Contrastive feature hierarchies and Germanic phonology

References

1. Antonsen, E. H.
   1963 The Proto-Norse vowel system and the younger fuþark. Scandinavian Studies35(3). 195–207.
   [Google Scholar]
2. Antonsen, E. H.
   1967 ‘Proto-Scandinavian’ and Common Nordic. Scandinavian Studies391. 16–39.
   [Google Scholar]
3. Antonsen, E. H.
   1972 The Proto-Germanic syllabics (vowels). InF. van Coetsem & H. L. Kufner (eds.), Toward a grammar of Proto-Germanic, 117–140. Tübingen: Niemeyer. 10.1515/9783111549040.117
   https://doi.org/10.1515/9783111549040.117 [Google Scholar]
4. Barnes, M. P.
   2004 Spirant denotation by younger fuparkb. InA. van Nahl, L. Elmevik, & S. Brink (eds.), Namenwelten, 605–614. Berlin: De Gruyter. 10.1515/9783110911473.605
   https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110911473.605 [Google Scholar]
5. Barnes, M. P.
   2009 The origins of the younger fuþark: A review of recent and less recent research. NOWELE56/571. 123–142. 10.1075/nowele.56‑57.06bar
   https://doi.org/10.1075/nowele.56-57.06bar [Google Scholar]
6. Barnes, M. P.
   2012 Runes: A handbook. Woodbridge: Boydell.
   [Google Scholar]
7. Benediktsson, Hreinn
   1959 The vowel system of Icelandic: A survey of its history. Word15(2). 282–312. 10.1080/00437956.1959.11659700
   https://doi.org/10.1080/00437956.1959.11659700 [Google Scholar]
8. Benediktsson, H.
   1963 Some aspects of Nordic umlaut and breaking. Language39(3). 409–431. 10.2307/411124
   https://doi.org/10.2307/411124 [Google Scholar]
9. Benediktsson, H.
   1967 The Proto-Germanic vowel system. InTo honor Roman Jakobson: Essays on the occasion of his seventieth birthday, 11 October 1966, Vol.11, 174–196. The Hague and Paris: Mouton. 10.1515/9783111604763‑017
   https://doi.org/10.1515/9783111604763-017 [Google Scholar]
10. Benediktsson, H.
    (ed.) 1972 The First Grammatical Treatise. Reykjavik: University of Iceland, Institute of Nordic Linguistics.
    [Google Scholar]
11. Benediktsson, H.
    1974 The Common Nordic vowel system. Scandinavian Studies46(2). 89–101.
    [Google Scholar]
12. Birkmann, T.
    1995 Von Ågedal bis Malt. Die skandinavischen Runeninschriften vom Ende des 5. bis Ende des 9. Jahrhunderts. Berlin, New York: de Gruyter.
    [Google Scholar]
13. Boersma, P.
    1998 Functional phonology: Formalizing the interactions between articulatory and perceptual drives. The Hague: Holland Academic Graphics.
    [Google Scholar]
14. Cairns, C. E.
    1988 Phonotactics, markedness and lexical representation. Phonology5(2). 209–236. 10.1017/S095267570000227X
    https://doi.org/10.1017/S095267570000227X [Google Scholar]
15. Cherry, E. C., M. Halle, & R. Jakobson
    1953 Toward the logical description of languages in their phonemic aspect. Language29(1). 34–46. 10.2307/410451
    https://doi.org/10.2307/410451 [Google Scholar]
16. Chomsky, N. & M. Halle
    1968 The sound pattern of English. New York: Harper & Row.
    [Google Scholar]
17. Clements, G. N.
    2001 Representational economy in constraint-based phonology. InT. A. Hall (ed.), Distinctive feature theory, 71–146. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. 10.1515/9783110886672.71
    https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110886672.71 [Google Scholar]
18. Clements, G. N.
    2009 The role of features in phonological inventories. InE. Raimy & C. Cairns (eds.), Contemporary views on architecture and representations in phonological theory, 19–68. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press. 10.7551/mitpress/7997.003.0005
    https://doi.org/10.7551/mitpress/7997.003.0005 [Google Scholar]
19. Diderichsen, P.
    1945 Runer og runeforskning i nordisk belysning. Nordisk tidskrift för vetenskap, konst och industri211. 319–334.
    [Google Scholar]
20. Dresher, B. E.
    1998 On contrast and redundancy. Presented at theannual meeting of the Canadian Linguistic Association, May 1998, Ottawa. Ms., University of Toronto.
    [Google Scholar]
21. Dresher, B. E.
    2007 Variability in Trubetzkoy’s classification of phonological oppositions. The LACUS Forum331. 133–142.
    [Google Scholar]
22. Dresher, B. E.
    2009 The contrastive hierarchy in phonology. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/CBO9780511642005
    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511642005 [Google Scholar]
23. Dresher, B. E.
    2015 The motivation for contrastive feature hierarchies in phonology. Linguistic Variation15(1). 1–40. 10.1075/lv.15.1.01dre
    https://doi.org/10.1075/lv.15.1.01dre [Google Scholar]
24. Dresher, B. E.
    2016 Contrast in phonology 1867–1967: History and development. Annual Review of Linguistics21. 53–73. 10.1146/annurev‑linguistics‑011415‑040800
    https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-linguistics-011415-040800 [Google Scholar]
25. Dresher, B. E.
    2018 Contrastive feature hierarchies in Old English diachronic phonology. Transactions of the Philological Society116(1). 1–29. 10.1111/1467‑968X.12105
    https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-968X.12105 [Google Scholar]
26. Dresher, B. E.
    2019 Contrastive feature hierarchies in phonology: Variation and universality. InD. W. Lightfoot & J. Havenhill (eds.), Variable properties in language: Their nature and acquisition, 13–25. Washington, DC: Georgetown University Press. 10.2307/j.ctvfxv99p.6
    https://doi.org/10.2307/j.ctvfxv99p.6 [Google Scholar]
27. Dresher, B. E.
    2025 Diachronic phonology with Contrastive Hierarchy Theory. InH. Kennard, E. Lindsay-Smith, A. Lahiri, & M. Maiden (eds.), Historical Linguistics 2022. Selected papers from the 25th ICHL, Oxford, 1–5 August 2022, 20–34. Amsterdam: Benjamins. 10.1075/cilt.369.02dre
    https://doi.org/10.1075/cilt.369.02dre [Google Scholar]
28. Dresher, B. E. & D. C. Hall
    2021 The road not taken: The Sound Pattern of Russian and the history of contrast in phonology. Journal of Linguistics57(2). 405–444. 10.1017/S0022226720000377
    https://doi.org/10.1017/S0022226720000377 [Google Scholar]
29. Dresher, B. E., G. L. Piggott, & K. Rice
    1994 Contrast in phonology: Overview. Toronto Working Papers in Linguistics13(1). iii–xvii.
    [Google Scholar]
30. Dyck, C.
    1995 Constraining the phonology — phonetics interface, with exemplification from Spanish and Italian dialects. Doctoral dissertation, University of Toronto.
31. Hall, D. C.
    2007 The role and representation of contrast in phonological theory. Doctoral dissertation, University of Toronto.
32. Hall, D. C.
    2011 Phonological contrast and its phonetic enhancement: Dispersedness without dispersion. Phonology28(1). 1–54. 10.1017/S0952675711000029
    https://doi.org/10.1017/S0952675711000029 [Google Scholar]
33. Halle, M.
    1959 The sound pattern of Russian: A linguistic and acoustical investigation. The Hague: Mouton. Second printing, 1971.
    [Google Scholar]
34. Harms, R. T.
    1968 Introduction to phonological theory. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
    [Google Scholar]
35. Haugen, E.
    (ed.) 1950 First Grammatical Treatise: The earliest Germanic phonology. Language monograph 25. Baltimore, MD: Linguistic Society of America. Updated 1972, London: Longman. 10.2307/522272
    https://doi.org/10.2307/522272 [Google Scholar]
36. Haugen, E.
    1969 On the parsimony of the younger futhark. InC. Gellinek (ed.), Festschrift für Konstantin Reichardt, 51–58. Bern, München: Francke Verlag.
    [Google Scholar]
37. Jakobson, R.
    1941 Kindersprache, Aphasie und allgemeine Lautgesetze (Språkvetenskapliga Sällskapets i Uppsala Förhandlingar). Uppsala: Uppsala Universitet.
    [Google Scholar]
38. Jakobson, R.
    (1962 [1931]) Phonemic notes on Standard Slovak. InSelected writings I. Phonological studies, 221–230. The Hague: Mouton. [Published in Czech inSlovenská miscellanea (Studies presented to Albert Pražak). Bratislava 1931.]
    [Google Scholar]
39. Jakobson, R. & M. Halle
    1956 Fundamentals of language. The Hague: Mouton.
    [Google Scholar]
40. Jakobson, R., C. G. M. Fant, & M. Halle
    1952 Preliminaries to Speech Analysis. MIT Acoustics Laboratory, Technical Report, No. 13. Reissued byMIT Press, Cambridge, Mass., Eleventh Printing 1976.
    [Google Scholar]
41. Keyser, S. J. & K. N. Stevens
    2006 Enhancement and overlap in the speech chain. Language82(1). 33–63. 10.1353/lan.2006.0051
    https://doi.org/10.1353/lan.2006.0051 [Google Scholar]
42. Ko, S.
    2010 A contrastivist view on the evolution of the Korean vowel system. Proceedings of the Sixth Workshop on Altaic Formal Linguistics (WAFL 6). MIT Working Papers in Linguistics611. 181–196.
    [Google Scholar]
43. Ko, S.
    2011 Vowel contrast and vowel harmony shift in the Mongolic languages. Proceedings of the Seventh Workshop on Altaic Formal Linguistics (WAFL 7). MIT Working Papers in Linguistics621. 187–202.
    [Google Scholar]
44. Ko, S.
    2018 Tongue root harmony and vowel contrast in Northeast Asian languages. Wiesbaden: Harrassowitz Verlag. 10.2307/j.ctvckq52c
    https://doi.org/10.2307/j.ctvckq52c [Google Scholar]
45. Krekoski, R.
    2017 Contrast and complexity in Chinese tonal systems. Doctoral dissertation, University of Toronto.
46. Liestøl, A.
    1981a The emergence of the Viking runes. Proceedings of the First International Symposium on Runes and Runic Inscriptions. Michigan Germanic Studies71. 107–118.
    [Google Scholar]
47. Liestøl, A.
    1981b The Viking runes: The transition from the older to the younger fuþark. Saga-Book201. 247–266.
    [Google Scholar]
48. Mackenzie, S.
    2011 Contrast and the evaluation of similarity: Evidence from consonant harmony. Lingua121(8). 1401–1423. 10.1016/j.lingua.2011.03.004
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lingua.2011.03.004 [Google Scholar]
49. Mackenzie, S.
    2013 Laryngeal co-occurrence restrictions in Aymara: Contrastive representations and constraint interaction. Phonology30(2). 297–345. 10.1017/S0952675713000146
    https://doi.org/10.1017/S0952675713000146 [Google Scholar]
50. Moulton, W. G.
    1954 The stops and spirants of Early Germanic. Language30(1). 1–42. 10.2307/410217
    https://doi.org/10.2307/410217 [Google Scholar]
51. Natvig, D. A.
    2018 Contrast, variation, and change in Norwegian vowel systems. Doctoral dissertation, University of Wisconsin.
52. Oxford, W.
    2015 Patterns of contrast in phonological change: Evidence from Algonquian vowel systems. Language91(2). 308–357. 10.1353/lan.2015.0028
    https://doi.org/10.1353/lan.2015.0028 [Google Scholar]
53. Purnell, T. & E. Raimy
    2015 Distinctive features, levels of representation and historical phonology. InP. Honeybone & J. Salmons (eds.), The handbook of historical phonology, 522–544. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
54. Purnell, T. C., E. Raimy, & J. Salmons
    2019 Old English vowels: Diachrony, privativity, and phonological representations. Language95(4). e447–e473. 10.1353/lan.2019.0083
    https://doi.org/10.1353/lan.2019.0083 [Google Scholar]
55. Rischel, J.
    1966 Phoneme, grapheme, and the “importance” of distinctions: Functional aspects of the Scandinavian runic reform. Interim Report No. 1, Research Group for Quantitative Linguistics, Stockholm, 1–21. Reprinted in Rischel 2009: 254–271.
    [Google Scholar]
56. Rischel, J.
    2009 Sound structure in language, edited and with an introduction byN. Grønnum, F. Gregersen, & H. Basbøll. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
57. Sandstedt, J. J. M.
    2018 Feature specifications and contrast in vowel harmony: The orthography and phonology of Old Norwegian height harmony. Doctoral dissertation, University of Edinburgh.
58. Schalin, J.
    2017 Scandinavian umlaut and contrastive feature hierarchies. NOWELE70(2). 171–254. 10.1075/nowele.70.2.03sch
    https://doi.org/10.1075/nowele.70.2.03sch [Google Scholar]
59. Schalin, J.
    2018 Preliterary Scandinavian sound change viewed from the east: Umlaut remodelled and language contact revisited. Doctoral dissertation, University of Helsinki.
60. Schalin, J.
    2021 Nordic umlaut, contrastive features and stratal phonology. Nordlyd45(1). 7–37.
    [Google Scholar]
61. Schalin, J.
    2024 North Germanic labiovelar breaking: Reconstructing the phonological conditions. Presented atFonologi i Norden, Feb. 2024. Stockholm. 10.13140/RG.2.2.21465.49762
    https://doi.org/10.13140/RG.2.2.21465.49762 [Google Scholar]
62. Schulte, M.
    2006 The transformation of the older fuþark: Number magic, runographic, or linguistic principles?Arkiv för Nordisk Filologi1211. 41–74.
    [Google Scholar]
63. Schulte, M.
    2009 The Scandinavian runic reform: A sound notion or a research dogma?NOWELE56/571. 107–121. 10.1075/nowele.56‑57.05sch
    https://doi.org/10.1075/nowele.56-57.05sch [Google Scholar]
64. Spahr, C.
    2014 A contrastive hierarchical account of positional neutralization. The Linguistic Review31(3–4). 551–585. 10.1515/tlr‑2014‑0008
    https://doi.org/10.1515/tlr-2014-0008 [Google Scholar]
65. Stevens, K. N., S. J. Keyser, & H. Kawasaki
    1986 Toward a phonetic and phonological theory of redundant features. InJ. S. Perkell & D. H. Klatt (eds.), Invariance and variability in speech processes, 426–449. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
    [Google Scholar]
66. Sullivan, W. J.
    1998 Underspecification and feature geometry: Theorems of a reticular theory of language. LACUS Forum241. 53–65.
    [Google Scholar]
67. Trnka, B.
    1939 Phonological remarks concerning the Scandinavian runic writing. Travaux du Cercle linguistique de Prague81. 292–296.
    [Google Scholar]
68. Voeltzel, L.
    2016 Morphophonologie des langues scandinaves: Hiérarchie segmentale et complexité syllabique. Doctoral dissertation, University of Nantes.
69. Zhang, X.
    1996 Vowel systems of the Manchu-Tungus languages of China. Doctoral dissertation, University of Toronto.