Volume 25, Issue 1
  • ISSN 0929-0907
  • E-ISSN: 1569-9943
Buy:$35.00 + Taxes
Preview this article:


Article metrics loading...

Loading full text...

Full text loading...


  1. Cartier, Emmanuel
    2017 Neoveille, a web platform for neologism tracking. Proceedings of the Software Demonstrations of the 15th Conference of the European Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics (ACL), 95–98. 10.18653/v1/E17‑3024
    https://doi.org/10.18653/v1/E17-3024 [Google Scholar]
  2. Croft, William
    2000Explaining language change. Harlow & Munich: Longman.
    [Google Scholar]
  3. Gérard, Christophe, Lauren Bruneau, Ingrid Falk, Delphine Bernhard & Ann-Lise Rosio
    2017 Le Logoscope : Observatoire des innovations lexicales en français contemporain. InJoaquín García Palacios, Goedele de Sterck, Daniel Linder, Jesús Torre del Rey, Miguel Sánchez Ibanez & Nava Maroto García (eds.), La neología en las lenguas Románicas: Recursos, estrategias y nuevas orientaciones, 339–356. Frankfurt: Peter Lang.
    [Google Scholar]
  4. Grieve, Jack, Andrea Nini & Diansheng Guo
    2016 Analyzing lexical emergence in Modern American English online. English Language and Linguistics21(1). 99–127. 10.1017/S1360674316000113
    https://doi.org/10.1017/S1360674316000113 [Google Scholar]
  5. Kerremans, Daphné
    2015A web of new words: A corpus-based study of the conventionalization process of English neologisms. Frankfurt am Main: Peter Lang. 10.3726/978‑3‑653‑04788‑2
    https://doi.org/10.3726/978-3-653-04788-2 [Google Scholar]
  6. Kerremans, Daphné & Jelena Prokić
    2018 Mining the web for new words: Semi-automatic neologism identification with the NeoCrawler. Anglia136(2). 239–268. 10.1515/ang‑2018‑0032
    https://doi.org/10.1515/ang-2018-0032 [Google Scholar]
  7. Kerremans, Daphné, Jelena Prokić, Quirin Würschinger & Hans-Jörg Schmid
    2018 Using data-mining to identify and study patterns in lexical innovation on the web: The NeoCrawler. Pragmatics & Cognition25(1). 173–199. [=this volume]
    [Google Scholar]
  8. Kjellander, Daniel
    2018 Cognitive constraints in English lexical blending: A data collection methodology and an explanatory model. Pragmatics & Cognition25(1). 141–172. [=this volume]
    [Google Scholar]
  9. Labov, William
    1980 The social origins of sound change. InWilliam Labov (ed.), Locating language in space and time, 251–266. New York: Academic Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  10. Milroy, James
    1992Linguistic variation and change: On the historical sociolinguistics of English. Oxford: Blackwell.
    [Google Scholar]
  11. Nevalainen, Terttu
    2018 From speaker innovation to lexical change: A sociohistorical approach to neologisms. Pragmatics & Cognition25(1). 7–28. [=this volume]
    [Google Scholar]
  12. Niculescu-Gorpin, Anabella-Gloria & Monica Vasileanu
    2018 Acceptability and diffusion of luxury Anglicisms in present-day Romanian. Pragmatics & Cognition25(1). 85–120. [=this volume]
    [Google Scholar]
  13. Säily, Tanja, Eetu Mäkelä & Mika Hämäläinen
    2018 Explorations into the social contexts of neologism use in early English correspondence. Pragmatics & Cognition25(1). 29–48. [=this volume]
    [Google Scholar]
  14. Svanlund, Jan
    2018 Metalinguistic comments and signals: What can they tell us about the conventionalization of neologies?Pragmatics & Cognition25(1). 121–140. [=this volume]
    [Google Scholar]
  15. Vejdemo, Susanne
    2018 Lexical change often begins and ends in semantic peripheries: Evidence from color linguistics. Pragmatics & Cognition25(1). 49–84. [=this volume]
    [Google Scholar]
  16. Weinreich, Uriel, William Labov & Marvin Herzog
    1968 Empirical foundations for a theory of language change. InWinfried P. Lehmann & Yakov Malkiel (eds.), Directions for historical linguistics, 95–188. Austin: University of Texas Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  • Article Type: Introduction
This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was successful
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error