1887
Volume 30, Issue 2
  • ISSN 0929-0907
  • E-ISSN: 1569-9943
USD
Buy:$35.00 + Taxes

Abstract

This article reviews Indirect Speech Acts

 
9781108673112

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1075/pc.00037.bou
2024-07-11
2025-06-17
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. Bach, Kent & Robert M. Harnish
    1979Linguistic communication and speech acts. MIT Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  2. Brown, Penelope & Stephen C. Levinson
    1987Politeness, some universals in language use. Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/CBO9780511813085
    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511813085 [Google Scholar]
  3. Clark, Herbert H.
    1979 Responding to Indirect Speech Acts. Cognitive Psychology11(4). 430–477. 10.1016/0010‑0285(79)90020‑3
    https://doi.org/10.1016/0010-0285(79)90020-3 [Google Scholar]
  4. Francik, Ellen P. & Herbert H. Clark
    1985 How to Make Requests that Overcome Obstacles to Compliance. Journal of Memory and Language24(5). 560–568. 10.1016/0749‑596X(85)90046‑4
    https://doi.org/10.1016/0749-596X(85)90046-4 [Google Scholar]
  5. Gibbs, Raymond W.
    1983 Do People Always Process the Literal Meanings of Indirect Requests?Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition9(3). 524–533.
    [Google Scholar]
  6. Giora, Rachel
    2004 On the Graded Salience Hypothesis. Intercultural Pragmatics1(1). 113–123. 10.1515/iprg.2004.001
    https://doi.org/10.1515/iprg.2004.001 [Google Scholar]
  7. Morgan, James L.
    1978 Two Types of Convention in Speech Acts. InPetr Cole (ed.), Pragmatics. 10.1163/9789004368873_010
    https://doi.org/10.1163/9789004368873_010 [Google Scholar]
  8. Panther, Klaus-Uwe & Linda Thornburg
    1998 A Cognitive Approach to Inferencing in Conversation. Journal of Pragmatics30(6). 755–769. 10.1016/S0378‑2166(98)00028‑9
    https://doi.org/10.1016/S0378-2166(98)00028-9 [Google Scholar]
  9. Pérez Hernández, Lorena
    2013 Illocutionary Constructions: (Multiple Source)-in-Target Metonymies, Illocutionary ICMs, and Specification Links. Language & Communication33(2). 128–149. 10.1016/j.langcom.2013.02.001
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.langcom.2013.02.001 [Google Scholar]
  10. Pinker, Steven, Martin A. Nowak & James J. Lee
    2008 The Logic of Indirect Speech. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences105(3). 833–838. 10.1073/pnas.0707192105
    https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0707192105 [Google Scholar]
  11. Searle, John
    1979Expression and meaning: studies in the theories of speech acts. Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/CBO9780511609213
    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511609213 [Google Scholar]
  12. Sperber, Dan & Deirdre Wilson
    1996Relevance: Communication and cognition. Blackwell Publishing.
    [Google Scholar]
/content/journals/10.1075/pc.00037.bou
Loading
  • Article Type: Book Review
This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was successful
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error