1016/0277-5395(84)90086-4 [Google Scholar]
  25. Lepper, G.
    (2000) Categories in text and talk. London: Sage. doi: 10.4135/9781849208727
    https://doi.org/10.4135/9781849208727 [Google Scholar]
  26. Leudar, I. , Marsland, V. & Nekvapil, J.
    (2004) On Membership Categorization. “Us”, “Them” and “Doing Violence” in Political Discourse. Discourse & Society, 15(2–3), 243–266. doi: 10.1177/0957926504041019
    https://doi.org/10.1177/0957926504041019 [Google Scholar]
  27. Loeschper, G.
    (1999) Bausteine für eine psychologische Theorie richterlichen Urteilens. Baden-Baden, DE: Nomos-Verl.-Ges.
    [Google Scholar]
  28. Maruna, S.
    (2001) Making good. How ex-convicts reform and rebuild their lives. Princeton, N.J.: American Psychological Association. doi: 10.1037/10430‑000
    https://doi.org/10.1037/10430-000 [Google Scholar]
  29. Muncie, J.
    (2015) Youth & Crime (4th ed.). London: Sage.
    [Google Scholar]
  30. Newburn, T.
    (2013) Criminology. Abingdon: Routledge.
    [Google Scholar]
  31. Polletta, F. , Chen, P. C. B. , Gardner, B. , & Motes, A.
    (2011) The Sociology of Storytelling. Annual Review of Sociology, 37, 109–130. doi: 10.1146/annurev‑soc‑081309‑150106
    https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-soc-081309-150106 [Google Scholar]
  32. Presser, L.
    (2008) Been a heavy life. Stories of violent men. Urbana: University of Illinois Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  33. (2010) Collecting and Analyzing the Stories of Offenders. Journal of Criminal Justice Education, 21(4), 431–446. doi: 10.1080/10511253.2010.516563
    https://doi.org/10.1080/10511253.2010.516563 [Google Scholar]
  34. Rajack-Talley, T. , Talley, C. R. , & Tewskbury, R.
    (2005) The Knowledge of Detained Juveniles About the Juvenile Justice System. Juvenile and Family Court Journal, 56, 29–39. doi: 10.1111/j.1755‑6988.2005.tb00107.x
    https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1755-6988.2005.tb00107.x [Google Scholar]
  35. Rapley, T.
    (2012) Order, order: A “modest” response to Stokoe. Discourse Studies, 14(3), 321–328. doi: 10.1177/1461445612440775
    https://doi.org/10.1177/1461445612440775 [Google Scholar]
  36. Redding, R. E. , & Fuller, E. J.
    (2004) What Do Juvenile Offenders Know About Being Tried as Adults? Implications for Deterrence. Juvenile and Family Court Journal, 55(3), 35–44. doi: 10.1111/j.1755‑6988.2004.tb00167.x
    https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1755-6988.2004.tb00167.x [Google Scholar]
  37. Sacks, H.
    (1995) Lectures on conversation. Oxford: Blackwell. doi: 10.1002/9781444328301
    https://doi.org/10.1002/9781444328301 [Google Scholar]
  38. (1997) The Lawyer’s Work. In M. Travers & J. F. Manzo (Eds.), Law in action (pp.43–49). Aldershot: Ashgate.
    [Google Scholar]
  39. Sandberg, S.
    (2010) What can “Lies” Tell Us about Life? Notes toward a Framework of Narrative Criminology. Journal of Criminal Justice Education, 21(4), 447–465. doi: 10.1080/10511253.2010.516564
    https://doi.org/10.1080/10511253.2010.516564 [Google Scholar]
  40. (2016) The importance of stories untold. Crime, Media, Culture, 12(2), 153–171.
    [Google Scholar]
  41. Sandberg, S. & Ugelvik, T.
    (2016) The past, present, and future of narrative criminology. Crime, Media, Culture, 12(2), 129–136.
    [Google Scholar]
  42. Schegloff, E. A.
    (2007) A tutorial on membership categorization. Journal of Pragmatics, 39, 462–482. doi: 10.1016/j.pragma.2006.07.007
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2006.07.007 [Google Scholar]
  43. Scheppele, K. L.
    (1994) Practices of Truth-Finding in a Court of Law: The Case of Revised Stories. In T. R. Sarbin & J. I. Kitsuse (Eds.), Constructing the social (pp.84–100). London: Sage.
    [Google Scholar]
  44. Scott, M. B , & Lyman, S. M.
    (1968) Accounts. American Sociological Review, 33(1), 46–62. doi: 10.2307/2092239
    https://doi.org/10.2307/2092239 [Google Scholar]
  45. Silverman, D.
    (1998) Harvey Sacks. Social science and conversation analysis. Oxford: Oxford University.
    [Google Scholar]
  46. Stokoe, E.
    (2012) Moving forward with membership categorization analysis: Methods for systematic analysis. Discourse Studies, 14(3), 277–303. doi: 10.1177/1461445612441534
    https://doi.org/10.1177/1461445612441534 [Google Scholar]
  47. Sykes, G. M. & Matza, D.
    (1957) Techniques of Neutralization: A Theory of Delinquency. American Sociological Review, 22(6), 664–670. doi: 10.2307/2089195
    https://doi.org/10.2307/2089195 [Google Scholar]
  48. Travers, M. & Manzo, J. F.
    (Eds.) (1997) Law in action. Aldershot: Ashgate.
    [Google Scholar]
  49. Watson, D. R.
    (1976) Some Conceptual Issues in the Social Identification of Victims and Offenders. In E. C. Viano (Ed.), Victims and Society (pp.60–71). Washington: Visage Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  50. (1978) Categorization, Authorization and Blame-Negotiation in Conversation. Sociology, 12(1), 105–113. doi: 10.1177/003803857801200106
    https://doi.org/10.1177/003803857801200106 [Google Scholar]
  51. Watson, R.
    (1997) The Presentation of Victim and Motive in Discourse: The Case of Police Interrogations and Interviews. In M. Travers & J. F. Manzo (Eds.), Law in action (pp.77–97). Aldershot: Ashgate.
    [Google Scholar]
  52. Weisberg, R.
    (1996) Proclaiming Trials as Narratives: Premises and Pretenses. In P. Brooks & P. D. Gewirtz (Eds.), Law’s stories (pp.61–83). New Haven: Yale University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
http://instance.metastore.ingenta.com/content/journals/10.1075/ni.27.1.04dol
Loading
  • Article Type: Research Article
Keyword(s): defendants , Membership Categorization Analysis , trials and youth crime
This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was successful
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error