1887
Volume 33, Issue 1
  • ISSN 0929-0907
  • E-ISSN: 1569-9943

Abstract

Irony comprehension is a complex pragmatic skill developing late in childhood, with inconsistent findings regarding the acquisition age. One reason for this inconsistency could be that previous studies focused on different components of irony comprehension (e.g., speaker belief, emotion, meaning, intent), relied on metapragmatic questions, or used offline measures. Building on recent methods combining offline tasks with eye-tracking, we developed LEIRO, a tool for testing irony comprehension in children aged 3 and older. LEIRO presents vignette stories, requiring children to select objects based on target utterances, while eye-tracking and pupillometry measure implicit comprehension. A pilot study with German-speaking 7-year-olds ( = 15) and adults ( = 13), conducted primarily to test the method in practice, showed only limited irony comprehension in children compared to adults. LEIRO will be made available for cross-linguistic and cross-cultural studies to advance the research on, and thus our understanding of, the development of irony comprehension.

Available under the CC BY 4.0 license.
Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1075/pc.00050.fuc
2026-04-16
2026-05-11
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

/deliver/fulltext/pc.00050.fuc.html?itemId=/content/journals/10.1075/pc.00050.fuc&mimeType=html&fmt=ahah

References

  1. Banasik-Jemielniak, Natalia & Piotr Kałowski
    2022 Socio-cultural and individual factors in verbal irony use and understanding: What we know, what we don’t know, what we want to know. Review of Communication Research101. 80–113. 10.12840/ISSN.2255‑4165.036
    https://doi.org/10.12840/ISSN.2255-4165.036 [Google Scholar]
  2. Birchenough, Julia M. H., Robert Davies & Vincent Connelly
    2017 Rated age-of-acquisition norms for over 3,200 German words. Behavior Research Methods491. 484–501. 10.3758/s13428‑016‑0718‑0
    https://doi.org/10.3758/s13428-016-0718-0 [Google Scholar]
  3. Clark, Herbert H. & Richard J. Gerrig
    1984 On the pretense theory of irony. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General113(1). 121–126. 10.1037/0096‑3445.113.1.121
    https://doi.org/10.1037/0096-3445.113.1.121 [Google Scholar]
  4. Deliens, Gaétane, Kyriakos Antoniou, Elise Clin, Ekaterina Ostashchenko & Mikhail Kissine
    2018 Context, facial expression and prosody in irony processing. Journal of Memory and Language991. 35–48. 10.1016/j.jml.2017.10.001
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jml.2017.10.001 [Google Scholar]
  5. Dews, Shelly, Ellen Winner, Joan Kaplan, Elizabeth Rosenblatt, Malia Hunt, Karen Lim, Angela McGovern, Alison Qualter & Bonnie Smarsh
    1996 Children’s understanding of the meaning and functions of verbal irony. Child Development67(6). 3071–3085. 10.2307/1131767
    https://doi.org/10.2307/1131767 [Google Scholar]
  6. Falkum, Ingrid Lossius
    2022 The development of non-literal uses of language: Sense conventions and pragmatic competence. Journal of Pragmatics1881. 97–107. 10.1016/j.pragma.2021.12.002
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2021.12.002 [Google Scholar]
  7. Falkum, Ingrid Lossius & Franziska Köder
    2024 Investigating irony comprehension in children: Methods, challenges, and ways forward. InNatalia Banasik-Jemielniak, Piotr Kałowski & Maria Zajączkowska (eds.), Studying verbal irony and sarcasm. Methodological perspectives from communication studies and beyond, 145–173. Cham: Palgrave Macmillan. 10.1007/978‑3‑031‑57172‑5_7
    https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-57172-5_7 [Google Scholar]
  8. Filippova, Eva & Janet Wilde Astington
    2010 Children’s understanding of social-cognitive and social-communicative aspects of discourse irony. Child Development81(3). 913–928. 10.1111/j.1467‑8624.2010.01442.x
    https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8624.2010.01442.x [Google Scholar]
  9. Frank, Michael C., Mika Braginsky, Daniel Yurovski & Virginia A. Marchman
    2017 Wordbank: An open repository for developmental vocabulary data. Journal of Child Language441. 677–694. 10.1017/S0305000916000209
    https://doi.org/10.1017/S0305000916000209 [Google Scholar]
  10. Fuchs, Julia
    2023a 40 years of research into children’s irony comprehension: A review. Pragmatics & Cognition30(1). 1–30. 10.1075/pc.22015.fuc
    https://doi.org/10.1075/pc.22015.fuc [Google Scholar]
  11. 2023b Ironic, isn’t it!? A review on irony comprehension in children and adolescents with ASD. Research in Autism Spectrum Disorders1081. Article 102248. 10.1016/j.rasd.2023.102248
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rasd.2023.102248 [Google Scholar]
  12. Fuchs, Julia & Cornelia Schulze
    2024 LEIRO. The Leipzig kit for testing irony comprehension — Visual Stimuli (examples). Zenodo. 10.5281/zenodo.14237041
    https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.14237041 [Google Scholar]
  13. Garmendia, Joana
    2018Irony. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/9781316136218
    https://doi.org/10.1017/9781316136218 [Google Scholar]
  14. Grice, H. Paul
    1969 Utterer’s meaning and intentions. The Philosophical Review78(2). 147–177. 10.2307/2184179
    https://doi.org/10.2307/2184179 [Google Scholar]
  15. 1975 Logic and conversation. InPeter Cole & Jerry L. Morgan (eds.), Syntax and semantics (vol.III1: Speech acts), 41–58. New York: Academic Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  16. Hepach, Robert
    2024 Pupillometry in developmental psychology. InMeghan H. Papesh & Stephen D. Goldinger (eds.), Modern pupillometry: Cognition, neuroscience, and practical applications, 101–126. Cham: Springer. 10.1007/978‑3‑031‑54896‑3_3
    https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-54896-3_3 [Google Scholar]
  17. Köder, Franziska & Ingrid Lossius Falkum
    2020 Children’s metonymy comprehension: Evidence from eye-tracking and picture selection. Journal of Pragmatics1561. 191–205. 10.1016/j.pragma.2019.07.007
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2019.07.007 [Google Scholar]
  18. 2021 Irony and perspective-taking in children: The roles of norm violations and tone of voice. Frontiers in Psychology161. Article 624604. 10.3389/fpsyg.2021.624604
    https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2021.624604 [Google Scholar]
  19. Mazzaggio, Greta, Alessandra Zappoli & Diana Mazzarella
    2023 Verbal irony and the implicitness of the echo. The processing of young and older adults. Pragmatics & Cognition30(2). 412–443. 10.1075/pc.00036.maz
    https://doi.org/10.1075/pc.00036.maz [Google Scholar]
  20. Mazzarella, Diana & Nausicaa Pouscoulous
    2021 Pragmatics and epistemic vigilance: A developmental perspective. Mind & Language361. 355–376. 10.1111/mila.12287
    https://doi.org/10.1111/mila.12287 [Google Scholar]
  21. 2023 Ironic speakers, vigilant hearers. Intercultural Pragmatics20(2). 111–132. 10.1515/ip‑2023‑2001
    https://doi.org/10.1515/ip-2023-2001 [Google Scholar]
  22. Milosavljevic, Ana, Thomas Castelain, Nausicaa Pouscoulous & Diana Mazzarella
    2025 The developmental puzzle of irony understanding: Is epistemic vigilance the missing piece?Journal of Child Language. 1–22. 10.1017/S0305000925000091
    https://doi.org/10.1017/S0305000925000091 [Google Scholar]
  23. Pexman, Penny M. & Melanie Glenwright
    2007 How do typically developing children grasp the meaning of verbal irony?Journal of Neurolinguistics20(2). 178–196. 10.1016/j.jneuroling.2006.06.001
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jneuroling.2006.06.001 [Google Scholar]
  24. Pexman, Penny M., Lorraine Reggin & Kate Lee
    2019 Addressing the challenge of verbal irony: Getting serious about sarcasm training. Languages4(2). Article23. 10.3390/languages4020023
    https://doi.org/10.3390/languages4020023 [Google Scholar]
  25. Pfeifer, Valeria A. & Penny M. Pexman
    2024 When it pays to be insincere: On the benefits of verbal irony. Current Directions in Psychological Science33(1). 43–50. 10.1177/09637214231205312
    https://doi.org/10.1177/09637214231205312 [Google Scholar]
  26. Pouscoulous, Nausicaa & Michael Tomasello
    2020 Early birds: Metaphor understanding in 3-year-olds. Journal of Pragmatics1561. 160–167. 10.1016/j.pragma.2019.05.021
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2019.05.021 [Google Scholar]
  27. Schröder, Astrid, Teresa Gemballa, Steffie Ruppin & Isabell Wartenburger
    2012 German norms for semantic typicality, age of acquisition, and concept familiarity. Behavior Research Methods441. 380–394. 10.3758/s13428‑011‑0164‑y
    https://doi.org/10.3758/s13428-011-0164-y [Google Scholar]
  28. Schulze, Cornelia, Susanne Grassmann & Michael Tomasello
    2013 3-year-old children make relevance inferences in indirect verbal communication. Child Development84(6). 2079–2093. 10.1111/cdev.12093
    https://doi.org/10.1111/cdev.12093 [Google Scholar]
  29. Schulze, Cornelia & David Buttelmann
    2021 Children understand communication intuitively, but indirect communication makes them think twice: Evidence from pupillometry and looking patterns. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology2061. Article 105105. 10.1016/j.jecp.2021.105105
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jecp.2021.105105 [Google Scholar]
  30. Sperber, Dan & Deirdre Wilson
    1986/1995Relevance: Communication and cognition. Oxford: Blackwell.
    [Google Scholar]
  31. Vaish, Amrisha, Robert Hepach & Tobias Grossmann
    2018 Desire understanding in 2-year-old children: An eye-tracking study. Infant Behavior and Development521. 22–31. 10.1016/j.infbeh.2018.05.002
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.infbeh.2018.05.002 [Google Scholar]
  32. Zufferey, Sandrine
    2020 Pragmatic development in a first language: An overview. InKlaus P. Schneider & Elly Ifantidou (eds.), Developmental and clinical pragmatics, 33–60. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. 10.1515/9783110431056‑002
    https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110431056-002 [Google Scholar]
/content/journals/10.1075/pc.00050.fuc
Loading
/content/journals/10.1075/pc.00050.fuc
Loading

Data & Media loading...

  • Article Type: Research Article
Keyword(s): eye-tracking; irony comprehension; pragmatic development; pupillometry
This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was successful
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error