1887
  1. Home
  2. e-Journals
  3. NOWELE. North-Western European Language Evolution
  4. Volume 74, Issue 2
  5. Article
Volume 74, Issue 2
  • ISSN 0108-8416
  • E-ISSN: 2212-9715
USD
Buy:$35.00 + Taxes

Abstract

Abstract

Typologically, the Old and Middle Scandinavian languages preserve features lost in Modern Scandinavian (Danish, Norwegian and Swedish), especially zero arguments and inactive constructions. Both phenomena present difficulties for the analysis of the Old and Middle Scandinavian languages as configurational, and generative linguists often choose a reductionist strategy, claiming that at the level of deep structure, configurational structure persists. Based on Middle Danish, my claim will be that zero arguments are semantically different from – and therefore cannot be reduced to – pronouns, and secondly, that inactive constructions do not have oblique subjects, but oblique first arguments (A1s). The meanings of the case forms nominative and oblique differ, depending on their constructional context. Any functional theory must respect the relevant grammatical sign contrasts of the language analysed, not try to explain them away.

© John Benjamins Publishing Company
Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1075/nowele.00058.hel
2021-11-18
2023-09-24

  • From This Site

    /content/journals/10.1075/nowele.00058.hel
    dcterms_title,dcterms_subject,pub_keyword
    -contentType:Journal -contentType:Contributor -contentType:Concept -contentType:Institution
    10
    5
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. AM 187, 8o
    AM 187, 8o = Det arnamagnæanske håndskrift nr. 187 i oktav, indeholdende en dansk lægebog Ed. by V. Såby. Universitets-Jubilæets danske Samfund. Copenhagen: Thieles Bogtrykkeri 1883.
     [Google Scholar]
  2. Bønneb
    Bønneb = Middelalderens danske Bønnebøger I–V ed. by K. M. Nielsen. Copenhagen: Gyldendalske Boghandel/Nordisk Forlag 1945–1982.
     [Google Scholar]
  3. CCD
    CCD = Corpus Codicum Danicorum Medii Aevi. CCD III. Lex Scaniae, codd. B74 and GkS3121 ed. by J. Brøndum-Nielsen 1961; CCD X. Lex Jutiae, codd. C37 and C39, ed. byP. Skautrup. Copenhagen: Munksgaard 1973.
     [Google Scholar]
  4. DgL V
    DgL V = Danmarks gamle Landskabslove V, Eriks Sjællandske Lov ed. by P. Skautrup. Copenhagen 1936.
     [Google Scholar]
  5. Dma
    Dma = Danmarks middelalderlige annaler [Denmark’s medieval annals] ed. by E. Kroman. Copenhagen 1980.
     [Google Scholar]
  6. EL
    EL = Eriks Lov [Eric’s Law].
     [Google Scholar]
  7. Fragm
    Fragm = Fragmenter af gammeldanske Haandskrifter [Fragments of Middle Danish manuscripts] ed. by P. Diderichsen. Copenhagen: Schulz 1931–1937.
     [Google Scholar]
  8. GldO
    GldO = Gammeldansk Ordbog [Middle Danish Dictionary]. An electronically accessible, non-digitalised collection of excerpts for the Middle Danish Dictionary project. https://gammeldanskseddelsamling.dk/
  9. Harp S
    Harp S = Harpestreng ms. S from Harpestræng. Gamle danske Urtebøger, Stenbøger og Kogebøger Ed. by M. Kristensen. Copenhagen 1908–1920.
     [Google Scholar]
  10. HKv
    HKv = De hellige Kvinder. En Legende-Samling Ed. by C. J. Brandt. Copenhagen 1859.
     [Google Scholar]
  11. JBB
    JBB = Jesu Barndoms Bog. Ghemen ca. 1508. Danske Folkebøger 1, Apokryfe Bibelhistorier ed. by J. P. Jacobsen, 27–105. Copenhagen: Gyldendalske Boghandel Nordisk Forlag 1915 Electronic edition by Det Danske Sprog- og Litteraturselskab: https://tekstnet.dk/jesu-barndomsbog/1
  12. Kempis
    Kempis = Thomas a Kempis. Fire bøger om Kristi Efterfølgelse, i dansk oversættelse fra 15. Århundrede ed. by F. Rønning. Copenhagen 1884–1885.
     [Google Scholar]
  13. KøbstL
    KøbstL = Danmarks gamle Købstadslovgivning I–V ed. by E. Kroman. Copenhagen: Rosenkilde og Bagger 1951–1961.
     [Google Scholar]
  14. Luc
    Luc = Lucidarius. InA Danish Teacher’s Manual from the Mid-Fifteenth Century (COD. AM 76, 8°) Ed. by S. Kroon Lund: Lund University Press 1993.
     [Google Scholar]
  15. Lægeråd AM 819
    Lægeråd AM 819 = Medical Advice, excerpt for GldO from ms. AM 819 33r. https://gammeldanskseddelsamling.dk/
  16. Mandeville
    Mandeville = Mandevilles Rejse i gammeldansk Oversættelse [The journey of Mandeville in Middle Danish translation] ed. by M. Lorenzen. Copenhagen 1882.
     [Google Scholar]
  17. Miss
    Miss = Missiver fra Chr. I’s og Hans’ Tid I–II, vedW. Christensen 1912–1914.
     [Google Scholar]
  18. ML
    ML = Mariager Legendehåndskrift ed. by G. Knudsen, for Samfund til Udgivelse af gammel nordisk Litteratur. Copenhagen 1917–1930.
     [Google Scholar]
  19. OpbygSkr
    OpbygSkr = Opbyggelige skrifter [Devotional writings], efter Cod. Holm. A29, excerpt for GldO from ms. Stockholm A29 173v. https://gammeldanskseddelsamling.dk/
  20. Pass
    Pass = Den danske passionstraktat, from manuscript in Stockholm. Duplicated for GldO.
     [Google Scholar]
  21. Post
    Post = Postil i Uppsala. InSvenska Medeltids-postillor III ed. by G. E. Klemming. Stockholm: P. A. Norstedts & söner 1873.
     [Google Scholar]
  22. RigsL
    RigsL = Den danske rigslovgivning indtil 1400 ed. by E. Kroman. Copenhagen: Munksgaard 1971.
     [Google Scholar]
  23. Rim K41
    Rim K41 = Den danske Rimkrønike ed. by H. Nielsenfrom manuscript Stockholm K41. Universitets-Jubilæets danske Samfund. Copenhagen: H. H. Thiele 1906–1911.
     [Google Scholar]
  24. ScEL
    ScEL = Scanian Ecclesiastical Law.
     [Google Scholar]
  25. ScL
    ScL = Scanian Law.
     [Google Scholar]
  26. SjT
    SjT = Sjælens Trøst. Consolatio animae ed. by N. Nielsen. Universitets-Jubilæets danske Samfund. Copenhagen 1937–1952.
     [Google Scholar]
  27. Sydr
    Sydr = Sydrak. Efter haandskriftet Ny kgl. Samling 236, 4to ed. by G. Knudsen. Universitets-Jubilæets danske Samfund. Copenhagen 1921–32.
     [Google Scholar]
  28. Thord Degn
    Thord Degn = Danmarks gamle Landskabslove IV. Tillæg til Bind IV. Thord Degns Artikler, Text 2.
     [Google Scholar]
  29. Askedal, J. O.
    2001 ‘Oblique subjects’, structural and lexical case marking. InJ. T. Faarlund (ed.), Grammatical relations in change, 65–97. Amsterdam: Benjamins. https://benjamins.com/catalog/slcs.56.04ask. 10.1075/slcs.56.04ask
     https://doi.org/10.1075/slcs.56.04ask [Google Scholar]
  30. Baker, M.
    2001 Configurationality and polysynthesis. InM. Haspelmath, E. König, W. Österreicher & W. Raible (eds.), Language typology and language universals: An international handbook, vol.2, 1433–1441. Berlin: De Gruyter.
     [Google Scholar]
  31. Barðdal, J.
    2000 Oblique subjects in Old Scandinavian. NOWELE37. 25–51. 10.1075/nowele.37.02bar
     https://doi.org/10.1075/nowele.37.02bar [Google Scholar]
  32. 2001 The perplexity of Dat-Nom verbs in Icelandic. Nordic Journal of Linguistics24. 47–70. 10.1080/03325860117730
     https://doi.org/10.1080/03325860117730 [Google Scholar]
  33. Barðdal, J. & Þ. Eyþórsson
    2003 The change that never happened: the story of oblique subjects. Journal of Linguistics39. 439–472. 10.1017/S002222670300207X
     https://doi.org/10.1017/S002222670300207X [Google Scholar]
  34. 2018 What is a subject: The nature and validity of subject tests. InJ. Barðdal, N. Pat-El & S. M. Carey (eds.), Non-canonically case-marked subjects. The Reykjavík-Eyjafjallajökull papers, 257–273. Amsterdam: Benjamins. 10.1075/slcs.200.11bar
     https://doi.org/10.1075/slcs.200.11bar [Google Scholar]
  35. Bom, K.
    1954 Gammeldansk Ordliste. Duplicated for GldO.
     [Google Scholar]
  36. Christoffersen, M.
    1993 Setning og sammenheng. Syntaktiske studier i Magnus Lagabøters landslov. ADH-serien, 65. Kristiansand: Agder distriktshøgskole.
     [Google Scholar]
  37. Dyvik, H.
    1980 Om definisjonen av tema og rema [On the definition of theme and rheme]. Eigenproduksjon nr. 8. Institutt for lingvistikk. Universitetet i Bergen.
     [Google Scholar]
  38. Eyþórsson, Þ. & J. Barðdal
    2005 Oblique subjects: A common Germanic inheritance. Language81. 824–881. 10.1353/lan.2005.0173
     https://doi.org/10.1353/lan.2005.0173 [Google Scholar]
  39. Faarlund, J. T.
    1990 Syntactic change. Toward a theory of historical syntax. Trends in linguistics. Studies and monographs 50. Berlin: De Gruyter. 10.1515/9783110854947
     https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110854947 [Google Scholar]
  40. 2001 The notion of oblique subject and its status in the history of Icelandic. InJ. T. Faarlund (ed.), Grammatical relations in change [Studies in Language Companion Series 56], 99–135. Amsterdam: Benjamins. https://benjamins.com/catalog/slcs.56.05faa. 10.1075/slcs.56.05faa
     https://doi.org/10.1075/slcs.56.05faa [Google Scholar]
  41. 2004 The syntax of Old Norse. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
     [Google Scholar]
  42. Falk, C.
    1997 Fornsvenska upplevarverb. Lund: Lund University Press.
     [Google Scholar]
  43. Heltoft, L.
    2003 Iconic and categorical focus systems in Scandinavian. InV. Molnar & J. Hetland, (eds.), Structures of focus and grammatical relations, 43–87. Linguistische Arbeiten. Tübingen: Niemeyer. 10.1515/9783110949483.41
     https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110949483.41 [Google Scholar]
  44. 2011 Word order change as grammaticalisation. InJ. Nørgård-Sørensen, L. Heltoft & L. Schøsler, Connecting grammaticalisation, 171–235. Amsterdam: Benjamins. 10.1075/sfsl.65.06wor
     https://doi.org/10.1075/sfsl.65.06wor [Google Scholar]
  45. 2012 Zero expression of arguments in Old Danish. Acta Linguistica Hafniensia44(2). 169–191. doi:  10.1080/03740463.2013.797649
     https://doi.org/10.1080/03740463.2013.797649 [Google Scholar]
  46. 2019 Fra gammeldansk til nutidsdansk. Under medvirken af M. A. Nielsen. InE. Hjorth, H. G. Jacobsen, B. Jørgensen, B. Jacobsen, M. Jørgensen & L. K. Fahl (eds.), Dansk Sproghistorie 3: Bøjning og bygning, Syntaks ch. 11.2, 129–225. Aarhus: Det Danske Sprog- og Litteraturselskab and Aarhus Universitetsforlag.
     [Google Scholar]
  47. Submitted 2020 The semantic reorganisation of case paradigms and word order paradigms in the history of Danish. InG. Diewald & K. Politt (eds), Proceedings of the Workshop on Paradigmatic Organization. SLE Societas Linguistica Europea, Leipzig, August 2019.
     [Google Scholar]
  48. Hjelmslev, L.
    1943 Omkring Sprogteoriens Grundlæggelse. Københavns Universitets Festskrift 1943. Copenhagen.
     [Google Scholar]
  49. Hjartardóttir, Þ. B.
    1987 Getið í eyðurnar. Um eyður fyrir frumlög og andlög í eldri íslensku. Master’s Thesis, University of Iceland.
     [Google Scholar]
  50. Hrafnbjargarson, G. H.
    2003 Ikke-nominative subjekter i det danske sprogs historie. InP. Widell & M. Kunøe (eds.), 9. Møde om Udforskningen af Dansk Sprog, 188–197. Department of Nordic Language and Literature: Aarhus University.
     [Google Scholar]
  51. Luraghi, S.
    2010 The rise (and possible downfall) of configurationality. InS. Luraghi & V. Bubeni’k (eds.), The Bloomsbury companion to historical linguistics, 212–229. The Bloomsbury Publishing Company PLC.
     [Google Scholar]
  52. Melčuk, I.
    2014 Syntactic Subject: Syntactic Relations, once again. InV. A. Plungjan (main ed.), M. A. Daniel’, E. A. Ljutikova, S. G. Tatjevosov & O. V. Fjodorova (co-eds.), Jazyk. Konstanty. Peremennye. Pamjati Aleksandra Jevgen’jeviča Kibrika, 169–216. Sankt-Peterburg: Aleteija.
     [Google Scholar]
  53. Mørck, E.
    1992 Subjektets kasus i norrønt og mellomnorsk. Arkiv för nordisk filologi107. 53–99.
     [Google Scholar]
  54. Nielsen, M. Aa
    2013 Syntaktisk utvikling fra urnordisk til mellomnorsk. InO.-E. Haugen (ed.), Handbok i norrøn filologi, 2nd edition, 556–598. Bergen: Fagbokforlaget.
     [Google Scholar]
  55. Nørgård-Sørensen, J., L. Heltoft & L. Schøsler
    2011 Connecting grammaticalisation. Amsterdam: Benjamins. 10.1075/sfsl.65
     https://doi.org/10.1075/sfsl.65 [Google Scholar]
  56. Rögnvaldsson, E.
    1995 Old Icelandic: A non-configurational language?NOWELE26. 3–29. doi:  10.1075/nowele.26.01rog
     https://doi.org/10.1075/nowele.26.01rog [Google Scholar]
  57. Sigurðsson, H. Á.
    1989 Verbal syntax and case in Icelandic in a comparative GB approach. Lund: Department of Scandinavian Languages. University of Lund.
     [Google Scholar]
  58. 2006 The nom/acc alternation in Germanic. InJ. M. Hartmann and L. Molnárfi (eds.), Comparative studies in Germanic syntax: From Afrikaans to Zurich German, 13–50. Amsterdam: Benjamins. 10.1075/la.97.03sig
     https://doi.org/10.1075/la.97.03sig [Google Scholar]
  59. Zúñiga, F.
    2011 Why should beneficiaries be subjects (or objects)? Affaction and grammatical relations. InS. Kittilä, K. Västi & J. Ylikoski (eds.), Case, animacy and semantic roles, 329–48. Amsterdam: Benjamins. 10.1075/tsl.99.12zun
     https://doi.org/10.1075/tsl.99.12zun [Google Scholar]
http://instance.metastore.ingenta.com/content/journals/10.1075/nowele.00058.hel
Loading
The typology of Old Norse revisited
NOWELE. North-Western European Language Evolution 74, 242 (2021); https://doi.org/10.1075/nowele.00058.hel
/content/journals/10.1075/nowele.00058.hel
/content/journals/10.1075/nowele.00058.hel
Loading

Data & Media loading...

  • Article Type: Research Article

Most Cited

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was successful
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error