Sharing the moment as small stories

References

1. Barton, D. & Lee, C.
   (2013) Language online. London, UK: Routledge.
   [Google Scholar]
2. boyd, d.
   (2010) Social network sites as networked publics: Affordances, dynamics, and implications. In Z. Papacharissi (Ed.), Networked self: Identity, community, and culture on social network sites (pp.39–58). New York: Routledge.
   [Google Scholar]
3. Beer, D.
   (2009) Power through the algorithm? Participatory web cultures and the technological unconscious. New Media & Society, 11 , 985–1002. doi: 10.1177/1461444809336551
   https://doi.org/10.1177/1461444809336551 [Google Scholar]
4. Bell, A.
   (2001) “Back in style: Reworking audience design”. In Eckert, P. & Rickford, J. R. (Eds.), Style and sociolinguistic variation (pp.139–168). Cambridge: CUP.
   [Google Scholar]
5. Berry, D. M.
   (2011) The philosophy of software: Code and mediation in the digital age. Houndmills: Palgrave Macmillan. doi: 10.1057/9780230306479
   https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230306479 [Google Scholar]
6. Bolter, D. J. , & Grusin, R.
   (1998) Remediation: Understanding new media. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.
   [Google Scholar]
7. Brockmeier, J.
   (2015) Beyond the archive. Oxford: Oxford University Press. doi: 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199861569.001.0001
   https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199861569.001.0001 [Google Scholar]
8. Bucher, T.
   (2012) Want to be on the top? Algorithmic power and the threat of invisibility on Facebook. New Media & Society, 14 , 1164–1180. doi: 10.1177/1461444812440159
   https://doi.org/10.1177/1461444812440159 [Google Scholar]
9. Chun Hui Kyong, W.
   (2009) Programmed visions: Software and memory. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.
   [Google Scholar]
10. Constine, J.
    (2016) Instagram launches ‘stories’, a snapchatty feature for imperfect sharing. https://techcrucnh.com/2016/08/02
11. Cooper, S.
    (2016) Snapchat versus instagram: The war of the stories. www.thedrum.com/opinion/2016/08/25
12. De Fina, A. , & Georgakopoulou, A.
    (2012) Analyzing narrative: Discourse and sociolinguistic perspectives. Cambridge: CUP.
    [Google Scholar]
13. Eyar, N.
    (2014) Hooked. New York: Penguin Portfolio.
    [Google Scholar]
14. Genette, G.
    (1980) Narrative discourse. New York: Cornell University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
15. Georgakopoulou, A.
    (2007) Small stories, interaction and identities. Amsterdam/Philadelphia, PA: John Benjamins. doi: 10.1075/sin.8
    https://doi.org/10.1075/sin.8 [Google Scholar]
16. Georgakopoulou, A.
    (2013a) Storytelling on the go: Breaking news stories as a travelling narrative genre. In Hatavara, M. , Hydén, L-C. & Hyvärinen, Matti (Eds.), The travelling concepts of narrative, (pp.201–224). Amsterdam/Philadelphia, PA: John Benjamins. doi: 10.1075/sin.18.13geo
    https://doi.org/10.1075/sin.18.13geo [Google Scholar]
17. Georgakopoulou, A.
    (2013b) Small stories research as a framework for the study of social media practices: Narrative stancetaking and circulation in a Greek news story. Sociolinguistica, 27 , 19–36.
    [Google Scholar]
18. Georgakopoulou, A.
    (2014) Small stories transposition & social media: A micro-perspective on the ‘Greek crisis’. Discourse & Society, 25 , 519–539. doi: 10.1177/0957926514536963
    https://doi.org/10.1177/0957926514536963 [Google Scholar]
19. Georgakopoulou, A.
    (2015) Sharing as rescripting. Place manipulations on YouTube between narrative and social media affordances. Discourse, Context & Media, 9 , 64–72. doi: 10.1016/j.dcm.2015.07.002
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dcm.2015.07.002 [Google Scholar]
20. Georgakopoulou, A.
    (2016a) From writing the self to posting self(ies): A small stories approach to selfies. Open Linguistics, 2 , 300–317. doi: 10.1515/opli‑2016‑0014
    https://doi.org/10.1515/opli-2016-0014 [Google Scholar]
21. Georgakopoulou, A.
    (2016b) Friendly comments: Interactional displays of alignment on Facebook and YouTube. In Leppänen, S. , Kytölä, S. & Westinen, E. (Eds.), Discourse and identification: diversity and heterogeneity in social media practices (pp.178–207). London: Routledge.
    [Google Scholar]
22. Gerlitz, C. , & Helmond, A.
    (2013) The Like economy: Social buttons and the data-intensive web. New Media & Society, 15 , 1348–13645. doi: 10.1177/1461444812472322
    https://doi.org/10.1177/1461444812472322 [Google Scholar]
23. Gibson, J.
    (1977) The theory of affordances. In Shaw, R. & Bransford, J. (eds.) Perceiving, acting, and knowing. Hillsdale, NJ: Elrbaum. 127–143.
    [Google Scholar]
24. Hine, C. , Kendall, L. , & boyd, d.
    (2009) Question one: How can qualitative internet researchers define the boundaries of their projects?In Markham, A. N. & Baym, N. K. (Eds.), Internet inquiry: Conversations about method (pp.1–20). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage. doi: 10.4135/9781483329086.n1
    https://doi.org/10.4135/9781483329086.n1 [Google Scholar]
25. Jaffe, A.
    (2009) (Ed.) Sociolinguistic perspectives on stance. Oxford: Oxford University Press. doi: 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780195331646.001.0001
    https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780195331646.001.0001 [Google Scholar]
26. Jefferson, G.
    (1978) Sequential aspects of storytelling in conversation. In Schenkein, J. (Ed.), Studies in the organisation of conversational interaction (pp.219–249). New York: Academic Press. doi: 10.1016/B978‑0‑12‑623550‑0.50016‑1
    https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-623550-0.50016-1 [Google Scholar]
27. Jones, R. H.
    (2016) Surveillance. In Georgakopoulou, A. & Spilloti, T. (Eds.), The Routledge handbook of language and digital communication (pp.408–411). London: Routledge.
    [Google Scholar]
28. Kaun, A. , & Stiernstedt, F.
    (2014) Facebook time: Technological and institutional affordances for media memories. New Media & Society, 16 , 1154–1168. doi: 10.1177/1461444814544001
    https://doi.org/10.1177/1461444814544001 [Google Scholar]
29. Kitchin, R. , & Dodge, M.
    (2011) Code/space: Software and everyday life. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press. doi: 10.7551/mitpress/9780262042482.001.0001
    https://doi.org/10.7551/mitpress/9780262042482.001.0001 [Google Scholar]
30. Markham, A. N.
    (2013) Remix culture, remix methods: Reframing qualitative inquiry for social media contexts. In Denzin, N. & Giardina, M. (Eds.), Global dimensions of qualitative inquiry (pp.63–81). Walnut Creek, CA: Left Coast Press.
    [Google Scholar]
31. Page, R.
    (2012) Stories and social media. London: Routledge.
    [Google Scholar]
32. Page, R. , Harper, R. , & Frobenius, M.
    (2013) From small stories to networked narrative. The evolution of personal narratives in Facebook status updates. Narrative Inquiry, 23 , 192–213. doi: 10.1075/ni.23.1.10pag
    https://doi.org/10.1075/ni.23.1.10pag [Google Scholar]
33. Ricoeur, P.
    (1991) From text to action. London: Continuum.
    [Google Scholar]
34. Van Dijck, J.
    (2013) You have one identity: Performing the self on Facebook and LinkedIn. Media, Culture and Society, 35 , 199–215. doi: 10.1177/0163443712468605
    https://doi.org/10.1177/0163443712468605 [Google Scholar]
35. Wesch, M.
    (2008) Context collapse. mediatedcultures.net/youtube/context-collapse. Last accessed1/4/2017.
    [Google Scholar]
36. Zhang, L.
    (2010) What’s on your mind?https://www.facebook.com/notes/facebook-data-science/whats-on-your-mind/477517358858/