1887
Volume 70, Issue 2
  • ISSN 0108-8416
  • E-ISSN: 2212-9715
USD
Buy:$35.00 + Taxes

Abstract

This paper attempts to explain the origin and development of a subgroup of the Proto-Germanic weak verbs of class I (Gothic , , , , and ). The core of this group consists of Proto-Indo-European zero-grade primary *-/ presents, which all developed a present, ablauting preterit and *-- participle in Early Proto-Germanic. In so doing, they came to violate the requirement that each ablauting verb must possess distinct present and preterit stems. With the introduction of a new preterit plural vowel in the ablaut model of classes V and VI, this problem was solved for the primary *-/ presents belonging to these. Owing to the dominance of the present tense within the strong paradigm, a remodelling of the preterit was also the preferred solution for the remaining verbs, and this was eventually found in the innovation of new weak forms through an analogy involving their *-- participle.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1075/nowele.70.2.01rom
2017-09-19
2019-08-21
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. Beekes, R. & Beek, L. van
    2010Etymological Dictionary of Greek. Leiden: Brill.
    [Google Scholar]
  2. Braune, W. & Reiffenstein, I.
    2004aAlthochdeutsche Grammatik. 15. Aufl.Tübingen: Max Niemeyer Verlag. doi: 10.1515/9783110930887
    https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110930887 [Google Scholar]
  3. Braune, W. & Heidermanns, F.
    2004bGotische Grammatik. 20. Aufl.Tübingen: Max Niemeyer Verlag. doi: 10.1515/9783110945089
    https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110945089 [Google Scholar]
  4. Bammesberger, A.
    1986Der Aufbau des germanischen Verbalsystems. Heidelberg: C. Winter Universitätsverlag.
    [Google Scholar]
  5. Coetsem, F. van
    1990Ablaut and Reduplication in the Germanic verb. Heidelberg: Carl Winter Universitätsverlag.
    [Google Scholar]
  6. Collitz, H.
    1912Das schwache Präteritum und Seine Vorgeschichte. Göttingen: Vandenhoeck & Ruprecht.
    [Google Scholar]
  7. Gallée, J. & Tiefenbach, H.
    1993Altsächsische Grammatik. 3. Aufl.Tübingen: Max Niemeyer Verlag. doi: 10.1515/9783110920147
    https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110920147 [Google Scholar]
  8. Heidermanns, F.
    1993Etymologisches Wörterbuch der germanischen Primäradjektive. Berlin: de Gruyter. doi: 10.1515/9783110871616
    https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110871616 [Google Scholar]
  9. Hill, E.
    2010 A case study in grammaticalized inflectional morphology: Origin and development of the Germanic weak preterite. Diachronica27:3.411–458. doi: 10.1075/dia.27.3.02hil
    https://doi.org/10.1075/dia.27.3.02hil [Google Scholar]
  10. Hogg, R.
    1992A Grammar of Old English – Volume 1: Phonology. Oxford: Blackwell.
    [Google Scholar]
  11. Hogg, R. & Fulk, R.
    2011A Grammar of Old English – Volume 2: Morphology. Oxford: Blackwell.
    [Google Scholar]
  12. Kolb, H.
    1964 Über ‘brauchen‘ als Modalverb. Zeitschrift für deutsche Sprache20.64–78.
    [Google Scholar]
  13. Kortlandt, F.
    1989 The Germanic Weak preterit. Amsterdamer Beiträge zur älteren Germanistik28.101–109.
    [Google Scholar]
  14. Kroonen, G.
    2013Etymological Dictionary of Proto-Germanic. Leiden: Brill.
    [Google Scholar]
  15. Lloyd, A. et al.
    1988– Etymologisches Wörterbuch des Althochdeutschen. Göttingen: Vandenhoeck und Ruprecht.
    [Google Scholar]
  16. Lühr, R.
    1984 Reste der Athematischen Konjugation in den Germanischen Sprachen. In Untermann, J. & Brogyanyi, B. (eds.), Das Germanische und die Rekonstruktion der Indogermanischen Grundsprache, 25–87. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. doi: 10.1075/cilt.22.04luh
    https://doi.org/10.1075/cilt.22.04luh [Google Scholar]
  17. Mailhammer, R.
    2007The Germanic Strong Verbs: Foundations and Development of a New System. Berlin: de Gruyter. doi: 10.1515/9783110198782
    https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110198782 [Google Scholar]
  18. Ringe, D.
    2006A Linguistic History of English, Volume 1: From Proto-Indo-European to Proto-Germanic. New York: Oxford University Press. doi: 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199284139.001.0001
    https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199284139.001.0001 [Google Scholar]
  19. Rix, H. et al.
    2001Lexikon der indogermanischen Verben: die Wurzeln und ihre PrimärstammbildungenWiesbaden: Reichert.
    [Google Scholar]
  20. Seebold, E.
    1970Vergleichendes und etymologisches Wö̈rterbuch der germanischen starken Verben. The Hague: Mouton. doi: 10.1515/9783110821956
    https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110821956 [Google Scholar]
  21. Sturtevant, A.
    1951 Notes on Certain Variations and Forms in the Old Germanic Dialects. Modern Language Review66:5.300–304.
    [Google Scholar]
  22. Szemérenyi, O.
    1980 Latin verbs in -uō, -uere . In Izzo, H. (ed.), Italic and Romance: Linguistic Studies in Honor of Ernst Pulgram, 9–33. Amsterdam: Benjamins. doi: 10.1075/cilt.18.05sze
    https://doi.org/10.1075/cilt.18.05sze [Google Scholar]
  23. Tops, G.
    1974The Origin of the Germanic Dental Preterit: A Critical Research History Since 1912. Leiden: Brill.
    [Google Scholar]
  24. Vaan, M. de
    2008Etymological dictionary of Latin and the other Italic languages. Leiden: Brill.
    [Google Scholar]
  25. Vleeskruyer, R.
    1953The Life of St. Chad: An Old English Homily (diss.). Amsterdam: North-Holland Publishing Company.
    [Google Scholar]
http://instance.metastore.ingenta.com/content/journals/10.1075/nowele.70.2.01rom
Loading
/content/journals/10.1075/nowele.70.2.01rom
Loading

Data & Media loading...

  • Article Type: Research Article
This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was successful
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error