1887
Volume 28, Issue 1
  • ISSN 0929-0907
  • E-ISSN: 1569-9943
USD
Buy:$35.00 + Taxes

Abstract

Abstract

is a specific domain of Russian obscene vocabulary including words related to sexuality. The first sociolinguistic studies on emerged after the fall of the Soviet Union, concomitantly with the formation of Russian gender studies in the early 1990s (Tëmkina & Zdravomyslova 2003: 51). Until today, research on gender and taboo in Russian has been exiguous. Many scholars claim that the use of is a male prerogative (Uspenskiĭ 1994: 56, Doleschal & Schmid 2001: 274), whereas women’s use of mat is heavily sanctioned in society. Through data from a survey I carried out with 772 participants, I illustrate that is strongly present in women’s language use and that stereotypical gender conceptualizations are undergoing change. From the participants’ answers it emerges that discussions about the use of obscene language play a critical role in the multifaceted process of renegotiation of gender roles in post-Soviet contexts.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1075/pc.00021.luc
2022-03-16
2022-05-23
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. Allan, Keith & Kate Burridge
    2006Forbidden words: Taboo and the censoring of language. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/CBO9780511617881
    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511617881 [Google Scholar]
  2. Brandist, Craig
    2003 The origins of Soviet sociolinguistics. Journal of Sociolinguistics7(2). 213–231. 10.1111/1467‑9481.00220
    https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9481.00220 [Google Scholar]
  3. Doleschal, Ursula & Schmid, Sonja
    2001 Doing gender in Russian: Structure and perspective. InMarlies Hellinger & Hadumod Bußmann (eds.), Gender across languages: The linguistic representation of women and men, Vol.1, 253–282). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 10.1075/impact.9.16dol
    https://doi.org/10.1075/impact.9.16dol [Google Scholar]
  4. Fjeld, Ruth E. Vatvedt, Elsa Kristiansen, Marianne Rathje, Veturlidi Oskarsson, Natalia Konstaninovskaia, Inayat Gill & Fekede Menuta
    2019 The worldwide use and meaning of the f-word. Intercultural Pragmatics16(1). 85–111. 10.1515/ip‑2019‑0004
    https://doi.org/10.1515/ip-2019-0004 [Google Scholar]
  5. Furman, Michael Douglas
    2018 Of mat and men: Taboo words and the language of Russian female punks. Laboratorium. Zhurnal Sot͡sialʹnykh Issledovaniĭ [Journal of Social Studies] 10(1). 5–28. 10.25285/2078‑1938‑2018‑10‑1‑5‑28
    https://doi.org/10.25285/2078-1938-2018-10-1-5-28 [Google Scholar]
  6. Galdas, Paul Michael
    2017 Revisiting bias in qualitative research: Reflections on its relationship with funding and impact. International Journal of Qualitative Methods16. 1–2. 10.1177/1609406917748992
    https://doi.org/10.1177/1609406917748992 [Google Scholar]
  7. Güvendir, Emre
    2015 Why are males inclined to use strong swear words more than females? An evolutionary explanation based on male intergroup aggressiveness. Language Sciences50. 133–139. 10.1016/j.langsci.2015.02.003
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.langsci.2015.02.003 [Google Scholar]
  8. Harjus, Jannis
    2017 Perceptual variety linguistics: Jerezano speakers’ concepts and perceptions of phonetic variation in western Andalusian Spanish. Loquens4(2). e042. 10.3989/loquens.2017.042
    https://doi.org/10.3989/loquens.2017.042 [Google Scholar]
  9. Jakobson, Roman
    1985 Slavic gods and demons. InStephen Rudy (ed.), Selected writings. Volume VII: Contributions to comparative mythology, 3–11. Berlin, New York and Amsterdam: Mouton. 10.1515/9783110855463.3
    https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110855463.3 [Google Scholar]
  10. Kleĭmënova, Ekaterina Grigorʹevna
    2012 Ti͡uremnai͡a subkulʹtura kak osobyĭ vid sot͡sialʹnogo vzaimodeĭstvii͡a [The prison subculture as a specific type of social interaction]. Vestnik Udmurtskogo Universiteta. Filosofii͡a. Sot͡siologii͡a. Psikhologii͡a. Pedagogika4. 33–37.
    [Google Scholar]
  11. Kovalev, Manuela
    2014 The function of Russian obscene language in late Soviet and post-Soviet prose. Manchester: The University of Manchester dissertation.
  12. Krefeld, Thomas & Pustka, Elissa
    2010 Für eine perzeptive Varietätenlinguistik. InThomas Krefeld & Elissa Pustka (eds.), Perzeptive Varietätenlinguistik. Spazi Comunicativi = Kommunikative Räume, vol.8, 9–28. Frankfurt am Main u. a.: Centre for Language and Cognition. 10.5282/ubm/epub.14736
    https://doi.org/10.5282/ubm/epub.14736 [Google Scholar]
  13. Lakoff, George & Mark Johnson
    1980 Conceptual metaphor in everyday language. The Journal of Philosophy77(8). 453–486. 10.2307/2025464
    https://doi.org/10.2307/2025464 [Google Scholar]
  14. 2003Metaphors we live by. Chicago: University of Chicago Press. 10.7208/chicago/9780226470993.001.0001
    https://doi.org/10.7208/chicago/9780226470993.001.0001 [Google Scholar]
  15. Lakoff, Robin Tolmach & Mary Bucholtz
    (ed.) 2004Language and woman’s place: Text and commentaries. Oxford and New York: Oxford University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  16. Lenin, Vladimir Ilʹich
    1973 [1914] Nuzhen li obi͡azatelʹnyĭ gosudarstvennyĭ i͡azyk? [Is a compulsory state language necessary?]. InVladimir Ilʹich Lenin, Polnoe sobranie sochineniĭ [Unabridged collected works]. Moscow: Izdatelʹstvo politicheskoĭ literatury.
    [Google Scholar]
  17. Levin, I͡uriĭ Iosifovich
    1998Izbrannye trudy. Poėtika. Semiotika [Collected works. Poetics. Semiotics]. Moscow: I͡azyki russkoĭ kulʹtury.
    [Google Scholar]
  18. Löckenhoff, Corinna E., Wayne Chan, Robert R. McCrae, Filip De Fruyt, Lee Jussim, Marleen De Bolle, Paul T. Costa
    2014 Gender stereotypes of personality: Universal and accurate?Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology45(5). 675–694. 10.1177/0022022113520075
    https://doi.org/10.1177/0022022113520075 [Google Scholar]
  19. Müller, Cornelia, Alan Cienki, Ellen Fricke, Silva H. Ladewig, David McNeill & Sedinha Tessendorf
    2014Body – language – communication: An international handbook on multimodality in human interaction, vol.2. Berlin and Boston: Walter de Gruyter.
    [Google Scholar]
  20. Nat͡sionalʹnyĭ korpus russkogo i͡azyka [National Corpus of the Russian Language]. Available athttps://ruscorpora.ru/new/
  21. Niedzielski, Nancy & Dennis Preston
    2000Folk linguistics. Berlin and New York: Mouton de Gruyter. 10.1515/9783110803389
    https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110803389 [Google Scholar]
  22. OECD Organisation for Economic Cooperation and Development
    OECD Organisation for Economic Cooperation and Development 2019Education at a glance 2019. OECD indicators. 10.1787/19991487
    https://doi.org/10.1787/19991487 [Google Scholar]
  23. Pavlenko, Aneta
    2005Emotions and language. Cambridge and New York: Cambridge University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  24. Peri, Alexis
    2018 New Soviet woman: The post-World War II feminine ideal at home and abroad. Russian Review77(4). 621–644. 10.1111/russ.12202
    https://doi.org/10.1111/russ.12202 [Google Scholar]
  25. Preston, Dennis
    2005 Perceptual dialectology. InUlrich Ammon, Norbert Dittmar, Klaus J. Mattheier & Peter Trudgill (eds.), Sociolinguistics: An international handbook of the science of language and society, vol.2, 1683–1695. Berlin: de Gruyter. 10.1515/9783110171488.2.8.1683
    https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110171488.2.8.1683 [Google Scholar]
  26. Rezanova, Zoi͡a & Anastasii͡a Khlebnikova
    2015 Gender metaphors in Russian and English linguocultures: A comparative study. Procedia – Social and Behavioral Sciences215. 273–278. 10.1016/j.sbspro.2015.11.634
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2015.11.634 [Google Scholar]
  27. Scheller-Boltz, Dennis
    2017The discourse on gender identity in contemporary Russia: An introduction with a case study in Russian gender linguistics. Hildesheim, Zürich and New York: Georg Olms Verlag.
    [Google Scholar]
  28. 2020Grammatik und Ideologie: Feminisierungsstrategien im Russischen und Polnischen aus Sicht der Wissenschaft und Gesellschaft. Berlin: Peter Lang. 10.3726/b16505
    https://doi.org/10.3726/b16505 [Google Scholar]
  29. Smith, Stephen Antony
    1998 The social meanings of swearing: Workers and bad language in late imperial and early Soviet Russia. Past & Present160. 167–202. 10.1093/past/160.1.167
    https://doi.org/10.1093/past/160.1.167 [Google Scholar]
  30. Stapleton, Karyn
    2003 Gender and swearing: A community practice. Women and Language26(2). 22–33.
    [Google Scholar]
  31. Tëmkina, Anna & Elena Zdravomyslova
    2003 Gender studies in post-Soviet society: Western frames and cultural differences. Studies in East European Thought55. 51–61. 10.1023/A:1021857831011
    https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1021857831011 [Google Scholar]
  32. 2014 Gender’s crooked path: Feminism confronts Russian patriarchy. Current Sociology62(2). 253–270. 10.1177/0011392113515566
    https://doi.org/10.1177/0011392113515566 [Google Scholar]
  33. Timroth, Wilhelm von
    1986Russian and Soviet sociolinguistics and taboo varieties of the Russian language (argot, jargon, slang and “mat”). München: Verlag Otto Sagner. 10.3726/b12672
    https://doi.org/10.3726/b12672 [Google Scholar]
  34. Ugolovnyĭ kodeks Rossiĭskoĭ Federat͡sii [Criminal Code of the Russian Federation] available onpravo.gov.ru/proxy/ips/?docbody=&prevDoc=102041891&backlink=1&&nd=102799947 (last updated on7/31/2020).
  35. Uspenskiĭ, Boris
    1994 Mifologicheskiĭ aspekt russkoĭ ėkspressivnoĭ frazeologii [The mythological aspect of Russian expressive phraseology]. InBoris Uspenskiĭ, Izbrannye trudy [Selected writings], vol.2, 53–128. Moscow: Gnozis.
    [Google Scholar]
  36. 2018 Mifologicheskiĭ aspekt russkoĭ ėkspressivnoĭ frazeologii [The mythological aspect of Russian expressive phraseology]. InBoris Uspenskiĭ, Issledovanii͡a po russkoĭ literature, folʹkloru i mifologii, 195–286. Moscow: Common place.
    [Google Scholar]
http://instance.metastore.ingenta.com/content/journals/10.1075/pc.00021.luc
Loading
/content/journals/10.1075/pc.00021.luc
Loading

Data & Media loading...

  • Article Type: Research Article
Keyword(s): gender; mat; perceptual; post-Soviet; psycholinguistics; Russian; sociolinguistics; taboo
This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was successful
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error