The Leipzig-Jakarta list as a means to test Old English / Old Norse mutual intelligibility

References

1. Barnes, M.
   1992 Norse in the British Isles. In A. Faulkes & R. Perkins (eds.), Viking revaluations. Viking Society centenary symposium 14–15 May 1992, 65–84. London: Viking Society for Northern Research.
   [Google Scholar]
2. Baetke, W.
   2006 Wörterbuch zur altnordischen Prosaliteratur. Digital. Edited by H. Fix Greifswald: Universität Greifswald. Available at: emedien.ub.uni-greifswald.de/ebooks/altnord-wb/baetke_digital.pdf
   [Google Scholar]
3. Benediktsson, H.
   1961 The earliest Germanic phonology. Lingua10. 237–254. 10.1016/0024‑3841(61)90130‑9
   https://doi.org/10.1016/0024-3841(61)90130-9 [Google Scholar]
4. Berg, I.
   2016 A note on the relationship between Scandinavian and Low German. Journal of Historial Sociolinguistics2(2). 189–210. 10.1515/jhsl‑2016‑0012
   https://doi.org/10.1515/jhsl-2016-0012 [Google Scholar]
5. Bosworth, J. & T. N. Toller
   1955 An Anglo-Saxon dictionary: Based on the manuscript collections of Joseph Bosworth. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   [Google Scholar]
6. Braunmüller, K.
   2002 Semicommunication and accommodation: Observations from the linguistic situation in Scandinavia. International Journal of Applied Linguistics12(1). 1–23. 10.1111/1473‑4192.00022
   https://doi.org/10.1111/1473-4192.00022 [Google Scholar]
7. Braunmüller, K.
   2012 Semi-communication and beyond. Some results of the Hamburg Hanseatic Project (1990–1995). In L. Elemevik & E. H. Jahr (eds.), Contact between Low German and Scandiavian in the Late Middle Ages. 25 years of research, 75–94. Stockholm: Kungl. Gustav Adolfs Akademien för Svensk folkkultur.
   [Google Scholar]
8. Brinton, L. J.
   1996 Pragmatic markers in English: Grammaticalization and discourse functions. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. 10.1515/9783110907582
   https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110907582 [Google Scholar]
9. Brinton, L. J. & L. K. Arnovick
   2017 The English language: A linguistic history, 3rd edn.Oxford: Oxford University Press. 10.1017/9781316286562
   https://doi.org/10.1017/9781316286562 [Google Scholar]
10. Brunner, K.
    1965 Altenglische Grammatik: Nach der angelsächsischen Grammatik von Eduard Sievers, 3rd edn.Tübingen: Niemeyer. 10.1515/9783110930894
    https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110930894 [Google Scholar]
11. Campbell, A.
    1959 Old English grammar. Oxford: Clarendon.
    [Google Scholar]
12. Coates, R.
    2006 Behind the dictionary-forms of Scandinavian elements in England. Journal of the English Place-Name Society38. 43–61.
    [Google Scholar]
13. Cole, M.
    2018 A native origin for Present-Day English they, their, them . Diachronica35(2). 165–209. 10.1075/dia.16026.col
    https://doi.org/10.1075/dia.16026.col [Google Scholar]
14. Czaykowksa-Higgins, E. & M. D. Kinkade
    1998 Salish languages and linguistics. In E. Czaykowksa-Higgins & M. D. Kinkade (eds.), Salish languages and linguistics. Theoretical and descriptive perspectives, 1–68. Berlin: Mouton De Gruyter. 10.1515/9783110801255.1
    https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110801255.1 [Google Scholar]
15. Davis, G.
    2006 Comparative syntax of Old English and Old Icelandic. Oxford: Peter Lang.
    [Google Scholar]
16. Delsing, L.-O. & K. L. Åkeson
    2005 Håller språket ihop Norden? En forskningsrapport om ungdomars förståelse av danska, svenska och norska. Copenhagen: Nordiska Ministerrådet. 10.6027/tn2005‑573
    https://doi.org/10.6027/tn2005-573 [Google Scholar]
17. DOE = Cameron, A. , A. Crandell Amos , A. diPaolo Healey
    2018 Dictionary of Old English: A to I online. Retrieved fromhttps://tapor.library.utoronto.ca/doe/
    [Google Scholar]
18. Downey, S. , G. Sun & G. Kondrak
    2017 Alignment of Phonetic Sequences Using the ‘ALINE’ Algorithm (AlineR). R.
    [Google Scholar]
19. Downey, S. , G. Sun & P. Norquest
    2017 AlineR: An R package for optimizing feature-weighted alignments and linguistic distances. The R Journal9(1). 138. 10.32614/RJ‑2017‑005
    https://doi.org/10.32614/RJ-2017-005 [Google Scholar]
20. Durkin, P.
    2014 Borrowed words: A history of loanwords in English. Oxford: Oxford University Press. 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199574995.001.0001
    https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199574995.001.0001 [Google Scholar]
21. Fjalldal, M.
    1993 How valid is the Anglo-Scandinavian language passage in Gunnlaug’s Saga as historical evidence?Neophilologus77. 601–609. 10.1007/BF00999968
    https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00999968 [Google Scholar]
22. Fleming, R.
    2010 Britain after Rome. The fall and rise, 400–1070. London: Allen Lane.
    [Google Scholar]
23. Foote, P. G.
    1974 Gunnlaugssaga ormstungu. London: Viking Society for Northern Research.
    [Google Scholar]
24. Forte, A. , R. D. Oram & F. Pedersen
    2005 Viking empires. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
25. Gooskens, C. & W. Heeringa
    2004 The position of Frisian in the Germanic language area. In D. Gilbers , M. Schreuder & N. Knevel (eds.), On the boundaries of phonology and phonetics, 61–87. Groningen: University of Groningen.
    [Google Scholar]
26. Gooskens, C.
    2006 Linguistic and extra-Linguistic Predictors of inter-Scandinavian intelligibility. Linguistics in the Netherlands23. 101–13. 10.1075/avt.23.12goo
    https://doi.org/10.1075/avt.23.12goo [Google Scholar]
27. Gooskens, C.
    2007 The contribution of linguistic factors to the intelligibility of closely related languages. Journal of Multilingual and Multicultural Development28(6). 445–467. 10.2167/jmmd511.0
    https://doi.org/10.2167/jmmd511.0 [Google Scholar]
28. Haas, W.
    2014 Sprache in Variation – und warum sich die Deutschschweizer trotzdem verstehen. In E. Glaser , A. Kolmer , M. Meyer & E. Stark (eds.), Sprache(n) verstehen, 127–150. Zürich: vdf Hochschulverlag.
    [Google Scholar]
29. Hadley, D.
    2002 Viking and native: Re-thinking identity in the Danelaw. Early Medieval Europe11(1). 45–70. 10.1111/1468‑0254.00100
    https://doi.org/10.1111/1468-0254.00100 [Google Scholar]
30. Hagland, J. R.
    2000 “Alls vér erum einnar tungu” – igjen: Språkhistorisk realitet eller litterært topos?Íslenskt mál og almenn málfræði22. 107–112.
    [Google Scholar]
31. Harðarson, G.
    1999 “Alls vér erum einnar tungu”. Um skyldleika ensku og íslensku í Fyrstu málfræðiritgerðinni. Íslenskt mál og almenn málfræði21. 11–30.
    [Google Scholar]
32. Haspelmath, M. & U. Tadmor
    2009 The Loanword Typology Project and the World Loanword Database. In M. Haspalmath & U. Tadmor (eds.). Loanwords in the world’s languages. A comparative handbook. Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton. 10.1515/9783110218442.1
    https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110218442.1 [Google Scholar]
33. Haugen, E.
    1966 Semicommunication: The language gap in Scandinavia. Sociological Inquiry36(2). 280–297. 10.1111/j.1475‑682X.1966.tb00630.x
    https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1475-682X.1966.tb00630.x [Google Scholar]
34. Heeringa, W.
    2004 Measuring dialect pronunciation differences using Levensthein Distance. PhD Thesis, University of Groningen.
35. Heusler, A.
    1932 Altisländisches Elementarbuch. Heidelberg: Winter.
    [Google Scholar]
36. van Heuven, V. J.
    2008 Making sense of strange sounds: (Mutual) intelligibility of related language varieties. A review. International Journal of Humanities and Arts Computing2(1–2). 39–62. 10.3366/E1753854809000305
    https://doi.org/10.3366/E1753854809000305 [Google Scholar]
37. Higham, N. J. & M. J. Ryan
    2013 The Anglo-Saxon world. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
38. Hines, J.
    1990 Philology, archaeology and the adventus Saxonum vel Anglorum. In A. Bammesberger & A. Wollmann (eds.), Britain 400–600: Language and history, 17–36. Heidelberg: Winter.
    [Google Scholar]
39. Hogg, R. M.
    1992 A grammar of Old English. Volume 1: Phonology. Oxford: Blackwell.
    [Google Scholar]
40. International Phonetic Association
    International Phonetic Association 2013 Handbook of the International Phonetic Association: A guide to the use of the international phonetic alphabet, 14th print edn.Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
41. Jensen, J. B.
    1989 On the Mutual Intelligibility of Spanish and Portuguese. Hispania72(4). 848–852. 10.2307/343562
    https://doi.org/10.2307/343562 [Google Scholar]
42. Kirchmeier, S. & E. S. Jansen
    2016 Nordisk sprogforståelse og kommunikationsstrategier. Sprog i Norden 2016, 61–78.
    [Google Scholar]
43. Kondrak, G.
    2000 A new algorithm for the alignment of phonetic sequences. Proceedings of the first meeting of the North American Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics Conference, 288–295. N.p.: Association for Computational Linguistics.
    [Google Scholar]
44. Kondrak, G.
    2002 Algorithms for language reconstruction. PhD Thesis, University of Toronto.
45. Kondrak, G. & T. Sherif
    2006 Evaluation of several phonetic similarity algorithms on the task of cognate identification. In J. Nerbonne & E. Hinrichs (eds.), Proceedings of the COLING-ACL Workshop on Linguistic Distances, 43–50. Association for Computational Linguistics. 10.3115/1641976.1641983
    https://doi.org/10.3115/1641976.1641983 [Google Scholar]
46. Kruskal, J. B.
    1983 An overview of sequence comparison: Time warps, string edits, and Macromolecules. SIAM Review25(2). 201–37. 10.1137/1025045
    https://doi.org/10.1137/1025045 [Google Scholar]
47. Lass, R.
    1994 Old English. A historical linguistic companion. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/CBO9780511621000
    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511621000 [Google Scholar]
48. Lavelle, R.
    2010 Alfred’s wars. Sources and interpretations of Anglo-Saxon warfare in the Viking Age. Woodbridge: The Boydell Press.
    [Google Scholar]
49. Levenshtein, V. I.
    1966 Binary codes capable of correcting deletions, insertions, and reversals. Soviet Physics Doklady10(8). 707–710.
    [Google Scholar]
50. Mattingly, D.
    2006 An imperial possession. Britain in the Roman Empire. London: Penguin.
    [Google Scholar]
51. McCarthy, M.
    1999 What constitutes a basic vocabulary for spoken communication?Studies in English Language and Literature1. 233–249.
    [Google Scholar]
52. Moulton, W. G.
    1988 Mutual intelligibility among speakers of early Germanic dialects. In D. G. Calder & T. C. Christy (eds.), Germania. Comparative studies in the Old Germanic languages and literatures, 9–28. Wolfeboro, NH: D. S. Brewer.
    [Google Scholar]
53. Nedoma, R.
    2006 Kleine Grammatik des Altisländischen. Heidelberg: Winter.
    [Google Scholar]
54. Nesse, A.
    2002 Språkkontakt mellon norsk og tysk i hansatidens Bergen. Oslo: Novus forlag.
    [Google Scholar]
55. Nesse, A.
    2012 Norwegian and German in Bergen. In L. Elemevik & E. H. Jahr (eds.), Contact between Low German and Scandiavian in the Late Middle Ages. 25 Years of Research, 95–112. Uppsala: Kungl. Gustav Adolfs Akademien för svensk folkkultur.
    [Google Scholar]
56. Nielsen, H. F.
    2015 The vowel systems of Old English, Old Norse and Old High German compared. In J. O. Aksedal & H. F. Nielsen (eds.), Early Germanic languages in contact, 261–276. Amsterdam: Benjamins. 10.1075/nss.27.14nie
    https://doi.org/10.1075/nss.27.14nie [Google Scholar]
57. Noreen, A.
    1970 Altnordische Grammatik. Tübingen: Niemeyer.
    [Google Scholar]
58. Ogden, C. K.
    1932 Basic English. A general introduction with rules and grammar, 2nd edn. London: Kegan Paul.
    [Google Scholar]
59. Pagel, M. , Q. D. Atkinson & A. Meade
    2007 Frequency of word-use predicts rates of lexical evolution throughout Indo-European history. Nature449(11). 717–721. 10.1038/nature06176
    https://doi.org/10.1038/nature06176 [Google Scholar]
60. Richards, J. D.
    2000 Viking Age England. Stroud: Tempus.
    [Google Scholar]
61. Robinson, O. W.
    1992 Old English and its closest relatives. A Survey of the earliest Germanic languages. London: Routledge.
    [Google Scholar]
62. Sağın-Şimşek, Ç. & W. König
    2011 Receptive multilingualism and language understanding: Intelligibility of Azerbaijani to Turkish speakers. International Journal of Bilingualism16(3). 315–331. 10.1177/1367006911426449
    https://doi.org/10.1177/1367006911426449 [Google Scholar]
63. Salway, P.
    1981 Roman Britain. Oxford: Clarendon.
    [Google Scholar]
64. Sawyer, B. & P. Sawyer
    1993 Medieval Scandinavia: From conversion to reformation, circa 800–1500. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
    [Google Scholar]
65. Schrijver, P.
    2014 Language contact and the origin of Germanic languages. New York: Routledge.
    [Google Scholar]
66. Swadesh, M.
    1950 Salish internal relationships. International Journal of American Linguistics16(4). 157–167. 10.1086/464084
    https://doi.org/10.1086/464084 [Google Scholar]
67. Swan, M.
    2001 Authorship and anonymity. In P. Pulsiano & E. Treharne (eds.), A companion to Anglo-Saxon literature, 71–83. Oxford: Blackwell.
    [Google Scholar]
68. Tadmor, U. , M. Haspelmath & B. Taylor
    2010 Borrowability and the notion of basic vocabulary. Diachronica21(2). 226–246.
    [Google Scholar]
69. Toon, T. E.
    1992 Old English dialects. In R. M. Hogg (ed.), The Cambridge history of the English language, 421–426. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
70. Townend, M.
    2002 Language and history in Viking Age England. Linguistic relations between speakers of Old Norse and Old English. Turnhout: Brepols. 10.1484/M.SEM‑EB.5.106296
    https://doi.org/10.1484/M.SEM-EB.5.106296 [Google Scholar]
71. Wright, J. & E. M. Wright
    1982 Old English grammar. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
    [Google Scholar]