1887
  1. Home
  2. e-Journals
  3. NOWELE. North-Western European Language Evolution
  4. Volume 76, Issue 2
  5. Article
Volume 76, Issue 2
  • ISSN 0108-8416
  • E-ISSN: 2212-9715
USD
Buy:$35.00 + Taxes

Abstract

Abstract

This contribution supports and extends the principle of end-weight, first formulated by Quirk et al. (1972) to describe the tendency of heavy constituents to appear late in a sentence. Developing this principle further, we argue that it favours the addition of (functionally non-neutral) morphological markers to sentence-final constituents, which are typically characterized by prosodic prominence. The markers we study are undergoing diachronic establishment or loss and are thus temporarily variable. They represent rather diverse categories in different West Germanic languages and varieties (English, Northern Low German, Frisian) and have been gathered from different periods. Examples include inflectional endings of nouns, adjectives, finite verbs and infinitives, pro-form uses of possessives and the adjective , prepositional choices, the -prefix and periphrastic ‘do’. We suggest that end-weight is scalar, with absolute sentence-final position producing the strongest effects.

© 2023 John Benjamins Publishing Company
Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1075/nowele.00078.sch
2023-12-12
2024-10-14

  • From This Site

    /content/journals/10.1075/nowele.00078.sch
    dcterms_title,dcterms_subject,pub_keyword
    -contentType:Journal -contentType:Contributor -contentType:Concept -contentType:Institution
    10
    5
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. BNC. The British National Corpus
    BNC. The British National Corpus 1995 Version 1.0. BNC Consortium/Oxford University Computing Services.
     [Google Scholar]
  2. ECF. Eighteenth-century fiction
    ECF. Eighteenth-century fiction 1996 Electronic Book Technologies Inc./Chadwyck-Healey. Cambridge. [10,300,000 words]
     [Google Scholar]
  3. EEPF. Early English prose fiction
    EEPF. Early English prose fiction 1997 Electronic Book Technologies Inc./Chadwyck-Healey. Cambridge. Inassociation with the Salzburg Centre for Research on the English Novel SCREEN. [9,900,000 words]
     [Google Scholar]
  4. EPD. English prose drama
    EPD. English prose drama 1996/1997 Electronic Book Technologies Inc./Chadwyck-Healey. Cambridge. [27,000,000 words]
     [Google Scholar]
  5. Fort, M. C.
    1980 Saterfriesisches Wörterbuch: Mit einer grammatischen Übersicht. Hamburg: Buske.
     [Google Scholar]
  6. 1985 Saterfriesisches Volksleben. Rhauderfehn: Ostendorp.
     [Google Scholar]
  7. 2015 Saterfriesisches Wörterbuch: Mit einer phonologischen und grammatischen Übersicht. Hamburg: Buske.
     [Google Scholar]
  8. HC. The Helsinki corpus of English texts
    HC. The Helsinki corpus of English texts 1991 Compiled byM. Kytö, M. Rissanen, M. Kilpiö, L. Kahlas-Tarkka, S. Nevanlinna, I. Taavitsainen, T. Nevalainen, and H. Raumolin-Brunberg. Helsinki: Department of English, University of Helsinki.
  9. Holsten, Ch. (Holschen, K.
    ) 1962 De gesunne Karkenslaap un annere Smüüstergeschichten. Bremen: Klammer & Bergfried.
     [Google Scholar]
  10. ) 1963 Mit den groten Brummvagel in Unkel Sam sien Land. Bremen: Klammer & Bergfried.
     [Google Scholar]
  11. ) 1970 Hochtietsgrusen: Plattdüütsche Geschichten to’n Smüüstern un Högen. 2nd edn.Leer: Schuster.
     [Google Scholar]
  12. ) 1970 Holschen snittjert. 4th edn.Leer: Schuster.
     [Google Scholar]
  13. Los Angeles Times
    Los Angeles Times 1992 On CD-ROM. Knight Ridder Information Inc.
     [Google Scholar]
  14. Los Angeles Times
    Los Angeles Times 1999 Courtesy of the Los Angeles Times Editorial Library.
     [Google Scholar]
  15. Mohr, W.
    1987 Lach mit mi: Vertellns un Riemels von Lüüd achtern Elwdiek. 3rd edn.Freiburg/Elbe: dbw-Verlags GmbH.
     [Google Scholar]
  16. NCF. Nineteenth-century fiction
    NCF. Nineteenth-century fiction 1999/2000 Electronic Book Technologies Inc./Chadwyck-Healey. Cambridge. [39,700,000 words]
  17. OED 2. The Oxford English Dictionary (2nd edn) on CD-ROM
    OED 2. The Oxford English Dictionary (2nd edn) on CD-ROM 1992 (Version 1.10). Edited byJ. A. Simpson and E. S. C. Weiner. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
  18. PPCME2. The Penn-Helsinki Parsed Corpus of Middle English, 2nd edn
    PPCME2. The Penn-Helsinki Parsed Corpus of Middle English, 2nd edn 2000 A. Kroch, A. Taylor & B. Santorini. Department of Linguistics, University of Pennsylvania. https://www.ling.upenn.edu/hist-corpora/
  19. The Guardian
    The Guardian 1994 Including The Observer on CD-ROM.
     [Google Scholar]
  20. The Times
    The Times 1997 Including The Sunday Times Compact Disc Edition.
     [Google Scholar]
  21. Allen, C.
    1980 Movement and deletion in Old English. Linguistic Inquiry111. 261–323.
     [Google Scholar]
  22. Behaghel, O.
    1909–10 Beziehungen zwischen Umfang und Reihenfolge von Satzgliedern. Indogermanistische Forschungen251. 110–142.
     [Google Scholar]
  23. Bock, H.
    1931 Studien zum präpositionalen Infinitiv und Akkusativ mit dem to-Infinitiv. Anglia551. 114–249.
     [Google Scholar]
  24. Bolinger, D.
    1971 The phrasal verb in English. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
     [Google Scholar]
  25. Bollmann, H.
    1942 Mundarten auf der Stader Geest. Oldenburg: Stalling.
     [Google Scholar]
  26. Borowsky, T. J.
    1986 Topics in the lexical phonology of English. Doctoral dissertation. University of Massachusetts Amherst.
  27. Bunning, H.
    1934/35 Studien zur Geschichte der Bremischen Mundart. Niederdeutsches Jahrbuch60/611. 63–147.
     [Google Scholar]
  28. Ciszek, E.
    2002 ME -lich(e)/-ly. Studia Anglica Posnaniensia381. 105–129.
     [Google Scholar]
  29. Cruttenden, A.
    (ed.) 2008 Gimson’s pronunciation of English. 7th edn.London: Hodder.
     [Google Scholar]
  30. Denison, D.
    1993 English historical syntax: Verbal constructions. London: Longman.
     [Google Scholar]
  31. Eitelmann, M.
    2016 Support for end-weight as a determinant of linguistic variation and change. English Language and Linguistics20(3). 395–420. 10.1017/S1360674316000356
     https://doi.org/10.1017/S1360674316000356 [Google Scholar]
  32. Fisiak, J.
    1968 A short grammar of Middle English. Part I: Graphemics, phonemics and morphemics. Warszawa: PWN – Polish Scientific Publishers/London: Oxford University Press.
     [Google Scholar]
  33. Fleischer, J.
    2002 Preposition stranding in German dialects. InS. Barbiers, L. Cornips & S. van der Kleij (eds.), Syntactic microvariation: Online proceedings – Workshop on syntactic microvariation, 30–31 August 2000, 116–151. Meertens Instituut, Amsterdam.
     [Google Scholar]
  34. Görlach, M.
    1991 Introduction to Early Modern English. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/CBO9781139166010
     https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139166010 [Google Scholar]
  35. Greenberg, J. H.
    1966 Some universals of grammar with particular reference to the order of meaningful elements. InJ. H. Greenberg (ed.), Universals of Language. 2nd edn, 73–113. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
     [Google Scholar]
  36. Hawkins, J. A.
    2007 Processing typology and why psychologists need to know about it. New Ideas in Psychology25(2). 87–107. 10.1016/j.newideapsych.2007.02.003
     https://doi.org/10.1016/j.newideapsych.2007.02.003 [Google Scholar]
  37. Hirotani, M., L. Frazier & K. Rayner
    2006 Punctuation and intonation effects on clause and sentence wrap-up: Evidence from eye movements. Journal of Memory and Language54(3). 425–443. 10.1016/j.jml.2005.12.001
     https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jml.2005.12.001 [Google Scholar]
  38. Keseling, G.
    1968 Periphrastische Verbformen im Niederdeutschen. Niederdeutsches Jahrbuch811. 139–152.
     [Google Scholar]
  39. 1970 Erwägungen zu einer überregionalen Syntax der niederdeutschen Mundarten. InD. Hofmann & W. Sanders (eds.), Gedenkschrift für William Foerste, 354–365. Köln/Wien: Böhlau.
     [Google Scholar]
  40. Lass, R.
    1992 Phonology and morphology. InN. Blake (ed.), The Cambridge history of the English language. Volume II: 1066–1476, 23–155. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/CHOL9780521264754.003
     https://doi.org/10.1017/CHOL9780521264754.003 [Google Scholar]
  41. Leech, G.
    1983 Principles of pragmatics. London: Longman.
     [Google Scholar]
  42. 2006 A glossary of English grammar. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press. 10.1515/9780748626915
     https://doi.org/10.1515/9780748626915 [Google Scholar]
  43. 2014 Growth and decline: How grammar has been changing in recent English. InN. Lavidas, Th. Alexiou & A. M. Sougari (eds.), Major trends in theoretical and applied linguistics 1: Selected papers from the 20th ISTAL, 47–65. London: Versita. 10.2478/9788376560762.p12
     https://doi.org/10.2478/9788376560762.p12 [Google Scholar]
  44. Leech, G. & N. Smith
    2009 Change and constancy in linguistic change: How grammatical usage in written English evolved in the period 1931–1991. InA. Renouf & A. Kehoe (eds.), Corpus linguistics: Refinements and reassessments, 173–200. Amsterdam: Rodopi. 10.1163/9789042025981_011
     https://doi.org/10.1163/9789042025981_011 [Google Scholar]
  45. Lindquist, H.
    2000 Livelier or more lively? Syntactic and contextual factors influencing the comparison of disyllabic adjectives. InJ. M. Kirk (ed.), Corpora galore: Analyses and techniques in describing English: Papers from the 19th International conference on English language research on computerized corpora (ICAME 1998), 125–132. Amsterdam: Rodopi. 10.1163/9789004485211_012
     https://doi.org/10.1163/9789004485211_012 [Google Scholar]
  46. Minkova, D.
    1991 The history of final vowels in English: The sound of muting (TiEL 4). Berlin: De Gruyter. 10.1515/9783110889512
     https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110889512 [Google Scholar]
  47. Mondorf, B.
    2009 More support for more-support. Amsterdam: Benjamins. 10.1075/silv.4
     https://doi.org/10.1075/silv.4 [Google Scholar]
  48. Mustanoja, T. F.
    1960 A Middle English syntax. Part I. Parts of speech. Helsinki: Société Néophilologique.
     [Google Scholar]
  49. Nespor, M. & I. Vogel
    1986 Prosodic phonology. Berlin: De Gruyter.
     [Google Scholar]
  50. 2007 Prosodic phonology: With a new foreword. 2nd edn. [1st edn 1986.] Berlin: De Gruyter. 10.1515/9783110977790
     https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110977790 [Google Scholar]
  51. OED Online
    OED Online. Oxford University Press. https://www.oed.com
  52. Quirk, R., S. Greenbaum, G. Leech & J. Svartvik
    1972 A grammar of contemporary English. London: Longman.
     [Google Scholar]
  53. 1985 A comprehensive grammar of the English language. London: Longman.
     [Google Scholar]
  54. Rohdenburg, G.
    1986 Phonologisch und morphologisch bedingte Variation in der Verbalsyntax des Nordniederdeutschen. Niederdeutsches Jahrbuch1091. 86–117.
     [Google Scholar]
  55. 1989a Zur Verdrängung des Nominativs durch den Obliquus im Nordniederdeutschen unter besonderer Berücksichtigung prosodischer Faktoren. Kopenhagener Beiträge zur Germanistischen Linguistik251. 83–143.
     [Google Scholar]
  56. 1989b Prosodische Einflüsse in der Morphologie: Zur Variation von Kurz- und Langformen bei Feminina im Nordniedersächsischen. InN. Reiter (ed.), Akten des 23. Linguistischen Kolloquiums, Berlin 1988, 59–71. Tübingen: Niemeyer.
     [Google Scholar]
  57. 2002 Die Umschreibung finiter Verbformen mit doon ,tun‘ und die Frikativierung stammauslautender Plosive in nordniederdeutschen Mundarten. NOWELE401. 85–104. 10.1075/nowele.40.04roh
     https://doi.org/10.1075/nowele.40.04roh [Google Scholar]
  58. 2004 Grammatische Parallelen zwischen niederdeutschen Mundarten und Nichtstandardvarietäten im Englischen aus typologischer Sicht. Niederdeutsches Jahrbuch1271. 85–122.
     [Google Scholar]
  59. 2020 The complexity principle at work with rival prepositions. English Language and Linguistics241. 769–800. 10.1017/S1360674319000327
     https://doi.org/10.1017/S1360674319000327 [Google Scholar]
  60. Saltveit, L.
    1979 Der prädikative Akkusativ im Niederdeutschen. InW. Kramer, U. Scheuermann & D. Stellmacher (eds.), Gedenkschrift für Heinrich Wesche, 219–225. Neumünster: Wachholz.
     [Google Scholar]
  61. Sanders, H.
    1915 Der syntaktische Gebrauch des Infinitivs im Frühmittelenglischen. Heidelberg: Winter.
     [Google Scholar]
  62. Schlüter, J.
    2005 Rhythmic grammar: The influence of rhythm on grammatical variation and change in English. Berlin: De Gruyter. 10.1515/9783110219265
     https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110219265 [Google Scholar]
  63. 2009 Weak segments and syllable structure in Middle English. InD. Minkova (ed.), Phonological weakness in English: From Old to Present-Day English, 199–236. New York: Palgrave Macmillan. 10.1007/978‑0‑230‑29686‑2_10
     https://doi.org/10.1007/978-0-230-29686-2_10 [Google Scholar]
  64. 2015 Rhythmic influence on grammar: Scope and limitations. InR. Vogel & R. van de Vijver (eds.), Rhythm in cognition and grammar: A Germanic perspective, 179–205. Berlin: De Gruyter. 10.1515/9783110378092.179
     https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110378092.179 [Google Scholar]
  65. Schlüter, J. & G. Rohdenburg
    2017 Prosodic salience as a determinant of morphological marking. Paper presented atICAME 38, University of Prague, 24–28 May 2017.
     [Google Scholar]
  66. Selkirk, E. O.
    1984 Phonology and syntax: The relation between sound and structure. Cambridge, MA/London, UK: MIT Press.
     [Google Scholar]
  67. Seppänen, A.
    1997 The genitive and the category of case in the history of English. InR. Hickey & S. Puppel (eds.), Language history and linguistic modelling: A festschrift for Jacek Fisiak on his 60th birthday. Volume I: Language history, 193–214. Berlin: De Gruyter. 10.1515/9783110820751.193
     https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110820751.193 [Google Scholar]
  68. Slofstra, B. & E. Hoekstra
    2022 Sprachlehre des Saterfriesischen. Leeuwarden: Fryske Akademy. https://www.seeltersk.de/archiv/sprachlehre-des-saterfriesischen-2022/
     [Google Scholar]
  69. Tamminga, D. A.
    1963 Op’e taelhelling: Losse trochsneden fan Frysk taellibben. Bolsward (Boalsert): Osinga.
     [Google Scholar]
  70. Trudgill, P.
    1978 Introduction: Sociolinguistics and sociolinguistics. InTrudgill, P. (ed.), Sociolinguistic patterns in British English, 1–18. London: Arnold.
     [Google Scholar]
  71. Vennemann, Th.
    1974 Topics, subjects and word order: From SXV to SVX via TVX. InJ. M. Anderson, & Ch. Jones (eds.), Historical linguistics. VolumeI1, 339–376. Amsterdam: North Holland.
     [Google Scholar]
  72. 1976 Categorial grammar and the order of meaningful elements. InA. Juilland (ed.), Linguistic studies offered to Joseph Greenberg on the occasion of his sixtieth birthday, 615–634. Saratoga, CA: Anma Libri.
     [Google Scholar]
  73. 1977 Konstituenz und Dependenz in einigen neueren Grammatiktheorien. Sprachwissenschaft21. 259–301.
     [Google Scholar]
  74. Versloot, A.
    Forthcoming. Old English gerund in -enne or -anne: A case of chronology inversion?NOWELE77(1).
     [Google Scholar]
  75. Visser, F. Th.
    1973 An historical syntax of the English language. Part three, second half: Syntactical units with two and with more verbs. Leiden: Brill.
     [Google Scholar]
  76. Wasow, Th.
    1997a End-weight from the speaker’s perspective. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research26(3). 347–361. 10.1023/A:1025080709112
     https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1025080709112 [Google Scholar]
  77. 1997b Remarks on grammatical weight. Language Variation and Change9(1). 81–105. 10.1017/S0954394500001800
     https://doi.org/10.1017/S0954394500001800 [Google Scholar]
  78. Weber, Th.
    2017 Die TUN-Periphrase im Niederdeutschen: Funktionale und formale Aspekte. Tübingen: Stauffenburg.
     [Google Scholar]
  79. Wells, J. C.
    1990 Syllabification and allophony. InS. Ramsaran (ed.), Studies in the pronunciation of English: A commemorative volume in honour of A. C. Gimson, 76–86. London: Routledge.
     [Google Scholar]
  80. Wolfram, W.
    1976 Toward a description of a-prefixing in Appalachian English. American Speech511. 45–56. 10.2307/455354
     https://doi.org/10.2307/455354 [Google Scholar]
  81. 1980 A-prefixing in Appalachian English. InW. Labov (ed.), Locating language in time and space, 107–142. New York: Academic Press.
     [Google Scholar]
/content/journals/10.1075/nowele.00078.sch
Loading
End-weight at its most dynamic
NOWELE. North-Western European Language Evolution 76, 153 (2023); https://doi.org/10.1075/nowele.00078.sch
/content/journals/10.1075/nowele.00078.sch
/content/journals/10.1075/nowele.00078.sch
Loading

Data & Media loading...

  • Article Type: Research Article

Most Cited

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was successful
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error