1887
Volume 73, Issue 2
  • ISSN 0108-8416
  • E-ISSN: 2212-9715
USD
Buy:$35.00 + Taxes

Abstract

This article reviews Gemination, Lenition, and Vowel Lengthening. On the History of Quantity in Germanic

 

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1075/nowele.00044.pie
2020-10-16
2020-10-27
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. Boas, H. C.
    2009The life and death of Texas German. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  2. Cathey, J. E.
    1997 Variation and reduction in Modern Faroese vowels. InT. Brinkmann (eds.), Vergleichende germanische Philologie und Skandinavistik. Festschrift für Otmar Werner, 91–100. Tübingen: Niemeyer. 10.1515/9783110931259‑007
    https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110931259-007 [Google Scholar]
  3. Davis, G. W. & G. K. Iverson
    1995 Segment organization in the High German Consonant Shift. American Journal of Germanic Linguistics and Literatures7. 111–127. 10.1017/S1040820700001566
    https://doi.org/10.1017/S1040820700001566 [Google Scholar]
  4. Goblirsch, K.
    1994Consonant strength in Upper German dialects. Odense: Odense University Press. 10.1075/nss.10
    https://doi.org/10.1075/nss.10 [Google Scholar]
  5. 2002 On the development of Germanic consonants: The Danish Shift and the Danish Lenition. Beiträge zur Geschichte der deutschen Sprache und Literatur124. 199–232. 10.1515/BGSL.2002.199
    https://doi.org/10.1515/BGSL.2002.199 [Google Scholar]
  6. 2005Lautverschiebungen in den germanischen Sprachen. Heidelberg: Winter.
    [Google Scholar]
  7. 2015 Aspiration und Lautverschiebung: Zur Typologie des Niederländischen. North-Western European Language Evolution68. 187–225. 10.1075/nowele.68.2.04gob
    https://doi.org/10.1075/nowele.68.2.04gob [Google Scholar]
  8. Haldiman, H.
    1903 Der Vokalismus der Mundart von Goldbach. Zeitschrift für hochdeutsche Mundarten4. 295–351.
    [Google Scholar]
  9. Hall, T. A.
    2014 The analysis of Westphalian German spirantization. Diachronica31. 223–266. 10.1075/dia.31.2.03hal
    https://doi.org/10.1075/dia.31.2.03hal [Google Scholar]
  10. 2015 The modern reflexes of Westphalian German Schärfung. Zeitschrift für Dialektologie und Linguistik82. 26–47.
    [Google Scholar]
  11. Holsinger, D. J.
    2000 Lenition in Germanic: Prosodic templates in sound change. Doctoral dissertation, University of Wisconsin-Madison.
  12. 2008 Germanic prosody and consonant strength. InJ. Brandão de Carvalho, T. Scheer & P. Ségéral (eds.), Lenition and fortition, 273–300. Berlin: de Gruyter. 10.1515/9783110211443.2.273
    https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110211443.2.273 [Google Scholar]
  13. Holthausen, F.
    1886Die Soester Mundart. Laut- und Formenlehre. Leipzig: Soltau.
    [Google Scholar]
  14. Katz, J. & M. Fricke
    2018 Auditory disruption improves word segmentation: A functional basis for lenition phenomena. Glossa3. 1–25. 10.5334/gjgl.443
    https://doi.org/10.5334/gjgl.443 [Google Scholar]
  15. Kranzmayer, E.
    1981Laut- und Flexionslehre der deutschen Zimbrischen Mundart. Ed. byM. Hornung. Vienna: Verband der wissenschaftlichen Gesellschaften Österreichs.
    [Google Scholar]
  16. Labov, W.
    1981 Resolving the Neogrammarian controversy. Language57. 267–308. 10.2307/413692
    https://doi.org/10.2307/413692 [Google Scholar]
  17. Liberman, A.
    1992 A bird’s-eye view of open syllable lengthening in English and the other Germanic languages. North-Western European Language Evolution20. 67–87. 10.1075/nowele.20.06lib
    https://doi.org/10.1075/nowele.20.06lib [Google Scholar]
  18. Mailhammer, R., W. W. Kruger & A. Makiyama
    2015 Type frequency influences phonological generalizations: Eliminating stressed open syllables with short vowels in West Germanic. Journal of Germanic Linguistics27. 205–237. 10.1017/S1470542715000069
    https://doi.org/10.1017/S1470542715000069 [Google Scholar]
  19. Pierce, M.
    2000 Constraints on syllable structure in Early Germanic. Journal of Indo- European Studies28. 17–29.
    [Google Scholar]
  20. Polomé, E.
    1949 A West Germanic reflex of the Verschärfung. Language25. 182–189. 10.2307/409942
    https://doi.org/10.2307/409942 [Google Scholar]
  21. Restle, D.
    2003Silbenschnitt – Quantität – Kopplung. Zur Geschichte, Charakterisierung und Repräsentation der Anschlußprosodie. Paderborn: Fink.
    [Google Scholar]
  22. Riad, T.
    1995 The quantity shift in Germanic: A typology. Amsterdamer Beiträge zur älteren Germanistik42. 159–184. 10.1163/18756719‑90000061
    https://doi.org/10.1163/18756719-90000061 [Google Scholar]
  23. Schirmunski, V. M.
    1962Deutsche Mundartkunde. Vergleichende Laut- und Formenlehre der deutschen Mundarten. Berlin: Akademie Verlag.
    [Google Scholar]
  24. Söderström, S.
    1972Om kvantitetsutvecklingen i norrländskamål. Gammal kort stavelse i Kalix- och Pitemålen i Nordmalungs och Raglenda socknar. Uppsala: Almqvist.
    [Google Scholar]
  25. Spiekermann, H.
    2000Silbenschnitt in deutschen Dialekten. Tübingen: Niemeyer. 10.1515/9783110929874
    https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110929874 [Google Scholar]
  26. Weinreich, U., W. Labov & M. Herzog
    1968 Empirical foundations for a theory of language change. InW. Lehmann & Y. Malkiel (eds.), Directions for historical linguistics, 95–198. Austin, TX: University of Texas Press.
    [Google Scholar]
http://instance.metastore.ingenta.com/content/journals/10.1075/nowele.00044.pie
Loading
  • Article Type: Book Review
This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was successful
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error