Volume 28, Issue 2
  • ISSN 0929-0907
  • E-ISSN: 1569-9943
Preview this article:

This work was made publicly available by the publisher.

Article metrics loading...

Loading full text...

Full text loading...



  1. Blakemore, Diane
    1987Semantic Constraints on Relevance. Oxford: Blackwell.
    [Google Scholar]
  2. Escandell-Vidal, Victoria & Manuel Leonetti
    2011 The rigidity of procedural meaning. InVictoria Escandell-Vidal, Manuel Leonetti & Aoife Ahern (eds.), Procedural Meaning: Problems and Perspectives, 81–102. Bingley: Emerald Group Publishing. 10.1163/9780857240941_005
    https://doi.org/10.1163/9780857240941_005 [Google Scholar]
  3. Maillat, Didier & Steve Oswald
    2009 Defining manipulative discourse: The pragmatics of cognitive illusions. International Review of Pragmatics1. 348–370. 10.1163/187730909X12535267111651
    https://doi.org/10.1163/187730909X12535267111651 [Google Scholar]
  4. Oswald, Steve
    2016 Rhetoric and cognition: Constraints on argument processing. InManuel Padilla Cruz (ed.), Relevance Theory: Recent Developments, Current Challenges and Future Directions, 261–285. Amsterdam & Philadelphia: John Benjamins. 10.1075/pbns.268.10osw
    https://doi.org/10.1075/pbns.268.10osw [Google Scholar]
  5. Wharton, Tim
    2003 Interjections, language and the ‘showing-saying’ continuum. Pragmatics & Cognition11(1). 39–91. 10.1075/pc.11.1.04wha
    https://doi.org/10.1075/pc.11.1.04wha [Google Scholar]
  6. 2009Pragmatics and non-verbal communication. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/CBO9780511635649
    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511635649 [Google Scholar]
  7. Wilson, Deirdre
    2003 Relevance and lexical pragmatics. Rivista di Linguistica15(2). 273–291.
    [Google Scholar]
  8. 2011 Procedural meaning: Past, present, future. InVictoria Escandell-Vidal, Manuel Leonetti & Aoife Ahern (eds.), Procedural Meaning: Problems and Perspectives, 3–31. Bingley: Emerald Group Publishing. 10.1108/S1472‑7870(2011)0000025005
    https://doi.org/10.1108/S1472-7870(2011)0000025005 [Google Scholar]
  9. 2016 Reassessing the conceptual-procedural distinction. Lingua175–176: 5–19. 10.1016/j.lingua.2015.12.005
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lingua.2015.12.005 [Google Scholar]
  10. Wilson, Deirdre & Robyn Carston
    2007 A unitary approach to lexical pragmatics: Relevance, inference and ad hoc concepts. InNoel Burton-Roberts (ed.), Pragmatics, 230–259. Basingstoke: Palgrave. 10.1057/978‑1‑349‑73908‑0_12
    https://doi.org/10.1057/978-1-349-73908-0_12 [Google Scholar]
  11. 2019 Pragmatics and the challenge of ‘non-propositional’ effects. Journal of Pragmatics57. 125–148. 10.1016/j.pragma.2019.01.005
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2019.01.005 [Google Scholar]
  12. Wilson, Deirdre & Dan Sperber
    1993 Linguistic form and relevance. Lingua90(1). 1–25. 10.1016/0024‑3841(93)90058‑5
    https://doi.org/10.1016/0024-3841(93)90058-5 [Google Scholar]
  13. Wilson, Deirdre & Tim Wharton
    2006 Relevance and prosody. Journal of Pragmatics38(10). 1559–1579. 10.1016/j.pragma.2005.04.012
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2005.04.012 [Google Scholar]
  • Article Type: Introduction
This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was successful
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error