1887
Volume 24, Issue 2
  • ISSN 0929-0907
  • E-ISSN: 1569-9943
USD
Buy:$35.00 + Taxes

Abstract

Abstract

This article focuses on , for which the definitions have often been loose and confusing, integrating it into the concept of . My approach is based on a large corpus of examples taken from two contemporary television-series, which help identify the wide range of linguistic processes at the core of sarcastic utterances. I present a quantitative and descriptive analysis of the main processes found in two American television-series: and . The results show the intricate meanings created in sarcasm through various linguistic mechanisms, such as repetition, explicitation, metonymy, metaphor, shift of focus, reasoning, and rhetorical questions. This more holistic analysis, including a broad corpus of instances and a more detailed analysis of the examples, aims to fill the unexplored gaps in more classical analyses, emphasizing the complexities and implications that can be drawn in interaction.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1075/pc.17027.tab
2018-10-19
2019-09-16
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. Attardo, Salvatore
    2000 Irony as relevant inappropriateness. Journal of Pragmatics32. 793–826. 10.1016/S0378‑2166(99)00070‑3
    https://doi.org/10.1016/S0378-2166(99)00070-3 [Google Scholar]
  2. Attardo, Salvatore & Victor Raskin
    1991 Script theory revisited: Joke similarity and joke representation model. Humor: The International Journal of Humor Research4 (3/4). 293–347.
    [Google Scholar]
  3. Attardo, Salvatore, Christian F. Hempelmann & Sara Di Maio
    2002 Script oppositions and logical mechanisms: Modeling incongruities and their resolutions. Humor: International Journal of Humor Research15(1). 3–46. 10.1515/humr.2002.004
    https://doi.org/10.1515/humr.2002.004 [Google Scholar]
  4. Averbeck, Joshua M.
    2013 Comparison of ironic and sarcastic arguments in terms of appropriateness and effectiveness in personal relationships. Argument and Advocacy50. 47–57.
    [Google Scholar]
  5. Averbeck, Joshua M. & Dale Hample
    2008 Ironic message production: How and why we produce ironic messages. Communication Monographs75. 396–410. 10.1080/03637750802512389
    https://doi.org/10.1080/03637750802512389 [Google Scholar]
  6. Barbe, Katharina
    1995Irony in context. Amsterdam & Philadelphia: John Benjamins Publishing Company. 10.1075/pbns.34
    https://doi.org/10.1075/pbns.34 [Google Scholar]
  7. Barnden, John A.
    2010 Metaphor and metonymy: Making their connections more slippery. Cognitive Linguistics21(1). 1–34. 10.1515/cogl.2010.001
    https://doi.org/10.1515/cogl.2010.001 [Google Scholar]
  8. Black, Max
    1993 More about metaphor. InAndrew Ortony (ed.), Metaphor and thought, 2nd edn., 19–41. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/CBO9781139173865.004
    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139173865.004 [Google Scholar]
  9. Booth, Wayne C.
    1974A rhetoric of irony. Chicago & London: The University of Chicago Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  10. Bowes, Andrea & Albert Katz
    2011 When sarcasm stings. Discourse Processes48. 215–236. 10.1080/0163853X.2010.532757
    https://doi.org/10.1080/0163853X.2010.532757 [Google Scholar]
  11. Brône, Geert
    2008 Hyper- and misunderstanding in interactional humor. Journal of Pragmatics40. 2027–2061. 10.1016/j.pragma.2008.04.011
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2008.04.011 [Google Scholar]
  12. 2010Bedeutungskonstitution in verbalem Humor: Ein kognitiv-linguistischer und diskurssemantischer Ansatz. Frankfurt am Main: Lang.
    [Google Scholar]
  13. 2012 Humor and irony in cognitive pragmatics. InHans-Jörg Schmid (ed.), Cognitive pragmatics, 463–504. Berlin/Boston: Walter de Gruyter. 10.1515/9783110214215.463
    https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110214215.463 [Google Scholar]
  14. 2017 Cognitive linguistics and humor. InSalvatore Attardo (ed.), The Routledge handbook of language and humor, 250–366. New York/London: Routledge. 10.4324/9781315731162‑18
    https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315731162-18 [Google Scholar]
  15. Brône, Geert & Kurt Feyaerts
    2003The cognitive linguistics of incongruity resolution: Marked reference-point structures in humor. University of Leuven, Department of Linguistics preprintNo.205.
    [Google Scholar]
  16. Bryant, Gregory A. & Jean E. Fox Tree
    2002 Recognizing verbal irony in spontaneous speech. Metaphor and Symbol17(2). 99–117. 10.1207/S15327868MS1702_2
    https://doi.org/10.1207/S15327868MS1702_2 [Google Scholar]
  17. Burgers, Christian, Margot van Mulken & Peter Jan Schellens
    2012 Verbal irony: Differences in usage across written genres. Journal of Language and Social Psychology31(3). 290–310. 10.1177/0261927X12446596
    https://doi.org/10.1177/0261927X12446596 [Google Scholar]
  18. Burgers, Christian & Margot van Mulken
    2017 Humor markers. InSalvatore Attardo (ed.), The Routledge handbook of language and humor, 385–399. New York/London: Routledge. 10.4324/9781315731162‑27
    https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315731162-27 [Google Scholar]
  19. Clark, Herbert H.
    1996Using language. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/CBO9780511620539
    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511620539 [Google Scholar]
  20. Clark, Herbert H. & Richard J. Gerrig
    1984 On the pretense theory of irony. Journal of Experimental Psychology113. 121–126. 10.1037/0096‑3445.113.1.121
    https://doi.org/10.1037/0096-3445.113.1.121 [Google Scholar]
  21. Colston, Herbert. L.
    1997 Salting a wound or sugaring a pill: The pragmatic functions of ironic criticism. Discourse Processes23. 23–45. 10.1080/01638539709544980
    https://doi.org/10.1080/01638539709544980 [Google Scholar]
  22. CORINTH, Corpus Interactionele Humor 2007–2009 Kurt Feyaerts & Dirk Speelman, K. U. Leuven. https://www.kuleuven.be/onderwijs/prijs-onderwijsraad/2009/corinth
    [Google Scholar]
  23. Coulson, Seana
    2005 Sarcasm and the space structuring model. InSeana Coulson & Barbara Lewandowska-Tomasczyk (eds.), The literal and the nonliteral in language and thought, 129–144. Berlin: Lang.
    [Google Scholar]
  24. Croft, William & D. Alan Cruse
    2004Cognitive Linguistics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/CBO9780511803864
    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511803864 [Google Scholar]
  25. Dress, Megan L., Roger J. Kreuz, Kristen E. Link & Gina M. Caucci
    2008 Regional variation in the use of sarcasm. Journal of Language and Social Psychology27(1). 71–85. 10.1177/0261927X07309512
    https://doi.org/10.1177/0261927X07309512 [Google Scholar]
  26. Dynel, Marta
    2011 Stranger than fiction: A few methodological notes on linguistic research in film discourse. Brno Studies in English37(1). 41–61. 10.5817/BSE2011‑1‑3
    https://doi.org/10.5817/BSE2011-1-3 [Google Scholar]
  27. 2017 Academics vs. American scriptwriters vs. Academics: A battle over the etic and emic “sarcasm” and “irony” labels. Language & Communication55. 69–87. 10.1016/j.langcom.2016.07.008
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.langcom.2016.07.008 [Google Scholar]
  28. Fägersten, Kristy Beers
    (ed.) 2016Watching TV with a linguist. NY: Syracuse University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  29. Fauconnier, Gilles
    1984Espaces mentaux. Aspects de la construction du sens dans les langues naturelles. Paris: Les Editions de minuit.
    [Google Scholar]
  30. 1994Mental spaces: Aspects of meaning construction in natural language. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/CBO9780511624582
    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511624582 [Google Scholar]
  31. Feyaerts, Kurt
    1999 Metonymic hierarchies: The conceptualization of stupidity in German idiomatic expressions. InKlaus-Uwe Panther & Günther Radden (eds.), Metonymy in language and thought, 309–332. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins. 10.1075/hcp.4.18fey
    https://doi.org/10.1075/hcp.4.18fey [Google Scholar]
  32. 2013 Tackling the complexity of spontaneous humorous interaction. An integrated classroom-modeled corpus approach. InLeonor Ruiz-Gurillo & Maria Belén Alvarado Ortega (eds.), Irony and humor, 243–268. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins Publishing Company. 10.1075/pbns.231.14fey
    https://doi.org/10.1075/pbns.231.14fey [Google Scholar]
  33. Feyaerts, Kurt, Dirk Speelman, Geert Brône & Bert Oben
    2011Corinth: Corpus Interactionele Humor. University of Leuven.
    [Google Scholar]
  34. Feyaerts, Kurt & Geert Brône
    2005 Expressivity and metonymic inferencing: Stylistic variation in non-literary language use. Style39(1). 12–35.
    [Google Scholar]
  35. Gibbs, Raymond
    1994The poetics of mind: Figurative thought, language and understanding. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  36. Gibbs, Raymond W.
    2000 Irony in talk among friends. Metaphor and Symbol15(1–2). 5–27. 10.1080/10926488.2000.9678862
    https://doi.org/10.1080/10926488.2000.9678862 [Google Scholar]
  37. Giora, Rachel
    1995 On irony and negation. Discourse Processes19. 239–264. 10.1080/01638539509544916
    https://doi.org/10.1080/01638539509544916 [Google Scholar]
  38. Glenwright, Melanie & Penny M. Pexman
    2010 Development of children’s ability to distinguish sarcasm and verbal irony. Journal of Child Language37(2). 429–451. 10.1017/S0305000909009520
    https://doi.org/10.1017/S0305000909009520 [Google Scholar]
  39. Grice, Paul
    1975 Logic and conversation. InJerry Morgan & Peter Cole (eds.), Syntax and semantics, vol.3: Speech Acts. New York: Academic Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  40. 1989Studies in the way of words. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  41. Haiman, John
    1998Talk is cheap: Sarcasm, alienation and evolution of language. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  42. Hancock, Jeffrey T.
    2004 Verbal irony use in face-to-face and computer-mediated conversations. Journal of Language and Social Psychology23(4). 447–463. 10.1177/0261927X04269587
    https://doi.org/10.1177/0261927X04269587 [Google Scholar]
  43. Hanks, Patrick
    2013 Creatively exploiting linguistic norms. InTony Veale, Kurt Feyaerts & Charles Forceville (eds.), Creativity and the agile mind: A multidisciplinary study of a multifaceted phenomenon, 119–138. Berlin: Walter de Gruyter. 10.1515/9783110295290.119
    https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110295290.119 [Google Scholar]
  44. Havertake, Henk
    1990 A speech-act analysis of irony. Journal of Pragmatics14. 77–109. 10.1016/0378‑2166(90)90065‑L
    https://doi.org/10.1016/0378-2166(90)90065-L [Google Scholar]
  45. Kihara, Yoshihiko
    2005 The mental space structure of verbal irony. Cognitive Linguistics16(3). 513–530. 10.1515/cogl.2005.16.3.513
    https://doi.org/10.1515/cogl.2005.16.3.513 [Google Scholar]
  46. Koshik, Irene
    2005Beyond rhetorical questions: Assertive questions in everyday interactions. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins. 10.1075/sidag.16
    https://doi.org/10.1075/sidag.16 [Google Scholar]
  47. Kotthoff, Helga
    2003 Responding to irony in different contexts: On cognition in conversation. Journal of Pragmatics35. 1387–1411. 10.1016/S0378‑2166(02)00182‑0
    https://doi.org/10.1016/S0378-2166(02)00182-0 [Google Scholar]
  48. 2007 Oral genres of humor. On the dialectic of genre knowledge and creative authoring. Journal of Pragmatics17(2). 263–296. 10.1075/prag.17.2.04kot
    https://doi.org/10.1075/prag.17.2.04kot [Google Scholar]
  49. 2009 An interactional approach to irony development. InNeal R. Norrick & Delia Chiaro (eds.), Humor in interaction, 49–77. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins Publishing Company. 10.1075/pbns.182.03kot
    https://doi.org/10.1075/pbns.182.03kot [Google Scholar]
  50. Lagerwerf, Luuk
    2007 Irony and sarcasm in advertisements: Effects of relevant inappropriateness. Journal of Pragmatics39. 1702–1721. 10.1016/j.pragma.2007.05.002
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2007.05.002 [Google Scholar]
  51. Lakoff, George & Mark Johnson
    1980Metaphors we live by. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  52. Lee, Christopher J. & Albert N. Katz
    1998 The differential role of ridicule in sarcasm and irony. Metaphor and Symbol13(1). 1–15. 10.1207/s15327868ms1301_1
    https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327868ms1301_1 [Google Scholar]
  53. Mesing, Joslyn, Danielle Williams & Dawn Blasko
    2012 Sarcasm in relationships: Hurtful or humorous?International Journal of Psychology47. 724–724
    [Google Scholar]
  54. Muecke, Douglas C.
    1970Irony. London: Methuen.
    [Google Scholar]
  55. Nunberg, Geoffrey
    2001The way we talk now: Commentaries on language and culture. Boston: Houghton Mifflin.
    [Google Scholar]
  56. Nuolijärvi, Pirkko & Liisa Tiittula
    2011 Irony in political television debates. Journal of Pragmatics43(2). 572–587. 10.1016/j.pragma.2010.01.019
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2010.01.019 [Google Scholar]
  57. Peirsman, Yves & Dirk Geeraerts
    2006 Metonymy as a prototypical category. Cognitive Linguistics17(3). 269–316. 10.1515/COG.2006.007
    https://doi.org/10.1515/COG.2006.007 [Google Scholar]
  58. Quaglio, Paulo
    2016 The one based on 738,032 words: Language use in the Friends-corpus. InKristy Beers Fägersten (ed.). Watching TV with a Linguist, 307–334. NY: Syracuse University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  59. Radden, Günter & Zoltan Kövecses
    1999 Towards a theory of metonymy. InKlaus-Uwe Panther & Günther Radden (eds.), Metonymy in language and thought, 17–59. Amsterdam & Philadelphia: John Benjamins Publishing Company. 10.1075/hcp.4.03rad
    https://doi.org/10.1075/hcp.4.03rad [Google Scholar]
  60. Raskin, Victor
    1985Semantic mechanisms of humor. Dordrecht: D. Reidel.
    [Google Scholar]
  61. Rockwell, Patricia
    2000 Lower, slower, louder: Vocal cues to sarcasm. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research29(5). 483–495. 10.1023/A:1005120109296
    https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1005120109296 [Google Scholar]
  62. Schechter, Joshua
    2013 Deductive reasoning. InHarold Pashler (ed.), Encyclopedia of the mind, London: SAGE Publishing. 10.4135/9781452257044.n83
    https://doi.org/10.4135/9781452257044.n83 [Google Scholar]
  63. Sperber, Dan
    1984 Verbal irony: Pretense or echoic mention?Journal of Experimental Psychology113(1). 130–136. 10.1037/0096‑3445.113.1.130
    https://doi.org/10.1037/0096-3445.113.1.130 [Google Scholar]
  64. Sperber, Dan & Deidre Wilson
    1981 Irony and use-mention distinction. InPeter Cole (ed.), Radical pragmatics, 295–318. New York: Academic Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  65. Tabacaru, Sabina
    2015 Uma visão geral das teorias do humor: aplicação da incongruência e da superioridade ao sarcasmo. EID & A Revista electrônica de estudos integrados em discurso e argumentação9. 115–136.
    [Google Scholar]
  66. Tabacaru, Sabina & Maarten Lemmens
    2014 Raised eyebrows as gestural triggers in humor: The case of sarcasm and hyper-understanding. European Journal of Humor Research2(2). 11–31. 10.7592/EJHR2014.2.2.tabacaru
    https://doi.org/10.7592/EJHR2014.2.2.tabacaru [Google Scholar]
  67. Tabacaru, Sabina & Kurt Feyaerts
    2016 The power of metonymy in humor: Stretching contiguous relations across different layers of meaning. European Journal of Humour Research4(2). 1–18. 10.7592/EJHR2016.4.2.tabacaru
    https://doi.org/10.7592/EJHR2016.4.2.tabacaru [Google Scholar]
  68. Talmy, Leonard
    1972Semantic structures in English and Atsugewi. PhD dissertation, Department of Linguistics, University of California, Berkeley.
    [Google Scholar]
  69. 1983 How language structures space. InHerbert L. Pick & Linda P. Acredolo (eds.), Spatial orientation: Theory, research and application, 225–282. New York: Plenum Press. 10.1007/978‑1‑4615‑9325‑6_11
    https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4615-9325-6_11 [Google Scholar]
  70. Tobin, Vera & Michael Israel
    2012 Irony as a viewpoint phenomenon. InBarbara Dancygier & Eve Sweetser (eds.), Viewpoint in language: A multimodal perspective, 25–46. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/CBO9781139084727.004
    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139084727.004 [Google Scholar]
  71. Wilson, Deirdre
    2006 The pragmatics of verbal irony: Echo or pretence?Lingua116. 1722–1743. 10.1016/j.lingua.2006.05.001
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lingua.2006.05.001 [Google Scholar]
  72. Wilson, Deirdre & Dan Sperber
    2004 Relevance Theory. InLaurence R. Horn & Gregory Ward (eds.), The Handbook of pragmatics, 607–632. Oxford: Blackwell.
    [Google Scholar]
  73. Yuldashev, Akmal Gulamjanovich
    2016 Metaphtonymy as the main cognitive mechanism in the formation of idiomatic compound words. ANGLISTICUM. Journal of the Association for Anglo-American Studies5(7). 30–35.
    [Google Scholar]
http://instance.metastore.ingenta.com/content/journals/10.1075/pc.17027.tab
Loading
/content/journals/10.1075/pc.17027.tab
Loading

Data & Media loading...

  • Article Type: Research Article
Keyword(s): discourse , humor , interaction , irony , sarcasm and taxonomy
This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was successful
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error