1887
  1. Home
  2. e-Journals
  3. NOWELE. North-Western European Language Evolution
  4. Volume 72, Issue 1
  5. Article
Volume 72, Issue 1
  • ISSN 0108-8416
  • E-ISSN: 2212-9715
USD
Buy:$35.00 + Taxes

Abstract

Abstract

The quantitative reduction and loss of Proto-Germanic vowels during the transition from some form of Common North West Germanic to the attested ‘Old’ languages, such as Old English and Old Frisian, is a complicated process, interfering with morphological restructuring processes. Various reconstructions have been presented, the most extensive one by Boutkan (1995). Scrutiny of the Runic Frisian data, from the period ca. 500–800, shows that especially the apocope of PWGmc *- and of *- < PGmc *- should be positioned much later in the relative chronology than envisaged by Boutkan. The order that can be derived from the Runic Frisian data reflects a gradual loss of one mora, running in a cline from the least salient to the most salient vowel, which provides a phonetic rationale for the development. This gradual mora reduction can be dated to the period between ca. 500 and 700. This absolute dating can have implications for phonological processes in which root vowels interact with the quality or quantity of the vowel in the following syllable.

© John Benjamins Publishing Company
Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1075/nowele.00021.ver
2019-04-12
2025-02-08

  • From This Site

    /content/journals/10.1075/nowele.00021.ver
    dcterms_title,dcterms_subject,pub_keyword
    -contentType:Journal -contentType:Contributor -contentType:Concept -contentType:Institution
    10
    5
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. Bammesberger, A.
    1998 Runic Frisian weladu and further West Germanic nominal forms in -u. NOWELE. 33(1). 121–132. 10.1075/nowele.33.06bam
     https://doi.org/10.1075/nowele.33.06bam [Google Scholar]
  2. Boutkan, D.
    1995 The Germanic “Auslautgesetze.”Amsterdam: Rodopi.
     [Google Scholar]
  3. 1996 A concise grammar of the Old Frisian dialect of the first Riustring manuscript. [Odense]: Odense University Press. 10.1075/nss.16
     https://doi.org/10.1075/nss.16 [Google Scholar]
  4. Damsma, L. & A. P. Versloot
    2015 Vowel Epenthesis in Early Germanic Runic Inscriptions. Futhark: International Journal of Runic Studies6. 21–64.
     [Google Scholar]
  5. Düwel, K.
    2018 Merkwürdiges zu Goldbrakteaten und anderen Inschriftenträgern. In A. Bauer & A. Pesch (eds.), Hvanndalir – Beiträge zur europäischen Altertumskunde und mediävistischen Literaturwissenschaft: Festschrift für Wilhelm Heizmann (Reallexikon der germanischen Altertumskunde – Ergänzungsbände 106), 523–544. 10.1515/9783110569483‑028
     https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110569483-028 [Google Scholar]
  6. Düwel, K. & W.-D. Tempel
    1968 Knochenkämme mit Runeninschriften aus Friesland: mit einer Zusammenstellung aller bekannten Runenkämme und einem Beitrag zu den friesischen Runeninschriften. Palaeohistoria14. 353–391.
     [Google Scholar]
  7. Euler, W.
    2013 Das Westgermanische: von der Herausbildung im 3. bis zur Aufgliederung im 7. Jahrhundert; Analyse und Rekonstruktion. Berlin: Verl. Inspiration Un Limited.
     [Google Scholar]
  8. Findell, M.
    2012 Phonological evidence from the Continental Runic inscriptions. Berlin: De Gruyter. 10.1515/9783110289251
     https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110289251 [Google Scholar]
  9. 2014 Runes. London: The British Museum Press.
     [Google Scholar]
  10. Fischer, S. , M. H. Graf , C. Fossurier , M. Châtelet & J. Soulat
    2014 An inscribed silver spoon from Ichtratzheim (Bas-Rhin). Journal of Archaeology and Ancient History (JAAH)11. 3–25.
     [Google Scholar]
  11. Goering, N.
    2016 Early Old English foot structure. Transactions of the Philological Society114(2). 171–197. 10.1111/1467‑968X.12079
     https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-968X.12079 [Google Scholar]
  12. Goldschneider, J. M. & R. M. DeKeyser
    2001 Explaining the “natural order of L2 morpheme acquisition” in English: A meta-analysis of multiple determinants. Language Learning51(1). 1–50. 10.1111/1467‑9922.00147
     https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9922.00147 [Google Scholar]
  13. Graaf, T. de
    1986 Phonetic aspects of the Frisian vowel system. In N. Danielsen , E. Hansen , H. F. Nielsen & H. Bekker-Nielsen (eds.), Friserstudier IV/V: Foredrag holdt ved den 3. og 4. Friserdag i Odense 6.oktober 1983 og 5.november 1985, 3–20. Odense: Odense Universitetsforlag.
     [Google Scholar]
  14. Haugen, O. E.
    2004 Frå urnordisk til norrønt språk. Handbok i norrøn filologi, additional file online. [Bergen]: Fagbokforlaget. folk.uib.no/hnooh/handbok/ekstra/urnordisk.html
     [Google Scholar]
  15. Higham, N. J. & M. J. Ryan
    2015 The Anglo-Saxon world. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
     [Google Scholar]
  16. Hogg, R. M.
    2011 A grammar of Old English Vol. 1, Phonology. Chichester: Wiley-Blackwell.
     [Google Scholar]
  17. König, E.
    1911 Johannes Cadovius Müllers Memoriale linguae frisicae, nach der jeverschen Originalhandschrift,. Norden; Leipzig: Soltau.
     [Google Scholar]
  18. Krause, W.
    1971 Die Sprache der urnordischen Runeninschriften. Heidelberg: Winter.
     [Google Scholar]
  19. Kristoffersen, G.
    2008 Level stress in North Germanic. Journal of Germanic Linguistics20(2). 87–157. 10.1017/S1470542708000044
     https://doi.org/10.1017/S1470542708000044 [Google Scholar]
  20. Looijenga, T.
    2003 Texts & contexts of the oldest Runic inscriptions. Leiden: Brill.
     [Google Scholar]
  21. 2013 Die goldenen Runensolidi aus Harlingen und Schweindorf. In J. F. Kegler , A. Nieuwhof & K. Hüser (eds.), Land der Entdeckungen: Die Archäologie des friesischen Küstenraums; Begleitband zu den Ausstellungen: Land der Entdeckungen. Die Archäologie des friesischen Küstenraums, Ostfriesisches Landesmuseum, Emden: 27.01.2013–16.06.2013; Land der Entdeckungen – auf der Suche nach der Trichterbecherkultur, Drents Museum, Assen: 12.10.2013–05.01.2014; Land der Entdeckungen – urfriesisches Design, Fries Museum, Leeuwarden: ab September 2013 in der Dauerausstellung; Land der Entdeckungen – das versunkene Land ist fruchtbar, Groninger Museum, Groningen: 21.09.2013–09.02.2014 = land van ontdekkingen : De archeologie van het Friese kustgebied; Catalogus bij de tentoonstellingen, 430–431. Ostfriesische Landschaft.
     [Google Scholar]
  22. Nedoma, R.
    2007 Die voraltfriesischen personennamen der Runeninschriften auf dem webschwert von westeremden, dem Schwertchen von Arum und anderen denkmälern. In R. H. Bremmer Jr. , S. Laker & O. Vries (eds.), Advances in Old Frisian philology (= Amsterdamer Beiträge zur älteren Germanistik 64), 299–324. Amsterdam: Rodopi.
     [Google Scholar]
  23. 2014 Voraltfriesisch -u im Nominativ und Akkusativ Singular der maskulinen a-Stämme. In R. H. Bremmer Jr , S. Laker & O. Vries (eds.), Directions for Old Frisian philology (= Amsterdamer Beiträge zur älteren Germanistik 73), 343–368. Amsterdam: Rodopi.
     [Google Scholar]
  24. 2015 Wege und Probleme der areal- und sozioonomastischen Auswertung von Personennamen in älteren Runeninschriften auf Fibeln. In O. Grimm & A. Pesch (eds.), Archäologie und Runen: Fallstudien zu Inschriften im älteren Futhark, 291–332. Kiel; Hamburg: Wachholtz.
     [Google Scholar]
  25. Nedoma, R. & B. Theune-Großkopf
    2008 Ein Holzstuhl mit Runeninschrift aus dem frühmittelalterlichen Gräberfeld von Trossingen, Lkr. Tuttlingen (Baden-Württemberg). Mit einem Exkurs: lguskaþi auf dem Schemel von Wremen. Die Sprache46. 38–64.
     [Google Scholar]
  26. Nielsen, H. F.
    1984 Unaccented vowels in the Frisian runic inscriptions. Miscellanea Frisica11–19.
     [Google Scholar]
  27. 1996 Developments in Frisian runology: A discussion of Düwel & Tempel’s Runic Corpus from 1970. In T. Looijenga & A. Quak (eds.), Frisian runes and neighbouring traditions: Proceedings of the First International Symposium on Frisian Runes at the Fries Museum, Leeuwarden, 26–29January 1994, 123–130. Amsterdam: Rodopi.
     [Google Scholar]
  28. 2010 The early runic Language of Scandinavia: Studies in Germanic dialect geography. Heidelberg: Winter.
     [Google Scholar]
  29. 2001 Frisian and the Grouping of the Older Germanic Languages. In H. H. Munske (ed.), Handbuch des Friesischen / Handbook of Frisian studies, 512–523. Tübingen: Niemeyer. 10.1515/9783110946925.512
     https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110946925.512 [Google Scholar]
  30. 2010 The early runic language of Scandinavia: Proto-Norse or North-West Germanic?In J. O. Askedal , H. Bjorvand , J. E. Knirk & O. E. Nordgreen (eds.), Zentrale Probleme bei der Erforschung der älteren Runen: Akten einer internationalen Tagung an der Norwegischen Akademie der Wissenschaften, 95–114. Frankfurt am Main: Lang.
     [Google Scholar]
  31. Page, R. I.
    1996 On the Baffling Nature of Frisian Runes. In T. Looijenga & A. Quak (eds.), Frisian runes and neighbouring traditions: Proceedings of the First International Symposium on Frisian Runes at the Fries Museum, Leeuwarden, 26–29January 1994, 131–150. Amsterdam: Rodopi.
     [Google Scholar]
  32. Philippa, M. , F. Debrabandere , A. Quak , T. Schoonheim & N. van der Sijs
    2003 Etymologisch Woordenboek van het Nederlands. Amsterdam: Amsterdam University Press. www.etymologiebank.nl/
     [Google Scholar]
  33. Quak, A.
    1990 Runica Frisica. In R. H. Bremmer Jr , G. van der Meer & O. Vries (eds.), Aspects of Old Frisian philology (= Amsterdamer Beiträge Zur Älteren Germanistik 31/32), 357–370. Amsterdam: Rodopi.
     [Google Scholar]
  34. 2010 Zum Verhältnis der altfriesischen Runeninschriften zu den anderen Traditionen. In J. O. Askedal , H. Bjorvand , J. E. Knirk & O. E. Nordgreen (eds.), Zentrale Probleme bei der Erforschung der älteren Runen: Akten einer internationalen Tagung an der Norwegischen Akademie der Wissenschaften, 151–162. Frankfurt am Main: Lang.
     [Google Scholar]
  35. Ringe, D. & A. Taylor
    2014 A linguistic history of English. Vol. II: The development of Old English. New York: Oxford University Press.
     [Google Scholar]
  36. Schmidt, C. G. , R. Nedoma & K. Düwel
    2010 Die Runeninschrift auf dem Kamm von Frienstedt, Stadt Erfurt. Die Sprache. 49(2). 123.
     [Google Scholar]
  37. Schuhmann, R.
    2014 Zur Endung runisch-altfriesisches -u und zur Entwicklung der Endung nom.sg.m. a-St. urgermanisches *-az. In R. H. Bremmer Jr , S. Laker & O. Vries (eds.), Directions for Old Frisian philology (= Amsterdamer Beiträge zur älteren Germanistik 73). 397–420. Amsterdam: Rodopi.
     [Google Scholar]
  38. Seebold, E.
    1990 Die Inschrift B von Westeremden und die friesischen Runen. In R. H. Bremmer Jr , G. van der Meer & O. Vries (eds.), Aspects of Old Frisian philology (= Amsterdamer Beiträge zur älteren Germanistik 31–32), 408–427. Amsterdam: Rodopi.
     [Google Scholar]
  39. 1996 Wie friesisch ist der Brakteat von Wurt Hitsum?In T. Looijenga & A. Quak (eds.), Frisian runes and neighbouring traditions: Proceedings of the First International Symposium on Frisian Runes at the Fries Museum, Leeuwarden, 26–29January 1994, 181–198. Amsterdam: Rodopi.
     [Google Scholar]
  40. Sipma, P. & O. Vries
    1927 Oudfriesche Oorkonden (Oudfriese Taal- en Rechtsbronnen). Vol.1–4. ’s Gravenhage: Nijhoff.
     [Google Scholar]
  41. Smith, L. C.
    2008 Old Frisian vowel balance and its relationship to West Germanic apocope and syncope. In R. H. Bremmer Jr , S. Laker & O. Vries (eds.), Advances in Old Frisian philology (= Amsterdamer Beiträge zur älteren Germanistik 64), 379–410. Amsterdam: Rodopi.
     [Google Scholar]
  42. Smith, N. & K. van Leyden
    2007 The unusual outcome of a level-stress situation: The case of Wursten Frisian. NOWELE52(1). 31–66. 10.1075/nowele.52.04smi
     https://doi.org/10.1075/nowele.52.04smi [Google Scholar]
  43. Stiles, P. V.
    2013 The pan-West Germanic isoglosses and the subrelationships of West Germanic to other branches. NOWELE66(1). 5–38. 10.1075/nowele.66.1.02sti
     https://doi.org/10.1075/nowele.66.1.02sti [Google Scholar]
  44. Syrett, M.
    1994 The unaccented vowels of Proto-Norse. [Odense]: Odense University Press. 10.1075/nss.11
     https://doi.org/10.1075/nss.11 [Google Scholar]
  45. Versloot, A. P.
    1996 Konsonantengeminaten in der Sprache der Wangerooger: eine Einmaligkeit unter den westgermanischen Sprachen. In H. F. Nielsen & A. Petersen (eds.), A Frisian and Germanic miscellany: Published in honour of Nils Århammar on his sixty-fifth birthday, 7 August 1996 (= NOWELE 28/29), 241–250. Odense / Bredstedt: Odense University Press / Nordfriisk Instituut.
     [Google Scholar]
  46. 2008 Mechanisms of language change: Vowel reduction in 15th century West Frisian. Utrecht: LOT.
     [Google Scholar]
  47. 2014 The Runic Frisian vowel system: The earliest history of Frisian and Proto-Insular North Frisian. Amsterdamer Beiträge zur älteren Germanistik72. 35–62. 10.1163/9789401211017_003
     https://doi.org/10.1163/9789401211017_003 [Google Scholar]
  48. 2016a Unstressed vowels in Runic Frisian. The history of Frisian in the light of the Germanic ‘Auslautgesetze’. Us Wurk65. 1–39.
     [Google Scholar]
  49. 2016b The development of Old Frisian unstressed -u in the Ns of feminine ō-stems. In A. Bannink & W. Honselaar (eds.), From variation to iconicity (Festschrift for Olga Fischer), 377–392. Amsterdam: Pegasus.
     [Google Scholar]
  50. 2017a Mith frethe to wasane “to be in peace”: Remnants of the instrumental case in 13th and 14th century Old Frisian. Filologia Germanica – Germanic Philology9. 201–230.
     [Google Scholar]
  51. 2017b Proto-Germanic ai in North and West Germanic. Folia Linguistica51 (s38). 281–324. 10.1515/flih‑2017‑0010
     https://doi.org/10.1515/flih-2017-0010 [Google Scholar]
  52. Forthcoming. Reconstructing the historical phonology of Old English.
     [Google Scholar]
  53. Versloot, A. P. & E. Adamczyk
    2018 Plural inflection in North Sea Germanic languages: A multivariate analysis of morphological variation. In A. Dammel , M. Eitelmann & M. Schmuck (eds.), Reorganising grammatical variation. Diachronic studies in the retention, redistribution and refunctionalisation of linguistic variants (Studies in Language Companion Series [SLCS]), 17–55. Amsterdam: Benjamins. 10.1075/slcs.203.02ver
     https://doi.org/10.1075/slcs.203.02ver [Google Scholar]
  54. Waxenberger, G.
    2013 The reflection of pre-Old English sound changes in pre-Old English runic inscriptions. In H. Sauer & G. Waxenberger (eds.), Recording English, researching English, transforming English, 17–64. Frankfurt am Main: Lang.
     [Google Scholar]
  55. 2017 How “English” is the Early Frisian Runic Corpus?In N. IJssenagger & J. Hines (eds.), Frisians and their North Sea neighbours, from the fifth century to the Viking age, 93–124. Woodbridge: Boydell and Brewer.
     [Google Scholar]
  56. Wipf, E.
    1910 Die Mundart von Visperterminen im Wallis. Frauenfeld: Huber.
     [Google Scholar]
/content/journals/10.1075/nowele.00021.ver
Loading
Reduction of unstressed vowels in Proto-Frisian and the Germanic ‘Auslautgesetze’
NOWELE. North-Western European Language Evolution 72, 78 (2019); https://doi.org/10.1075/nowele.00021.ver
/content/journals/10.1075/nowele.00021.ver
/content/journals/10.1075/nowele.00021.ver
Loading

Data & Media loading...

  • Article Type: Research Article

Most Cited

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was successful
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error