1887
Volume 30, Issue 2
  • ISSN 0929-0907
  • E-ISSN: 1569-9943
USD
Buy:$35.00 + Taxes

Abstract

Abstract

Speakers can express a critical, dissociative attitude by being ironic. According to the Echoic account of verbal irony, this attitude targets a proposition that echoes a thought attributed to someone other than the speaker herself at the present time. This study investigated the role of echo in irony processing across the lifespan. Through a self-paced reading task, we assessed whether the degree of explicitness of the proposition echoed by the ironical statement and the age of the participant influenced irony processing. Our results show that, independently of age, ironic statements were costlier to process than literal statements, with aging further increasing difficulty. Crucially, our manipulation of the echo affected reading times: it was more complex to process irony when this echoed an implicature or an implicit expectation, particularly for older adults. This work corroborates the role of the echo in verbal irony providing insights into age-related changes in irony processing.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1075/pc.00036.maz
2024-07-11
2025-02-09
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. Anderson, Karen, Jake Harwood & Mary Lee Hummert
    2005 The grandparent-grandchild relationship: Implications for models of intergenerational communication. Human Communication Research31(2). 268–294. 10.1111/j.1468‑2958.2005.tb00872.x
    https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2958.2005.tb00872.x [Google Scholar]
  2. Angeleri, Romina, & Gabriella Airenti
    2014 The development of joke and irony understanding: A study with 3-to 6-year-old children. Canadian Journal of Experimental Psychology/Revue Canadienne de Psychologie Expérimentale68(2). 133–146. 10.1037/cep0000011
    https://doi.org/10.1037/cep0000011 [Google Scholar]
  3. Bambini, Valentina, Lotte Van Looy, Kevin Demiddele & Walter Schaeken
    2021 What is the contribution of executive functions to communicative-pragmatic skills? Insights from aging and different types of pragmatic inference. Cognitive Processing22(3). 435–452. 10.1007/s10339‑021‑01021‑w
    https://doi.org/10.1007/s10339-021-01021-w [Google Scholar]
  4. Baron-Cohen, Simon, Sally Wheelwright, Richard Skinner, Joanne Martin & Emma Clubley
    2001 The autism-spectrum quotient (AQ): Evidence from Asperger syndrome/high-functioning autism, malesand females, scientists and mathematicians. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders31(1). 5–17. 10.1023/A:1005653411471
    https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1005653411471 [Google Scholar]
  5. Bates, Douglas, Martin Mächler, Ben Bolker & Steve Walker
    2015 Fitting linear mixed-effects models using lme4. Journal of Statistical Software67(1). 1–48.
    [Google Scholar]
  6. Bernstein, Daniel M., Wendy Loken Thornton & Jessica A. Sommerville
    2011 Theory of mind through the ages: Older and middle-aged adults exhibit more errors than do younger adults on a continuous false belief task. Experimental Aging Research37(5). 481–502. 10.1080/0361073X.2011.619466
    https://doi.org/10.1080/0361073X.2011.619466 [Google Scholar]
  7. Bischetti, Luca, Irene Ceccato, Serena Lecce, Elena Cavallini & Valentina Bambini
    2019 Pragmatics and theory of mind in older adults’ humor comprehension. Current Psychology1–17. 10.1007/s12144‑019‑00295‑w
    https://doi.org/10.1007/s12144-019-00295-w [Google Scholar]
  8. Burke, Deborah M. & Meredith A. Shafto
    2011 Language and aging. InFergus I. M. Craik & Timothy A. Salthouse (eds.), The handbook of aging and cognition, 381–451. New York: Psychology Press. 10.4324/9780203837665.ch8
    https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203837665.ch8 [Google Scholar]
  9. Byrd, Mark
    1991 Adult age differences in the ability to read and remember metaphor. Educational Gerontology: An International Quarterly17(4). 297–313. 10.1080/0360127910170401
    https://doi.org/10.1080/0360127910170401 [Google Scholar]
  10. Claeskens, Gerda & Nils Lid Hjort
    2008 Minimizing average risk in regression models. Econometric Theory24(2). 493–527. 10.1017/S0266466608080201
    https://doi.org/10.1017/S0266466608080201 [Google Scholar]
  11. Clark, Herbert H. & Richard J. Gerrig
    1984 On the pretense theory of irony. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General1131. 121–126. 10.1037/0096‑3445.113.1.121
    https://doi.org/10.1037/0096-3445.113.1.121 [Google Scholar]
  12. Cohen, Jacob
    2013Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences. New York: Academic Press. 10.4324/9780203771587
    https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203771587 [Google Scholar]
  13. Cordonier, Natacha, Marion Fossard & Maud Champagne-Lavau
    2020 Differential impairments in irony comprehension in brain-damaged individuals: Insight from contextual processing, theory of mind, and executive functions. Neuropsychology34(7). 750–763. 10.1037/neu0000682
    https://doi.org/10.1037/neu0000682 [Google Scholar]
  14. Craik, Fergus I. & Ellen Bialystok
    2006 Cognition through the lifespan: Mechanisms of change. Trends in Cognitive Sciences10(3). 131–138. 10.1016/j.tics.2006.01.007
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tics.2006.01.007 [Google Scholar]
  15. Creusere, Marlena A.
    2000 A developmental test of theoretical perspectives on the understanding of verbal irony: Children’s recognition of allusion and pragmatic insincerity. Metaphor & Symbol15(1/2). 29–45. 10.1080/10926488.2000.9678863
    https://doi.org/10.1080/10926488.2000.9678863 [Google Scholar]
  16. Dash, Ch, Sanjeev Kumar, Ajit Kumar Behera, Satchidananda Dehuri & Ashish Ghosh
    2023 An outliers detection and elimination framework in classification task of data mining. Decision Analytics Journal61. 100164. 10.1016/j.dajour.2023.100164
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dajour.2023.100164 [Google Scholar]
  17. Deliens, Gaétane, Fanny Papastamou, Nicolas Ruytenbeek, Philippine Geelhand & Mikhail Kissine
    2018 Selective pragmatic impairment in autism spectrum disorder: Indirect requests versus irony. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders48(9). 2938–2952. 10.1007/s10803‑018‑3561‑6
    https://doi.org/10.1007/s10803-018-3561-6 [Google Scholar]
  18. Dews, Shelly, Ellen Winner, Joan Kaplan, Elizabeth Rosenblatt, Malia Hunt, Karen Lim, Angela McGovern, Alison Qualter & Bonnie Smarsh
    1996 Children’s understanding of the meaning and functions of verbal irony. Child Development67(6). 3071–3085. 10.2307/1131767
    https://doi.org/10.2307/1131767 [Google Scholar]
  19. Domaneschi, Filippo & Simona Di Paola
    2019 The aging factor in presupposition processing. Journal of Pragmatics1401. 70–87. 10.1016/j.pragma.2018.11.014
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2018.11.014 [Google Scholar]
  20. Fabiani, Monica
    2012 It was the best of times, it was the worst of times: A psychophysiologist’s view of cognitive aging. Psychophysiology49(3). 283–304. 10.1111/j.1469‑8986.2011.01331.x
    https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1469-8986.2011.01331.x [Google Scholar]
  21. Filik, Ruth, & Linda M. Moxey
    2010 The on-line processing of written irony. Cognition116(3). 421–436. 10.1016/j.cognition.2010.06.005
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cognition.2010.06.005 [Google Scholar]
  22. Filippova, Eva
    2014 Irony production and comprehension. InMatthews, Danielle (ed.), Pragmatic development in first language acquisition, 261–278. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 10.1075/tilar.10.15fil
    https://doi.org/10.1075/tilar.10.15fil [Google Scholar]
  23. Filippova, Eva, & Janet W. Astington
    2008 Further development in social reasoning revealed in discourse irony understanding. Child Development791. 126–138. 10.1111/j.1467‑8624.2007.01115.x
    https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8624.2007.01115.x [Google Scholar]
  24. Garmendia, Joana
    2018Irony. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  25. Gaudreau, Geneviève, Laura Monetta, Joël Macoir, Robert Laforce Jr., Stéphane Poulin & Carol Hudon
    2013 Verbal irony comprehension in older adults with amnestic mild cognitive impairment. Neuropsychology27(6). 702–712. 10.1037/a0034655
    https://doi.org/10.1037/a0034655 [Google Scholar]
  26. Gibbs, Raymond W.
    1986 On the psycholinguistics of sarcasm. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General115(1). 3–15. 10.1037/0096‑3445.115.1.3
    https://doi.org/10.1037/0096-3445.115.1.3 [Google Scholar]
  27. Hancock, Jeffrey T., Philip J. Dunham & Kelly Purdy
    2000 Children’s comprehension of critical and complimentary forms of verbal irony. Journal of Cognition and Development1(2). 227–248. 10.1207/S15327647JCD010204
    https://doi.org/10.1207/S15327647JCD010204 [Google Scholar]
  28. Happé, Francesca G.
    1993 Communicative competence and theory of mind in autism: A test of relevance theory. Cognition48(2). 101–119. 10.1016/0010‑0277(93)90026‑R
    https://doi.org/10.1016/0010-0277(93)90026-R [Google Scholar]
  29. Harris, Melanie & Penny M. Pexman
    2003 Children’s perceptions of the social functions of verbal irony. Discourse Processes36(3). 147–165. 10.1207/S15326950DP3603_1
    https://doi.org/10.1207/S15326950DP3603_1 [Google Scholar]
  30. Henry, Julie D., Louise H. Phillips, Ted Ruffman & Phoebe E. Bailey
    2013 A meta-analytic review of age differences in theory of mind. Psychology and Aging28(3). 826–839. 10.1037/a0030677
    https://doi.org/10.1037/a0030677 [Google Scholar]
  31. Hubert, Mia & Stephan Van der Veeken
    2008 Outlier detection for skewed data. Journal of Chemometrics: A Journal of the Chemometrics Society22(3–4). 235–246. 10.1002/cem.1123
    https://doi.org/10.1002/cem.1123 [Google Scholar]
  32. Hummert, Mary L., Teri A. Garstka, Ellen Bouchard Ryan & Jaye L. Bonnesen
    2004 The role of age stereotypes in interpersonal communication. InJon F. Nussbaum & Justine Coupland (eds.), The handbook of communication and aging research, 111–134. New York: Routledge.
    [Google Scholar]
  33. Jorgensen, Julia, George A. Miller & Dan Sperber
    1984 Test of the mention theory of irony. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General113(1). 112–120. 10.1037/0096‑3445.113.1.112
    https://doi.org/10.1037/0096-3445.113.1.112 [Google Scholar]
  34. Kaakinen, Johanna K., Henri Olkoniemi, Taina Kinnari & Jukka Hyönä
    2014 Processing of written irony: An eye movement study. Discourse Processes51(4). 287–311. 10.1080/0163853X.2013.870024
    https://doi.org/10.1080/0163853X.2013.870024 [Google Scholar]
  35. Keenan, Thomas R. & Kathleen Quigley
    1999 Do young children use echoic information in their comprehension of sarcastic speech? A test of echoic mention theory. British Journal of Developmental Psychology17(1). 83–96. 10.1348/026151099165168
    https://doi.org/10.1348/026151099165168 [Google Scholar]
  36. Köder, Franziska, & Ingrid Lossius Falkum
    2021 Irony and perspective-taking in children: The roles of norm violations and tone of voice. Frontiers in Psychology121. 624604. 10.3389/fpsyg.2021.624604
    https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2021.624604 [Google Scholar]
  37. Kreuz, Roger J. & Sam Glucksberg
    1989 How to be sarcastic: The echoic reminder theory of verbal irony. Journal of experimental psychology: General118.4. 374.
    [Google Scholar]
  38. Kumon-Nakamura, Sachi, Sam Glucksberg & Mary Brown
    1995 How about another piece of pie: The allusional pretense theory of discourse irony. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General124(1). 3–21. 10.1037/0096‑3445.124.1.3
    https://doi.org/10.1037/0096-3445.124.1.3 [Google Scholar]
  39. Kuznetsova, Alexandra, Per B. Brockhoff & Rune H. B. Christensen
    2017 lmerTest package: Tests in linear mixed effects models. Journal of Statistical Software821. 1–26. 10.18637/jss.v082.i13
    https://doi.org/10.18637/jss.v082.i13 [Google Scholar]
  40. Lenth, Russel V.
    2021 Estimated marginal means, aka least-squares means [R Package Emmeans Version 1.6. 0]. Comprehensive R Archive Network (CRAN).
    [Google Scholar]
  41. Mashal, Nira, Ronit Gavrieli & Gitit Kavé
    2011 Age-related changes in the appreciation of novel metaphoric semantic relations. Aging, Neuropsychology, and Cognition18(5). 527–543. 10.1080/13825585.2011.575202
    https://doi.org/10.1080/13825585.2011.575202 [Google Scholar]
  42. Mazzaggio, Greta & Luca Surian
    2018 A diminished propensity to compute scalar implicatures is linked to autistic traits. Acta Linguistica Academica65(4). 651–668. 10.1556/2062.2018.65.4.4
    https://doi.org/10.1556/2062.2018.65.4.4 [Google Scholar]
  43. Mazzarella, Diana & Nausicaa Pouscoulous
    2021 Pragmatics and epistemic vigilance: A developmental perspective. Mind & Language36(3). 355–376. 10.1111/mila.12287
    https://doi.org/10.1111/mila.12287 [Google Scholar]
  44. 2023 Ironic speakers, vigilant hearers. Intercultural Pragmatics20(2). 111–132. 10.1515/ip‑2023‑2001
    https://doi.org/10.1515/ip-2023-2001 [Google Scholar]
  45. Milosavljevic, A.
    (forthcoming). Experiments on the development of irony. Walking through a methodological maze. InBanasik-Jemielniak, N. Kałowski, P and Zajączkowska, M.Studying verbal irony and sarcasm. Palgrave Macmillan.
    [Google Scholar]
  46. Murman, Daniel L.
    2015 The impact of age on cognition. Seminars in Hearing36(3). 111–121. 10.1055/s‑0035‑1555115
    https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0035-1555115 [Google Scholar]
  47. Murphy, Dana R., Meredyth Daneman & Bruce A. Schneider
    2006 Why do older adults have difficulty following conversations?Psychology and Aging21(1). 49–61. 10.1037/0882‑7974.21.1.49
    https://doi.org/10.1037/0882-7974.21.1.49 [Google Scholar]
  48. Nakassis, Constantine & Jesse Snedeker
    2002 Beyond sarcasm: Intonation and context as relational cues in children’s recognition of irony. InBarbora Skarabela, Sarah Fish & Anna H.-J. Do (eds.), Proceedings of the twenty-sixth Boston University conference on language development, 429–440. Somerville, MA: Cascadilla Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  49. Nasreddine, Ziad S. & Bhavini B. Patel
    2016 Validation of Montreal cognitive assessment, MoCA, alternate French versions. Canadian Journal of Neurological Sciences43(5). 665–671. 10.1017/cjn.2016.273
    https://doi.org/10.1017/cjn.2016.273 [Google Scholar]
  50. Nasreddine, Ziad S., Natalie A. Phillips, Valérie Bédirian, Simon Charbonneau, Victor Whitehead, Isabelle Collin, Jeffrey L. Cummings & Howard Chertkow
    2005 The Montreal Cognitive Assessment, MoCA: A brief screening tool for mild cognitive impairment. Journal of the American Geriatrics Society53(4). 695–699. 10.1111/j.1532‑5415.2005.53221.x
    https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1532-5415.2005.53221.x [Google Scholar]
  51. Nilsen, Elizabeth S., Melanie Glenwright & Vanessa Huyder
    2011 Children and adults understand that verbal irony interpretation depends on listener knowledge. Journal of Cognition and Development12(3). 374–409. 10.1080/15248372.2010.544693
    https://doi.org/10.1080/15248372.2010.544693 [Google Scholar]
  52. Nippold, Marilyn A., Linda D. Uhden & Ilsa E. Schwarz
    1997 Proverb explanation through the lifespan: A developmental study of adolescents and adults. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research40(2). 245–253. 10.1044/jslhr.4002.245
    https://doi.org/10.1044/jslhr.4002.245 [Google Scholar]
  53. Palacios, Sánchez C., M. V. Trianes Torres & M. J. Blanca Mena
    2009 Negative aging stereotypes and their relation with psychosocial variables in the elderly population. Archives of Gerontology and Geriatrics48(3). 385–390. 10.1016/j.archger.2008.03.007
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.archger.2008.03.007 [Google Scholar]
  54. Panzeri, Francesca, Greta Mazzaggio, Beatrice Giustolisi, Silvia Silleresi & Luca Surian
    2022 The atypical pattern of irony comprehension in autistic children. Applied Psycholinguistics43(4). 757–784. 10.1017/S0142716422000091
    https://doi.org/10.1017/S0142716422000091 [Google Scholar]
  55. Pexman, Penny M. & Melanie Glenwright
    2007 How do typically developing children grasp the meaning of verbal irony?Journal of Neurolinguistics20(2). 178–196. 10.1016/j.jneuroling.2006.06.001
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jneuroling.2006.06.001 [Google Scholar]
  56. Phillips, Louise H., Roy Allen, Rebecca Bull, Alexandra Hering, Matthias Kliegel & Shelley Channon
    2015 Older adults have difficulty in decoding sarcasm. Developmental Psychology51(12). 1840–1852. 10.1037/dev0000063
    https://doi.org/10.1037/dev0000063 [Google Scholar]
  57. R Core Team
    R Core Team (2023) R: A Language and Environment for Statistical Computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria. 〈https://www.R-project.org/〉.
    [Google Scholar]
  58. Reinecke, Robert, Simona Di Paola, Filippo Domaneschi & Marion Fossard
    2022 Presupposition processing declines with age. Cognitive Processing23(3). 479–502. 10.1007/s10339‑022‑01088‑z
    https://doi.org/10.1007/s10339-022-01088-z [Google Scholar]
  59. Ronderos, Camilo R., Ira Noveck & John Tomlinson
    2020 Intentionality, speaker’s attitude and the processing of verbal irony. InProceedings for the 42nd Annual Meeting of the Cognitive Science Society. https://cognitivesciencesociety.org/cogsci20/papers/0825/0825.pdf
    [Google Scholar]
  60. Ryan, Ellen, Howard Giles, Giampieto Bartolucci & Karen Henwood
    1986 Psycholinguistic and social psychological components of communication by and with the elderly. Language & Communication6(1/2). 1–24. 10.1016/0271‑5309(86)90002‑9
    https://doi.org/10.1016/0271-5309(86)90002-9 [Google Scholar]
  61. Saban-Bezalel, Ronit, Dror Dolfin, Nathaniel Laor & Nira Mashal
    2019 Irony comprehension and mentalizing ability in children with and without autism spectrum disorder. Research in Autism Spectrum Disorders581. 30–38. 10.1016/j.rasd.2018.11.006
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rasd.2018.11.006 [Google Scholar]
  62. Schwoebel, John, Shelly Dews, Ellen Winner & Kavitha Srinivas
    2000 Obligatory processing of the literal meaning of ironic utterances: Further evidence. Metaphor & Symbol15(1/2). 47–61. 10.1080/10926488.2000.9678864
    https://doi.org/10.1080/10926488.2000.9678864 [Google Scholar]
  63. Sperber, Dan
    1984 Verbal irony: Pretense or echoic mention?Journal of Experimental Psychology: General113(1). 130–136. 10.1037/0096‑3445.113.1.130
    https://doi.org/10.1037/0096-3445.113.1.130 [Google Scholar]
  64. Sperber, Dan & Deirdre Wilson
    1981 Irony and the use-mention distinction. Philosophy31. 143–184.
    [Google Scholar]
  65. Spotorno, Nicola & Ira Noveck
    2014 When is irony effortful?Journal of Experimental Psychology: General143(4). 1649. 10.1037/a0036630
    https://doi.org/10.1037/a0036630 [Google Scholar]
  66. Spotorno, Nicola, Eric Koun, Jérôme Prado, Jean-Baptiste Van Der Henst & Ira A. Noveck
    2012 Neural evidence that utterance-processing entails mentalizing: The case of irony. NeuroImage63(1). 25–39.
    [Google Scholar]
  67. Sullivan, Kate, Ellen Winner & Natalie Hopfield
    1995 How children tell a lie from a joke: The role of second-order mental state attributions. British Journal of Developmental Psychology13(2). 191–204. 10.1111/j.2044‑835X.1995.tb00673.x
    https://doi.org/10.1111/j.2044-835X.1995.tb00673.x [Google Scholar]
  68. Symeonidou, Irene
    2018 The development of theory of mind and pragmatics in adolescents. London: UCL PhD dissertation.
  69. Țurcan, Alexandra & Ruth Filik
    2016 An eye-tracking investigation of written sarcasm comprehension: The roles of familiarity and context. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition42(12). 1867. 10.1037/xlm0000285
    https://doi.org/10.1037/xlm0000285 [Google Scholar]
  70. 2017 Investigating sarcasm comprehension using eye-tracking during reading. InAngeliki Athanasiadou & Herbert L. Colston (eds.), Irony in language use and communication, 255–276. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 10.1075/ftl.1.13tuc
    https://doi.org/10.1075/ftl.1.13tuc [Google Scholar]
  71. Uekermann, Jennifer, Shelley Channon & Irene Daum
    2006 Humor processing, mentalizing, and executive function in normal aging. Journal of the International Neuropsychological Society12(2). 184–191. 10.1017/S1355617706060280
    https://doi.org/10.1017/S1355617706060280 [Google Scholar]
  72. Uekermann, Jennifer, Patrizia Thoma & Irene Daum
    2008 Proverb interpretation changes in aging. Brain and Cognition67(1). 51–57. 10.1016/j.bandc.2007.11.003
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bandc.2007.11.003 [Google Scholar]
  73. van Tiel, Bob & Mikhail Kissine
    2018 Quantity-based reasoning in the broader autism phenotype: A web-based study. Applied Psycholinguistics39(6). 1373–1403. 10.1017/S014271641800036X
    https://doi.org/10.1017/S014271641800036X [Google Scholar]
  74. Weissman, Benjamin & Marina Terkourafi
    2019 Are false implicatures lies? An empirical investigation. Mind & Language34(2). 221–246. 10.1111/mila.12212
    https://doi.org/10.1111/mila.12212 [Google Scholar]
  75. Wilson, Deirdre
    2006 The pragmatics of verbal irony: Echo or pretence?Lingua116(10). 1722–1743. 10.1016/j.lingua.2006.05.001
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lingua.2006.05.001 [Google Scholar]
  76. Wilson, Deirdre & Dan Sperber
    2012 Explaining irony. InDeirdre Wilson & Dan Sperber (eds.), Meaning and relevance, 123–146. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/CBO9781139028370.008
    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139028370.008 [Google Scholar]
  77. Winner, Ellen & Sue Leekam
    1991 Distinguishing irony from deception: Understanding the speaker’s second-order intention. British Journal of Developmental Psychology9(2). 257–270. 10.1111/j.2044‑835X.1991.tb00875.x
    https://doi.org/10.1111/j.2044-835X.1991.tb00875.x [Google Scholar]
  78. Yang, Jiawei, Susanto Rahardja & Pasi Fränti
    2019 Outlier detection: How to threshold outlier scores?InProceedings of the International Conference on Artificial Intelligence, Information Processing and Cloud Computing (AIIPCC ’19). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, Article 37, 1–6. 10.1145/3371425.3371427
    https://doi.org/10.1145/3371425.3371427 [Google Scholar]
  79. Zehr, Jeremy & Florian Schwarz
    2018 PennController for Internet Based Experiments (IBEX). 10.17605/OSF.IO/MD832
    https://doi.org/10.17605/OSF.IO/MD832 [Google Scholar]
/content/journals/10.1075/pc.00036.maz
Loading
/content/journals/10.1075/pc.00036.maz
Loading

Data & Media loading...

  • Article Type: Research Article
Keyword(s): ageing; degree of explicitness; echoic account; irony comprehension
This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was successful
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error