Explorations into the social contexts of neologism use in early English correspondence

References

1. Adamson, Sylvia
   1989 With double tongue: Diglossia, stylistics and the teaching of English. In Mick Short (ed.), Reading, analysing and teaching literature, 204–240. London: Longman.
   [Google Scholar]
2. Alexander, Marc & Christian Kay
   2014 The spread of RED in the Historical Thesaurus of English. In Wendy Anderson , Carole P. Biggam , Carole Hough & Christian Kay (eds.), Colour studies: A broad spectrum, 126–139. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
   [Google Scholar]
3. Amoia, Marilisa & Jose Manuel Martinez
   2013 Using comparable collections of historical texts for building a diachronic dictionary for spelling normalization. In Piroska Lendvai & Kalliopi Zervanou (eds.), Proceedings of the 7th Workshop on Language Technology for Cultural Heritage, Social Sciences, and Humanities (LaTeCH 2013), 84–89. Stroudsburg, PA: Association for Computational Linguistics.
   [Google Scholar]
4. Baron, Alistair , Paul Rayson & Dawn Archer
   2009 Automatic standardization of spelling for historical text mining. In Claire Warwick (ed.), Digital Humanities 2009: Conference abstracts, 309–312. College Park, MD: Maryland Institute for Technology in the Humanities.
   [Google Scholar]
5. Bauer, Laurie
   2001 Morphological productivity (Cambridge Studies in Linguistics 95). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/CBO9780511486210
   https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511486210 [Google Scholar]
6. Bird, Steven , Ewan Klein & Edward Loper
   2009 Natural language processing with Python: Analyzing text with the Natural Language Toolkit. Sebastopol, CA: O’Reilly Media.
   [Google Scholar]
7. Brewer, Charlotte
   2007 Treasure-house of the language: The living OED. New Haven: Yale University Press.
   [Google Scholar]
8. Burns, Philip R.
   2013 MorphAdorner v2: A Java library for the morphological adornment of English language texts. Evanston, IL: Northwestern University. morphadorner.northwestern.edu/morphadorner/ (19May 2018)
   [Google Scholar]
9. CEEC. Corpora of Early English Correspondence Terttu Nevalainen , Helena Raumolin-Brunberg
   CEEC. Corpora of Early English Correspondence. Compiled by Terttu Nevalainen , Helena Raumolin-Brunberg at theDepartment of Modern Languages, University of Helsinki. www.helsinki.fi/varieng/CoRD/corpora/CEEC/ (19May 2018)
10. Conde-Silvestre, Juan Camilo
    2012 The role of social networks and mobility in diachronic sociolinguistics. In Juan Manuel Hernández-Campoy & Juan Camilo Conde-Silvestre (eds.), The handbook of historical sociolinguistics (Blackwell Handbooks in Linguistics), 332–352. Chichester: Wiley-Blackwell. 10.1002/9781118257227.ch18
    https://doi.org/10.1002/9781118257227.ch18 [Google Scholar]
11. Grieve, Jack , Andrea Nini & Diansheng Guo
    2017 Analyzing lexical emergence in Modern American English online. English Language and Linguistics21(1). 99–127. 10.1017/S1360674316000113
    https://doi.org/10.1017/S1360674316000113 [Google Scholar]
12. Hoffmann, Sebastian
    2004 Using the OED quotations database as a corpus – a linguistic appraisal. ICAME Journal28. 17–30.
    [Google Scholar]
13. Kaislaniemi, Samuli
    2018 The Corpus of Early English Correspondence Extension (CEECE). In Terttu Nevalainen , Minna Palander-Collin & Tanja Säily (eds.), Patterns of change in 18th-century English: A sociolinguistic approach (Advances in Historical Sociolinguistics 8), 45–59. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
    [Google Scholar]
14. Kaunisto, Mark
    2013 Scare quotes and glosses: Indicators of lexical innovation with affixed derivatives. In Roderick W. McConchie , Teo Juvonen , Mark Kaunisto , Minna Nevala & Jukka Tyrkkö (eds.), Selected proceedings of the 2012 Symposium on New Approaches in English Historical Lexis (HEL-LEX 3), 97–106. Somerville, MA: Cascadilla Proceedings Project.
    [Google Scholar]
15. Kay, Christian , Jane Roberts , Michael Samuels & Irené Wotherspoon
    (eds.) 2009 Historical Thesaurus of the Oxford English Dictionary. OED Online. Oxford University Press. www.oed.com/thesaurus (19May 2018)
    [Google Scholar]
16. Miller, George A.
    1995 WordNet: A lexical database for English. Communications of the ACM38(11). 39–41. 10.1145/219717.219748
    https://doi.org/10.1145/219717.219748 [Google Scholar]
17. Nevalainen, Terttu
    1999 Early Modern English lexis and semantics. In Roger Lass (ed.), The Cambridge history of the English language, III: 1476–1776, 332–458. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
18. OED. Oxford English Dictionary
    OED. Oxford English Dictionary. OED Online. Oxford University Press. www.oed.com (19May 2018)
    [Google Scholar]
19. Palander-Collin, Minna & Mikko Hakala
    2011 Standardized versions of the Corpora of Early English Correspondence. Corpus Resource Database (CoRD). Helsinki: VARIENG. www.helsinki.fi/varieng/CoRD/corpora/CEEC/standardized.html (19May 2018)
    [Google Scholar]
20. PCEEC Arja Nurmi , Ann Taylor , Anthony Warner , Susan Pintzuk , and Terttu Nevalainen
    PCEEC 2006 Parsed Corpus of Early English Correspondence, tagged version. Annotated by Arja Nurmi , Ann Taylor , Anthony Warner , Susan Pintzuk , and Terttu Nevalainen . Compiled by theCEEC Project Team. York: University of YorkandHelsinki: University of Helsinki. Distributed through the Oxford Text Archive. www.helsinki.fi/varieng/CoRD/corpora/CEEC/. (19May 2018.)
    [Google Scholar]
21. Philips, Lawrence
    2000 The double metaphone search algorithm. C/C++ Users Journal18(6). 38–43.
    [Google Scholar]
22. Plag, Ingo
    2003 Word-formation in English (Cambridge Textbooks in Linguistics). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/CBO9780511841323
    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511841323 [Google Scholar]
23. Renouf, Antoinette
    2007 Tracing lexical productivity and creativity in the British media: ‘The chavs and the chav-nots’. In Judith Munat (ed.), Lexical creativity, texts and contexts (Studies in Functional and Structural Linguistics 58), 61–89. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 10.1075/sfsl.58.12ren
    https://doi.org/10.1075/sfsl.58.12ren [Google Scholar]
24. Säily, Tanja
    2014 Sociolinguistic variation in English derivational productivity: Studies and methods in diachronic corpus linguistics (Mémoires de la Société Néophilologique de Helsinki XCIV). Helsinki: Société Néophilologique.
    [Google Scholar]
25. Säily, Tanja & Jukka Suomela
    2017 types 2: Exploring word-frequency differences in corpora. In Turo Hiltunen , Joe McVeigh & Tanja Säily (eds.), Big and rich data in English corpus linguistics: Methods and explorations (Studies in Variation, Contacts and Change in English 19). Helsinki: VARIENG. www.helsinki.fi/varieng/series/volumes/19/saily_suomela/ (19May 2018)
    [Google Scholar]
26. Säily, Tanja , Jukka Suomela & Eetu Mäkelä
    . In preparation. Variation in morphological productivity in the history of English: The case of -er.
    [Google Scholar]
27. Scherrer, Yves & Tomaž Erjavec
    2016 Modernising historical Slovene words. Natural Language Engineering22(6). 881–905. 10.1017/S1351324915000236
    https://doi.org/10.1017/S1351324915000236 [Google Scholar]