1887
Volume 75, Issue 2
  • ISSN 0108-8416
  • E-ISSN: 2212-9715
USD
Buy:$35.00 + Taxes

Abstract

Abstract

This is a study of the semantics of definiteness marking and of its applicability to the Old East Scandinavian linguistic scenario. Contrary to the Modern Continental Scandinavian languages, Old East Scandinavian varieties did not possess fully-fledged definite articles, although all three demonstrative systems (, and ) show some evidence of being used as markers of definiteness. A semantic analysis of these forms in extracts from the and reveals the differentiated intermediate stages along the cline of grammaticalisation these definiteness markers found themselves in during this linguistic period. This confirms, in turn, that despite not being employed as definite articles proper, and show some degree of semantic bleaching.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1075/nowele.00067.san
2022-11-22
2022-11-30
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. Andersen, H.
    2006 Grammation, regrammation, and degrammation: Tense loss in Russian. Diachronica23(2). 231–258. 10.1075/dia.23.2.02and
    https://doi.org/10.1075/dia.23.2.02and [Google Scholar]
  2. Ariel, M.
    1988 Referring and accessibility. Journal of Linguistics24(1). 65–87. 10.1017/S0022226700011567
    https://doi.org/10.1017/S0022226700011567 [Google Scholar]
  3. Becher, V.
    2010 Differences in the use of deictic expressions in English and German texts. Linguistics48(4). 1309–1342. 10.1515/ling.2010.042
    https://doi.org/10.1515/ling.2010.042 [Google Scholar]
  4. Börjars, K. & J. Payne
    2016Adjectival definiteness marking and noun-phrase internal functions. University of Manchester, HEADLEX, 25 July 2016.
    [Google Scholar]
  5. Braunmüller, K.
    2002 The Ancient Nordic linguistic system from a typological point of view: Phonology, graphemics, morphology, syntax, and word order. InO. Bandle, K. Braunmüller, E. H. Jahr, A. Karker, H. Naumann, & U. Teleman (eds.), The Nordic languages: An international handbook of the history of the North Germanic Languages, vol. 11, 649–656. Berlin: De Gruyter.
    [Google Scholar]
  6. Breban, T.
    2012 Functional shifts and the development of English determiners. InA. Meurman–Solin, M. J. López–Couso & B. Los (eds.), Information structure and syntactic change in the history of English, 271–300. New York: Oxford University Press. 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199860210.003.0012
    https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199860210.003.0012 [Google Scholar]
  7. Carlquist, J.
    2002 The history of Old Nordic manuscripts III: Old Swedish. InO. Bandle, K. Braunmüller, E. H. Jahr, A. Karker, H. Naumann, & U. Teleman (eds.), The Nordic languages: An international handbook of the history of the North Germanic Languages, vol. 11, 808–816. Berlin: De Gruyter.
    [Google Scholar]
  8. Charolles, M.
    1990 L’anaphore associative: Problèmes de délimitation, Verbum131. 119–48.
    [Google Scholar]
  9. Crisma, P.
    2011 The emergence of the definite article in English: A contact–induced change?InP. Sleeman & H. Perridon (eds.), The Noun Phrase in Romance and Germanic: Structure, variation, and change, 175–192. Amsterdam: Benjamins. 10.1075/la.171.13cri
    https://doi.org/10.1075/la.171.13cri [Google Scholar]
  10. 2015 The ‘indefinite article’ from cardinal to operator to expletive. InCh. Gianollo, A. Jäger, & D. Penka (eds.), Language change at the syntax–semantics interface, 125–151. Berlin: De Gruyter. 10.1515/9783110352306.125
    https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110352306.125 [Google Scholar]
  11. Crisma, P. & S. Pintzuk
    2016An from Old to Middle English. InS. Vikner, H. Jørgensen & E. van Gelderen (eds.), Let us have articles betwixt Us: Papers in historical and comparative linguistics in honour of Johanna L. Wood, 161–183. Aarhus: Aarhus University.
    [Google Scholar]
  12. Dahl, Ö.
    2015Grammaticalization in the north: Noun Phrase morphosyntax in Scandinavian vernaculars. Berlin: Language Science Press. 10.26530/OAPEN_559871
    https://doi.org/10.26530/OAPEN_559871 [Google Scholar]
  13. Delbrück, B.
    1916Der Altisländische artikel: Germanische SyntaxIII1. Leipzig: Teubner.
    [Google Scholar]
  14. Delsing, L.
    2002 The morphology of Old Nordic II: Old Swedish and Old Danish. InO. Bandle, K. Braunmüller, E. H. Jahr, A. Karker, H. Naumann, & U. Teleman (eds.), The Nordic languages: An international handbook of the history of the North Germanic Languages, vol. 11, 925–939. Berlin: De Gruyter.
    [Google Scholar]
  15. (ed.) 2017Fornsvenska Textbanken. Lund: Lund University. https://project2.sol.lu.se/fornsvenska/
    [Google Scholar]
  16. De Mulder, W. & A. Cartier
    2011 The grammaticalization of definite articles. InB. Heine & H. Narrog (eds.), The Oxford handbook of grammaticalization, 522–535. Oxford: Oxford University Press. 10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199586783.013.0042
    https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199586783.013.0042 [Google Scholar]
  17. Diessel, H.
    1999Demonstratives: Form, function, and grammaticalization. Amsterdam: Benjamins. 10.1075/tsl.42
    https://doi.org/10.1075/tsl.42 [Google Scholar]
  18. Dryer, M. S.
    1989 Article–noun order. Chicago Linguistic Society251. 83–97.
    [Google Scholar]
  19. Faarlund, J. T.
    2004The syntax of Old Norse: With a survey of the inflectional morphology and a complete bibliography. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  20. Fertig, D.
    2013Analogy and morphological change (Edinburgh Historical Linguistics 1). Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press. 10.1515/9780748646234
    https://doi.org/10.1515/9780748646234 [Google Scholar]
  21. Fraurud, K.
    2000 Possessives with extensive use: A source of definite articles?InI. Baron, M. Herslund & F. Sørensen (eds.), Dimensions of possession, 72–97. Amsterdam: Benjamins.
    [Google Scholar]
  22. Frederiksen, B. O.
    2002 The history of Old Nordic manuscripts IV: Old Danish. InO. Bandle, K. Braunmüller, E. H. Jahr, A. Karker, H. Naumann, & U. Teleman (eds.), The Nordic languages: An international handbook of the history of the North Germanic Languages, vol. 11, 816–824. Berlin: De Gruyter.
    [Google Scholar]
  23. Grimm, J.
    1898Deutsche Grammatik IV. Berlin: F. Dümmler.
    [Google Scholar]
  24. Gundel, J. K., N. Hedberg, & R. Zacharski
    1993 Cognitive status and the form of referring expressions in discourse. Language691. 274–307. 10.2307/416535
    https://doi.org/10.2307/416535 [Google Scholar]
  25. Haugen, E.
    1976The Scandinavian languages: An introduction to their history. London: Faber and Faber.
    [Google Scholar]
  26. Hawkins, J.
    1978Definiteness and indefiniteness: A study in reference and grammaticality prediction. London: Croom Helm.
    [Google Scholar]
  27. Hawkins, J. A.
    2009 Germanic languages. InB. Comrie (ed.), The world’s major languages, 2nd edn, 51–58. London: Routledge.
    [Google Scholar]
  28. Heine, B.
    1997Cognitive foundations of grammar. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  29. Heine, B. & T. Kuteva
    2009World lexicon of grammaticalization. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  30. Heltoft, L.
    2001 Reanalysing structure: The Danish definite article, its predecessors, and development. Acta Linguistica Hafniensia33(1). 67–90. 10.1080/03740463.2001.10412195
    https://doi.org/10.1080/03740463.2001.10412195 [Google Scholar]
  31. Himmelmann, H. P.
    1997Deiktikon, Artikel, Nominalphrase: Zur Emergenz syntaktischer Struktur. Berlin: De Gruyter. 10.1515/9783110929621
    https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110929621 [Google Scholar]
  32. Huddleston, R. & G. K. Pullum
    2002The Cambridge grammar of the English language. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/9781316423530
    https://doi.org/10.1017/9781316423530 [Google Scholar]
  33. Jónsson, F.
    1901Det Norsk-Islandske Skjaldesprog omtr. 800–1300. Copenhagen: Møllers.
    [Google Scholar]
  34. Kuryłowicz, J.
    1965 [1975] The evolution of grammatical categories. Diogenes 51. Esquisses linguistiques, vol. 2, 38–54. Munich: Fink.
    [Google Scholar]
  35. Lander, E. T. & L. Haegeman
    2014 Old Norse as an NP language: With observations on the Common Norse and Northwest Germanic runic inscriptions. Transactions of the Philological Society112(3). 279–318. 10.1111/1467‑968X.12022
    https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-968X.12022 [Google Scholar]
  36. Lehmann, C.
    1982Thoughts on grammaticalization: A programmatic sketch. Cologne: Institut für Sprachwissenschaft.
    [Google Scholar]
  37. Lyons, C.
    1999Definiteness. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/CBO9780511605789
    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511605789 [Google Scholar]
  38. Millar, R. M.
    2000System collapse, system rebirth: The demonstrative pronouns of English 900–1350 and the birth of the definite article. Bern: Peter Lang.
    [Google Scholar]
  39. Neckel, G.
    1924Die Entwicklung von schwachtonigem Altnordischem u (o) vor m aus helleren Vokalen und der altnordische Substantivartikel: Festschrift für E. Mogk. Haale an der Saale: Niemeyer.
    [Google Scholar]
  40. Nygaard, M.
    1905Norrøn syntax. Kristiania: Aschehoug & Co.
    [Google Scholar]
  41. Peel, C.
    (ed.) 2015Guta Lag and Guta Saga: The law and history of the Gotlanders. London: Routledge. 10.4324/9781315735863
    https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315735863 [Google Scholar]
  42. Perridon, H. C. B.
    1989 Reference, definiteness, and the noun phrase in Swedish. PhD Dissertation, University of Amsterdam.
  43. 1997 Is the definite article in Jutlandic a borrowing from Low German?Multilingua16(4). 351–363. 10.1515/mult.1997.16.4.351
    https://doi.org/10.1515/mult.1997.16.4.351 [Google Scholar]
  44. Perridon, H. C. B. & P. Sleeman
    2011 The noun phrase in Germanic and Romance: Common developments and differences. InP. Sleeman & H. C. B. Perridon (eds.), The noun phrase in Romance and Germanic: Structure, variation, and change, 1–21. Amsterdam: Benjamins. 10.1075/la.171.02per
    https://doi.org/10.1075/la.171.02per [Google Scholar]
  45. Peterson, P.
    2018 An annotated edition and translation of The Older Law of Västergötland. The Heroic Age181. www.heroicage.org/issues/18/peterson.php
    [Google Scholar]
  46. Pfaff, A.
    2019 Reunited after 1000 years: The development of definite articles in Icelandic. Nordic Journal of Linguistics421. 165–207. 10.1017/S0332586519000155
    https://doi.org/10.1017/S0332586519000155 [Google Scholar]
  47. Pfaff, A. & G. Walkden
    . Forthcoming. Adjectival articles in early Germanic. InK. Bech & A. Pfaff eds. Diversity in the Old Germanic noun phrase. Open Germanic Linguistics. Berlin: Language Science Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  48. Philippi, J.
    1997 The rise of the article in the Germanic languages. InA. van Kemenade & N. Vincent (eds.), Parameters of morphosyntactic change, 62–93. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  49. Pollack, H. W.
    1912 Zur Stellung des Attributes im Urgermanischen: Ein Beitrag zur Geschichte des suffigierten Artikel im Altnordischen und der germanischen Kasuskomposita. Indogermanische Forschungen301. 283–302. 10.1515/9783110242706.283
    https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110242706.283 [Google Scholar]
  50. Prince, E. F.
    1981 Toward a taxonomy of given–new information. InP. Cole (ed.), Radical pragmatics, 223–255. New York: Academic Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  51. Ratkus, A.
    2018 Weak adjectives need not be definite: The evidence of variation in Gothic. Indogermanische Forschungen123(1). 27–64. 10.1515/if‑2018‑0002
    https://doi.org/10.1515/if-2018-0002 [Google Scholar]
  52. Ringe
    Ringe 2006From Proto-Indo-European to Proto-Germanic. A linguistic history of English, vol. 11. Oxford: Oxford University Press. 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199284139.001.0001
    https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199284139.001.0001 [Google Scholar]
  53. Roehrs, D. & C. D. Sapp
    2004 The rise of the suffixal article in the Early North Germanic DP. InM. T. Martinez, A. Alcázar, and M. T. Hernández (eds.), Proceedings of the thirty-third Western Conference on Linguistic, vol. 161, 290–301. Fresno: California State University.
    [Google Scholar]
  54. Skrzypek, D.
    2009a Äldre and Yngre Västgötalagen–– Some linguistic evidence. Folia Scandinavica101. 205–218.
    [Google Scholar]
  55. 2009b The formation of the definite article in the Nordic languages. Lingua Posnaniensis511. 65–76. 10.2478/v10122‑009‑0005‑y
    https://doi.org/10.2478/v10122-009-0005-y [Google Scholar]
  56. 2010 Between a demonstrative and an article: The status of in in Old Swedish. Folia Scandinavica111. 145–162.
    [Google Scholar]
  57. 2012Grammaticalization of (in)definiteness in Old Swedish. Poznan: Adam Mickiewicz University.
    [Google Scholar]
  58. 2020 Indirect anaphora in a diachronic perspective: The case of Danish and Swedish. InK. Balogh, A. Latrouite & R. Van Valin Jr. (eds.), Nominal anchoring: Specificity, definiteness, and article systems across languages, 171–193. Berlin: Language Science Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  59. Skrzypek, D., A. Piotrowska, & R. Jaworski
    2021The diachrony of definiteness in North Germanic. Leiden: Brill. 10.1163/9789004463684
    https://doi.org/10.1163/9789004463684 [Google Scholar]
  60. Sommerer, L.
    2018Article emergence in Old English: A constructionalist perspective. Berlin: De Gruyter. 10.1515/9783110541052
    https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110541052 [Google Scholar]
  61. Stroh-Wollin, U.
    2009 On the development of definiteness markers in Scandinavian. Working Papers in Scandinavian Syntax831. 1–25.
    [Google Scholar]
  62. 2020Hinn and hinn: Early Icelandic as the clue to the history and etymology of two Old Scandinavian words. Nordic Journal of Linguistics431. 205–228. 10.1017/S0332586520000086
    https://doi.org/10.1017/S0332586520000086 [Google Scholar]
  63. Syrett, M.
    2002 Morphological developments from Ancient Nordic to Old Nordic. InO. Bandle, K. Braunmüller, E. H. Jahr, A. Karker, H. Naumann, & U. Teleman (eds.), The Nordic languages: An international handbook of the history of the North Germanic languages, vol. 11, 719–729. Berlin: De Gruyter.
    [Google Scholar]
  64. Tamm, D. & H. Vogt
    (eds.) 2016The Danish medieval laws: The laws of Scania, Zealand, and Jutland. London: Routledge. 10.4324/9781315646374
    https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315646374 [Google Scholar]
  65. Traugott, E.
    1980 Meaning-change in the development of grammatical markers. Language Sciences2(1). 44–61. 10.1016/S0388‑0001(80)80004‑0
    https://doi.org/10.1016/S0388-0001(80)80004-0 [Google Scholar]
  66. Vrieland, S. D.
    2011 Old Gutnish historical phonology and the Old Norse context. Master’s Thesis, University of Leiden.
    [Google Scholar]
  67. Wagener, T.
    2017The history of Nordic relative clauses. Berlin: De Gruyter. 10.1515/9783110496536
    https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110496536 [Google Scholar]
  68. Wright, J.
    1910Grammar of the Gothic language. Oxford: Clarendon.
    [Google Scholar]
http://instance.metastore.ingenta.com/content/journals/10.1075/nowele.00067.san
Loading
/content/journals/10.1075/nowele.00067.san
Loading

Data & Media loading...

  • Article Type: Research Article
This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was successful
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error