Volume 25, Issue 3
  • ISSN 0929-0907
  • E-ISSN: 1569-9943
Buy:$35.00 + Taxes
Preview this article:


Article metrics loading...

Loading full text...

Full text loading...


  1. Bakhtin, Mikhail
    1986 The problem of speech genre. InCaryl Emerson & Michael Holquist (eds.), Speech genres and other late essays, 60–102. Austin: University of Texas Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  2. Barlow, Michael & Suzanne Kemmer
    (eds.) 2000Usage-based models of language. Stanford, CA: CSLI Publications.
    [Google Scholar]
  3. Berkenkotter, Carol & Thomas N. Huckin
    1993 Rethinking genre from a sociocognitive perspective. Written Communication10. 475–509. 10.1177/0741088393010004001
    https://doi.org/10.1177/0741088393010004001 [Google Scholar]
  4. 1995Genre knowledge in disciplinary communication: Cognition, culture, power. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
    [Google Scholar]
  5. Blumenthal-Dramé, Alice
    2012Entrenchment in usage-based theories: What corpus data do and do not reveal about the mind. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. 10.1515/9783110294002
    https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110294002 [Google Scholar]
  6. Bybee, Joan L.
    2006 From usage to grammar: The mind’s response to repetition, Language82(4). 711–733. 10.1353/lan.2006.0186
    https://doi.org/10.1353/lan.2006.0186 [Google Scholar]
  7. Bybee, Joan L. & Paul J. Hopper
    (eds.) 2001Frequency and the emergence of linguistic structure. Amsterdam: Benjamins. 10.1075/tsl.45
    https://doi.org/10.1075/tsl.45 [Google Scholar]
  8. Capra, Fritjof
    2005 Complexity and life. Theory, Culture and Society22(5). 33–44. 10.1177/0263276405057046
    https://doi.org/10.1177/0263276405057046 [Google Scholar]
  9. Devitt, Amy
    2009 Re-fusing form in genre study. InJanet Giltrow & Dieter Stein (eds.), Genres in the internet: Issues in the theory of genre, 27–47. Amsterdam: Benjamins. 10.1075/pbns.188.02dev
    https://doi.org/10.1075/pbns.188.02dev [Google Scholar]
  10. Fillmore, Charles J.
    1982 Frame semantics. InThe Linguistic Society of Korea (ed.), Linguistics in the morning calm, 111–137. Seoul: Hanshin.
    [Google Scholar]
  11. Freadman, Aviva & Peter Medway
    (eds.) 1994Genre and the New Rhetoric. London: Taylor & Francis.
    [Google Scholar]
  12. Grice, Paul H.
    1975 Logic and conversation. InPeter J. Cole & Jerry Morgan (eds.), Syntax and semantics, vol. 3: Speech acts, 41–58. New York: Academic Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  13. Harder, Peter
    2010Meaning in mind and society. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. 10.1515/9783110216059
    https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110216059 [Google Scholar]
  14. Hopper, Paul J.
    1987 Emergent grammar. The Annual Proceedings of the Berkeley Linguistics Society13. 139–157. 10.3765/bls.v13i0.1834
    https://doi.org/10.3765/bls.v13i0.1834 [Google Scholar]
  15. Hyon, Sunny
    1996 Genre in three traditions. TESOL Quarterly30. 693–722. 10.2307/3587930
    https://doi.org/10.2307/3587930 [Google Scholar]
  16. Johnstone, Barbara
    2018Discourse analysis, 3rd edn.London: Blackwell.
    [Google Scholar]
  17. Langacker, Ronald W.
    1984 Active Zones. The Annual Proceedings of the Berkeley Linguistics Society10. 172–188. 10.3765/bls.v10i0.3175
    https://doi.org/10.3765/bls.v10i0.3175 [Google Scholar]
  18. 1991Foundations of Cognitive Grammar, vol. 2: Descriptive applications. Stanford: Stanford University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  19. 2000 A dynamic usage-based model. InMichael Barlow & Suzanne Kemmer (eds.), Usage-based models of language, 1–63. Stanford: CSLI Publications.
    [Google Scholar]
  20. 2001 Discourse in Cognitive Grammar. Cognitive Linguistics12(2). 143–188. 10.1515/cogl.12.2.143
    https://doi.org/10.1515/cogl.12.2.143 [Google Scholar]
  21. 2009Investigations in Cognitive Grammar. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. 10.1515/9783110214369
    https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110214369 [Google Scholar]
  22. Merlini Barbaresi, Lavinia
    2003 Toward a theory of text complexity. InLavinia Merlini Barbaresi (ed.), Complexity in language and text, 23–66. Pisa: Edizioni Plus.
    [Google Scholar]
  23. Miller, Carolyn
    1984 Genre as social action. Quarterly Journal of Speech70. 151–167. 10.1080/00335638409383686
    https://doi.org/10.1080/00335638409383686 [Google Scholar]
  24. Paltridge, Brian
    1995 Working with genre: A pragmatic perspective. Journal of Pragmatics24. 393–406. 10.1016/0378‑2166(94)00058‑M
    https://doi.org/10.1016/0378-2166(94)00058-M [Google Scholar]
  25. Sbisà, Marina
    2006 Two conceptions of rationality in Grice’s theory of implicature. InElvio Baccarini & Snježana Prijić-Samaržija (eds.), Rationality of belief and action, 233–247. Rijeka: University of Rijeka.
    [Google Scholar]
  26. 2007Detto non detto: Le forme della comunicazione implicita. Roma-Bari: Laterza.
    [Google Scholar]
  27. Schmid, Hans-Jörg
    2012 Generalizing the apparently ungeneralizable: Basic ingredients of a cognitive-pragmatic approach to the construal of meaning-in-context. InHans-Jörg Schmid (ed.), Cognitive Pragmatics, 3–22. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. 10.1515/9783110214215.3
    https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110214215.3 [Google Scholar]
  28. 2014 Lexico-grammatical patterns, pragmatic associations and discourse frequency. InThomas Herbst, Hans-Jörg Schmid & Susen Faulhaber (eds.), Constructions – collocations – patterns, 239–293. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
    [Google Scholar]
  29. 2015 A blueprint of the Entrenchment-and-Conventionalization Model. Yearbook of the German Cognitive Linguistics Association3. 1–27. 10.1515/gcla‑2015‑0002
    https://doi.org/10.1515/gcla-2015-0002 [Google Scholar]
  30. 2016 Why cognitive linguistics must embrace the pragmatic and social dimensions of language and how it could do so more seriously. Cognitive Linguistics27(4). 543–557. 10.1515/cog‑2016‑0048
    https://doi.org/10.1515/cog-2016-0048 [Google Scholar]
  31. 2017 A framework for understanding entrenchment and its psychological foundations. InHans-Jörg Schmid (ed.), Entrenchment and the psychology of language learning. How we reorganize and adapt linguistic knowledge, 9–36. Boston: APA and Mouton de Gruyter. 10.1037/15969‑002
    https://doi.org/10.1037/15969-002 [Google Scholar]
  32. 2018 Ein integratives soziokognitives Modell des dynamischen Lexikons. InStefan Engelberg, Henning Lobin, Kathryn Steyer & Sascha Wolfer (eds.), Wortschätze: Dynamik, Muster, Komplexität, 215–231. Berlin/Boston: Mouton de Gruyter. 10.1515/9783110579963‑012
    https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110579963-012 [Google Scholar]
  33. Schmid, Hans-Jörg & Annette Mantlik
    2015 Entrenchment in historical corpora? Reconstructing dead authors’ minds from their usage profiles. Anglia133(4). 583–623. 10.1515/ang‑2015‑0056
    https://doi.org/10.1515/ang-2015-0056 [Google Scholar]
  34. Steen, Gerard
    2011 Genre between the humanities and the sciences. InMarcus Callies, Wolfram R. Keller & Astrid Lohöfer (eds.), Bi-directionality in the cognitive sciences, 24–41. Amsterdam: Benjamins. 10.1075/hcp.30.03ste
    https://doi.org/10.1075/hcp.30.03ste [Google Scholar]
  35. Stukker, Ninke, Wilbert Spooren & Gerard Steen
    (eds.) 2016Genre in language, discourse and cognition. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. 10.1515/9783110469639
    https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110469639 [Google Scholar]
  36. The Five Graces Group
    The Five Graces Group (Clay Bleckner, Richard Blythe, Joan Bybee, Morten H. Christiansen, William Croft, Nick C. Ellis, John Holland, Jinyun Ke, Diane Larsen-Freeman, Tom Schoenemann) 2009 Language is a complex-adaptive system: Position paper. Language Learning59(1). 1–26.
    [Google Scholar]
  37. Tomasello, Michael
    2008The origins of human communication. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press. 10.7551/mitpress/7551.001.0001
    https://doi.org/10.7551/mitpress/7551.001.0001 [Google Scholar]
  38. Toulmin, Stephen
    2003 [1958]The uses of argument. Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/CBO9780511840005
    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511840005 [Google Scholar]
  39. Wittgenstein, Ludwig
    1967 [1953]Ricerche filosofiche. Torino: Einaudi.
    [Google Scholar]
  • Article Type: Introduction
This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was successful
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error