1887
Volume 30, Issue 2
  • ISSN 0929-0907
  • E-ISSN: 1569-9943
USD
Buy:$35.00 + Taxes

Abstract

Abstract

The aim of this paper is to explore the relationship between visual imagery and metaphor, highlighting the historical neglect of this relationship in philosophy and cognitive science and exploring the reasons behind this neglect in theoretical and empirical studies. After outlining influential philosophical theories on the relationship between metaphor and visual imagery, I provide a critical overview of empirical findings on this. Thus, I argue that experimental studies lack sufficient empirical evidence to make meaningful generalizations and fail to determine the true role of visual imagery in metaphor comprehension. Nevertheless, they do not allow us to rule out the involvement of imagery in the comprehension of at least certain metaphors. The present paper proposes that visual imagery might play different roles depending on the semantic features of the vehicle and the kind of meaning conveyed by different types of metaphors. I conclude this discussion by sketching a roadmap for further exploration of this fascinating and challenging relationship.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1075/pc.00034.gar
2024-07-11
2025-02-17
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. Aristotle
    Aristotle. Poetics edited by I. Bywater). Oxford: Oxford at the Clarendon Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  2. Aristotle
    Aristotle. Rhetoric. New York: Dover Publications.
    [Google Scholar]
  3. Bardzokas, Valandis
    2023 Creative metaphors and non-propositional effects: An experiment. Pragmatics. 1–28. 10.1075/prag.22034.bar
    https://doi.org/10.1075/prag.22034.bar [Google Scholar]
  4. Barsalou, Lawrence
    2008 Grounded cognition. Annual Review of Psychology561. 617–45. 10.1146/annurev.psych.59.103006.093639
    https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.psych.59.103006.093639 [Google Scholar]
  5. Billow, Richard
    1975 A cognitive developmental study of metaphor comprehension. Developmental Psychology11(4). 415–423. 10.1037/h0076668
    https://doi.org/10.1037/h0076668 [Google Scholar]
  6. Black, Max
    1962Models and metaphors. Ithaca: Cornell University Press. 10.7591/9781501741326
    https://doi.org/10.7591/9781501741326 [Google Scholar]
  7. Bolognesi, Marianna & Tommaso Caselli
    2022 Specificity ratings for Italian data. Behavioral Research Methods551. 3531–3548. 10.3758/s13428‑022‑01974‑6
    https://doi.org/10.3758/s13428-022-01974-6 [Google Scholar]
  8. Borg, Emma
    2001 An expedition abroad: Metaphor, thought and reporting. Midwest Studies in Philosophy25(1). 227–248. 10.1111/1475‑4975.00046
    https://doi.org/10.1111/1475-4975.00046 [Google Scholar]
  9. Bottini, Gabriella, Rhiannon Corcoran, Roberto Sterzi, Eraldo Paulesu, Pietro Schenone, Pina Scarpa, Richard Frackowiak & Chris D. Frith
    1994 The role of the right hemisphere in the interpretation of figurative aspects of language: A positron emission tomography activation study. Brain117(6). 1241–53. 10.1093/brain/117.6.1241
    https://doi.org/10.1093/brain/117.6.1241 [Google Scholar]
  10. Boyd, Richard
    1993 Metaphor and theory change. InAndrew Ortony (ed.), Metaphor and thought, 481–532. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/CBO9781139173865.023
    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139173865.023 [Google Scholar]
  11. Camp, Elisabeth
    2006 Metaphor and that certain ‘je ne sais quoi’. Philosophical Studies1291. 1–25. 10.1007/s11098‑005‑3019‑5
    https://doi.org/10.1007/s11098-005-3019-5 [Google Scholar]
  12. Canal, Paolo, Luca Bischetti, Chiara Bertini, Irene Ricci, Serena Lecce & Valentina Bambini
    2022 N400 differences between physical and mental metaphors: The role of theories of mind. Brain and Cognition1611. 1–13. 10.1016/j.bandc.2022.105879
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bandc.2022.105879 [Google Scholar]
  13. Carapezza, Marco & Stefana Garello
    2020 Il triangolo non l’avevo considerato. Metafora, immagini mentali e proposizioni tra Relevance Theory e Perceptual Symbol Theory. Rivista Italiana di Filosofia del Linguaggio307–320.
    [Google Scholar]
  14. Carston, Robyn
    2010 Metaphor: Ad hoc concepts, literal meaning and mental images. Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society1101. 295–321. 10.1111/j.1467‑9264.2010.00288.x
    https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9264.2010.00288.x [Google Scholar]
  15. 2018 Figurative language, mental imagery and pragmatics. Metaphor & Symbol33(3). 1–46. 10.1080/10926488.2018.1481257
    https://doi.org/10.1080/10926488.2018.1481257 [Google Scholar]
  16. Cavazzana, Alessandro & Marianna Bolognesi
    2020 Uncanny resemblance: Words, pictures and conceptual representations in the field of metaphor. Cognitive Linguistic Studies7(1). 31–57. 10.1075/cogls.00048.cav
    https://doi.org/10.1075/cogls.00048.cav [Google Scholar]
  17. Cuccio, Valentina, Marco Carapezza & Vittorio Gallese
    2013 Metafore che risuonano. Linguaggio e corpo tra filosofia e neuroscienze. Senso e Sensibile. Prospettive tra estetica e filosofia del linguaggioVII (17). 69–74.
    [Google Scholar]
  18. Davidson, Donald
    1978 What metaphors mean. Critical Inquiry51. 31–47. 10.1086/447971
    https://doi.org/10.1086/447971 [Google Scholar]
  19. Davies, Martin
    1982 Idiom and metaphor. Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society831. 67–85. 10.1093/aristotelian/83.1.67
    https://doi.org/10.1093/aristotelian/83.1.67 [Google Scholar]
  20. Deiber, Marie-Pierre, Ibanez, Vicente, Honda, Manubu, Sadato, Nadato, Raman, Ramesh, Hallett, Mark
    1998 Cerebral processes related to visuo-motor imagery and generation of simple finger movements studies with positron emission tomography. Neuroimage7(2). 73–85.
    [Google Scholar]
  21. Di Nuovo, Santo, Sabrina Castellano & Marina Guarnera
    2014Mental imagery test. Firenze: Hogrefe.
    [Google Scholar]
  22. Dukes, Daniel
    2021 The rise of affectivism. Nature Human Behaviour5(7). 816–820. 10.1038/s41562‑021‑01130‑8
    https://doi.org/10.1038/s41562-021-01130-8 [Google Scholar]
  23. Empson, William
    1962 Rhythm and imagery in English poetry. British Journal of Aesthetics21. 36–54. 10.1093/bjaesthetics/2.1.36
    https://doi.org/10.1093/bjaesthetics/2.1.36 [Google Scholar]
  24. Ervas, Francesca
    2019 Natura multimodale e creatività del linguaggio poetico. Rivista di Estetica701. 75–91. 10.4000/estetica.5125
    https://doi.org/10.4000/estetica.5125 [Google Scholar]
  25. Ervas, Francesca & Elisabetta Gola
    2013 Lessico e immaginazione nella traduzione delle metafore. E/C17(7). 91–96.
    [Google Scholar]
  26. 2016 Arguing by metaphors. Rivista Italiana di Filosofia del Linguaggio21. 1–6.
    [Google Scholar]
  27. Eviatar, Zohar & Marcel Adam Just
    2006 Brain correlates of discourse processing: An fMRI investigation of irony and conventional metaphor comprehension. Neuropsychologia441. 2348–2359. 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2006.05.007
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2006.05.007 [Google Scholar]
  28. Ferretti, Francesco
    1998Pensare vedendo. Le immagini mentali nella scienza cognitiva. Roma: Carocci.
    [Google Scholar]
  29. Forceville, Charles & Eduardo E. Urios-Aparisi
    2009Multimodal metaphor. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. 10.1515/9783110215366
    https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110215366 [Google Scholar]
  30. Frezza, Giulia
    2016 Metaphor: The good argument in science communication. Rivista Italiana di Filosofia del Linguaggio21. 21–33.
    [Google Scholar]
  31. Garello, Stefana & Marco Carapezza
    2023 Pragmatics, metaphor studies and the challenge of mental imagery. InAlessandro Capone & Assunta Penna (eds.), Exploring contextualism and performativity: The environment matters, 85–103. Cham: Springer. 10.1007/978‑3‑031‑12543‑0_5
    https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-12543-0_5 [Google Scholar]
  32. Gibbs, Raymond & Josephine Bogdanovich
    1992 Mental imagery in interpreting poetic metaphor. Metaphor & Symbol14(1). 37–44. 10.1207/s15327868ms1401_4
    https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327868ms1401_4 [Google Scholar]
  33. Gleason, Daniel
    2009 The visual experience of image metaphor: Cognitive insights into imagist figures. Poetics Today30(3). 423–470. 10.1215/03335372‑2009‑002
    https://doi.org/10.1215/03335372-2009-002 [Google Scholar]
  34. Glucksberg, Sam & Catherine Haugh
    2006 On the relation between metaphor and simile: When comparison fails. Mind & Language21(3). 3–18.
    [Google Scholar]
  35. Green, Mitch
    2017 Imagery, expression and metaphor. Philosophical Studies1741. 33–46. 10.1007/s11098‑015‑0607‑x
    https://doi.org/10.1007/s11098-015-0607-x [Google Scholar]
  36. Grice, Paul
    1957 Meaning. The Philosophical Review661. 377–88.
    [Google Scholar]
  37. 1975 Logic and conversation. InPeter Cole & Jerry Morgan (eds.), Syntax and Semantics 3: Speech Acts. New York: Academic Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  38. 1989Studies in the Way of Words. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  39. Harris, Richard J., Mary Anne Lahey & Faith Marsalek
    1980 Metaphors and images: Rating, reporting and remembering. InRichard Honeck & Robert Hoffman (eds.), Cognition and figurative language, 163–181. London: Routledge.
    [Google Scholar]
  40. Hesse, Mary
    1988 The cognitive claims of metaphor. Journal of Speculative Philosophy2(1). 1–16.
    [Google Scholar]
  41. Ifantidou, Elly
    2019 Relevance and metaphor understanding in a second language. InKate Scott, Billy Clark & Robyn Carston (eds.), Relevance, pragmatics and interpretation, 218–230. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/9781108290593.019
    https://doi.org/10.1017/9781108290593.019 [Google Scholar]
  42. 2021 Non-propositional effects in verbal communication: The case of metaphor. Journal of Pragmatics1811, 6–16. 10.1016/j.pragma.2021.05.009
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2021.05.009 [Google Scholar]
  43. Ifantidou, Elly & Anna Hatzidaki
    2019 Metaphor comprehension in L2: Meaning, images and emotions. Journal of Pragmatics1491. 78–90. 10.1016/j.pragma.2019.06.005
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2019.06.005 [Google Scholar]
  44. Ifantidou, Elly & Anna Piata
    2021 Metaphor and mental shortcuts. Pragmatics & Cognition28(2). 299–320. 10.1075/pc.21009.ifa
    https://doi.org/10.1075/pc.21009.ifa [Google Scholar]
  45. Ifantidou, Elly, Tim Wharton & Louis Saussure
    2021Beyond meaning. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 10.1075/pbns.324
    https://doi.org/10.1075/pbns.324 [Google Scholar]
  46. Ishai, Alumit, Leslie Ungerleider & James Haxby
    2000 Distributed neural systems for the generation of visual images. Neuron28(3). 979–990. 10.1016/S0896‑6273(00)00168‑9
    https://doi.org/10.1016/S0896-6273(00)00168-9 [Google Scholar]
  47. Just, Marcel
    2008 What brain imaging can tell us about embodied meaning. InManuel de Vega, Arthur Glenberg & Arthur Graesser (eds.), Symbols and embodiment, 75–84. Oxford: Oxford University Press. 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199217274.003.0005
    https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199217274.003.0005 [Google Scholar]
  48. Just, Marcel, Patricia Carpenter, Timothy Keller, Lisa Emery, Holly Zajac & Keith Thulborn
    2001 Interdependence of nonoverlapping cortical systems in dual cognitive tasks. Neuroimage14(2). 417–426. 10.1006/nimg.2001.0826
    https://doi.org/10.1006/nimg.2001.0826 [Google Scholar]
  49. Katz, Albert
    1989 On choosing the vehicles of metaphors: Referential concreteness, semantic distances and individual differences. Journal of Memory and Language28(4). 486–499. 10.1016/0749‑596X(89)90023‑5
    https://doi.org/10.1016/0749-596X(89)90023-5 [Google Scholar]
  50. Kosslyn, Stephen
    1994Image and brain: The resolution of the imagery debate. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press. 10.7551/mitpress/3653.001.0001
    https://doi.org/10.7551/mitpress/3653.001.0001 [Google Scholar]
  51. Lakoff, George
    1987 Image metaphors. Metaphor & Symbolic Activity2(3). 219–222. 10.1207/s15327868ms0203_4
    https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327868ms0203_4 [Google Scholar]
  52. Lepore, Ernie & Matthew Stone
    2010 Against metaphorical meaning. Topoi291. 165–180. 10.1007/s11245‑009‑9076‑1
    https://doi.org/10.1007/s11245-009-9076-1 [Google Scholar]
  53. 2015Imagination and convention: Distinguishing grammar and inference in language. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  54. Levinson, Stephen
    2002Presumptive meanings: The theory of generalized conversational implicature. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press
    [Google Scholar]
  55. Lo Piparo, Franco
    2011 Omonimia, sinonimia, metafora. Una lettura linguistico-matematica. InCristina Rossitto (ed.), Studies on Aristotle and the aristotelian tradition, 31–57. Lecce: Edizioni di storia della tradizione aristotelica.
    [Google Scholar]
  56. Mahon, Bradford & Caramazza, Alfonso
    2008 A critical look at the embodied cognition hypothesis and a new proposal for grounding conceptual content. J Physiol Paris102 (1-3). 59–70.
    [Google Scholar]
  57. Marks, David
    1973Vividness of visual imagery questionnaire (VVIQ) [Database record]. APA PsycTests.
    [Google Scholar]
  58. 1995 New directions for mental imagery research. Journal of Mental Imagery191. 153–167.
    [Google Scholar]
  59. Marschark, Marc & Reed Hunt
    1985 On memory for metaphor. Memory & Cognition13(5). 413–424. 10.3758/BF03198454
    https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03198454 [Google Scholar]
  60. Martinengo, Alberto
    2016Filosofie della metafora. Milano: Guerini Scientifica.
    [Google Scholar]
  61. Mazzone, M. & Campisi, E.
    2019 Gesti co-verbali e immagini mentali: i confini dell’intenzione comunicativa. Rivista Internazionale di Filosofia e Psicologia10(2). 190–207.
    [Google Scholar]
  62. McGinn, Colin
    2004Mindsight. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  63. Moeschler, Jacques
    2009 Pragmatics, propositional and non-propositional effects: Can a theory of utterance interpretation account for the emotions in verbal communication?Social Science Information48(3). 447–464. 10.1177/0539018409106200
    https://doi.org/10.1177/0539018409106200 [Google Scholar]
  64. Muraki, Emilio, Stephan Dahm & Penny Pexman
    2023 Meaning in hand: Investigating shared mechanisms of motor imagery and sensorimotor simulation in language processing. Cognition2401. 1–17. 10.1016/j.cognition.2023.105589
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cognition.2023.105589 [Google Scholar]
  65. Nanay, Bence
    2018 Multimodal mental imagery. Cortex1051. 125–134. 10.1016/j.cortex.2017.07.006
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cortex.2017.07.006 [Google Scholar]
  66. 2023Mental imagery. Oxford: Oxford University Press. 10.1093/oso/9780198809500.001.0001
    https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780198809500.001.0001 [Google Scholar]
  67. Ojha, Amitash & Bipin Indurkhya
    2016 On the role of perceptual features in metaphor comprehension. InElisabetta Gola & Francesca Ervas (eds.), Metaphor and Communication, 147–169. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 10.1075/milcc.5.08ojh
    https://doi.org/10.1075/milcc.5.08ojh [Google Scholar]
  68. Ortony, Andrew
    1975 Why metaphors are necessary and not just nice. Educational Theory25(1). 45–53. 10.1111/j.1741‑5446.1975.tb00666.x
    https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1741-5446.1975.tb00666.x [Google Scholar]
  69. Ortony, Andrew, Diane Schallert, Ralph Reynolds & Stephen Antos
    1978 Interpreting metaphors and idioms: Some effects of context on comprehension. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior171. 465–477. 10.1016/S0022‑5371(78)90283‑9
    https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-5371(78)90283-9 [Google Scholar]
  70. Ortony, Andrew & Lynn Fainsiliber
    1987 Metaphorical uses of language in the expression of emotions. Metaphor & Symbolic Activity2(4). 239–250. 10.1207/s15327868ms0204_2
    https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327868ms0204_2 [Google Scholar]
  71. Paivio, Allan
    1979Imagery and verbal processes. New York: Routledge.
    [Google Scholar]
  72. Paivio, Allan & James Clark
    1986 The role of topic and vehicle imagery in metaphor comprehension. Communication & Cognition191. 367–388
    [Google Scholar]
  73. Pecher, Diane, Van Dantzig, Saskia, Zwaan, Rolf, & Zeelenberg, René
    2009 Language comprehenders retain implied shape and orientation of objects. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology62(6). 1108–1114.
    [Google Scholar]
  74. Piazza, Francesca
    2008La Retorica di Aristotele: Introduzione alla lettura. Roma: Carocci.
    [Google Scholar]
  75. Pilkington, Adrian
    2000Poetic effects: A Relevance theory perspective. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 10.1075/pbns.75
    https://doi.org/10.1075/pbns.75 [Google Scholar]
  76. Richards, Ivor. A.
    1936The philosophy of rhetoric. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  77. Roeckelein, Jon E.
    2004Imagery in psychology: A reference guide. Westport, CT: Praeger.
    [Google Scholar]
  78. Rorty, Richard
    1987 Unfamiliar noises (with Mary Hesse). Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society611. 283–311. 10.1093/aristoteliansupp/61.1.283
    https://doi.org/10.1093/aristoteliansupp/61.1.283 [Google Scholar]
  79. Schmidt, Gwen, DeBuse, Casey & Carol Seger
    2007 Right hemisphere metaphor processing? Characterizing the lateralization of semantic processes. Brain and Language100(2). 127–141. 10.1016/j.bandl.2005.03.002
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bandl.2005.03.002 [Google Scholar]
  80. Searle, John R.
    1979Expression and meaning: Studies in the theory of speech acts. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/CBO9780511609213
    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511609213 [Google Scholar]
  81. Semino, Elena
    2021 Not soldiers but fire-fighters: Metaphors and covid-19. Health Communication36(1). 50–58. 10.1080/10410236.2020.1844989
    https://doi.org/10.1080/10410236.2020.1844989 [Google Scholar]
  82. Shen, Zih-Yu, Yi-Thing Tsai & Chia-Lin Lee
    2015 Joint influence of metaphor familiarity and mental imagery ability on action metaphor comprehension: An event-related potential study. Language and Linguistics16(4). 615–636
    [Google Scholar]
  83. Shibata, Midori, Abe Jun-ichi, Terao Atsushi & Tamaki Miyamoto
    2007 Neural mechanisms involved in the comprehension of metaphoric and literal sentences: An fMRI study. Brain Research, 92–102. 10.1016/j.brainres.2007.06.040
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.brainres.2007.06.040 [Google Scholar]
  84. Sperber, Dan & Deirde Wilson
    1995Relevance: Communication and cognition. Oxford: Blackwell.
    [Google Scholar]
  85. 2008 A deflationary account of metaphor. InRaymond Gibbs (ed.), The Cambridge handbook of metaphor and thought, 84–106. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/CBO9780511816802.007
    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511816802.007 [Google Scholar]
  86. Todorov, Tzvetan
    1967Littérature et signification. Paris: Larousse.
    [Google Scholar]
  87. Wharton, Tim
    2009Pragmatics and non-verbal communication. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/CBO9780511635649
    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511635649 [Google Scholar]
  88. 2022 Relevance: Communication and cognition and…?Pragmatics and Cognition28(2). 321–346. 10.1075/pc.21013.wha
    https://doi.org/10.1075/pc.21013.wha [Google Scholar]
  89. Wharton, Tim, Constant Bonard, Daniel Dukes, David Sander & Steve Oswald
    2021 Relevance and emotion. Journal of Pragmatics1811. 259–269. 10.1016/j.pragma.2021.06.001
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2021.06.001 [Google Scholar]
  90. Wilson, Deirdre & Robyn Carston
    2019 Pragmatics and the challenge of non-propositional effects. Journal of Pragmatics1451. 31–38. 10.1016/j.pragma.2019.01.005
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2019.01.005 [Google Scholar]
  91. Wimsatt, William & Monroe Beardsley
    1954The verbal icon: Studies in the meaning of poetry. Lexington: University Press of Kentucky.
    [Google Scholar]
  92. Zeman, Adam, Michaela Dewar & Sergio Della Sala
    2015 Lives without imagery – congenital Aphantasia. Cortex731. 378–380. 10.1016/j.cortex.2015.05.019
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cortex.2015.05.019 [Google Scholar]
/content/journals/10.1075/pc.00034.gar
Loading
/content/journals/10.1075/pc.00034.gar
Loading

Data & Media loading...

  • Article Type: Research Article
Keyword(s): imagery; metaphor comprehension; non-propositional effects; propositional meaning
This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was successful
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error