1887
image of Reply to commentaries

There is no abstract available.

Available under the CC BY 4.0 license.
Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1075/pc.00058.enf
2026-08-18
2026-09-09
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

/deliver/fulltext/10.1075/pc.00058.enf/pc.00058.enf.html?itemId=/content/journals/10.1075/pc.00058.enf&mimeType=html&fmt=ahah

References

  1. Anscombe, G. Elizabeth M.
    1957Intention. Oxford: Blackwell.
    [Google Scholar]
  2. 1979 Under a description. Noûs(). –. 10.2307/2214398
    https://doi.org/10.2307/2214398 [Google Scholar]
  3. Carneiro, Robert L.
    2000 The transition from quantity to quality: A neglected causal mechanism in accounting for social evolution. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences(). –. 10.1073/pnas.240462397
    https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.240462397 [Google Scholar]
  4. Dingemanse, Mark & N. J. Enfield
    2024 Interactive repair and the foundations of language. Trends in Cognitive Sciences(). –. 10.1016/j.tics.2023.09.003
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tics.2023.09.003 [Google Scholar]
  5. Enfield, N. J.
    2014 The item-system problem. InN. J. Enfield, Paul Kockleman & Jack Sidnell (eds.), The Cambridge handbook of linguistic anthropology, –. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/CBO9781139342872.004
    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139342872.004 [Google Scholar]
  6. Enfield, N. J. & Jack Sidnell
    2015 Language structure and social agency: Confirming polar questions in conversation. Linguistics Vanguard(). –. 10.1515/lingvan‑2014‑1008
    https://doi.org/10.1515/lingvan-2014-1008 [Google Scholar]
  7. 2017The concept of action. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/9781139025928
    https://doi.org/10.1017/9781139025928 [Google Scholar]
  8. Geurts, Bart
    2022 Evolutionary pragmatics: From chimp-style communication to human discourse. Journal of Pragmatics. –. 10.1016/j.pragma.2022.07.004
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2022.07.004 [Google Scholar]
  9. Gramsci, Antonio
    1971Selections from the prison notebooks (translated and edited byQuintin Hoare & Geoffrey Nowell Smith). New York: International Publishers.
    [Google Scholar]
  10. Kockelman, Paul
    2013Agent, person, subject, self: A theory of ontology, interaction, and infrastructure. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  11. Litowitz, Douglas
    2000 Gramsci, hegemony, and the law. Brigham Young University Law Review. –.
    [Google Scholar]
  12. Mann, Michael
    1986The sources of social power: A history of power from the beginning to A. D. 1760. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/CBO9780511570896
    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511570896 [Google Scholar]
  13. Macpherson, Crawford B.
    1962The political theory of possessive individualism: Hobbes to Locke. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  14. Peirce, Charles S.
    1992The essential Peirce: Selected philosophical writings, 1867–1893. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  15. Schegloff, Emanuel A.
    1992 Repair after next turn: The last structurally provided defense of intersubjectivity in conversation. American Journal of Sociology(). –. 10.1086/229903
    https://doi.org/10.1086/229903 [Google Scholar]
  16. Schegloff, Emanuel A., Jefferson, Gail & Sacks, Harvey
    1977 The preference for self-correction in the organization of repair in conversation. Language(). –. 10.2307/413107
    https://doi.org/10.2307/413107 [Google Scholar]
  17. Sidnell, Jack
    2009 Comparative perspectives in conversation analysis. InJack Sidnell (ed.), Conversation analysis: Comparative perspectives, –. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/CBO9780511635670.002
    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511635670.002 [Google Scholar]
  18. 2010Conversation analysis: An introduction. Oxford: Wiley-Blackwell.
    [Google Scholar]
  19. 2014 The architecture of intersubjectivity revisited. InN. J. Enfield, Paul Kockelman & Jack Sidnell (eds.), The Cambridge handbook of linguistic anthropology, –. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/CBO9781139342872.018
    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139342872.018 [Google Scholar]
  20. Weinreich, Uriel, Labov, William & Herzog, Marvin
    1968 Empirical foundations for a theory of language change. InWinfred P. Lehmann & Yakov Malkiel (eds.), Directions for historical linguistics. Texas: University of Texas Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  21. Wrong, Dennis H.
    1979Power: Its forms, bases, and uses. New York: Harper and Row.
    [Google Scholar]
/content/journals/10.1075/pc.00058.enf
Loading
  • Article Type: Reply
This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was successful
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error