Volume 25, Issue 1
  • ISSN 0929-0907
  • E-ISSN: 1569-9943
Buy:$35.00 + Taxes



This paper describes ongoing work towards a rich analysis of the social contexts of neologism use in historical corpora, in particular the , with research questions concerning the innovators, meanings and diffusion of neologisms. To enable this kind of study, we are developing new processes, tools and ways of combining data from different sources, including the , the , and contemporary published texts. Comparing neologism candidates across these sources is complicated by the large amount of spelling variation. To make the issues tractable, we start from case studies of individual suffixes () and people (Thomas Twining). By developing tools aiding these studies, we build toward more general analyses. Our aim is to develop an open-source environment where information on neologism candidates is gathered from a variety of algorithms and sources, pooled, and presented to a human evaluator for verification and exploration.


Article metrics loading...

Loading full text...

Full text loading...


  1. Adamson, Sylvia
    1989 With double tongue: Diglossia, stylistics and the teaching of English. In Mick Short (ed.), Reading, analysing and teaching literature, 204–240. London: Longman.
    [Google Scholar]
  2. Alexander, Marc & Christian Kay
    2014 The spread of RED in the Historical Thesaurus of English. In Wendy Anderson , Carole P. Biggam , Carole Hough & Christian Kay (eds.), Colour studies: A broad spectrum, 126–139. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
    [Google Scholar]
  3. Amoia, Marilisa & Jose Manuel Martinez
    2013 Using comparable collections of historical texts for building a diachronic dictionary for spelling normalization. In Piroska Lendvai & Kalliopi Zervanou (eds.), Proceedings of the 7th Workshop on Language Technology for Cultural Heritage, Social Sciences, and Humanities (LaTeCH 2013), 84–89. Stroudsburg, PA: Association for Computational Linguistics.
    [Google Scholar]
  4. Baron, Alistair , Paul Rayson & Dawn Archer
    2009 Automatic standardization of spelling for historical text mining. In Claire Warwick (ed.), Digital Humanities 2009: Conference abstracts, 309–312. College Park, MD: Maryland Institute for Technology in the Humanities.
    [Google Scholar]
  5. Bauer, Laurie
    2001Morphological productivity (Cambridge Studies in Linguistics 95). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/CBO9780511486210
    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511486210 [Google Scholar]
  6. Bird, Steven , Ewan Klein & Edward Loper
    2009Natural language processing with Python: Analyzing text with the Natural Language Toolkit. Sebastopol, CA: O’Reilly Media.
    [Google Scholar]
  7. Brewer, Charlotte
    2007Treasure-house of the language: The living OED. New Haven: Yale University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  8. Burns, Philip R.
    2013MorphAdorner v2: A Java library for the morphological adornment of English language texts. Evanston, IL: Northwestern University. morphadorner.northwestern.edu/morphadorner/ (19May 2018)
    [Google Scholar]
  9. CEEC. Corpora of Early English Correspondence
    CEEC. Corpora of Early English Correspondence. Compiled by Terttu Nevalainen , Helena Raumolin-Brunberg at theDepartment of Modern Languages, University of Helsinki. www.helsinki.fi/varieng/CoRD/corpora/CEEC/ (19May 2018)
  10. Conde-Silvestre, Juan Camilo
    2012 The role of social networks and mobility in diachronic sociolinguistics. In Juan Manuel Hernández-Campoy & Juan Camilo Conde-Silvestre (eds.), The handbook of historical sociolinguistics (Blackwell Handbooks in Linguistics), 332–352. Chichester: Wiley-Blackwell. 10.1002/9781118257227.ch18
    https://doi.org/10.1002/9781118257227.ch18 [Google Scholar]
  11. Grieve, Jack , Andrea Nini & Diansheng Guo
    2017 Analyzing lexical emergence in Modern American English online. English Language and Linguistics21(1). 99–127. 10.1017/S1360674316000113
    https://doi.org/10.1017/S1360674316000113 [Google Scholar]
  12. Hoffmann, Sebastian
    2004 Using the OED quotations database as a corpus – a linguistic appraisal. ICAME Journal28. 17–30.
    [Google Scholar]
  13. Kaislaniemi, Samuli
    2018The Corpus of Early English Correspondence Extension (CEECE). In Terttu Nevalainen , Minna Palander-Collin & Tanja Säily (eds.), Patterns of change in 18th-century English: A sociolinguistic approach (Advances in Historical Sociolinguistics 8), 45–59. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
    [Google Scholar]
  14. Kaunisto, Mark
    2013 Scare quotes and glosses: Indicators of lexical innovation with affixed derivatives. In Roderick W. McConchie , Teo Juvonen , Mark Kaunisto , Minna Nevala & Jukka Tyrkkö (eds.), Selected proceedings of the 2012 Symposium on New Approaches in English Historical Lexis (HEL-LEX 3), 97–106. Somerville, MA: Cascadilla Proceedings Project.
    [Google Scholar]
  15. Kay, Christian , Jane Roberts , Michael Samuels & Irené Wotherspoon
    (eds.) 2009Historical Thesaurus of the Oxford English Dictionary. OED Online. Oxford University Press. www.oed.com/thesaurus (19May 2018)
    [Google Scholar]
  16. Miller, George A.
    1995 WordNet: A lexical database for English. Communications of the ACM38(11). 39–41. 10.1145/219717.219748
    https://doi.org/10.1145/219717.219748 [Google Scholar]
  17. Nevalainen, Terttu
    1999 Early Modern English lexis and semantics. In Roger Lass (ed.), The Cambridge history of the English language, III: 1476–1776, 332–458. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  18. OED. Oxford English Dictionary
    OED. Oxford English Dictionary. OED Online. Oxford University Press. www.oed.com (19May 2018)
    [Google Scholar]
  19. Palander-Collin, Minna & Mikko Hakala
    2011 Standardized versions of the Corpora of Early English Correspondence. Corpus Resource Database (CoRD). Helsinki: VARIENG. www.helsinki.fi/varieng/CoRD/corpora/CEEC/standardized.html (19May 2018)
    [Google Scholar]
  20. PCEEC
    PCEEC 2006Parsed Corpus of Early English Correspondence, tagged version. Annotated by Arja Nurmi , Ann Taylor , Anthony Warner , Susan Pintzuk , and Terttu Nevalainen . Compiled by theCEEC Project Team. York: University of YorkandHelsinki: University of Helsinki. Distributed through the Oxford Text Archive. www.helsinki.fi/varieng/CoRD/corpora/CEEC/. (19May 2018.)
    [Google Scholar]
  21. Philips, Lawrence
    2000 The double metaphone search algorithm. C/C++ Users Journal18(6). 38–43.
    [Google Scholar]
  22. Plag, Ingo
    2003Word-formation in English (Cambridge Textbooks in Linguistics). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/CBO9780511841323
    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511841323 [Google Scholar]
  23. Renouf, Antoinette
    2007 Tracing lexical productivity and creativity in the British media: ‘The chavs and the chav-nots’. In Judith Munat (ed.), Lexical creativity, texts and contexts (Studies in Functional and Structural Linguistics 58), 61–89. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 10.1075/sfsl.58.12ren
    https://doi.org/10.1075/sfsl.58.12ren [Google Scholar]
  24. Säily, Tanja
    2014Sociolinguistic variation in English derivational productivity: Studies and methods in diachronic corpus linguistics (Mémoires de la Société Néophilologique de Helsinki XCIV). Helsinki: Société Néophilologique.
    [Google Scholar]
  25. Säily, Tanja & Jukka Suomela
    2017types 2: Exploring word-frequency differences in corpora. In Turo Hiltunen , Joe McVeigh & Tanja Säily (eds.), Big and rich data in English corpus linguistics: Methods and explorations (Studies in Variation, Contacts and Change in English 19). Helsinki: VARIENG. www.helsinki.fi/varieng/series/volumes/19/saily_suomela/ (19May 2018)
    [Google Scholar]
  26. Säily, Tanja , Jukka Suomela & Eetu Mäkelä
    . In preparation. Variation in morphological productivity in the history of English: The case of -er.
    [Google Scholar]
  27. Scherrer, Yves & Tomaž Erjavec
    2016 Modernising historical Slovene words. Natural Language Engineering22(6). 881–905. 10.1017/S1351324915000236
    https://doi.org/10.1017/S1351324915000236 [Google Scholar]

Data & Media loading...

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was successful
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error