A multifactorial account of analogical developments in Old English nominal paradigms

References

1. Adamczyk, E.
   2018 Reshaping of the nominal inflection in Early Northern West Germanic. Amsterdam: Benjamins. 10.1075/nss.31
   https://doi.org/10.1075/nss.31 [Google Scholar]
2. Adamczyk, E.
   2019 The dynamics of changes in the early English inflection: Evidence from the Old English nominal system. In C. Claridge & B. Bös (eds.), Historical syntax: Papers from the 19th Conference on English Historical Linguistics (ICEHL), Duisburg-Essen 22–26 August 2016, 9–33. Amsterdam: Benjamins.
   [Google Scholar]
3. Adamczyk, E. & A. Versloot
   2019 Phonological constraints on morphology: Evidence from Old English nominal inflection. Folia Linguistica40(1). 153–176. 10.1515/flih‑2019‑0008
   https://doi.org/10.1515/flih-2019-0008 [Google Scholar]
4. Allen, C. L.
   1995 Case marking and reanalysis: Grammatical relations from Old to Early Modern English. Oxford: Clarendon.
   [Google Scholar]
5. Blevins, J. P.
   2004 Inflection classes and economy. In G. Müller , L. Gunkel & G. Zifonun (eds.), Explorations in nominal inflection, 41–85. Berlin: De Gruyter. 10.1515/9783110197501.51
   https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110197501.51 [Google Scholar]
6. Blumenthal-Dramé, A.
   2012 Entrenchment in usage-based theories: What corpus data do and do not reveal about the mind. Berlin: De Gruyter. 10.1515/9783110294002
   https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110294002 [Google Scholar]
7. Booij, G.
   1996 Inherent versus contextual inflection and the split morphology hypothesis. In G. Booij & J. van Marle (eds.), Yearbook of morphology 1995, 1–16. Dordrecht: Springer. 10.1007/978‑94‑017‑3716‑6_1
   https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-017-3716-6_1 [Google Scholar]
8. Boutkan, D.
   1995 The Germanic ‘Auslautgesetze’. Amsterdam: Rodopi.
   [Google Scholar]
9. Bybee, J.
   1995 Regular morphology and the lexicon. Language and Cognitive Processes10(5). 425–455. 10.1080/01690969508407111
   https://doi.org/10.1080/01690969508407111 [Google Scholar]
10. Bybee, J.
    2007 Frequency of use and the organisation of language. Oxford: Oxford University Press. 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780195301571.001.0001
    https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780195301571.001.0001 [Google Scholar]
11. Bybee, J.
    2010 Language, usage and cognition. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/CBO9780511750526
    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511750526 [Google Scholar]
12. Campbell, A.
    1977 Old English grammar (reprint of the first edition 1959). Oxford: Clarendon.
    [Google Scholar]
13. Corbett, G. , A. Hippisley , D. Brown & P. Marriott
    2001 Frequency, regularity and the paradigm: A perspective from Russian on a complex relation. In J. Bybee & P. Hopper (eds.), Frequency and the emergence of linguistic structure, 201–226. Amsterdam: Benjamins. 10.1075/tsl.45.11cor
    https://doi.org/10.1075/tsl.45.11cor [Google Scholar]
14. Dammel, A. & S. Kürschner
    2008 Complexity in nominal plural allomorphy: A contrastive survey of ten Germanic languages. In M. Miestamo , K. Sinnemäki & F. Karlsson (eds.), Language complexity: Typology, contact, change, 243–262. Amsterdam: Benjamins. 10.1075/slcs.94.15dam
    https://doi.org/10.1075/slcs.94.15dam [Google Scholar]
15. Dammel, A. , S. Kürschner & D. Nübling
    2010 Pluralallomorphie in zehn germanischen Sprachen. Konvergenzen und Divergenzen in Ausdrucksverfahren und Konditionierung. In A. Dammel , S. Kürschner & D. Nübling (eds.), Kontrastive germanistische Linguistik, 587–642. Hildesheim: Olms.
    [Google Scholar]
16. Dehaene, S.
    2003 The neural basis of the Weber–Fechner Law: A logarithmic mental number line. Trends in Cognitive Sciences7(4). 145–147. 10.1016/S1364‑6613(03)00055‑X
    https://doi.org/10.1016/S1364-6613(03)00055-X [Google Scholar]
17. Diessel, H.
    2004 The acquisition of complex sentences. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/CBO9780511486531
    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511486531 [Google Scholar]
18. Diessel, H.
    2007 Frequency effects in language acquisition, language use, and diachronic change. New Ideas in Psychology25 (2). 104–123. 10.1016/j.newideapsych.2007.02.002
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.newideapsych.2007.02.002 [Google Scholar]
19. Ellis, N. C.
    2002 Reflections on frequency effects in language processing. Studies in Second Language Acquisition24. 297–339. 10.1017/S0272263102002140
    https://doi.org/10.1017/S0272263102002140 [Google Scholar]
20. Ellis, N. C. & L. Collins
    2009 Input and second language acquisition: The roles of frequency, form, and function. Introduction to the Special Issue. The Modern Language Journal93. 329–335. 10.1111/j.1540‑4781.2009.00893.x
    https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-4781.2009.00893.x [Google Scholar]
21. Gardani, F.
    2013 Dynamics of morphological productivity. The evolution of noun classes from Latin to Italian. Leiden: Brill. 10.1163/9789004244658
    https://doi.org/10.1163/9789004244658 [Google Scholar]
22. Goldschneider, J. & R. DeKeyser
    2001 Explaining the ‘natural order of L2 morpheme acquisition’ in English: A meta-analysis of multiple determinants. Language Learning51. 1–50. 10.1111/1467‑9922.00147
    https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9922.00147 [Google Scholar]
23. Goldsmith, J. A.
    1990 Autosegmental and metrical phonology. Oxford: Blackwell.
    [Google Scholar]
24. Greenberg, J.
    1966 Language universals. The Hague: Mouton.
    [Google Scholar]
25. Haspelmath, M.
    2006 Against markedness (and what to replace it with). Journal of Linguistics42(1). 25–70. 10.1017/S0022226705003683
    https://doi.org/10.1017/S0022226705003683 [Google Scholar]
26. Haspelmath, M.
    2008 Frequency vs. iconicity in explaining grammatical asymmetries. Cognitive Linguistics. 19(1). 1–33. 10.1515/COG.2008.001
    https://doi.org/10.1515/COG.2008.001 [Google Scholar]
27. Hawkins, John A.
    2004 Efficiency and complexity in grammars. Oxford: Oxford University Press. 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199252695.001.0001
    https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199252695.001.0001 [Google Scholar]
28. Healey, A. , J. Holland , D. McDougall & I. McDougall
    (eds.) 2009 The Dictionary of Old English Corpus in Electronic Form. Toronto: Toronto University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
29. Hoekstra, E. & A. P. Versloot
    2019 Factors promoting the retention of irregularity: On the interplay of salience, absolute frequency and proportional frequency in West Frisian plural morphology. Morphology29. 31–50. 10.1007/s11525‑018‑9334‑2
    https://doi.org/10.1007/s11525-018-9334-2 [Google Scholar]
30. Hogg, R. M.
    1992 A grammar of Old English. Volume I: Phonology. Oxford: Blackwell.
    [Google Scholar]
31. Hogg, R. M. & R. D. Fulk
    2011 A grammar of Old English. Volume II: Morphology. Oxford: Blackwell.
    [Google Scholar]
32. Hosmer, D. W. & S. Lemeshow
    1989 Applied logistic regression. New York: Wiley.
    [Google Scholar]
33. Köpcke, K.-M.
    1993 Schemata bei der Pluralbildung im Deutschen: Versuch einer kognitiven Morphologie. Tübingen: Narr.
    [Google Scholar]
34. Kürschner, S.
    2008 Deklinationsklassen-Wandel eine diachron-kontrastive Studie zur Entwicklung der Pluralallomorphie im Deutschen, Niederländischen, Schwedischen und Dänischen. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
    [Google Scholar]
35. Langacker, R. W.
    1987 Foundations of cognitive grammar. Volume I: Theoretical prerequisites. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
36. Nooteboom, S. G. & A. Cohen
    1995 Spreken en verstaan. Een nieuwe inleiding tot de experimentele fonetiek. Assen: Van Gorcum.
    [Google Scholar]
37. Versloot, A. P. & E. Adamczyk
    2018 Plural inflection in North Sea Germanic languages: A multivariate analysis of morphological variation. In A. Dammel , M. Eitelmann & M. Schmuck (eds.), Reorganising grammatical variation. Diachronic studies in the retention, redistribution and refunctionalisation of linguistic variants, 17–55. Amsterdam: Benjamins. 10.1075/slcs.203.02ver
    https://doi.org/10.1075/slcs.203.02ver [Google Scholar]
38. Wurzel, W. U.
    1989 Inflectional morphology and naturalness. Dordrecht: Kluwer.
    [Google Scholar]
39. Zipf, G. K.
    1936 The psychobiology of language. London: Routledge.
    [Google Scholar]