1887
  1. Home
  2. e-Journals
  3. NOWELE. North-Western European Language Evolution
  4. Volume 76, Issue 2
  5. Article
Volume 76, Issue 2
  • ISSN 0108-8416
  • E-ISSN: 2212-9715
USD
Buy:$35.00 + Taxes

Abstract

Abstract

In 2021–2023, several rune-inscribed sandstone fragments were discovered by archaeologists of the Museum of Cultural History, University of Oslo, at a Roman Iron Age grave field by the Svingerud road at Hole in eastern Norway. Several of these fragments fit together as parts of one larger sandstone slab. The main fragment with multiple inscriptions was unearthed in a flat grave (cremation) in November 2021. Radiocarbon dating of the organic material dated the burial to before 300 CE (Solheim et al., forthcoming). This article provides a detailed runological and linguistic account of the inscribed fragments, as of July 2023. The focus is on the main finds, while the work on numerous small fragments is ongoing. This find may shed new light on the features and functions of early runic writing.

© 2023 John Benjamins Publishing Company
Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1075/nowele.00080.zil
2023-12-12
2024-10-08

  • From This Site

    /content/journals/10.1075/nowele.00080.zil
    dcterms_title,dcterms_subject,pub_keyword
    -contentType:Journal -contentType:Contributor -contentType:Concept -contentType:Institution
    10
    5
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. Antonsen, E. H.
    1980 On the typology of the older runic inscriptions. Scandinavian Studies52(1). 1–15. www.jstor.org/stable/40917948 (Accessed27 August 2023)
     [Google Scholar]
  2. 1998 On runological and linguistic evidence for dating runic inscriptions. InK. Düwel (ed.), Runeninschriften als Quellen interdisziplinärer Forschung: Abhandlungen des Vierten Internationalen Symposiums über Runen und Runeninschriften in Göttingen vom 4.-9. August 1995 (ERGA 15), 150–159. Berlin: De Gruyter. 10.1515/9783110821901.150
     https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110821901.150 [Google Scholar]
  3. 2002 Runes and Germanic linguistics (Trends in Linguistics: Studies and Monographs 140). Berlin: De Gruyter. 10.1515/9783110885521
     https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110885521 [Google Scholar]
  4. Axboe, M., U. Clavadetscher, K. Düwel, K. Hauck & L. von Padberg
    1985–89 Die Goldbrakteaten der Völkerwanderungszeit 1–3. Ikonographischer Katalog (Münstersche Mittelalter-Schriften 24.1.1–24.3.2). München: Fink Verlag.
     [Google Scholar]
  5. Bandle, O., L. Elmevik & G. Widmark
    (eds.) 2002 The Nordic languages: An international handbook of the history of the North Germanic languages11 (HSK 22). Berlin: De Gruyter.
     [Google Scholar]
  6. Barnes, M. P.
    2012 Runes: A handbook. Woodbridge: Boydell.
     [Google Scholar]
  7. 2013 What is runology, and where does it stand today?Futhark: International Journal of Runic Studies41. 7–30. https://uu.diva-portal.org/smash/get/diva2:682688/FULLTEXT01.pdf (Accessed1 September 2023)
     [Google Scholar]
  8. Bianchi, M.
    2012 Att vara eller att icke vara text: runtextens gränser. Språk och stil22(1). 31–52.
     [Google Scholar]
  9. Bjorvand, H. & F. O. Lindeman
    2019 Våre arveord: Etymologisk ordbok. 3rd edn.Oslo: Novus forlag.
     [Google Scholar]
  10. Bugge, Sophus
    1892 Runestenen fra Opedal i Hardanger. Arkiv för nordisk filologi81. 1–36.
     [Google Scholar]
  11. DK = Danske Runeindskrifter
    DK = Danske Runeindskrifter. National Museum of Denmark and University of Copenhagen. runer.ku.dk/ (Accessed27 August 2023)
  12. DR = Jacobsen, L. & E. Moltke
    1941–42.
  13. Düwel, K.
    1989 Runenritzende Frauen. InL. Peterson & S. Strandberg (eds.), Studia onomastica. Festskrift till Thorsten Andersson den 23. februari 1989, 43–50. Stockholm: Almqvist & Wiksell.
     [Google Scholar]
  14. 1994 Runische und lateinische Epigraphik im süddeutschen Raum zur Merowingerzeit. InK. Düwel (ed.), Runische Schriftkultur in kontinental-skandinavischer und -angelsächsischer Wechselbeziehung. Internationales Symposium in der Werner-Reimers-Stiftung vom 24.–27. Juni 1992 in Bad Homburg (ERGA 10), 229–308. Berlin: De Gruyter. 10.1515/9783110877366.229
     https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110877366.229 [Google Scholar]
  15. 2002 Runenkundige Frauen im Frühmittelalter. InI. Bennewitz (ed.), Lektüren der Differenz. Studien zur Mediävistik und Geschlechtergeschichte gewidmet Ingvild Birkhan, 23–35. Bern: Peter Lang.
     [Google Scholar]
  16. 2007 Die Fibel von Meldorf. 25 Jahre Diskussion und kein Ende – zugleich ein Beitrag zur Interpretationsproblematik und Forschungsgeschichte. InS. Burmeister (ed.), Zweiundvierzig. Festschrift für Michael Gebühr zum 65. Geburtstag, 167–174. Rahden: Leidorf.
     [Google Scholar]
  17. 2008 Runenkunde. 4th edn. (Sammlung Metzler 72). Stuttgart: Metzler. 10.1007/978‑3‑476‑01419‑1
     https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-476-01419-1 [Google Scholar]
  18. Düwel, K. & W. Heizmann
    2006 Das ältere Fuþark – Überlieferung und Wirkungsmöglichkeiten der Runenreihe. InA. Bammesberger & G. Waxenberger (eds.), DasFuþark und seine einzelsprachlichen Weiterentwicklungen. Akten der Tagung in Eichstätt vom20.–24. Juli 2003. (ERGA 51), 3–60. Berlin: De Gruyter. 10.1515/9783110922981.3
     https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110922981.3 [Google Scholar]
  19. Düwel, K., R. Nedoma & S. Oehrl
    2020 Die südgermanischen Runeninschriften (ERGA 119). Berlin: De Gruyter. 10.1515/9783110533187
     https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110533187 [Google Scholar]
  20. Ebel, Else
    1963 Die Terminologie der Runentechnik. Phil. Dissertation. Universität Göttingen.
  21. Eythórsson, T.
    2011 (publ. 2012) Variation in the syntax of the older runic inscriptions. Futhark: International Journal of Runic Studies21. 27–49. https://www.diva-portal.org/smash/get/diva2:512976/FULLTEXT01.pdf (Accessed23 August 2023)
     [Google Scholar]
  22. Faarlund, J.
    2008 Ancient Nordic. InR. Woodard (ed.), The ancient languages of Europe, 215–229. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/CBO9780511486814.013
     https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511486814.013 [Google Scholar]
  23. Faulkes, A.
    (ed.) 1998 Snorri Sturluson: Edda. Skáldskaparmál 1. Introduction, text and notes. London: Viking Society for Northern Research.
     [Google Scholar]
  24. G = Jansson
    1962–78 & Gustavson (unpublished).
  25. Graf, M. H.
    2010 Paraschriftliche Zeichen in südgermanischen Runeninschriften. Studien zur Schriftkultur des kontinentalgermanischen Runenhorizonts (Medienwandel – Medienwechsel – Medienwissen, Historische Perspektiven 12). Zürich: Chronos Verlag.
     [Google Scholar]
  26. 2011 Schrift, Sprache und was dazwischen liegt. Zur Materialität epigraphischer Schriftlichkeit der ältesten Runeninschriften. InM. Schulte & R. Nedoma (eds.), Language and literacy in early Scandinavia and beyond (NOWELE 62–63), 213–247. Odense: University Press of Southern Denmark.
     [Google Scholar]
  27. 2011 (publ. 2012) Schrifttheoretische Überlegungen zu nicht-lexikalischen Inschriften aus dem südgermanischen Runenkorpus. Futhark: International Journal of Runic Studies, 103–122. https://urn.kb.se/resolve?urn=urn:nbn:se:uu:diva-171056 (Accessed22 August 2023)
     [Google Scholar]
  28. Grønvik, O.
    1987 Fra Ågedal til Setre. Oslo: Universitetsforlaget.
     [Google Scholar]
  29. 1996 Fra Vimose til Ødemotland. Nye studier over runeinnskrifter fra førkristen tid i Norden. Oslo: Universitetsforlaget.
     [Google Scholar]
  30. Gustafson, Lil
    2016 Møter på Veien – kultplass gjennom 1500 år. Et maktsenter på Ringerike i eldre jernalder. Oslo: University of Oslo, Museum of Cultural History. https://press.nordicopenaccess.no/index.php/noasp/catalog/book/59 (Accessed22 August 2023) 10.23865/noasp.59
     https://doi.org/10.23865/noasp.59 [Google Scholar]
  31. Gustavson, H.
    1997 (publ. 1998) Verksamheten vid Runverket i Stockholm. Nyfynd och nyregistreringar 1996. Nytt om runer121. 24–31.
     [Google Scholar]
  32. 2002 (publ. 2004) Verksamheten vid Runverket i Stockholm. Nyfynd och nyregistreringar 2001. Nytt om runer121. 24–39.
     [Google Scholar]
  33. Gustavson, H., J. Hamilton & L. Kitzler Åhfeldt
    2006 Fragmenten från Tomteboda. Runstenar med bildframställning eller bildstenar med runinskrift. Fornvännen1011. 254–67.
     [Google Scholar]
  34. Gustavson, H. & J. O. H. Swantesson
    2011 Strängnäs, Skramle och Tomteboda: tre urnordiska runinskrifter. Fornvännen1061. 306–321.
     [Google Scholar]
  35. Gustavson, H., T. Snædal & M. Källström
    . Gotlands runinskrifter31. Manuscript available at: https://www.raa.se/kulturarv/runor-och-runstenar/digitala-sveriges-runinskrifter/gotlands-runinskrifter-3/ (Accessed1 September 2023)
     [Google Scholar]
  36. Harris, J.
    2012 Older Germanic poetry, with a note on the Icelandic sagas. InK. Reichl (ed.), Medieval oral literature, 253–78. Berlin: De Gruyter.
     [Google Scholar]
  37. Heide, E.
    2019 Er det så sikkert at alle er namn? Ein merknad om metode og personnamn i urnordiske runeinnskrifter. Namn og Nemne351. 41–54.
     [Google Scholar]
  38. Høst, G.
    1976 Runer. Våre eldste norske runeinnskrifter. Oslo: Aschehoug.
     [Google Scholar]
  39. IK = Ikonographischer Katalog. Axboe
    1985–89.
  40. Imer, L. M.
    2010 Runes and Romans in the North. Futhark: International Journal of Runic Studies11. 41–64. https://urn.kb.se/resolve?urn=urn:nbn:se:uu:diva-136959 (Accessed23 August 2023)
     [Google Scholar]
  41. 2011a Maturus fecit – Unwod made: runic inscriptions on fibulae in the late Roman Iron Age. Lund Archaeological Review 2011 11–27.
     [Google Scholar]
  42. 2011b The oldest runic monuments in the North: dating and distribution. NOWELE62–631. 169–212. 10.1075/nowele.62‑63.04ime
     https://doi.org/10.1075/nowele.62-63.04ime [Google Scholar]
  43. 2015a Jernalderens runeindskrifter i Norden. 1: Kronologi og kontekst. (Aarbøger for nordisk Oldkyndighed og Historie 2013–14). Copenhagen: Det Kongelige Nordiske Oldskriftselskab.
     [Google Scholar]
  44. 2015b Jernalderens runeindskrifter i Norden. 2: Katalog (Aarbøger for nordisk Oldkyndighed og Historie 2013–14). Copenhagen: Det Kongelige Nordiske Oldskriftselskab.
     [Google Scholar]
  45. Imer, L. M. & S. Sindbæk
    2021 Nye funn av runer i Ribe. Danske Studier 2021 5–20.
     [Google Scholar]
  46. Imer, L. M. & K. S. K. Vasshus
    2023 Lost in transition. The runic bracteates from the Vindelev hoard. NOWELE76(1). 60–99. 10.1075/nowele.00074.ime
     https://doi.org/10.1075/nowele.00074.ime [Google Scholar]
  47. Iversen, F., K. Kjesrud, H. Bjorvand, J. Kimball & S. Mannsåker Gundersen
    2019 Irilen på Øverby i Vingulmark. Viking821. 63–98. 10.5617/viking.7116
     https://doi.org/10.5617/viking.7116 [Google Scholar]
  48. Jacobsen, L. & E. Moltke
    1941–42 Danmarks Runeindskrifter 1–3: Text. Atlas. Registre. Copenhagen: Munkgaard.
     [Google Scholar]
  49. Jansson, S. B. F., E. Wessén & E. Svärdström
    1962–78 Gotlands runinskrifter 1–2 (Sveriges Runinskrifter 11–12). Stockholm: Almqvist & Wiksell.
     [Google Scholar]
  50. Kaiser, L.
    2021 Runes across the North Sea from the Migration period and beyond (ERGA 126). Berlin: de Gruyter. 10.1515/9783110728224
     https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110728224 [Google Scholar]
  51. Kitzler Åhfeldt, L.
    2020 Provenancing rune carvers on Bornholm through 3D-scanning and multivariate statistics of the carving technique. European Journal of Archaeology23/11. 82–104. 10.1017/eaa.2019.37
     https://doi.org/10.1017/eaa.2019.37 [Google Scholar]
  52. KJ = Krause, W. & H. Jankuhn
    1966.
  53. Knirk, J. E.
    2000 Kårstad. §3. Runologisches. InH. Beck, D. Geuenich & H. Steuer (eds.), Reallexikon der germanischen Altertumskunde161, 324. Berlin: De Gruyter.
     [Google Scholar]
  54. 2002 Myklebostad. §2. Runologisches. InH. Beck, D. Geuenich & H. Steuer (eds.), Reallexikon der germanischen Altertumskunde201, 453–54. Berlin: De Gruyter.
     [Google Scholar]
  55. 2011 Hogganvik-innskriften: en hard runologisk nøtt. Viking741. 25–39.
     [Google Scholar]
  56. Krause, W. & H. Jankuhn
    1966 Die Runeninschriften im älteren Futhark 1–2. (Abhandlungen der Akademie der Wissenschaften in Göttingen, Philol.-Hist. Klasse, 3/65). Göttingen: Vandenhoeck & Ruprecht.
     [Google Scholar]
  57. Kroonen, G.
    2013 Etymological dictionary of Proto-Germanic. Leiden: Brill.
     [Google Scholar]
  58. Kruken, K. & O. Stemshaug
    2013 Norsk personnamnleksikon. 3rd edn.Oslo: Det norske samlaget.
     [Google Scholar]
  59. Krusch, B.
    (ed.) 1888 Virtutum sanctae Geretrudis continuatio (MGH SS rer. Merov. 2). 471–74. Hannover: Hahn.
     [Google Scholar]
  60. (ed.) 1902 Vita virtutesque Fursei abbatis Latiniacensis et de Fuilano additamentum Nivialense, inPassiones vitaeque sanctorum aevi merovingici (MGH SS rer. Merov. 4), 423–440. Hannover: Hahn.
     [Google Scholar]
  61. Looijenga, T.
    2003 Texts and contexts of the oldest runic inscriptions (The Northern World Series 4). Leiden: Brill. 10.1163/9789047401285
     https://doi.org/10.1163/9789047401285 [Google Scholar]
  62. LP = The Lexicon Poeticum Project
    LP = The Lexicon Poeticum Project, https://lexiconpoeticum.org/m.php?p=lp
  63. MacLeod, M. & B. Mees
    2006 Runic amulets and magic objects. Woodbridge: Boydell.
     [Google Scholar]
  64. Mandt, G.
    2005 Kårstad i Stryn – møteplass for ulike kulttradisjoner i eldre jernalder?In: K. A. Bergsvik & A. Engevik (eds.), Fra funn til samfunn. Jernalderstudier tilegnet Bergljot Solberg på 70-årsdagen (UBAS Nordisk 1), 51–67. Bergen: University of Bergen.
     [Google Scholar]
  65. Mees, B.
    2006 Runes in the first century. InM. Stoklund, M. Lerche Nielsen, B. Holmberg & G. Fellows-Jensen (eds.), Runes and their secrets: studies in runology, 201–231. Copenhagen: Museum Tusculanum Press.
     [Google Scholar]
  66. 2008 Style, manner and formula in early Germanic epigraphy. NOWELE54–551. 63–97. 10.1075/nowele.54‑55.02mee
     https://doi.org/10.1075/nowele.54-55.02mee [Google Scholar]
  67. 2013 ‘Giving’ and ‘making’ in early runic epigraphy. Transactions of the Philological Society1111. 326–53. 10.1111/j.1467‑968X.2012.01321.x
     https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-968X.2012.01321.x [Google Scholar]
  68. 2016 (publ. 2017) The Hogganvik inscription and early Nordic memorialisation. Futhark: International Journal of Runic Studies71. 7–28. https://urn.kb.se/resolve?urn=urn:nbn:se:uu:diva-316585 (Accessed23 August 2023)
     [Google Scholar]
  69. N = Olsen, M.
    1941–90.
  70. Nedoma, R.
    2004 Personennamen in südgermanischen Runeninschriften (Studien zur altgermanischen Namenkunde 1). Heidelberg: Universitätsverlag Winter.
     [Google Scholar]
  71. 2010 Schrift und Sprache in den ostgermanischen Runeninschriften. NOWELE58–591. 1–70. 10.1075/nowele.58‑59.01ned
     https://doi.org/10.1075/nowele.58-59.01ned [Google Scholar]
  72. 2017 The documentation of Germanic. InJ. Klein, B. Joseph & M. Fritz (eds.), Handbook of comparative and historical Indo-European linguistics: an international handbook21 (HSK 41/2), 875–88. Berlin: De Gruyter. 10.1515/9783110523874‑008
     https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110523874-008 [Google Scholar]
  73. 2022 Zur Runeninschrift auf dem Goldhorn B von Gallehus. Beiträge zur Geschichte der deutschen Sprache und Literatur144 (2). 188–213. 10.1515/bgsl‑2022‑0014
     https://doi.org/10.1515/bgsl-2022-0014 [Google Scholar]
  74. Odenstedt, B.
    1990 On the origin and early history of the runic script (Acta Academiae Regiae Gustavi Adolphi 59). Uppsala: Gustav Adolfs Akademien.
     [Google Scholar]
  75. Oehrl, S.
    2006/2007 (publ. 2011). Runen, runenähnliche Zeichen und Tierdarstellungen auf Waffen. Offa63–641. 63–78.
     [Google Scholar]
  76. 2020 Paraschriftliche Zeichen(komplexe) im Kontext südgermanischer Runenüberlieferung. InK. Düwel, R. Nedoma & S. Oehrl (eds.), Die südgermanischen Runeninschriften (ERGA 119), cxlvii–clxxvii. Berlin: De Gruyter.
     [Google Scholar]
  77. Olsen, M., A. Liestøl, I. Sanness Johnsen & J. E. Knirk
    1941–90 Norges innskrifter med de yngre runer1–6. Oslo: Norsk historisk Kjeldeskriftinstitutt.
     [Google Scholar]
  78. ONP = Dictionary of Old Norse Prose
    ONP = Dictionary of Old Norse Prose. Available at: https://onp.ku.dk/onp/onp.php (Accessed6 August 2023)
  79. Pereswetoff-Morath, Sofia
    2019 Viking-Age runic plates: readings and interpretations. (Runrön 21/1; Acta academiae regiae Gustavi Adolphi 155). Uppsala: Uppsala University.
     [Google Scholar]
  80. Peterson, L.
    1994 On the relationship between Proto-Scandinavian and continental Germanic personal names. InK. Düwel (ed.), Runische Schriftkultur in kontinental-skandinavischer und -angelsächsischer Wechselbeziehung. Internationales Symposium in der Werner-Reimers-Stiftung vom 24.–27. Juni 1992 inBad Homburg (ERGA 10), 128–175. Berlin: De Gruyter. 10.1515/9783110877366.128
     https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110877366.128 [Google Scholar]
  81. 2002 The development of Proto-Nordic personal names. InO. Bandle, L. Elmevik & G. Widmark (eds.), The Nordic languages: an international handbook of the history of the North Germanic languages11 (HSK 22), 664–671. Berlin: De Gruyter.
     [Google Scholar]
  82. 2004 Lexikon över urnordiska personnamn. Uppsala: Uppsala University. https://www.isof.se/download/18.7854edc917c1170935619ca3/1633884603245/urnordiska-personnamn.pdf (Accessed6 August 2023)
     [Google Scholar]
  83. RuneS = Database based at the Academy of Sciences, Göttingen
    RuneS = Database based at the Academy of Sciences, Göttingen. https://www.runesdb.eu/project/ (Accessed31 August 2023)
  84. Runor = Database based at the Swedish National Heritage Board
    Runor = Database based at the Swedish National Heritage Board. https://app.raa.se/open/runor/search (Accessed31 August 2023)
  85. Schulte, M.
    2001 Methodische Überlegungen zur lexikalischen Semantik des Urnordischen. InH. Vater & O. Letnes (eds.), Modalität und mehr. Modality and more (Fokus 23), 166–177. Trier: Wissenschaftlicher Verlag.
     [Google Scholar]
  86. 2002 The development of Proto-Nordic lexicon. InO. Bandle, L. Elmevik & G. Widmark (eds.), The Nordic languages: An international handbook of the history of the North Germanic languages11 (HSK 22), 657–664. Berlin: De Gruyter.
     [Google Scholar]
  87. 2009 Early runic ‘metrical’ inscriptions – how metrical are they?InT. K. Dewey & Frog (eds.), Versatility in versification: multidisciplinary approaches to metrics (Berkeley Insights in Linguistics and Semiotics 74), 3–22. New York: Peter Lang.
     [Google Scholar]
  88. 2013 The Norwegian Hogganvik stone as an emblem of social status and identity. InJournal of the North Atlantic 4 (Across the Sólundarhaf: connections between Scotland and the Nordic World. Selected papers from the inaugural St. Magnus conference 2011). 120–128. 10.3721/037.004.sp419
     https://doi.org/10.3721/037.004.sp419 [Google Scholar]
  89. 2018a Den eldste tiden (–700). InA. Nesse (ed.), Norsk språkhistorie 4. Tidslinjer, 51–117. Oslo: Novus.
     [Google Scholar]
  90. 2018b Urnordisch. Eine Einführung (Wiener Studien zur Skandinavistik 26). Wien: Praesens Verlag.
     [Google Scholar]
  91. Seebold, E.
    2011 Typologische Chronologie der älteren nordischen Runen. Mit besonderer Berücksichtigung der Brakteateninschriften und der Inschriften der Übergangszeit. NOWELE62–631. 91–168. 10.1075/nowele.62‑63.03see
     https://doi.org/10.1075/nowele.62-63.03see [Google Scholar]
  92. SG = Düwel, K., R. Nedoma & S. Oehrl
    2020.
  93. Simson, B.
    (ed.) 1905 Annales Mettenses Priores (Monumentis Germaniae Historicis. Scriptores Rerum Germanicarum 10). Hannover: Hahn.
     [Google Scholar]
  94. Sm NOR1997;24 = Gustavson, H.
    1997 (publ. 1998)
  95. Snædal, T.
    1993 Runfynd 1991 och 1992. Fornvännen881. 223–237.
     [Google Scholar]
  96. Solheim, S.
    (forthcoming). The oldest rune-stone in the world? Newly discovered rune-stone from Svingerud, Norway gives novel insight into early runic writing. [publication in preparation]
     [Google Scholar]
  97. Stoklund, M.
    1995 Die Runen der römischen Kaiserzeit. InU. Lund Hansen & V. Alexandersen (eds.), Himlingøje – Seeland – Europa. Nordiske Fortidsminder Serie131, 317–46. Copenhagen: Det Kongelige Nordiske Oldskriftselskab.
     [Google Scholar]
  98. Talbert, R. J. A.
    2017 Sundials and their place in the Roman Empire. InRoman portable sundials: The empire in your hand. New York: Oxford Academic, online edition. 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780190273484.003.0001
     https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780190273484.003.0001 [Google Scholar]
  99. U Fv1993;234 = Snædal, T.
    1993.
  100. U NOR2002;32 = Gustavson, H.
    2002 (publ. 2004).
  101. Waldispühl, M.
    2013 Schreibpraktiken und Schriftwissen in den südgermanischen Runeninschriften: zur Funktionalität epigraphischer Schriftverwendung. (Medienwandel–Medienwechsel–Medienwissen 26). Zürich: Chronos Verlag.
     [Google Scholar]
  102. Williams, H.
    1992 Which came first, e or E?Arkiv för nordisk filologi1071. 192–205.
     [Google Scholar]
  103. 1998 Runic inscriptions as sources for personal names. InK. Düwel (ed.), Runeninschriften als Quellen interdisziplinärer Forschung:Abhandlungen des Vierten Internationalen Symposiums über Runen und Runeninschriften in Göttingen vom 4.–9. August 1995 (ERGA 15), 601–10. Berlin: De Gruyter. 10.1515/9783110821901.601
     https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110821901.601 [Google Scholar]
  104. Winter, E.
    2013 Zeitzeichen: Zur Entwicklung und Verwendung antiker Zeitmesser1–2. Berlin: De Gruyter.
     [Google Scholar]
  105. Zilmer, Kristel
    2020 Runic sticks and other inscribed objects from medieval Bergen: challenges and possibilities. Maal og Minne112/11. 65–101. https://ojs.novus.no/index.php/MOM/article/view/1801 (Accessed6 August 2023)
     [Google Scholar]
  106. Zimmermann, C.
    2010 ‘How to do things with runes’: illocutionary forces and communicative purposes behind the runic inscriptions in the older fuþark. Futhark: International Journal of Runic Studies11. 85–107. https://urn.kb.se/resolve?urn=urn:nbn:se:uu:diva-136961 (Accessed31 August 2023)
     [Google Scholar]
  107. Zimmermann, C. & U. Zimmermann
    2022 Graphtypologische Beschreibung und Analyse runischer Graphe: fuþark – fuþorc – fuþąrk/fuþork. InE. Marold & C. Zimmermann (eds.). Studien zur runischen Graphematik: Methodische Ansätze und digitale Umsetzung (Runrön 25), 13–91. Uppsala: Uppsala University. 10.33063/diva‑462700
     https://doi.org/10.33063/diva-462700 [Google Scholar]
/content/journals/10.1075/nowele.00080.zil
Loading
Runic fragments from the Svingerud grave field in Norway
NOWELE. North-Western European Language Evolution 76, 233 (2023); https://doi.org/10.1075/nowele.00080.zil
/content/journals/10.1075/nowele.00080.zil
/content/journals/10.1075/nowele.00080.zil
Loading

Data & Media loading...

  • Article Type: Research Article

Most Cited

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was successful
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error