Volume 27, Issue 1
  • ISSN 1387-6740
  • E-ISSN: 1569-9935
Buy:$35.00 + Taxes


In this paper, we describe a method for performing structural narrative analysis that draws on narratology and literary studies, moving structural narrative analysis from a focus on examining linguistic parts of narratives to understanding thematic structures that make up the whole narrative. We explore the possibility of constructing participant narratives using Campbell’s monomyth as a coding and structuralizing scheme. The method we describe is the response to the question, “How might we find a reliable way to construct ‘smooth’ stories (with attention to the structures of stories) so that we might compare trajectories of student experiences?” To answer this question, we use narrative interviews from a larger study to show how this method can make sense of interviews and construct accessible and useful participant narratives. We close by providing an example narrative constructed using the monomyth coding scheme and discussing benefits and difficulties associated with this method.


Article metrics loading...

Loading full text...

Full text loading...


  1. Campbell, J.
    (2004) The hero with a thousand faces. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  2. Connelly, M. , & Clandinin, J.
    (1990) Stories of experience and narrative inquiry. Educational Researcher, 19(5), 2–14. doi: 10.3102/0013189X019005002
    https://doi.org/10.3102/0013189X019005002 [Google Scholar]
  3. Daiute, C.
    (2014) Narrative inquiry: A dynamic approach. Los Angeles, CA: Sage Publications.
    [Google Scholar]
  4. Fludernik, M. & Olson, G.
    (2011) Introduction. In G. Olson (Ed.), Current trends in Narratology. Boston, MA: Walter De Gruyter. doi: 10.1515/9783110255003.1
    https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110255003.1 [Google Scholar]
  5. Garcia, M.
    (2015) Literary narrative as cognitive structure in the brain. Narrative Inquiry, 25(1), 22–36.
    [Google Scholar]
  6. Heinen, S.
    (2009) The role of narratology in narrative research across the disciplines. In S. Heinen & R. Sommer (Eds.), Narratologia: Narratology in the age of cross-disciplinary narrative research (pp.193–211). Boston, MA: Walter de Gruyter. doi: 10.1515/9783110222432
    https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110222432 [Google Scholar]
  7. Herman, D.
    (2007) Storytelling and the sciences of mind: Cognitive narratology, discursive psychology, and narratives in face-to-face interaction. Narrative, 15(3), 307–325. doi: 10.1353/nar.2007.0023
    https://doi.org/10.1353/nar.2007.0023 [Google Scholar]
  8. (2009) Cognitive Narratology. In P. Hühn , J. Pier , W. Schmid & J. Schönert (Eds.), Handbook of Narratology (pp.30–43). Boston, MA: Walter de Gruyter.
    [Google Scholar]
  9. Kellam, N. , Gerow, K. , & Walther, J.
    (2015, June). Narrative Analysis in Engineering Education Research: Exploring Ways of Constructing Narratives to have Resonance with the Reader and Critical Research Implications. Paper presented atAmerican Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference and Exposition, Seattle. doi: 10.18260/p.24521.
    https://doi.org/10.18260/p.24521 [Google Scholar]
  10. Kim, J.
    (2016) Understanding narrative inquiry. Los Angeles, CA: Sage Publications.
    [Google Scholar]
  11. Labov, W.
    (1972) Language in the inner city: Studies in the Black English vernacular. Philadelphia, PA: University of Pennsylvania Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  12. Lieblich, A. , Tuval-Mashiach, R. & Zilber, T.
    (1998) Narrative research: Reading, analysis, and interpretation. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.
    [Google Scholar]
  13. Leeming, D. A.
    (2010) Monomyth. In D. A. Leeming , K. Madden , & S. Marlan (Eds.), Encyclopedia of psychology and religion (pp.578–580). New York, NY: Springer Science.
    [Google Scholar]
  14. Mitchell, M. C. & Egudo. M.
    (2003) A review of narrative methodology. Adelaide: DSTO Systems Sciences Laboratory. Retrieved fromwww.dtic.mil/dtic/tr/fulltext/u2/a421725.pdf doi: 10.1037/e426492005‑001
    https://doi.org/10.1037/e426492005-001 [Google Scholar]
  15. Netolicky, D.
    (2015) Using literary metaphor and characters as structural and symbolic tools: Creating a layered story world while preserving participant anonymity. Narrative Inquiry, 25(2), 264–282.
    [Google Scholar]
  16. Polkinghorne, D. E.
    (1995) Narrative configuration in qualitative analysis. International Journal of Qualitative Studies in Education, 8(1), 5–23. doi: 10.1080/0951839950080103
    https://doi.org/10.1080/0951839950080103 [Google Scholar]
  17. Riessman, C. K.
    (2008) Narrative methods for the human sciences. Los Angeles, CA: Sage Publications.
    [Google Scholar]
  18. Sommer, R.
    (2009) A cross-disciplinary approach to literary storytelling. In S. Heinen & R. Sommer (Eds.), Narratologia: Narratology in the age of cross-disciplinary narrative research (pp.193–211). New York, NY: Walter de Gruyter.
    [Google Scholar]
  19. Spence, D. P.
    (1986) Narrative smoothing and clinical wisdom. In T. R. Sarbin (Ed.), Narrative psychology: The storied nature of human conduct (pp.211–232). Westport, CT: Praeger Publishers.
    [Google Scholar]
  20. Webster, L. , & Mertova, P.
    (2007) Using narrative inquiry as a research method: An introduction to using critical event narrative analysis in research on learning and teaching. New York, NY: Routledge.
    [Google Scholar]

Data & Media loading...

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was successful
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error